All 2010 Hummers will have FlexFuel engines

March28

march2008/hummer-h3-E85.jpg

GM took the opportunity on Friday to announce all Hummer models will have biofuel capability by 2010. The announcement took place at the same time as a Classic Chevrolet / Hummer in Dallas, TX became the first new car and truck dealership in the U.S. to open public biofuel pumps. To celebrate the opening, GM had a 2009 H2 SUT on-hand at the dealership, which is E85 capable. The SUT, along with the regular H2, represent just two of the 15 FlexFuel models GM will offer for the 2009 model year. The public first saw an E85-capable Hummer in the form of the HX Concept.

The station, called Classic Clean Fuels and located in nearby Dallas, TX, comprises nine dedicated pumps that cost over half a million dollars to install and deliver E85, E10 and biodiesel.

The dealership, thanks to an on-site E85 pump currently under conversion, will deliver all new FlexFuel vehicles with a tank of E85. In addition, an Enterprise Rent-A-Car branch located within the dealership will devote a quarter of its fleet to FlexFuel vehicles that will be filled up exclusively at the new station. Less than 1 percent of U.S. filling stations offer E85.

“We sell a lot of trucks capable of running on alternative fuels like E85, and even though there has been some increased availability, we saw a need for more E85 pumps where drivers could fill up,” said Charles Martin, general manager at Classic Chevrolet / Hummer, in a statement.




 


35 Comments

  1. I'd be happy to fill up a new HX there, just build it!

    Comment by Seriously, posted on March28 at 4:37 pm
  2. I see a serious flaw with the design, as I thought it is mandated that tires be covered or have mudflaps. I would hate to be following the HX as the rocks thrown off the tires are major paint chippers to those who are unfortunate to be following the HX. However, that will probably only last a while for an HX driver…until someone kicks their ass for throwing stones.

    Comment by F451, posted on March28 at 4:53 pm
  3. There has to be a more inexpensive way to say, "I support our troops."

    Comment by howsmydriving, posted on March28 at 4:55 pm
  4. Build it and they will come…

    Comment by AmericanMade, posted on March28 at 5:13 pm
  5. They'll all have FlexFuel engines? Awesome so that means they'll get 8 mpg instead of 4?

    Comment by Stridder44, posted on March28 at 5:48 pm
  6. no it means they'll be able to us E85, which is more expensive to produce, but taxed less, there is a station by me e85 was about 3 bucks a gallon, vs the current 3.30ish for 87 octane in the area.

    Comment by kagon, posted on March28 at 6:04 pm
  7. Biofuel ruins the planet just as much as gasoline

    Comment by LaCaLover, posted on March28 at 6:18 pm
  8. Hasn't it been established that E85 is not an effective solution? Why is GM so obsessed with it?

    Comment by vincenzo, posted on March28 at 6:33 pm
  9. To me there really is no solution but driving less, and using our feet more. Everything has its negative side.

    Comment by hateful83, posted on March28 at 7:32 pm
  10. What is so negative about walking? You see so much more, it is more healthful, you meet more people you create less pollution, but if you are dumb enough to buy a house in a development 3 miles from the nearest store then that is your own fault

    Comment by LaCaLover, posted on March28 at 7:59 pm
  11. Just what the world doesn't need.

    Comment by Vroom, posted on March28 at 9:11 pm
  12. Good point vincenzo. GM is scrambling for some reason I don't really understand to give Hummer the illusion of being green. The catch 22 in all this is I don't think Hummer drivers care. Safe to say if the only time the majority ever even see gravel is during road construction then you're pretty much left with the macho/status thing. I'm not saying that's bad, we are living in a free country, but if GM honestly thinks sales are going to rise dramatically because of E85 I believe they're sadly mistaken.

    Comment by johnnycanuck, posted on March28 at 10:26 pm
  13. It's not about increasing sales, it's all about appearances of being a green car company. Nobody will buy the E85 Hummers for their capability, they'll buy them to point at the badge and show their buddies how environmentally conscious they are while driving "badass" wheels.

    Comment by zoomzoomr, posted on March29 at 12:41 am
  14. I dont care if it runs on E85 or on baby seals, I just want that car.

    Comment by BlackX, posted on March29 at 3:06 am
  15. Forget E85 - give us diesel.

    Comment by The Stig, posted on March29 at 5:10 am
  16. E10 and E85 are both nothing more than a tremendous load of horse shit spoon fed to consumers by our glorious federal government. Fuel economy with either is in the crapper. Both take more petroleum to produce than they replace. This is just another government scam to screw us all using the "environment" as a tool to get there.

    Bio diesel from rape seed is a much better plan, just there are too many idiots in the USA that think any diesel is bad. They have no clue.

    Comment by gbb, posted on March29 at 7:50 am
  17. BlackX How very clever of you

    Comment by LaCaLover, posted on March29 at 8:14 am
  18. gbb, I think you need to do some research. Only when you add up all the energy inputs from corn based ethanol do you come out that far behind. There was a really interesting article in Motor Trend outlining one company's efforts to produce ethanol from bio waste (switch grass, old tires, old water bottles, etc). They figure they can do ethanol for about a buck a gallon, using about a gallon of water in the process.

    Won't you be pissed when that fuel hits the pumps and your POS won't run on it!

    Comment by injunraiv, posted on March29 at 9:14 am
  19. injunraiv,
    I agree with you, but i thought it took 3 gallons of of water to produce 1 gallon of ethanol, and because of this there were concerns producing this fuel would have an impact on water supply's, no?

    Comment by AmericanMade, posted on March29 at 10:16 am
  20. The Stig: exactly. I'd rather see them focus on bringing proven Diesel technology to the broad North-American public rather than invest in, what could be, a troublesome Ethanol production.

    Comment by 1c3d0g, posted on March29 at 10:59 am
  21. This E85 bullshit is starting to irritate me. My understanding is that it's barely more efficient and equally noxious, and it's driving the price of cornflour so high that MExican families are resorting to prostituting their little daughters to pay the electric bill

    Comment by DeansterTJ, posted on March29 at 12:21 pm
  22. deantj: but the farmers in Iowa and Nebraska are happy about it

    Comment by jackjimturkey, posted on March29 at 12:36 pm
  23. Hummer needs to drop the H2 completely, I have noticed the prices of used H2s plummeting here in the NW. Bring out the HX, and lighten up the H3. Cellulosic ethanol is the way to go.

    Comment by Eddie Willers, posted on March29 at 1:48 pm
  24. I wonder who has GM's balls

    Comment by JedS88, posted on March29 at 2:05 pm
  25. jackjimturkey: did the Mexicans' daughters move to Iowa and Nebraska?

    Comment by LaCaLover, posted on March29 at 6:01 pm
  26. on a subway today I saw someone having newsweek or easy read of sorts with headliner explaining that ethanol is any better for the planet then oil. This flex fuel is good for farmers only. But it will hurt those who don't grow corn - animal feed is getting as expensive as diesel fuel.
    The truck in the picture does not look like truck for a working stiff. Nor it is transportation vehicle: it is as comfortable for 4 as Corolla or Cavalier. If GM wants to help planet and stop financial bleeding they have to stop throwing good money after bad: it is realization time that monster truck era is history.

    Comment by autonut, posted on March29 at 6:30 pm
  27. The hx is designed to compete with the wrangler, I see plenty of working stiffs driving those.

    Comment by Eddie Willers, posted on March29 at 8:11 pm
  28. Funny GM is so obsessed with junk science, causing more energy to produce than what we get in the engine. Stop trying to come out with something to rival Hybrid, at least not E85. E85 is just part of the propaganda for less reliance on MidEast Oil. What would happen if the cornfields are wiped out in natural disaster? Long line at gas pump again? C'mon GM, you've got to do better than this.

    Comment by sharpie, posted on March30 at 12:37 am
  29. Eddie, what working stiff can afford a two seater with mileage of Ferrari, price tag of a cheap Porsche and performance characteristics of '92 Civic? I cant see anyone who works for his money to piss it away so foolishly. Perhaps it's me, but then again it's not like GM is selling those monsters. Passing yesterday by port in Elizabeth NJ I could not help to notice how many monster trucks are sitting in the port. We are not talking dealer lot even: port is filling up.

    Comment by autonut, posted on March30 at 1:43 pm
  30. economy goes down, food prices go up, whats next? raining cats and dogs? taking all that corn into fuel?

    Comment by Htay9500, posted on March30 at 8:31 pm
  31. Nut, The HX seats four, with a pair of bucket-type seats in the second row. The rear seats mimic the front seats' design and can be removed to generate more cargo room. All the seats feature a four-point, racing-style safety harness.

    Lets hope it gets good mileage and costs around 30k.

    Comment by Eddie Willers, posted on March30 at 9:56 pm
  32. Well la-de-da… they're making this one a flex-fuel vehicle which means you're gonna take an engine that runs off of lower-grade gasoline and then run it on fuel that's rated at 105 octane. BRILLIANT! If they're gonna run the engines on this stuff they could at least tune the engines properly. A nice variable-compression engine would be perfect for this. So you're basically gonna loose fuel economy and think that you're saving the environment and saving money when you're not… brilliant, just fantastic.

    I always get pissed when I see GM and Ford making cars that can run on E85 but are better suited to just stay on 87 octane fuel. Now if I can convert my old benz to run on E85 that'll be much better… a decent HP gain at the cost of raising the compression a bit.. eh… it's a weekend car so who cares?

    Comment by Dante_JoseCuervo, posted on March31 at 11:23 am
  33. Diesel needed

    Comment by lyndon_h, posted on March31 at 12:33 pm
  34. LaCa: No, but the economies of those two states depend to a good extrent on corn.

    Comment by jackjimturkey, posted on March31 at 1:11 pm
  35. Actually bio-fuel's biggest contribution is less reliance on foriegn oil. Which is a good thing for the states. That has been stated many times. It is not the cure all but neither is hybrids. Hydrogen-wait and see.
    lacalover-there is know way you are a car lover. Sounds more like you are an enviromental wacko. You can't be both.

    Comment by lamboz get a life, posted on March31 at 2:20 pm

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Ford Truck Accessories
Find a great selection of Ford truck accessories at AutoTruckToys.com
Auto Loan
Request a Auto Loan from LendingTree.com
Car Rentals
For convenient car rental locations in the US, use Dollar Car Rental.
Insurance Quotes
Quote, compare and save! Free auto insurance quotes at Progressive.com
Auto Insurance
Unitrin Direct: Get an auto insurance quote & save up to $303 or more.
o