




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger to remain rear-wheel drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dzuchowski</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-445148</link>
		<dc:creator>dzuchowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-445148</guid>
		<description>Chrysler replaced the ly cars that were FWD with the LX cars that are RWD. The reasoning at the time to go back to rwd was to have a better large car experience.  Then just after 1 model run they considered going back to fwd? Thank you Feds for killing RWD.  I wounder if the next mustang and corvette will be fwd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler replaced the ly cars that were FWD with the LX cars that are RWD. The reasoning at the time to go back to rwd was to have a better large car experience.  Then just after 1 model run they considered going back to fwd? Thank you Feds for killing RWD.  I wounder if the next mustang and corvette will be fwd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g93</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-432521</link>
		<dc:creator>g93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-432521</guid>
		<description>yeah i agree with Blakkarr..chryslers my fav brand and there legacy is RWD soo it better stay that way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i agree with Blakkarr..chryslers my fav brand and there legacy is RWD soo it better stay that way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-360114</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-360114</guid>
		<description>Good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359453</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised Chrysler lasted past the Intrepid LH car fiasco.

Stupid dumb people are born everyday and will buy a shiny new car....no matter the history of the automaker.

BUT...Chrysler IS nearing the end..payback time.

DIE NOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised Chrysler lasted past the Intrepid LH car fiasco.</p>
<p>Stupid dumb people are born everyday and will buy a shiny new car&#8230;.no matter the history of the automaker.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;Chrysler IS nearing the end..payback time.</p>
<p>DIE NOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Aleman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359441</link>
		<dc:creator>El Aleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359441</guid>
		<description>true words, golf4me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true words, golf4me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golf4me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359366</link>
		<dc:creator>golf4me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359366</guid>
		<description>Only good decision they&#039;ve made in 2 years, well besides killing the Compiss and PT conv.

I hope the new LX kicks GM&#039;s FWD&#039;s in the ass and make Lutz look like an arsehole for abandoning the only thing that would have given GM any credibility in the large sedan market...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only good decision they&#8217;ve made in 2 years, well besides killing the Compiss and PT conv.</p>
<p>I hope the new LX kicks GM&#8217;s FWD&#8217;s in the ass and make Lutz look like an arsehole for abandoning the only thing that would have given GM any credibility in the large sedan market&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359326</link>
		<dc:creator>fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359326</guid>
		<description>chrysler is still innovative. good. AND, i agree, too, it is good to actually not hear a US-Automaker whine about regulations, but venture on, and take the challenge as a chance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chrysler is still innovative. good. AND, i agree, too, it is good to actually not hear a US-Automaker whine about regulations, but venture on, and take the challenge as a chance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AxeHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359323</link>
		<dc:creator>AxeHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359323</guid>
		<description>Test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359293</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359293</guid>
		<description>Is this RWD by birth as oppose to choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this RWD by birth as oppose to choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazdaman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359283</link>
		<dc:creator>mazdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359283</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s going to be interesting to see how Chrysler follows up on such iconic designs as the current 300 and Charger. I&#039;m glad that they will be continuing with the rear wheel drive format with these cars. 

I agree with CarStar: I would like to see them give the Chrysler division a midsize sedan on a shortened version of this platform (I&#039;m not sure if the Dodge midsize sedan should be rear wheel drive; I see pros and cons to this proposition). 

I also agree with El Aleman: at least we don&#039;t hear Chrysler whining about the CAFE regulations interfering with their plans for these cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see how Chrysler follows up on such iconic designs as the current 300 and Charger. I&#8217;m glad that they will be continuing with the rear wheel drive format with these cars. </p>
<p>I agree with CarStar: I would like to see them give the Chrysler division a midsize sedan on a shortened version of this platform (I&#8217;m not sure if the Dodge midsize sedan should be rear wheel drive; I see pros and cons to this proposition). </p>
<p>I also agree with El Aleman: at least we don&#8217;t hear Chrysler whining about the CAFE regulations interfering with their plans for these cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeansterTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359279</link>
		<dc:creator>DeansterTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359279</guid>
		<description>2011? Jesus....too bad, sounds like the 300 will go the way of the Taurus - unsalvageable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2011? Jesus&#8230;.too bad, sounds like the 300 will go the way of the Taurus &#8211; unsalvageable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bolex</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359265</link>
		<dc:creator>bolex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359265</guid>
		<description>awesome news and good for Chrylser, even if it was circumstantial.  both awesome cars. its a blessing in disguise for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome news and good for Chrylser, even if it was circumstantial.  both awesome cars. its a blessing in disguise for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarStar</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359262</link>
		<dc:creator>CarStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359262</guid>
		<description>I am glad that Chrysler is sticking with the RWD platform. This design is hot! The 300 design still looks good even though its been around for a while.  
The Charger needs some smoother lines. I think Chrysler should take it a step further and build the next mid-size Sebring/Avenger off the Challenger platform. That would be awesome. Who cares if it is powered by a very small V6 or a large 4-cylinder? I like RWD and I want it to stay around, even if FWD fuel economy is slightly better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that Chrysler is sticking with the RWD platform. This design is hot! The 300 design still looks good even though its been around for a while.<br />
The Charger needs some smoother lines. I think Chrysler should take it a step further and build the next mid-size Sebring/Avenger off the Challenger platform. That would be awesome. Who cares if it is powered by a very small V6 or a large 4-cylinder? I like RWD and I want it to stay around, even if FWD fuel economy is slightly better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359253</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359253</guid>
		<description>FWD is for losers! I&#039;m glad Chrysler is not switching to FWD, but I still don&#039;t understand why any company would want to go to such an ass-backwards configuration (the fuel consumption argument is silly, 1 less MPG ain&#039;t gonna kill nobody). To each his own, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWD is for losers! I&#8217;m glad Chrysler is not switching to FWD, but I still don&#8217;t understand why any company would want to go to such an ass-backwards configuration (the fuel consumption argument is silly, 1 less MPG ain&#8217;t gonna kill nobody). To each his own, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buytheredcar</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359245</link>
		<dc:creator>buytheredcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359245</guid>
		<description>its probably going to be the same design thats why</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its probably going to be the same design thats why</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Aleman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359216</link>
		<dc:creator>El Aleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359216</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just saying that with a modern diesel or even gas engine there is not the slightest problem with CAFE. A BMW is more expensive, sure, but not only because of its engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just saying that with a modern diesel or even gas engine there is not the slightest problem with CAFE. A BMW is more expensive, sure, but not only because of its engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buivrolet</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359215</link>
		<dc:creator>Buivrolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359215</guid>
		<description>WOOKIE62 - I have a feeling you misinterpreted my statement.  I am fully in support of Chrysler, but I am concerned for their future.  That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOKIE62 &#8211; I have a feeling you misinterpreted my statement.  I am fully in support of Chrysler, but I am concerned for their future.  That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbb</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359211</link>
		<dc:creator>gbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359211</guid>
		<description>I bought the first 300/SRT8 I laid my eyes on, still got it, still love it, not sure I will ever sell it. The only sedan built in NA in the last 30 years thats worth a $hit and its a great one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought the first 300/SRT8 I laid my eyes on, still got it, still love it, not sure I will ever sell it. The only sedan built in NA in the last 30 years thats worth a $hit and its a great one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359207</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359207</guid>
		<description>Any of you shitstains using the other hand to type while you jerk off need to be reminded just how good these cars are right now. Yes, the interior&#039;s not up to BMW or Mercedes standards (ironic as that may be) but where else do you find such a combination of comfort, power and prowess other than the 300/Charger for a price even hand lotion addicts like all you naysayers can afford. Why do you think they sell so well? These are cool f*cking cars, that&#039;s why. And when it&#039;s all said and done, Chrysler will probably look back at all this and be thankful they couldn&#039;t afford to go back to FWD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any of you shitstains using the other hand to type while you jerk off need to be reminded just how good these cars are right now. Yes, the interior&#8217;s not up to BMW or Mercedes standards (ironic as that may be) but where else do you find such a combination of comfort, power and prowess other than the 300/Charger for a price even hand lotion addicts like all you naysayers can afford. Why do you think they sell so well? These are cool f*cking cars, that&#8217;s why. And when it&#8217;s all said and done, Chrysler will probably look back at all this and be thankful they couldn&#8217;t afford to go back to FWD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Aleman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359202</link>
		<dc:creator>El Aleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359202</guid>
		<description>Beautiful. None of this &quot;Oh my god we can&#039;t build a rear wheel drive car with decent fuel mileage watch us suffer&quot; shit coming from Lutz. 
Seriously, look at the mileage of the BMW 5 Series (520d with 177 bhp and 265 lb-ft. of torque gets a 46 mpg and beats a Chrysler 300 3.5 in topspeead and off the line by a second) and tell me why exactly the 200 pounds extra make it impossible to be fuel efficient..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful. None of this &#8220;Oh my god we can&#8217;t build a rear wheel drive car with decent fuel mileage watch us suffer&#8221; shit coming from Lutz.<br />
Seriously, look at the mileage of the BMW 5 Series (520d with 177 bhp and 265 lb-ft. of torque gets a 46 mpg and beats a Chrysler 300 3.5 in topspeead and off the line by a second) and tell me why exactly the 200 pounds extra make it impossible to be fuel efficient..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359198</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359198</guid>
		<description>Good, looks like Chrysler intends to continue to build desirable cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, looks like Chrysler intends to continue to build desirable cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimothy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359197</link>
		<dc:creator>jimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359197</guid>
		<description>WOOKIE62: From the looks of it, they&#039;ve already run out of whitty things to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOOKIE62: From the looks of it, they&#8217;ve already run out of whitty things to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359194</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359194</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good news. At least we know one automaker will still be making RWD cars after 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good news. At least we know one automaker will still be making RWD cars after 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359185</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359185</guid>
		<description>Well it will be a completely different car by then and those new Cafe regs are kicking american car companies asses 
I thought only the Japanese were good at doing that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it will be a completely different car by then and those new Cafe regs are kicking american car companies asses<br />
I thought only the Japanese were good at doing that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359184</link>
		<dc:creator>F451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359184</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autoextremist.com/current/2008/2/12/rants-432.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chrysler is doomed.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.autoextremist.com/current/2008/2/12/rants-432.html" rel="nofollow">Chrysler is doomed.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e36m</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359179</link>
		<dc:creator>e36m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359179</guid>
		<description>By 2011 it should be the tata 300 or ________ (insert chinese company name) 300</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By 2011 it should be the tata 300 or ________ (insert chinese company name) 300</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buivrolet</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359175</link>
		<dc:creator>Buivrolet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359175</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see that they&#039;ll still be around...

But I have a feeling Chrysler is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see that they&#8217;ll still be around&#8230;</p>
<p>But I have a feeling Chrysler is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359167</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2011-chrysler-300-dodge-charger-to-remain-rear-wheel-drive.html#comment-359167</guid>
		<description>Wait, those shitty LX interiors aren&#039;t getting replaced until 2011??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, those shitty LX interiors aren&#8217;t getting replaced until 2011??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 463/464 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 21:19:49 -->
