Audi today announced its Supervisory Board has approved a $15.6 billion investment between 2006 and 2011 in new vehicles and manufacturing. Of that total, $11.1 billion will be invested in the development of new models alone.
Audi says it intends to extend its range of vehicle models from the existing 22 to a total of 40 by 2015. From 2007 onwards, investments will rise steadily to around $2.6 billion per year.
Rupert Stadler, Board Member for Finance and future Chairman of the Board of Management of Audi said: “Investments in new models, in product innovations and core competences are the lifeblood of any company. We can only ensure our corporate success by offering a range of attractive products. This is therefore also an investment in the future of the company and is decisive in safeguarding our jobs.”



12/11, 11:54 AM
posted by:
Veda
“We can only ensure our corporate success by offering a range of attractive products.”
As long as they are more reliable than their current offerings.
12/11, 12:12 PM
posted by:
Scott Kempton
Geez—I wonder how many different models we consumers here in the U.S. have whenever we go to shop for a new car? Remember when you chose between a Ford, a Chevy, or a Dodge, and they only had one or two models each? This is a great time to be a consumer, but I sure am glad I don’t have the responsibility for keeping ANY car manufacturer alive, but especially any of the domestics.
12/11, 12:14 PM
posted by:
Kryptonite
WOW! 40? My life at an Audi dealer is gonna get funky
12/11, 12:33 PM
posted by:
cknoff
Yes, lets flood the market with new products, dilute our brand image, and then be stuck with an overabundance of cars on the lots. Sounds like a good plan to me.
12/11, 12:57 PM
posted by:
1952 MG TD
Deutschland Deautschland uber alles
12/11, 1:23 PM
posted by:
meanpants555
I agree with cknoff. It sounds like Audi is getting bold and thinks that it can conquer all markets.
12/11, 1:39 PM
posted by:
Ricardo Head
How about sinking a few of those bucks into building motor that doesn’t break down all the time and that starts when you turn the key. I love Audis for how they drive and the exterior/interior design, but I would skip them simply because the motors are typical finnicky kraut crap. I hate those fussy motors.
.
Owning a german cars like dating a brainless hot chick – only idiots own them – a smart person rents or borrows, gets his thrill, and dumps it back on some moron with an inferiority complex.
12/11, 1:40 PM
posted by:
Scott Kempton
I agree with cknoff too. In my opinion, if Audi is going to try to cover all markets, they’re going to have to learn how to sell a car in the U.S. for $17-20,000. Their new A2 is kind of cool, but I looked at them, and they’re nearly $40,000! Like it or not, Americans still equate small with inexpensive, and $40K AIN’T inexpensive.
12/11, 1:47 PM
posted by:
Scott Kempton
Ricardo—how about showing us all what a classy guy you are, and make your point without resorting to racist remarks.
Having said that, I don’t know what your experience is with German engines, but since 1995, I’ve owned a ‘95 Golf, a ‘98 Passat, and I currently own an ‘03 Passat, all with four cylinder engines. I’ve driven each of them to at least 60K miles, all without a hint of engine trouble.
12/11, 1:55 PM
posted by:
BAMF
Scott– When my A8 got to 70K miles, the transmission died. $9,000 to replace. Lifetime transmission fluid my ass.
12/11, 2:19 PM
posted by:
Bush
Scott Kempton:
The problem with VW/Audi is after 80,000 miles. I’ve had both after that magic number since new. That’s when the problem start and get quickly progressivly worse. My take on them (they are fun to drive) is buy/lease new and dump it before 80K. Do not buy second hand ever.
12/11, 2:56 PM
posted by:
Jazz
WOW! 9 large for a tranny? Dayum! Just when I was considering putting a used A6 on my list.
12/11, 3:00 PM
posted by:
meanpants555
I like luke warm brainy chicks with a little 93 octane behind each ear, gets my engine revving.
12/11, 3:25 PM
posted by:
Renton
They are going to increase the number of models that still get one upped by BMW in the fun to drive/performance catagory.
Audi makes nice cars. They are more like German Lexus though. Without the resale value.
12/11, 3:54 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
I dont think the style of the A4 matches the driving experience. IMHO.
Every car company can always improve quality, but with the insane advancement in technology these days, you are bound to have problems, especially when a car starts looking at 80k miles +/-. It is a trade off.
12/11, 5:28 PM
posted by:
Don
Audi already has too many models. They should focus on fixing the problems these have instead of making more.
12/11, 8:07 PM
posted by:
Veda
Scott, sorry but I gotta agree with Ricardo here especially on Audi. They are like high maintenance classy chicks that are flawed in many ways but loved in many ways as well. The funny thing about these cars is that they’re like timebombs where after a certain mileage, they start require the same expensive repairs. Yea, dump them before they get worse…
12/11, 8:24 PM
posted by:
autonutt
Bush is absolutely correct.. NEVER buy a secondhand VW/Audi product over 80K miles (unless its a TDI).. nothing but grief from that point on. I hate to think how much more reliability could slip if they nearly double the number of products they offer?
12/11, 8:52 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
BAMF: oh damn!
I’m sad to hear that.
You guys are really making me scratch my head on this one, many friends of mine own VW’s and a few Audi’s, and they’ve always been pretty reliable…so what’s the deal, exactly?
12/11, 10:44 PM
posted by:
Bryce1821
My parents A8L got to 70k miles and they started having transmission problems as well. The dealership acknowledged that Audi is having troubles with the sealed transmissions. Because they are sealed, the entire unit has to be replaced and cannot be repaired. This of course costs a large sum of money. Needless to say they dumped that car and got a 745Li.
12/11, 11:13 PM
posted by:
A4
yeah guess what, theyll make 40 models, but we wont see at least 10 of them… and when you consider that S/RS models are each considered separate, its not too difficult a feat for them to achieve. Go audi.
12/11, 11:14 PM
posted by:
A4
but yes the reliability needs to change
12/12, 5:43 PM
posted by:
norby413
A. Had 2 Audi’s(new) over the last 5 years. Not a lick of trouble with either.
B. Audi AG is NOT concerned about the second buyer of their vehicles. VERY few typical Audi buyers keep their cars over the 4 year mark (out of warranty).
C. When they say “40″, they include model variations that cost very little to engineer. Porsche now has like 12 different models of just the 911 and is doing quite well. Audi is a bigger company with larger distribution network.
12/12, 6:31 PM
posted by:
SSTRFSTR
VAG products are terrible.
Being the secong owner of an Audi is like being the fifth owner of an abused Ferrari.
12/12, 9:20 PM
posted by:
NoobyBaboo
2002 Golf GL TDI with auto. Replaced transmission at 67K. No mods, people in Europe drive far harder than I do. 2001 drive train warranty was 10;100K, 2002 warranty is 5/60K; them Germans IS smart. 5K$ for the complete cycle. Reliability issues to say the least.
So far I’ve weighed in against VW with 3 serious buyers. I’m sure VW could not care less.
12/12, 10:53 PM
posted by:
A4
oh and referring to a comment way above about audis “new A2″
the A2 is hardly new, in fact its been discontinued. Before that, it was around since before the turn of the millenium.
12/12, 10:54 PM
posted by:
A4
(scott kempton)