Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

06/26/2006, 1:14 PM

DaimlerChrysler News

Reports: DaimlerChrysler decides to bring Smart to U.S.

The Wall Street Journal, Germany’s Der Spiegel, and the Detroit News are all independently reporting that DaimlerChrysler later this week will announce plans to begin selling the Smart car in the United States in 2007. The automaker is expected to announce the plan tomorrow (Tuesday). Over the past few months, rumors indicated DCX was increasingly leaning toward bringing the brand to America.

All three reports indicated the car would come to the United States in 2007. DaimlerChrysler is widely expected to roll out the next-generation Smart ForTwo in April 2007, which would coincide with the U.S. debut.

The next Smart car will get an updated exterior as well as improved fuel economy and performance. One recent report by Italy’s La Repubblica newspaper even suggests the car will be foot longer than its predecessor, and seat three people instead of just two.

Recently, smart discontinued its ForFour model, which has four doors and seated four passengers. Smart has said it wants to focus on a single model going forward. A three-seater two-door could be the necessarily compromise between the ForTwo and the ForFour.

In April, a car imported called ZAP began bringing the Smart ForTwo in limited numbers to U.S. customers. DaimlerChrysler has officially sold Smart cars in Canada for the past few years.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

06/26, 1:18 PM

posted by:

greg

Not again

06/26, 1:25 PM

posted by:

mike

they need to make one in the shape of a viper or dodge ram..

06/26, 1:25 PM

posted by:

tino

spifffffffy!:

06/26, 1:30 PM

posted by:

2006300C

These make no sense in the U.S. unless you live in the middle of NYC. Personally I would not sacrifice luxury, room, power, style or safety just to save a few dollars a month by driving this glorified golf cart. My living room on wheels gets 18 m.p.g in 100% urban driving and if you require any more than m.p.g in the low 20s for a non hybrid/diesel car than you should take the bus/train/bike/pogo stick because they would be more comfortable and far less embarrassing than being seen in this car.

06/26, 1:41 PM

posted by:

ss

this will be the perfect car for some people. (obvioulsy not 2006300C as he is proud of 18mpg) but i think this will sell resonably well. i doubt they will sell in high volume. but its a good alternative for someone who just runs errands around town and has a 2nd vehicle for longer trips. There are plenty of cars that will return well over 18mpg that are the driver wouldnt be embarassed to drive. To make such a comment makes you look like a narrow minded fool. Your 300c is a nice car, but if it was perfect Chrysler wouldnt sell anyother cars. From what i can remember about these cars the interiors are very well apointed, as these really are just tiny Mercedes (not so far off from your 300c)

06/26, 1:54 PM

posted by:

Madcapp

I hope I don’t accidentally fall into one of these cars while hopping around on a pogo stick, I’d flip it over and kill everyone inside.

06/26, 1:54 PM

posted by:

Tea DoubleYou Ay Tea

Which mike is which? mike or Mike or are they both just the same know-it-all?

06/26, 2:08 PM

posted by:

Mike

no, I am the know-it all…. the lowercase ‘M’ is an imposter.

If this site went by registration I would use mkbruin…

06/26, 2:12 PM

posted by:

stuart

This is a Mercedes-Benz just without the name. If you look at the engine it does have that name on there. Trust me I used to have one of these cars and they were spacious with even plenty of space free(I’m 6ft 4inch tall) compared to my other car the 3 series which my knee’s are always hitting the dash board. You can get about 70 - 80 mpg and around town and is a nippy little thing.

Someone I know is getting a conversion done on his car replacing the engine with a motor bike engine from a Honda 750cc. The 0-60 time should go down to around 3.5 and top speed to 130 which would be funny at traffic lights. Should make it a hit with the tuners

06/26, 2:15 PM

posted by:

British_Rover

They are already in the US. Someone is importing them because a dealership in Vermont is selling them. One of my clients bought one the same day he bought a Rover from me.

06/26, 2:16 PM

posted by:

M

Not the sportiest car but it is fuel efficient and probably will sell, good economical transportation for basic to and from work driving and such.

06/26, 2:16 PM

posted by:

2006300C

Did you not see that I wrote low to mid 20’s? I would NOT be embarrassed to drive an Acura TSX, Impala SS, Crossfire, MX-5, Civic Si, Solstice, Scion TC, SRT-4, Cobalt SS, Audi TT, BMW Z4, S2000, G35, Mazda3 or MINI cooper s and a couple others that I cannot recall at the moment BUT, in an all urban or suburban environment, even if you shut it off at long lights or drove as if there was a landmine under the throttle, you would struggle to get higher than the high teens to mid 20’s. In addition all those cars offer more equipment, power, room, cargo capacity and style than this overpriced oddity.

06/26, 2:19 PM

posted by:

Jerry Mahoney

Any chance of getting the smart forfour? Or is that one permanently retired? I”d go for a forfour in a sec.

06/26, 2:30 PM

posted by:

Toy Yoda

“These make no sense in the U.S. unless you live in the middle of NYC.”

When you consider that 1/2 the US population lives in cities, the car starts to make sense, if not completely. I think it’s great that they are coming to the States. Plus they get alot better than 18mpg. They get about 44 in the city, and about 64 on the highway.

If you hate SUVs another reason to hope for the SMART car’s success is that if it does become popular in the States, look to see SUV liability insurance to increase.

06/26, 3:02 PM

posted by:

frits(holland)

put them in the u.s. and get them out of europe
people must drive a spyker from holland!!!!!!!!!!!

06/26, 3:04 PM

posted by:

ss

for someone who just needs to move themself and maybe a friend this is the perfect car. I think this car is going to actaully turn into a fashion statment int he citys. you will see alot of these parked infront of fancy stores.

06/26, 3:07 PM

posted by:

2006300C

American population centers are nowhere near as densely populated as European and Asian ones. American cities are newer than them also and were designed with the automobile in mind.
Oh, and $21,000.00 for a two seater hatchback with a bad ride that goes 0-60 in 16.3 sec and has an ungoverned top speed of 80 m.p,h.? No thanks.

Source Top Gear magazine September 2005

“They are small and lightweight and cannot protect you as well as a larger carâ€?. “Fatalities are much higher with small, lightweight vehicles.”

Adrian Lund, of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

I downloaded a fifth gear crash test of the smart and even though the passenger cell was unaltered the amount of g forces that the passengers would experience would be fatal. The more metal you have between you and the object you encounter the more g’s will be absorbed.

06/26, 3:28 PM

posted by:

Toy Yoda

Well don’t buy one if you don’t want one. Personally, I wouldn’t want one, but not because it wouldn’t make sense, I’m really waiting for the Toyota Prius 100+mpg car which is supposedly gonna come out in a couple of years.

06/26, 3:30 PM

posted by:

ss

US crash stanards are totaly diff so that doesnt really hold water. Also if you read the article it says “The next Smart car will get an updated exterior as well as improved fuel economy and performance…newspaper even suggests the car will be foot longer than its predecessor” we wont be getting the car thats int he picture. i guess we will just have to wait and see what we get

06/26, 4:11 PM

posted by:

The Stig

Maybe not the smartest move.

06/26, 5:58 PM

posted by:

stefan

these comments are ridiculous.

especially the moron who is proud of his 18mpg.

this is whats wrong with america.

06/26, 6:02 PM

posted by:

Anonymous

As a back roads commuter, this car works. Smart also has a roadster that is pretty slick and efficiant as well. Hopefully they bring it over as well. This could be the start of microcar sales here in the states which would be pretty cool.

06/26, 6:27 PM

posted by:

foobar

These will do extremely well in cities, has anyone ever tried to park in San Francisco? Residental parking spaces will run you $300/month. Safety is of course an issue, but the next gen that is brought over will be safer than what is out now, and more of these on the road the safer it is for everyone. Shouldn’t we be thinking about society at large and bettering it for all? Oh, right, this is america - home of the stupid jackass. Sigh.

[...] read more | digg story [...]

06/26, 6:56 PM

posted by:

Jessie

I think it’s funny that everyone is making comments on how unsafe this car is. if you close minded people knew anything about the smart you would know about “the egg” construction.

get with it. http://www.smartusa.com.

06/26, 7:08 PM

posted by:

Al

to the guy with the 300c…

Re. Smart prices: when you mention 21,000 Usdollars for the Smart, you are probably a bit biased, aren’t you ?
If you go to http://www.smart.com and select United Kingdom, you will see that the Smart ForTwo with the 50 hp gas engine starts at 6,775 British Pounds or roughly 12,350 Usdollar. In Switzerland it starts at CHF 12′950 or roughly 10,500 Usdollars, tax included.
And you must be aware that cars cost WAY more in Europe than here, so you ought to expect a lower price here than there.
That figure you mentioned, 21,000 Usdollars, is just ridiculous…Go to the OFFICIAL Smart website if you don’t believe me…

Also, about the safety of a Smart…plenty of them around in Europe…plenty of accidents I guess, never I heard anything about it being a poor vehicle in such an occasion. You saw some video with the crash test and admitted it was good, but then said something like “…but the people inside must have been hurt really bad by the g-force”. Newsflash: the Smart has seatbelt and airbags and it got top notch crash ratings from all official agencies that are involved in crash tests.
But I guess, like the price you mentioned, that you must know better than anyone else.

PS: I drive a gas guzzler too…but not for that reason I can’t admit that there can be something good that doesn’t have to be a 5000 lbs behemoth…

Come on, man…be real.

06/26, 7:50 PM

posted by:

Mr. K.

Over 20K? Too expensive. Most Americans look at a small product and immediately think, what am I paying for? Plus the Fit, Scion, Yarus, are all fuel efficient, reliable and cheaper. Price it for the market.

06/26, 8:02 PM

posted by:

Michael Spadaro

Why the hell is this POS coming to the U.S. again?

[...] DaimlerChrysler is going to announce tomorrow that the SMART car will come to the United States in early 2007. That’s the word from three major newspapers citing insider sources! This comes after months of speculation. read more | digg story Posted by admin in Uncategorized | [...]

06/26, 9:42 PM

posted by:

prickly pete

Actually I bought one of these Smart cars for my Mother up in Vancouver Canada. It’s a 40 hp diesel which is a mid engine configuration. The car gets incredible fuel mileage (she spends roughly $10 every 3 weeks in fuel) and the interior room is quite spacious for a 2 seater. Fully loaded the car came to 20k. It comes with all the luxury options … P. Sunroof, heated seats,A/C, CD changer, P. windows and locks. The car can basically park anywhere do to it’s short wheelbase. If you live in a city that parking is at a premium this is definately a car you should look at. Don’t knock it till you try it .. you might just be surprised

[...] DaimlerChrysler is going to announce tomorrow that the SMART car will come to the United States in early 2007. That’s the word from three major newspapers citing insider sources! This comes after months of speculation. read more | digg story [...]

06/27, 12:42 AM

posted by:

Thing2

#5, DCX’s prolem with the Smart is because it appeals to only SOME people in an urban envrionment. These are supposed to be economical not just from a fuel standpoint but also from just initially buying one, no? There in lies the problem. You can’t make much of a profit from selling only a few cars very cheaply. To make money from selling only a few cars, you need to sell them for a lot. That’s why Aston Martins, etc. are expensive. In addition to the finest materials, they are sold in very limited quantities an so there is a low supply and a high demand to drive up the price, no pun intended. And as comment #4 so clearly pointed out, even some city-dwellers don’t want to part with thier luxury gas-guzzling SUVs for small cars that probably won’t be cost-effective enough to really persaude them to drive a Smart.

Only until the SUVs become bigger than the road, will people buy smaller cars.

06/27, 12:48 AM

posted by:

Thing2

The Smart Roadster would do well in the US. A cheap, small, pure, fun, little roadster is in dire need. The Miata and the ilk moved out of reach for a typical highschooler’s budget for a car, and this would fill in the niche in all settings, especially if hardtop.

[...] Source: LeftLaneNews [...]

06/27, 6:57 PM

posted by:

mblommel

Ummm… 2006300C you may want to go back to high school and take physics again. Extra vehicle mass (the more metal you love) has no effect on the G-forces experienced by a passenger in a collision. The G-forces are due to the rapid deceleration your body endures when you crash into something.

06/27, 8:12 PM

posted by:

2006300C

That metal I was talking about absorbs the various “forces” that an impact generates. The more “forces” absorbed by the mass that surrounds you the less “forces” that shall be transmitted to your body. The smart car was crash tested by DC themselves against an e class, head on 40 mph. the smart car was hit and than thrown back 25 feet in the direction from whence it came. The smart car went from 40-0-17 m.p.h in less than 2 seconds. That would be hell for the human body

06/28, 10:26 AM

posted by:

1c3d0g

#3, I told you repeatedly not to use my name. what are you, blind? :-/

[...] Reports: DaimlerChrysler decides to bring Smart to U.S. | Leftlane - Car News For Enthusiasts (tags: autos) [...]

07/02, 12:13 AM

posted by:

Longsnowsm

I would love to see the diesel version of this car come to the US. See not all Americans are afraid to drive something different, thoughtful, frugal, creative, and fun. Most Americans aren’t afraid to die, they are terrified to look bad though! Cannot get out of the Lemmings lines… Oops that line is moving, gotta go!

07/05, 2:05 PM

posted by:

Marti Hall-Powers

I can’t wait till it gets here/Tell Chrysler to hurry
it up–they will sell well here but particularly in
the larger cities/

07/18, 3:36 PM

posted by:

Jim

I bought mine from ZAP (pick-up at Ferrante Motors in VanDerGrift, PA near PIttsburgh) - I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!! Hav ehad it since mid-May 2006….get many lkooks and questions - - I don’t understand why Mercedes would not want to bring these into the US as soon as they could- dumb marketing!

07/25, 1:35 AM

posted by:

Dave

#41 - How much did you pay for it? I am in York County, PA and will drive to Pittsburgh for one. I saw the Smart while in Europe a few years ago and always wanted one (more than the 1″ ‘matchbox’ model I bought while over there).

07/29, 9:11 AM

posted by:

bob

i bought one of these instead of a corvette. When i seen this i totally changed my mind. I bought one of these and put nitrous on it.. Its sweet..

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.