Spy photographers have captured the 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class with less disguise than ever before. They even managed to get long-lens pictures of the car’s tail without any disguising at all.
An official unveiling is expected at the 2007 Geneva Motor Show, with sales starting shortly after. A wagon variant will arrive six months later. The base engine will be a direct injection 4-cylinder 1.8-liter with varying horsepower from 150 to 190. Horsepower for the 2.5- and 3.5-liter V6 engines will be 210 to 270 respectively. A C63 AMG is expected to replace the C55 is the model lineup. Gallery after the jump…


11/07, 8:43 PM
posted by:
acura_el2000
meh…
11/07, 8:51 PM
posted by:
Vdub
not bad…atleast it doesnt look liek a smaller version of the E and S.
11/07, 9:03 PM
posted by:
anonymous
what you talking about. it looks exactly like a small version of the S which looks rather dull itself already.
11/07, 9:16 PM
posted by:
mertzen
Like it a LOT better then the current one with it;s low rent looks.
11/07, 9:17 PM
posted by:
A4
it looks like a good blend between the rear of the CL and the rear of the S, while not looking too proper like the last one did. Mercedes really needs to inject a bit of mean and bite into their cars.. they too blandly styled for all those opting for BMWs and Audis. At least they look better than Lexus’s
11/07, 9:26 PM
posted by:
megator
Man i think the rear is so ugly it just seems overstyled. Mercedes needs to go back to being elegant and simple. They should build rock solid and last lifetimes like the old ones did.
11/07, 9:34 PM
posted by:
131172
Another dissappointing new model from Mercedes judging from the rear along. Hopefully the front will make up for the disastrous rear. Why didn’t they use the wider chrome stripe on the S and facelifted E?
11/07, 9:45 PM
posted by:
C-Hole
MB’s 3-series competitor (or have they given up?) had better have a decent C500, as the powertrain variations listed in this post look rather dismal. If not, I’d say MB is pretty much finished in this segment.
11/07, 10:11 PM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
reminiscent of the acura rl’s back. looks fine; i don’t like the where the badging falls however.
11/07, 10:16 PM
posted by:
lanapat7
Evolutionary not revolutionary.
The rear end will be copied by Korean manufacturers within the next 2 years.
But since these will be used as taxis all over Europe, they had to incorporate blandness into the design.
11/07, 10:28 PM
posted by:
Ricardo Head
Both a Toyota Camrys and Hyundai Sonatas look better than that. Even a Mercury Montego stirs the blood more. My God.
11/07, 11:20 PM
posted by:
cknoff
Naysayers say nay. What else is new? The car looks just fine. Not jump-out-at-you exciting, but still good nonetheless.
11/07, 11:32 PM
posted by:
Veda
The stop lights are so similar to a Honda City. The signature peanut headlights are gone replaced by something reminiscent of a Camry. What the heck…
11/07, 11:51 PM
posted by:
VDuv Kux Klan
looks good, better than the current model!
11/08, 12:17 AM
posted by:
Shawn1982
I don’t think it looks anything like the S from the back. Looks nice though. Def. a step up.
11/08, 1:00 AM
posted by:
Egbert Souse
For the past 10 years I really havent liked Mercedes what so ever, I love BMW and I’d always choose BMW over MB, to be honest I really expected something a lot better than this.. the rear of the car IMO is hideous.. Although, these are not official photos, and even if they were I still wait to see the car in person before making my final judgement.
But who am I kidding? I’m sure this car will sell very well just because its a Mercedes and everyone wants a Mercedes.
11/08, 3:07 AM
posted by:
Freshshoebox
It looks like the rear end is allowing to more room in the car without making it bigger to me. Kind of like the Scion tC, I kind of like it.
11/08, 7:31 AM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
A little conservative but a nice design overall
11/08, 9:39 AM
posted by:
meanpants555
Notice how the swag line turns into the rear lip spoiler. Interesting detail; I don’t feel like anyone has done that before. ‘Elegant and simple’ is just not where design is going.
11/08, 9:58 AM
posted by:
snork
I think it looks good. I saw a heavily disguised one similar to above last week here in North Jersey out testing followed by an undisguised CLS 320 CDI w/ Michigan plates. My camara phone is crappy so I didn’t bother trying to grab a pic. Later in the week I saw the CLS 320 CDI again out in front of the local Starbucks. No exterior camo, but the whole center console stack was covered by a neatly trimmed piece of leather that was nicely velcroed to the dash?
11/08, 10:39 AM
posted by:
Stuart
How anyone would think BMW have better rears then even lexus is beyond. They are hideous and not worth the first look let alone a second.
For gods sake the 7’s rear was so ugly the gave it a facelift very unusual for the rear.
11/08, 10:51 AM
posted by:
joseph
Not feeling IT one bit with this new design. We’ll know for sure once the wraps are off, but right now, they are being way too conservative if they are going after BMW and Lexus. It looks very blah and that rear end looks like the designer got 3/4 of it completed and gave up!!!
11/08, 11:14 AM
posted by:
The Stig
Boring and probably unreliable.
11/08, 11:39 AM
posted by:
bepsf
I rather like it - this design theme seems to work better on this smaller model than it does on the larger S Class - although the tail is looking a bit 1st Gen Audi A4 and what’s w/ the huge scoops in the doors for the doorpulls?
Will have to wait to see how the interior looks. Â Â
11/08, 12:25 PM
posted by:
doublearon21
the s class looks good, because its big, this has a short tail and kinda looks like a combo between a jaguar s type and a s class. dont like it at all
11/08, 12:27 PM
posted by:
A4
how about the first diesel sport sedan in america??? bring us a bluetec one and it just might keep up with BMW and Audi.. for a little while
11/08, 3:06 PM
posted by:
Don
poor man’s Benz
11/08, 4:03 PM
posted by:
CARnut
I like it, I can’t wait to see the C63, or for that matter the Sport model should be a looker as well if they treat it to the AMG body kit. I thought they shyed away from the 4 bangers though. Oh well the Kompressor 1.8 scoots along quite smoothly.
11/08, 5:26 PM
posted by:
monts
I think the back is to pudgy,
11/08, 6:50 PM
posted by:
Bobzooki
Thank goodness it doesn’t look like a Neon like the current model does. It reminds me of the very pretty rear end on the second generation AUdi A4. This is HOT I want one
11/08, 6:51 PM
posted by:
Bobzooki
Winding Road has way better pictures of this
11/08, 7:25 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
Unfortunately this will most likely be unreliable, like all of Mercedes’ models. Doesnt’ really matter though, i bet it’ll still be a sweet drive
11/08, 7:25 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
Also, I think that once we see the car in its entirety in official Mercedes release photos it’ll look better
11/08, 10:10 PM
posted by:
mmalartsik
I have seen it in person testing. This will be a home-run! Rumor has it that MB will have a tough time producing enough initially.
11/09, 1:06 PM
posted by:
CARnut
Bobzooki, name one part of the current C class that looks like a Neon part? I’ve gotta hear this…
11/09, 3:44 PM
posted by:
Bobzooki
Um all of it
11/09, 6:33 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
That’s not a good enough answer, such an easy way out of a hard question, once again, name one part, just one please.
11/09, 11:37 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
I keep looking at it, and part of me really likes the somewhat chiseled looks, but at the same time…its so upright/stodgy in appearance, but then again this is only a C220 CDI, maybe a C350 Sport/C63 AMG model would tighten up/buckle down the looks so that it can effectively look comparable to a sporty 3-Series or G35, or even an IS350 or TL or A4. I’m really torn on this one and most cars don’t do that to me
11/10, 12:45 PM
posted by:
J.A.N.E.
Looks very good.
11/10, 12:47 PM
posted by:
J.A.N.E.
It doesn’t take much.What a great look,though.
11/12, 9:42 PM
posted by:
Matt
Bobzooki how do you do it? Typing on a blog when clearly you are a blind person. Unless that is you are an imbecile and don’t know what you are taking about? Clearly it is the latter.