Despite Ford’s plan to sell off Land Rover (as well as fellow Brit Jaguar), drawing plans are on the table for a seven-seat version of its smallest SUV, called LR2 in North America and Freelander elsewhere. Particularly in the European market, demand for multi-seat SUVs, wagons and vans is on the rise, so a seven-seat model would seem practical.
British automotive publication AutoExpress says that the seven-seater will join the Land Rover range in about 18 months and that in Europe. Competition from new models, like the Peugeot 4007, a Peugeot-badged Mitsubishi Outlander, is heating up and Land Rover bosses think they need something to differentiate their model.
Land Rover has neither confirmed or denied the third row of seats, although a source close to the project says it’s a reality. The larger LR3 (still known as the Discovery in most markets) offers a third row of seats, but it has climbed up in price considerably compared to the model it replaced.
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.



07/31, 2:46 PM
posted by:
Aston Martin
I didn’t think the Freelander was big enough for an extra row of seats. They would need to extend the wheelbase, and that would put it into Discovery territory.
Otherwise, the Freelander is the only small SUV which can go off-road, aside the Jeep Wrangler
07/31, 3:02 PM
posted by:
1487_GM_SALES
Isn’t Land Rover dead? Hummer pretty much put the knife into that carcass, there’s no saving them now.
07/31, 3:03 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
my buddy has a freelander aside from the crappy ground clearance its pretty darn good offroad, its the 2 door version. the removable roof is ok, looks funny with the roof rack though, but all in all its really good for somebody who is not a serious offraoder.
07/31, 3:15 PM
posted by:
1487_GM_SALES
Ya, but the Freelander is a POS. Tell him to buy an H3 or an H4.
07/31, 3:20 PM
posted by:
Piablo
The funny thing is, they are getting 7 seats in a car/truck that is based off of the Mazda 6 platform. That’s some engineering, or wishful thinking. Even a Pathfinder, which is quite a bit larger than the Freelander has a cramped 3rd row.
I will say I like the new LR2/Escape light years beyond the previous model. It looks pretty good, fits better with the Explorer than it did before.
07/31, 3:27 PM
posted by:
RobCali
1487_GM_Sales … The H3 and the H4 are for posers.
07/31, 3:37 PM
posted by:
autonutt
There isn’t even a Hummer H4 yet! What platform will GM base it on, the Aveo or the SX4?
07/31, 7:36 PM
posted by:
jJayC08
1487-GM-SALES… What makes them a POS? I actually like Land Rovers, aside from their reliability problems with the LR3/Discovery and Range Rover.
The Hummer H3 is what’s a POS. It’s not quite a Hummer, but it’s not quite an SUV either… so what is it?
07/31, 7:58 PM
posted by:
DaHarder
I recently test drove the LR2, and left with the impression that it was too heavy, too slow and way too expensive for what buyers are getting…
In other words: TYPICAL LAND/RANGE ROVER!
07/31, 9:06 PM
posted by:
British_Rover
The LR2 doesn’t share anything with the Escape. They are on completely different platforms, use completely different engines. The LR2 shares more with the Volvo S80 then any other vehicle currently on sale. Land Rover’s sales have been going up for over three years now. They had record breaking worldwide sales in 2005, 2006 and are on track to do it again for 2007.
07/31, 9:51 PM
posted by:
Deanster
I hate Ford with a passion, but the Escape is really well-done. I’m surprised it has nothing in common with the LR2. They bloody well look like they’re platform mates.
I don’t think the LR2 is big enough for a 3rd row. They can barely fit the second row in comfortably. Stupid idea.
08/01, 2:17 AM
posted by:
GBilbo070
WOW just another big car for putting drug dealers in!
08/01, 6:31 AM
posted by:
Syrax
again, i have a 06 range rover and never had a single problem. the americans ones must have something.
08/01, 7:18 AM
posted by:
1487_GM_SALES
Oh please, everybody and their mom knows LandRovers are crap. Hummer is one of GM’s hottest brands and growing. And the LR2 is nothing more than a gussied up Escape, my Chevy Equinox will leave it stranded offroad.
08/01, 7:34 AM
posted by:
Get Real
NO INTERCEPTOR ?????????????
INSTEAD FORD WASTES MONEY PLANNING THIS CRAP ??????
THEY ARE STUPID…….STUPID…….STUPID !!!!!!
FORD DESERVES TO DIE !!!!!
08/01, 7:40 AM
posted by:
Get Real
Yes, I was yelling above.
08/01, 10:26 AM
posted by:
angelo
Hummers and Land Rovers don’t make any sense in urban driving. Get an X5 or an Acura MDX or RDX.
08/01, 10:54 AM
posted by:
jJayC08
“Oh please, everybody and their mom knows LandRovers are crap. Hummer is one of GM’s hottest brands and growing. And the LR2 is nothing more than a gussied up Escape, my Chevy Equinox will leave it stranded offroad”
Do you not know how to read, 1487_GM-Sales? There’s atleast 3 people who have stated “The Land Rover LR2 is NOT based on the Escape”.
Chevrolet Equinox will leave it stranded offroad? Psh, gimme a break, if your trying to be like GM_Number1_4ever or the likes, then DON’T, because you don’t come close to humor.
08/01, 12:13 PM
posted by:
British_Rover
The LR2 has best in class front headroom and best in class front legroom. It also has best in class rear headroom and only the RDX has more rear legroom by about an inch.
The escape uses the old mondeo chassis and a V6 with a four speed automatic. The LR2 uses an Inline six developed jointly by Volvo and Land Rover with a 6 speed manual shift capable automatic and a specially tuned haledex AWD system.
08/01, 12:13 PM
posted by:
British_Rover
Oops forgot the link…
http://www.cars.com/go/compare/trimCompare.jsp?acodes=USB80LRS081A0,USB70BMS201A0,USB70ACS121A0
08/01, 12:13 PM
posted by:
nitinsharma1000
freelander aint good but better than the h3
08/01, 12:29 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
NOT TO BASH OR JOIN GM MORON SALES, BUT THE H3 IS A BETTER OFFRAOD VEHICLE THAN THE FREELANDER, BUT THE FREELANDER IS A WAY BETTER ALL AROUND VEHICLE. THE FREELANDER LACKS ANY REAL GROUND CLEARANCE.
08/01, 1:33 PM
posted by:
Htay5500
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Vv7Fo8Cnk2o
LRs are crap? THINK AGAIN! I bet your eqinox can’t do this.
08/01, 3:25 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
^^^^i really like land rovers but that was the absolutely most fixed useless demonstration ever, anybody can deliberately get stuck doing what the caddy was doing, and they never explained the h2. seriously my 2wd frontier can get to the top of that little hill driven properly, but an exuinox would never out offroad a vehicle like the landrover.
08/01, 4:49 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
Angelo: your sentance should’ve ended after “x5.”
Land rover, hummer and Jeep are the only brands I’d even think of trying to take off-road.
08/01, 5:14 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
jack i fully 100% agree, hose 3 are the best anywhere.
08/01, 5:14 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
those
08/01, 7:11 PM
posted by:
Htay5500
I’d consider an LC though. theyre fantastic and the world heavily loves them. lots of great history and great reputation for quality and reliability. but jeeps arent bad, Hummers arent me though. LRs are amazing but pricey to maintain and fix.
08/02, 9:21 AM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
ultimately id take a lr, you cant beat the fun electronic goodies like hill decent, even in the freelander that feature is just too cool, i want a discovery with a snorkel kit. just think about what happens in africa or south america when you need a land rover part, somewhere somehow there is one to be found, try that with a hummer.
08/02, 9:24 AM
posted by:
Htay5500
I’d kill for an LR3 V8, beats the winter, good to drive around the city too.
08/02, 11:08 AM
posted by:
Syrax
I’ve driven a GMT800 Escalade once, and I wouldn’t try any off roading with it. I’ve been driving in the Pantanal with my Range Rover (I live in Sao Paulo, about 1400km or 870mls away) and never got stranded, or exploded, or willing to hit my car with a bat. The only other cars I’d consider trying something like this is the Benz G, the Land Cruiser (not the lexus), and the VW triplets (cayenne, touareg, Q7).
08/02, 6:43 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
htay: the only reason i left the Land Cruser off is because I’m never buying another toyota. If I did, that’s be it, though.
08/03, 1:38 AM
posted by:
Deanster
Jeep for offroad. No substitute. Not even Land Rover.
We’re not talking firewood roads and gravel. I mean crawling over xxxxing boulders without getting high-centered. Only Jeep, nothing else.
08/03, 12:31 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
There’s only one Jeep
08/03, 5:38 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
deans rite the jeep can articulate like nothing else over the big stuff.