Comments on: 2008 Saturn Vue

By: saltcar

saltcar — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:30:14 +0000

The Vue is a great example of a well excecuted program. Sure, there will always be something that somebody doesn’t like but overall its a great design and has world-class detail. This is a huge step forward for Saturn and GM. I know its popular to bitch all you want about American vehicles but there are so many things that make a car work that I can’t even begin to talk about them here. Its much bigger than door gaps, soft touch, and cupholders. Its time to put down the financial journals, Consumer Reports, and all the other “expert” rags and start looking at this stuff objectively. I could name a thousand things that GM (and others) do better than most import car companies in the world – but there’s not the room here. I didn’t say everthing – they’ve earned multiple prizes for bonehead moves too but you can’t ignore some of the benifits of having huge resources and experience. If they could only hire some more car guys (and girls) and keep momenteum like the Vue going! Did I mention the ZR1?

By: gbb

gbb — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:13:41 +0000

Vehicles like this from any manufacturer just don’t appeal to me. Just dont see the point of them. This one looks as nice as any, just not something I would buy.

By: LamborghiniZ

LamborghiniZ — Sun, 03 Dec 2006 22:57:20 +0000

Chevy 490, not only is your post basically incorrect, as Saturn still trails alll the Japanese companies basically, but I noticed a few spelling errors I can’t help but ignore:

*Finally

*Hole

*Becoming

By: chevy490

chevy490 — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:27:54 +0000

i see saturn finaly stepping out of the whole and becomming a respectable company!!

By: LamborghiniZ

LamborghiniZ — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 06:02:13 +0000

The Hybrid Vue is a pathetic excuse for a hybrid, read any review and it will describe it as barely getting better mpg, running absolutely terribly, and being even slower than the CR-V you mentioned above sj79. It doesnt even graze the radar for hybrids SUVs

By: sj79

sj79 — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:51:30 +0000

Not crazy about the styling but I’m sure it will sell well. This is no worse than the wierd looking CR-V and unlike Honda, Saturn offers you engine choices and a hybrid. Few small SUVs are all that stylish in my book so this is no worse. It will be much faster than the Escape or CR-V. The Honda needs over 9 seconds to get to 60 and barely gets better mileage than the Vue or Rav4 V6 models. Now that is Honda engineering at it’s best.

By: Saud

Saud — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:25:33 +0000

Hmm it’s ok… I think it’ll grow on me.

By: max

max — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:46:30 +0000

LamborghiniZ-
I never said anything bad about the CR-V. You are right, it does have an excellent interior. It isn’t my cup of tea, style wize, but nothing Honda sells is. I just think you need to give credit where it is due. Since it is just a picture we lets save our judgement of materials for when one can be sat in at an autoshow. You of all people should know that Honda pioneered the idea of economies of scale. The more of the same radio/HAVC controls that GM produces the lower the unit cost. For a corporation that is trying to save money, it is a good and cost effective idea. Later when GM acquires enough cash, they can begin making the interiors completely separate from each other.

A4-
Maybe instead of going of on a cursing rampage like a misbehaved 2 year old, you could bring some facts to your argument. Considering it is the exact same vehicle, execpt with different tail lights and interior, what has GM done to make it “much less attractive.” Is it the fact that it has a Saturn badge on it?

By: A4

A4 — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:06:57 +0000

hey max, i know the vue is the god damn opel antara, hence why i said that
my point is, it shouldve came exactly as the opel antara, but some how, some way, GM managed to make it much less attractive, albeit with the same sheetmetal. so cork it **** bite

By: BrokenCadillac...

BrokenCadillac... — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:36:35 +0000

I think I see a bit of a RangeRover Sport killer here…

And I saw an Ion Quadcoupe at lunch today. Couldn’t figure out why anyone would buy a 911 Turbo when the Ion clearly destroys it…

By: goldfish

goldfish — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:30:45 +0000

i prefer doing 100km than 60 clicks, actually faster

By: LamborghiniZ

LamborghiniZ — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:26:07 +0000

max, i think you’re “witty” little comment about me not knowing if a good car “bit me in the butt” is way off base, if you look at the interior of the Honda CR-V, the fit and finish is impecable, there are no gaps, it is stylish, and the materials are soft to the touch and less cheap and plasticky, im going by facts here bud, i dont think you know a damn thing about good cars period.

By: Endurancevm

Endurancevm — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:16:44 +0000

A better alternative to the Rav4 IMO. I wouldnt buy it, but the Vue XR sounds pretty nice with the 3.6HF.

By: 1234

1234 — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:26:23 +0000

Looks like a rebranded Equinox… yawn…

By: BrokenCadillac...

BrokenCadillac... — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:17:12 +0000

Is it still supposed to perform better than a BMW X5 or are we looking at a Cayenne Turbo killer here instead?

By: Joey D

Joey D — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:51:55 +0000

The front looks like a Pacifica, and the rest of it is just fat. I don’t know I need to see it in person.

By: VDuv Kux Klan

VDuv Kux Klan — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:04:13 +0000

nice suv

By: century24

century24 — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:34:29 +0000

I’d also be curious to see what the Red Line will look like. Red Line trim made even the old Vue look sexy.

By: century24

century24 — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:32:13 +0000

Not great, not terrible. But it’ll work I suppose. CaddyMTL- I agree…those are pretty funky headlights.

By: century24

century24 — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 03:25:05 +0000

Wow, this thread really has gone down the drain, hasn’t it?

By: LamborghiniZ

LamborghiniZ — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:38:09 +0000

deantj, i would def choose a Suzuki Grand Vitara over this, its crazy how overlooked that vehicle is, when its really quite capable

By: Vertical

Vertical — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:13:15 +0000

Once again, Detroit has teased us with an awesome concept vehicle (Saturn PreVue), only to build a boring, watered down vehicle like this.

By: Hal

Hal — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:05:55 +0000

don’t forget this from a few weeks ago for a laugh

http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/28/video-lutz-says-saturn-vue-easily-comparable-to-bmw-x5/

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:50:00 +0000

Bun_a_gm: agreed. Metric FTW.

By: Detroit Dude !

Detroit Dude ! — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:36:10 +0000

Very nice. Should be a good seller for Saturn and GM.

By: Elvio

Elvio — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:16:27 +0000

nice…

By: LamborghiniZ

LamborghiniZ — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:50:34 +0000

Eggy is a good word to describe the exterior, and while the interior is improved (but in reality anything is an improvement compared to the old Vue), it still is mediocre at best and trails far behind those offerings by Honda and Toyota. The plastic is hard, the design unimaginative, and the gaps prevalent and obvious.

By: Ricardo Head

Ricardo Head — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:10:52 +0000

The europeans prefer metric because in their minds their 8 centimeters sounds longer than our 7 inches. We all know the truth of the matter, but metric simply appeases their genetic inadequacies.
.

By: autonutt

autonutt — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:55:11 +0000

The taillight/rear side window looks directly lifted from the sister Suzuki XL7.. but of course the XL7 has a longer wheelbase and rear door. I’m sure most consumers won’t even notice, but I did.

By: bun_a_gm

bun_a_gm — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:48:45 +0000

Metric is simply the better system. Admit it americans…..

By: murphy1

murphy1 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:12:58 +0000

good one meanpants555, you’d think after 31 years they’d finally give up. what an enormous waste of time and money! we’ll NEVER drive in kilometers here….

By: lanapat7

lanapat7 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:02:14 +0000

Some exterior styling details are overkill, but at least they try to differntiate from the rest.
Good effort. Much better than the current square box.

By: meanpants555

meanpants555 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:54:50 +0000

Why do we still have to have both km/h and mph on our speedometers? Is it in case we cross over into Canada?

By: CaddyMTL

CaddyMTL — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:35:45 +0000

They did a good job on styling but they f**ked up the front headlights. Too small and too odd a shape.

By: DaveO

DaveO — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:24:03 +0000

Looks eggy and has too many lines. Like the extra ones on the tailgate and around the wheel arches. Guess GM sees some value in waving the “Opel” name around at marketing events. Sorry, but the real Opels all seem to look better. (excluding the Sky which is the same.)

Sidebar…while the side gill thing is neat…it is much better done on the Ford Focus S-Max.