The 2007 Acura RDX makes its debut today at Acura retailers nationwide. It has a manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $32,995. The 240 horsepower crossover was first unveiled at the at the New York Auto Show in April. [See our full report on the 2007 RDX for more].
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
08/10, 2:35 PM
posted by:
teknomusik
Bout damn time… Might have considered one if it was out a month ago.
08/10, 2:43 PM
posted by:
Car Pro
Check it our !!! Compare with Mazda CX-7
08/10, 2:46 PM
posted by:
BMW X3
Mazda CX-7 is much cheaper and more features.
08/10, 2:59 PM
posted by:
Bertha Venation
This car is so dorky i can’t see who will buy it. The Tiguan is a way better looker
08/10, 2:59 PM
posted by:
Betty Swollocks
32K for a CRV lol lol lol lol
08/10, 3:32 PM
posted by:
Kraig
in no way shape and form is this a CRV. They share nothing incommon
08/10, 3:36 PM
posted by:
Ass Wipah
you believe what you want Kraig
08/10, 3:44 PM
posted by:
Don
How does the CX-7 have more features? Fully loaded it has everything the same but the RDX has a more advanced drivetrain and comes with a standard CD Changer and moonroof. The RDX is meant to compete with the X3 and embarasses it. The X3 doesn’t even come with heated or leather seats.
08/10, 3:58 PM
posted by:
mbc
for almost 10 grand less, i’ll take the CX-7
08/10, 3:58 PM
posted by:
Jason Parry
The RDX is based on the new CRV platform. The RDX is loaded and really nice and compares with the CX-7. Small, efficient, sporty crossovers are the wave of the future.
08/10, 4:00 PM
posted by:
Joan in LA
Tiguan Tiguan Veracruz
RDX = Dumpy
08/10, 4:03 PM
posted by:
Don
10 grand less? You can’t even compare the two then they’re not in the same class. That’s like comparing a 4 cylinder accord to a 330i. The base version of the CX-7 will get you no features and a front wheel drive unreliable SUV. If you’re gonna compare that price level you compare it with the CR-V. Prices matter.
08/10, 4:25 PM
posted by:
Jay
I like it but I would choose Mazda CX-7 just because of better styling
08/10, 4:41 PM
posted by:
ehhh
Gary Evert makes an observation about the Acura RDX that some people within earshot cannot believe: “It is not based on the CR-V platform.†As Large project leader (a.k.a., chief engineer) of the RDX, he knows more than a little something about what it is based on or not. “It is a new platform.†In fact, there is nothing else that uses the platform.
Might be similar in size, but the RDX and CRV share little to nothing in common. Plus its got SH-AWD. woooooot.
08/10, 5:01 PM
posted by:
Bertha Venation
ehhh I don’t care, loaded it is nearly 40k, that’s way too expensive, not a great perceived value at all
08/10, 5:24 PM
posted by:
Don
and the X3 is a good value when it’s almost $50k loaded?
08/10, 5:25 PM
posted by:
Spoony
one of the best looking small SUVs in my opinion
08/10, 5:37 PM
posted by:
My Sharona
Spoony are you blind, mad or high as the RDX looks completely dorky?
08/10, 5:40 PM
posted by:
My Sharona
Duh the X3 is a BMW of course it is worth 50K
08/10, 6:38 PM
posted by:
Sandra Bollocks
Why don’t they bring back Integra and Prelude instead of this rubbish
08/10, 7:02 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Well, I for one love it. The upcoming CR-V is supposed to be based on the same platform but it won’t come with the same engine or have the upscale interior.
And as far as a 50K X3? What a waste!
08/10, 8:36 PM
posted by:
some_stupid_nut
I thought the RDX was pretty ugly, that is, until I saw the new X5.
08/10, 8:41 PM
posted by:
Paul D.
RDX is one of the sharper crossovers on the market. SH-AWD is a gem and a turbo motor should be quite a hoot to drive. SHould sell every single one that hets built.
08/11, 1:51 AM
posted by:
GET SAVED
I work at the HONDA plant in marysville ohio, where we build these things. And I can tell you they’re top notch. The interior is what sold me on the car, not to mention-the turbo, with SH-awd and paddle shifters to boot!
08/11, 3:22 AM
posted by:
DaveO
Am I the only one who thinks this looks like an Old Aurora from the side?
08/11, 11:45 AM
posted by:
Angelo
I went to Acura dealership and sat in it. I liked it, but the sales staff did not even make the slightest move at helping me. The hell with them, I’m always welcomed at my local Bimmer dealership. (this was on the north side in Indianapolis)
08/12, 3:04 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Asshole “1c3d0g”, troll with your own nick.
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.
Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.
Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
08/10, 2:35 PM
posted by:
teknomusik
Bout damn time… Might have considered one if it was out a month ago.
08/10, 2:43 PM
posted by:
Car Pro
Check it our !!! Compare with Mazda CX-7
08/10, 2:46 PM
posted by:
BMW X3
Mazda CX-7 is much cheaper and more features.
08/10, 2:59 PM
posted by:
Bertha Venation
This car is so dorky i can’t see who will buy it. The Tiguan is a way better looker
08/10, 2:59 PM
posted by:
Betty Swollocks
32K for a CRV lol lol lol lol
08/10, 3:32 PM
posted by:
Kraig
in no way shape and form is this a CRV. They share nothing incommon
08/10, 3:36 PM
posted by:
Ass Wipah
you believe what you want Kraig
08/10, 3:44 PM
posted by:
Don
How does the CX-7 have more features? Fully loaded it has everything the same but the RDX has a more advanced drivetrain and comes with a standard CD Changer and moonroof. The RDX is meant to compete with the X3 and embarasses it. The X3 doesn’t even come with heated or leather seats.
08/10, 3:58 PM
posted by:
mbc
for almost 10 grand less, i’ll take the CX-7
08/10, 3:58 PM
posted by:
Jason Parry
The RDX is based on the new CRV platform. The RDX is loaded and really nice and compares with the CX-7. Small, efficient, sporty crossovers are the wave of the future.
08/10, 4:00 PM
posted by:
Joan in LA
Tiguan Tiguan Veracruz
RDX = Dumpy
08/10, 4:03 PM
posted by:
Don
10 grand less? You can’t even compare the two then they’re not in the same class. That’s like comparing a 4 cylinder accord to a 330i. The base version of the CX-7 will get you no features and a front wheel drive unreliable SUV. If you’re gonna compare that price level you compare it with the CR-V. Prices matter.
08/10, 4:25 PM
posted by:
Jay
I like it but I would choose Mazda CX-7 just because of better styling
08/10, 4:41 PM
posted by:
ehhh
Gary Evert makes an observation about the Acura RDX that some people within earshot cannot believe: “It is not based on the CR-V platform.†As Large project leader (a.k.a., chief engineer) of the RDX, he knows more than a little something about what it is based on or not. “It is a new platform.†In fact, there is nothing else that uses the platform.
Might be similar in size, but the RDX and CRV share little to nothing in common. Plus its got SH-AWD. woooooot.
08/10, 5:01 PM
posted by:
Bertha Venation
ehhh I don’t care, loaded it is nearly 40k, that’s way too expensive, not a great perceived value at all
08/10, 5:24 PM
posted by:
Don
and the X3 is a good value when it’s almost $50k loaded?
08/10, 5:25 PM
posted by:
Spoony
one of the best looking small SUVs in my opinion
08/10, 5:37 PM
posted by:
My Sharona
Spoony are you blind, mad or high as the RDX looks completely dorky?
08/10, 5:40 PM
posted by:
My Sharona
Duh the X3 is a BMW of course it is worth 50K
08/10, 6:38 PM
posted by:
Sandra Bollocks
Why don’t they bring back Integra and Prelude instead of this rubbish
08/10, 7:02 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Well, I for one love it. The upcoming CR-V is supposed to be based on the same platform but it won’t come with the same engine or have the upscale interior.
And as far as a 50K X3? What a waste!
08/10, 8:36 PM
posted by:
some_stupid_nut
I thought the RDX was pretty ugly, that is, until I saw the new X5.
08/10, 8:41 PM
posted by:
Paul D.
RDX is one of the sharper crossovers on the market. SH-AWD is a gem and a turbo motor should be quite a hoot to drive. SHould sell every single one that hets built.
08/11, 1:51 AM
posted by:
GET SAVED
I work at the HONDA plant in marysville ohio, where we build these things. And I can tell you they’re top notch. The interior is what sold me on the car, not to mention-the turbo, with SH-awd and paddle shifters to boot!
08/11, 3:22 AM
posted by:
DaveO
Am I the only one who thinks this looks like an Old Aurora from the side?
08/11, 11:45 AM
posted by:
Angelo
I went to Acura dealership and sat in it. I liked it, but the sales staff did not even make the slightest move at helping me. The hell with them, I’m always welcomed at my local Bimmer dealership. (this was on the north side in Indianapolis)
08/12, 3:04 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Asshole “1c3d0g”, troll with your own nick.