and thats a long long name for a car

Was this really needed…?

I see a ton of Gray Hairs running about in these. Seems to have hit a niche so why not. Not going to be setting any roads on fire but it’s a perfectly useful A to B car and the folks I have talked to that own them seem to really like them.

i think last year they had the Route 66 version. it was bright yellow. I see tons of these on the road, if it works for Chrysler then by all means keep it up.

Fatstrat is right, if they can keep selling these vehicles to the older generation folks, why not?

Yawn. It is time for this design to go night night. I could see extensive make over or reworking it, but the only thing that has really changed are the headlights, and those took a turn for the worse.

I heard Chrysler is going to build another one next year and it is going to be called: 2007.5 Chrysler PT Avenue Cruiser Forest Loan Drive Edition With No Highway Options.

JC. Won’t this car ever die? IMO, one of the worst design in contemporary automotive styling.

Not a terrible marketing scheme, at least its sort of aesthetically pleasing. Its funny really, because the PT Cruiser has only been around since 2001, yet it FEELS like they’ve been here for a decade at least, because they turned from a funky, unique retro mobile, to a car as commonly seen as a Toyota Corolla. Plus it started the retro trend like none other and influenced GM in making the HHR, a shameful copy.

good turbo 4, incredibly versitle, good ergonomics.

The looks aren’t the best imo, but I wouldn’t turn one down. There is a lot of bang for the buck in them.

How DARE Chrysler take the name of my favorite stretch of road in vain. I will never buy a CHrysler product ever after this travesty. The state of California should sue Chrysler for this defamation. I expect a total boycott of Chrysler product in California for this

A boycott is not necessary as people don’t buy Chryslers in California anyway

The interior looks very cheap to me.
I liked the PT cruiser’s design it was somewhat “bold” for the time when it was released. It’s different from any other cars out there. But it’s getting old and I would love to see an updated model, maybe longer wheelbase and more interior room.
As already pointed out it’s got a good bang to the buck ratio. Nice car but needs to be updated some in my opinion

It’s like adding mustard to a **** sandwich. It doesn’t taste any better.

It needs to be updated ALOT!

Meeeh…

Now if the had a 2007 PT Cruiser Dr. Z “Panzerknacker” edition we could start talking about ‘mass market appeal’

The PT Cruiser Waffen SS edition might have snappy graphics

Is this car really only 5 years old? it feels and looks ancient. Doesn’t auger well for 300C, Charger and all the other retromobiles

I like the HHR much better!!

HHR same piece of **** different name

still ugly

Hot diggity … but doesn’t change the overall quality picture – it’s still a POS.

………….it still de same …it onli change e name

Yawn, nothing much to boast about. Wake us up when the next generation car comes along.

That is officially the worst placement of window controls in the history of mankind.

the PT Loser just got more loser-ey

Great interior.Super fun truck to drive.Perfect with two doors,as well.Lik a 32 Ford Vicky Hot Wheels car.2 doors.

The interior colours are a vacation and sanctuary for the mind.

If a person was to embark on a very long lucid dream and the mode of transport was this interior,I would say it was a first class choice.

Not everybody’s cup of tea,but that’s a good thing.