Comments on: 2007 Acura RDX goes on sale today

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:04:11 +0000

Asshole “1c3d0g”, troll with your own nick.

By: Angelo

Angelo — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:45:55 +0000

I went to Acura dealership and sat in it. I liked it, but the sales staff did not even make the slightest move at helping me. The hell with them, I’m always welcomed at my local Bimmer dealership. (this was on the north side in Indianapolis)

By: DaveO

DaveO — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:22:07 +0000

Am I the only one who thinks this looks like an Old Aurora from the side?

By: GET SAVED

GET SAVED — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 05:51:11 +0000

I work at the HONDA plant in marysville ohio, where we build these things. And I can tell you they’re top notch. The interior is what sold me on the car, not to mention-the turbo, with SH-awd and paddle shifters to boot!

By: Paul D.

Paul D. — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:41:38 +0000

RDX is one of the sharper crossovers on the market. SH-AWD is a gem and a turbo motor should be quite a hoot to drive. SHould sell every single one that hets built.

By: some_stupid_nut

some_stupid_nut — Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:36:26 +0000

I thought the RDX was pretty ugly, that is, until I saw the new X5.

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:02:33 +0000

Well, I for one love it. The upcoming CR-V is supposed to be based on the same platform but it won’t come with the same engine or have the upscale interior.

And as far as a 50K X3? What a waste!

By: Sandra Bollocks

Sandra Bollocks — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:38:38 +0000

Why don’t they bring back Integra and Prelude instead of this rubbish

By: My Sharona

My Sharona — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:40:05 +0000

Duh the X3 is a BMW of course it is worth 50K

By: My Sharona

My Sharona — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:37:01 +0000

Spoony are you blind, mad or high as the RDX looks completely dorky?

By: Spoony

Spoony — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:25:19 +0000

one of the best looking small SUVs in my opinion

By: Don

Don — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:24:07 +0000

and the X3 is a good value when it’s almost $50k loaded?

By: Bertha Venation

Bertha Venation — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:01:58 +0000

ehhh I don’t care, loaded it is nearly 40k, that’s way too expensive, not a great perceived value at all

By: ehhh

ehhh — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:41:36 +0000

Gary Evert makes an observation about the Acura RDX that some people within earshot cannot believe: “It is not based on the CR-V platform.” As Large project leader (a.k.a., chief engineer) of the RDX, he knows more than a little something about what it is based on or not. “It is a new platform.” In fact, there is nothing else that uses the platform.

Might be similar in size, but the RDX and CRV share little to nothing in common. Plus its got SH-AWD. woooooot.

By: Jay

Jay — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:25:20 +0000

I like it but I would choose Mazda CX-7 just because of better styling

By: Don

Don — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:49 +0000

10 grand less? You can’t even compare the two then they’re not in the same class. That’s like comparing a 4 cylinder accord to a 330i. The base version of the CX-7 will get you no features and a front wheel drive unreliable SUV. If you’re gonna compare that price level you compare it with the CR-V. Prices matter.

By: Joan in LA

Joan in LA — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:00:22 +0000

Tiguan Tiguan Veracruz
RDX = Dumpy

By: Jason Parry

Jason Parry — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:58:46 +0000

The RDX is based on the new CRV platform. The RDX is loaded and really nice and compares with the CX-7. Small, efficient, sporty crossovers are the wave of the future.

By: mbc

mbc — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:58:02 +0000

for almost 10 grand less, i’ll take the CX-7

By: Don

Don — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:44:43 +0000

How does the CX-7 have more features? Fully loaded it has everything the same but the RDX has a more advanced drivetrain and comes with a standard CD Changer and moonroof. The RDX is meant to compete with the X3 and embarasses it. The X3 doesn’t even come with heated or leather seats.

By: Ass Wipah

Ass Wipah — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:36:35 +0000

you believe what you want Kraig

By: Kraig

Kraig — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:32:30 +0000

in no way shape and form is this a CRV. They share nothing incommon

By: Betty Swollocks

Betty Swollocks — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:59:50 +0000

32K for a CRV lol lol lol lol

By: Bertha Venation

Bertha Venation — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:59:23 +0000

This car is so dorky i can’t see who will buy it. The Tiguan is a way better looker

By: BMW X3

BMW X3 — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:46:24 +0000

Mazda CX-7 is much cheaper and more features.

By: Car Pro

Car Pro — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:43:11 +0000

Check it our !!! Compare with Mazda CX-7

By: teknomusik

teknomusik — Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:35:06 +0000

Bout damn time… Might have considered one if it was out a month ago.