<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spied: 2011 Acura RL rear-wheel-drive sedan test mule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:08:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aggie531</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-461949</link>
		<dc:creator>aggie531</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-461949</guid>
		<description>^^yes the SLX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^yes the SLX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelo</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-388372</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-388372</guid>
		<description>NSX was rear-wheel drive.  So this is Acura&#039;s 2nd rear-wheel drive vehicle.

Didn&#039;t they also source some SUV from Isuzu in the mid-90&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NSX was rear-wheel drive.  So this is Acura&#8217;s 2nd rear-wheel drive vehicle.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t they also source some SUV from Isuzu in the mid-90&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-388229</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-388229</guid>
		<description>uhh they ran back to the drawing board because the current RL sells like a bag of rotten oranges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhh they ran back to the drawing board because the current RL sells like a bag of rotten oranges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387974</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387974</guid>
		<description>Speaking strictly on marketing terms, this is the long waited change needed for Acura.  RWD and AWD are the hallmarks of premium brands nowadays and though a V8 is another element of luxury, I bet most RL buyers would opt for the typical V6 due to gas prices.  Hopefully they also learned not to make it hella ugly again.  Regardless of how good a car is, if it&#039;s that ugly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking strictly on marketing terms, this is the long waited change needed for Acura.  RWD and AWD are the hallmarks of premium brands nowadays and though a V8 is another element of luxury, I bet most RL buyers would opt for the typical V6 due to gas prices.  Hopefully they also learned not to make it hella ugly again.  Regardless of how good a car is, if it&#8217;s that ugly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegriffon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387629</link>
		<dc:creator>thegriffon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387629</guid>
		<description>Awd has no bearing on the location of the front wheels in relation to the passenger cabin and front door. The critical factor is engine placement and orientation. Most fwd cars use a transverse engine layout with the engine sitting in front of the transmission and front axle, forcing the wheels as close to the passenger compartment as possible. Most rwd cars use a longitudinal engine layout with the transmission running rearward into the passenger cabin toward the rear axle. This layout allows engineers and designers to place the front wheels anywhere they damn well want, usually as close to the front of the vehicle as possible for improved ride and handling (which also gives them an advantage in the proposed 2011–2015 CAFE standard), and further from the front door. However many fwd cars also use this layout, with a power take-off from the rearward transmission to the front differential and no driveshaft to the rear except in awd variants. Most Acuras (including the RL), Audis, Subarus (a few are still offered in fwd models) and a few Hondas, Volkswagens and some other fwd cars use this layout. While this is bulkier and more complex than a standard transverse fwd system it has handling and pedestrian safety benefits (the unyielding engine being further from the usual point of impact). An awd system can be based on either layout, with a power take-off from the front transaxle to the rear differential, or from the longitudinal transmission to the front differential (often via a transfer case to control torque distribution). A few rwd cars use a rear transaxle, combining the longitudinal transmission with the rear differential, and using a short prop shaft to connect the front-mounted engine to the transmission; which eats into trunk space, but may allow better weight distribution. Even more variation is possible with mid-rear and rear-mounted engines (transverse engine and transmission ahead off or behind the rear axle; longitudinal engine and transmission ahead off or behind the rear axle; transverse engine and longitudinal transmission ahead of the rear axle [rare]).

Since the RL already uses a longitudinal engine and transmission, the spy photos reveal nothing about the existence of a rwd-only version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awd has no bearing on the location of the front wheels in relation to the passenger cabin and front door. The critical factor is engine placement and orientation. Most fwd cars use a transverse engine layout with the engine sitting in front of the transmission and front axle, forcing the wheels as close to the passenger compartment as possible. Most rwd cars use a longitudinal engine layout with the transmission running rearward into the passenger cabin toward the rear axle. This layout allows engineers and designers to place the front wheels anywhere they damn well want, usually as close to the front of the vehicle as possible for improved ride and handling (which also gives them an advantage in the proposed 2011–2015 CAFE standard), and further from the front door. However many fwd cars also use this layout, with a power take-off from the rearward transmission to the front differential and no driveshaft to the rear except in awd variants. Most Acuras (including the RL), Audis, Subarus (a few are still offered in fwd models) and a few Hondas, Volkswagens and some other fwd cars use this layout. While this is bulkier and more complex than a standard transverse fwd system it has handling and pedestrian safety benefits (the unyielding engine being further from the usual point of impact). An awd system can be based on either layout, with a power take-off from the front transaxle to the rear differential, or from the longitudinal transmission to the front differential (often via a transfer case to control torque distribution). A few rwd cars use a rear transaxle, combining the longitudinal transmission with the rear differential, and using a short prop shaft to connect the front-mounted engine to the transmission; which eats into trunk space, but may allow better weight distribution. Even more variation is possible with mid-rear and rear-mounted engines (transverse engine and transmission ahead off or behind the rear axle; longitudinal engine and transmission ahead off or behind the rear axle; transverse engine and longitudinal transmission ahead of the rear axle [rare]).</p>
<p>Since the RL already uses a longitudinal engine and transmission, the spy photos reveal nothing about the existence of a rwd-only version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoNameDenton1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387566</link>
		<dc:creator>NoNameDenton1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387566</guid>
		<description>The V8 is supposed to get cylinder deactivation for fuel economy, so not to bad of an idea, though I thoguht picturs of the NSX would appear before this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The V8 is supposed to get cylinder deactivation for fuel economy, so not to bad of an idea, though I thoguht picturs of the NSX would appear before this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387475</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387475</guid>
		<description>I agree XY 
I hate that the current RL has a reg version and a tech pkge version I think its better with everything with the options being the color and maybe the tires 
I know they dont need an 8 but the competition offers it and Im guessing that the RL will step up to compete with the LS and it just has to offer one then bc it would be in 7 series territory 
That is what I have been saying all along but If they want to increase the RL sales numbers then I guess it should be an option 
I dont think they need RWD like Ive said eight million times RWD isnt good in most parts of the country  but once again the competition has it so I guess they have to have it as well
If they had a RWD car lineup it would be OVER for Infiniti and it would put a SERIOUS beating on the Lexus brand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree XY<br />
I hate that the current RL has a reg version and a tech pkge version I think its better with everything with the options being the color and maybe the tires<br />
I know they dont need an 8 but the competition offers it and Im guessing that the RL will step up to compete with the LS and it just has to offer one then bc it would be in 7 series territory<br />
That is what I have been saying all along but If they want to increase the RL sales numbers then I guess it should be an option<br />
I dont think they need RWD like Ive said eight million times RWD isnt good in most parts of the country  but once again the competition has it so I guess they have to have it as well<br />
If they had a RWD car lineup it would be OVER for Infiniti and it would put a SERIOUS beating on the Lexus brand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyunya</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387468</link>
		<dc:creator>xyunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387468</guid>
		<description>1115, you don&#039;t make money by giving people options to think about. Acura does NOT need V8, especially today.  Companies make money on what they sell not on unsold options on their cars. Nobody sells V8 today. I suspect that Lexus hybrid ripped into M-B S class sales. The only V8 will sell without problem is in the  supercar/exotic class i.e. Ferrari,  Lambo, Maserati, RR, Bentley. I bet that you can get V8 E class cheaper then standard V6. I also predict diesel S class for 2010 or at least V6 in US market. Ditto, Audi 8 and Series 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1115, you don&#8217;t make money by giving people options to think about. Acura does NOT need V8, especially today.  Companies make money on what they sell not on unsold options on their cars. Nobody sells V8 today. I suspect that Lexus hybrid ripped into M-B S class sales. The only V8 will sell without problem is in the  supercar/exotic class i.e. Ferrari,  Lambo, Maserati, RR, Bentley. I bet that you can get V8 E class cheaper then standard V6. I also predict diesel S class for 2010 or at least V6 in US market. Ditto, Audi 8 and Series 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387438</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387438</guid>
		<description>I guess Acura has to offer an 8 even though the 6 is the one that will sell the most
I guess people want to know that they have the option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Acura has to offer an 8 even though the 6 is the one that will sell the most<br />
I guess people want to know that they have the option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387413</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387413</guid>
		<description>Please post some of what was said over and over again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please post some of what was said over and over again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impulsive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387396</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulsive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387396</guid>
		<description>&quot;an 8 cylinder is NOT needed especially with gas but ……&quot;

How about YOU go back and read fuckwad. And then try and remember all the SHIT you posted over and over again to the contrary, like your life depended on it ... FACK AFF, chimp ... you&#039;re out of your league ... back to your cage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;an 8 cylinder is NOT needed especially with gas but ……&#8221;</p>
<p>How about YOU go back and read ****wad. And then try and remember all the **** you posted over and over again to the contrary, like your life depended on it &#8230; FACK AFF, chimp &#8230; you&#8217;re out of your league &#8230; back to your cage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brassmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387387</link>
		<dc:creator>brassmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387387</guid>
		<description>Finally decided to play with the big boys? Honda is gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally decided to play with the big boys? Honda is gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387381</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387381</guid>
		<description>Are you still infatuated with the zoo? 
Like I said RWD is not better than SH AWD and an 8 cylinder is NOT needed especially with gas but ......
Read the post above you f#$%ing idiot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you still infatuated with the zoo?<br />
Like I said RWD is not better than SH AWD and an 8 cylinder is NOT needed especially with gas but &#8230;&#8230;<br />
Read the post above you f#$%ing idiot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Impulsive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387344</link>
		<dc:creator>Impulsive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387344</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ok I guess they have to address the V8 RWD issue.&quot; What, you finally cave, import monkey? Because they acknowledged it? When you argued forever with people here BEFORE they acknowledged it? Now that the market has turned 180 degrees? Fucking biased primate. You&#039;re as worthless as &#039;NoNameDufus&#039; and &#039;Hemiroid&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ok I guess they have to address the V8 RWD issue.&#8221; What, you finally cave, import monkey? Because they acknowledged it? When you argued forever with people here BEFORE they acknowledged it? Now that the market has turned 180 degrees? ****ing biased primate. You&#8217;re as worthless as &#8216;NoNameDufus&#8217; and &#8216;Hemiroid&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hateful83</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387328</link>
		<dc:creator>hateful83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387328</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s as though automakers live in a bubble and ignore the outside world. As a few have stated, the market is tilting in their favor, and they&#039;re ignoring it. Choosing to follow the prestige over practicality. Lets move upmarket, go RWD, and throw in some V8&#039;s so even less people buy our shit. As if that&#039;s not an ultracompetitive market already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s as though automakers live in a bubble and ignore the outside world. As a few have stated, the market is tilting in their favor, and they&#8217;re ignoring it. Choosing to follow the prestige over practicality. Lets move upmarket, go RWD, and throw in some V8&#8217;s so even less people buy our ****. As if that&#8217;s not an ultracompetitive market already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xkr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387315</link>
		<dc:creator>xkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387315</guid>
		<description>Yes finally! good job Acura.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes finally! good job Acura.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387288</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387288</guid>
		<description>global, that extra lenght is long compared to the tsx, which is the mule. but the rl is longer than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>global, that extra lenght is long compared to the tsx, which is the mule. but the rl is longer than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387283</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387283</guid>
		<description>LOL @ Voltron grill. All this thread makes me want to do is go and buy a black TSX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL @ Voltron grill. All this thread makes me want to do is go and buy a black TSX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387280</link>
		<dc:creator>shaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387280</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Acura, its about time you became a real luxury brand and stopped ripping people off for Accords with nice interiors.  This shoud get you half way there now you just need to fire all your stylists and drop the cheap painted plastic Voltron grill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Acura, its about time you became a real luxury brand and stopped ripping people off for Accords with nice interiors.  This shoud get you half way there now you just need to fire all your stylists and drop the cheap painted plastic Voltron grill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387273</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387273</guid>
		<description>Agreed xyunya: Acura&#039;s timing is about as bad as Detroit&#039;s. It just seems so odd that the Honda side can do no wrong but Acura has lost its way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed xyunya: Acura&#8217;s timing is about as bad as Detroit&#8217;s. It just seems so odd that the Honda side can do no wrong but Acura has lost its way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 02WRXPSM</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387268</link>
		<dc:creator>02WRXPSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387268</guid>
		<description>SH-AWD is not a joke; I&#039;ve driven Acuras with it in serious conditions, and it is as good or better than Subaru, which is the benchmark of that application. I don&#039;t understand the bitching about a lack of a V8 -- need we be reminded that Acura&#039;s parent company is Honda, who excels at small, powerful engines and has rarely (if ever) made a V8. If they are putting sixes in their trucks, why would you expect a V8 here in a fairly small car (compared to the other luxe sedans). The turbo inline four in the RDX is a really impressive motor, they need to spread that across their line (especially in the TSX).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SH-AWD is not a joke; I&#8217;ve driven Acuras with it in serious conditions, and it is as good or better than Subaru, which is the benchmark of that application. I don&#8217;t understand the bitching about a lack of a V8 &#8212; need we be reminded that Acura&#8217;s parent company is Honda, who excels at small, powerful engines and has rarely (if ever) made a V8. If they are putting sixes in their trucks, why would you expect a V8 here in a fairly small car (compared to the other luxe sedans). The turbo inline four in the RDX is a really impressive motor, they need to spread that across their line (especially in the TSX).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyunya</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387263</link>
		<dc:creator>xyunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387263</guid>
		<description>With current fuel prices everybody moves to V6 (Honda home turf). They may need to inject a bit of turbo into it, but since all big players are AWD, Acura needed RWD like herpes. The world is actually tilting in their favor and they missed the sign, if in fact they are struggling with V8 launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With current fuel prices everybody moves to V6 (Honda home turf). They may need to inject a bit of turbo into it, but since all big players are AWD, Acura needed RWD like herpes. The world is actually tilting in their favor and they missed the sign, if in fact they are struggling with V8 launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387256</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387256</guid>
		<description>All that extra length upfront to me means it&#039;s carrying a V10, not a V8.  Converting an AWD drivetrain to RWD wouldn&#039;t need extra space.  It could share the V10 with the upcoming NSX, with the RL tuned for torque while the NSX gets the high-revving HP version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that extra length upfront to me means it&#8217;s carrying a V10, not a V8.  Converting an AWD drivetrain to RWD wouldn&#8217;t need extra space.  It could share the V10 with the upcoming NSX, with the RL tuned for torque while the NSX gets the high-revving HP version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonnycat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387238</link>
		<dc:creator>jonnycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387238</guid>
		<description>and rwd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and rwd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387226</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387226</guid>
		<description>the latest RL looked good imo. and the SH-AWD is good as well. they only needed the V8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the latest RL looked good imo. and the SH-AWD is good as well. they only needed the V8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387224</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387224</guid>
		<description>I think you meant the RL. 
I think it would be best for all the cars to go RWD with SH AWD. If Acura goes that route the RL can walk all over the LS leaving the TL to move up and do battle with the 5/E/M/GS and the TSX to battle with the 3/C/G/IS(?) 
I think it&#039;s interesting that the RL currently competes with the E class the 5 Series the M and the GS. All of those cars offer an 8 but they mainly sell in 6 cylinder form. I guess Acura has to offer an 8 even though the 6 is the one that will sell the most 
I guess people want to know that they have the option. I hope that they make a RWD coupe like N4S said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant the RL.<br />
I think it would be best for all the cars to go RWD with SH AWD. If Acura goes that route the RL can walk all over the LS leaving the TL to move up and do battle with the 5/E/M/GS and the TSX to battle with the 3/C/G/IS(?)<br />
I think it&#8217;s interesting that the RL currently competes with the E class the 5 Series the M and the GS. All of those cars offer an 8 but they mainly sell in 6 cylinder form. I guess Acura has to offer an 8 even though the 6 is the one that will sell the most<br />
I guess people want to know that they have the option. I hope that they make a RWD coupe like N4S said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayer_ray_nagin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387219</link>
		<dc:creator>mayer_ray_nagin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387219</guid>
		<description>PLEASE, crApura, redesign that ass-looking grille asap.  That new TL with the stupid thing looks like hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE, crApura, redesign that ass-looking grille asap.  That new TL with the stupid thing looks like hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enthusiast89</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387215</link>
		<dc:creator>enthusiast89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387215</guid>
		<description>Acura really needed the rwd/v8 for the tl to be taken seriously. Now if they just made their whole line (with the possible exception of the tsx) rwd...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acura really needed the rwd/v8 for the tl to be taken seriously. Now if they just made their whole line (with the possible exception of the tsx) rwd&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl-future.html/comment-page-1#comment-387213</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7666#comment-387213</guid>
		<description>Ok I guess they have to address the V8 RWD issue.
I wonder if the entire car line will have RWD based SH awd or just the RL will have the RWD ?
Is this based on the NSW platform ? 
The Advanced car concept was just used on the 09 TL so it will be interesting to see how this will look ...and cost. Im think btw 50-70k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I guess they have to address the V8 RWD issue.<br />
I wonder if the entire car line will have RWD based SH awd or just the RL will have the RWD ?<br />
Is this based on the NSW platform ?<br />
The Advanced car concept was just used on the 09 TL so it will be interesting to see how this will look &#8230;and cost. Im think btw 50-70k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
