<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audi R8 to get 5.2L V10 from RS6 Avant, minus the turbos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:36:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381800</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 05:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381800</guid>
		<description>Audi Deutschland&#039;s site says the RS6 use a &lt;b&gt;5.0 V10&lt;/b&gt; not a 5.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audi Deutschland&#8217;s site says the RS6 use a <b>5.0 V10</b> not a 5.2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381441</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381441</guid>
		<description>jonmiles your an idiot, the new S4 is going to be great again just like the B5 2000-2002 platform with the 2.7 biturbo. What i dont understand is why LLN just didnt say it has the V10 out of the S6 or S8 instead of reminding us about the lack of turbos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jonmiles your an idiot, the new S4 is going to be great again just like the B5 2000-2002 platform with the 2.7 biturbo. What i dont understand is why LLN just didnt say it has the V10 out of the S6 or S8 instead of reminding us about the lack of turbos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381418</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381418</guid>
		<description>You know what, it&#039;s all publicity and BS, show me the real test numbers done by an independent party and we&#039;ll talk about the car&#039;s ranking among supercars.  Screw V10 or V12 if it&#039;s slower than a turbo V6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what, it&#8217;s all publicity and BS, show me the real test numbers done by an independent party and we&#8217;ll talk about the car&#8217;s ranking among supercars.  Screw V10 or V12 if it&#8217;s slower than a turbo V6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmiles</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381404</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381404</guid>
		<description>I really hope this rumor is BS allong with the rumor that the new S4 will be a supercharged 6....  I mean, cmon Audi... WTF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope this rumor is BS allong with the rumor that the new S4 will be a supercharged 6&#8230;.  I mean, cmon Audi&#8230; WTF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyBlazE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381156</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyBlazE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381156</guid>
		<description>Basically Americans are obese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically Americans are obese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B4 RSK</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381148</link>
		<dc:creator>B4 RSK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381148</guid>
		<description>I knew they had over heating problems with the RS6 Advant Engine (inclusive tubros) but i thought they had found a way to over come that problem with a propossed roof scoop what happened to that idea i want 2 turbos :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew they had over heating problems with the RS6 Advant Engine (inclusive tubros) but i thought they had found a way to over come that problem with a propossed roof scoop what happened to that idea i want 2 turbos <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Got Handling?</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381142</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Handling?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381142</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not seen any reviews where the V8&#039;s performance was a concern, so the boost should just make a great car greater.  And the noise... ever heard an M5 with a not-quite-legal exhaust?  The R8 V8 and RS4 are already giving my balls a happy tingle every time I hear them, I can&#039;t wait until this joins the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not seen any reviews where the V8&#8217;s performance was a concern, so the boost should just make a great car greater.  And the noise&#8230; ever heard an M5 with a not-quite-legal exhaust?  The R8 V8 and RS4 are already giving my balls a happy tingle every time I hear them, I can&#8217;t wait until this joins the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 02WRXPSM</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381137</link>
		<dc:creator>02WRXPSM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381137</guid>
		<description>lol, that&#039;s a great point -- however, there isn&#039;t a single Audi made that couldn&#039;t benefit from a serious diet; losing 440lbs would just be a START to the portly problems that the contemporary Audis have. I had a quattro back when Audi knew how to keep them at 3100lbs and it made a world of difference -- ypu could get by with a liter less displacement and only four gears and still kick the crap out of American POS sedans and coupes. And, everyone automatically assumed you were a dentist! (which I&#039;m not)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, that&#8217;s a great point &#8212; however, there isn&#8217;t a single Audi made that couldn&#8217;t benefit from a serious diet; losing 440lbs would just be a START to the portly problems that the contemporary Audis have. I had a quattro back when Audi knew how to keep them at 3100lbs and it made a world of difference &#8212; ypu could get by with a liter less displacement and only four gears and still kick the crap out of American POS sedans and coupes. And, everyone automatically assumed you were a dentist! (which I&#8217;m not)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381075</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381075</guid>
		<description>Stinky007, I bet you are from England. You see, for us Americans 440 lbs is a basic difference between Mr. &amp; Mrs. David Beckam and couple of happy-go-lucky American kids. We don&#039;t lunch on half a salad alone. If car can&#039;t handle weight of ordinary driver and passenger who needs it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stinky007, I bet you are from England. You see, for us Americans 440 lbs is a basic difference between Mr. &amp; Mrs. David Beckam and couple of happy-go-lucky American kids. We don&#8217;t lunch on half a salad alone. If car can&#8217;t handle weight of ordinary driver and passenger who needs it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381063</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381063</guid>
		<description>woo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMGoff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381043</link>
		<dc:creator>AMGoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381043</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I would never have really figured this as such a thing would be treading a little too close to the Gallardo... either way, there&#039;s never anything wrong with the notion of a Lambo for $40-50K off.

I&#039;d still like to see the 600HP V12 TDI... if anyone actually read the entire Wikipedia entry (despite the question of why anyone would rely on Wikipedia as a source of solid info) would have also probably come across the weight of the R8 on there somewhere.... The R8 is a heavy car as it is, so any extra tonnage added to the vehicle by the V12 would be easily offset by the big jump in power. 

Even with such weight... the R8 has been shown to stack up quite well against Porsche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I would never have really figured this as such a thing would be treading a little too close to the Gallardo&#8230; either way, there&#8217;s never anything wrong with the notion of a Lambo for $40-50K off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still like to see the 600HP V12 TDI&#8230; if anyone actually read the entire Wikipedia entry (despite the question of why anyone would rely on Wikipedia as a source of solid info) would have also probably come across the weight of the R8 on there somewhere&#8230;. The R8 is a heavy car as it is, so any extra tonnage added to the vehicle by the V12 would be easily offset by the big jump in power. </p>
<p>Even with such weight&#8230; the R8 has been shown to stack up quite well against Porsche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-381000</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-381000</guid>
		<description>I agree, but the problem is that everybody like the Twinturbo version of V10. If audi will remove the turbos then it wont be the same. I want to see RS8 with Twinturbo V10 and 580bhp. This would be the perfect combination. I really doubt that audi has problems with cooling. They used same cooling system as it is on the V12 concept and it works just fine. The real reason may be that audi doesnt want the RS8 to be faster and better than gallardo LP560. Keep in mind that LP560 will cost about 50% more than upcoming RS8 (or whatever it will be called). But as there are no official information yet, we can only guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but the problem is that everybody like the Twinturbo version of V10. If audi will remove the turbos then it wont be the same. I want to see RS8 with Twinturbo V10 and 580bhp. This would be the perfect combination. I really doubt that audi has problems with cooling. They used same cooling system as it is on the V12 concept and it works just fine. The real reason may be that audi doesnt want the RS8 to be faster and better than gallardo LP560. Keep in mind that LP560 will cost about 50% more than upcoming RS8 (or whatever it will be called). But as there are no official information yet, we can only guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380996</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380996</guid>
		<description>Get the penis, but no balls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get the penis, but no balls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stinky007</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380983</link>
		<dc:creator>Stinky007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380983</guid>
		<description>Well, first of all, I don&#039;t trust &quot;prototype reviews&quot;. I&#039;ve seen a couple of so called reviews for the W12 Golf which said the car was awesome and could beat a lot of &quot;supercars&quot;, but when everyone&#039;s favourite car a*****, Jeremy,  tested it on Top Gear, the car was extremely unstable and near impossible to control in the turns. The Lamborghini Reventon reviews also come to mind: the cars were limited to 120 km/h for the purpose of the reviews. The Enzo cannot be reviewed by the press without the written accept of Ferrari. The owner even signs a contract stating he&#039;s not going to leave anyone review it without Ferrari&#039;s approval.
What I mean to say is that a &quot;prototype review&quot; is just that! I doubt Audi let the one V12 TDI showcar get pushed hard enough by the press to prove that the extra 200kg doesn&#039;t make any difference. My take: it&#039;s just PR, magazines do it all the time. The praise a newly released cars to please the manufacturer and later bash for not being reliable. looking to dull after one year, etc...

My point is, if the V12 TDI would have made both economical and performance sense, Audi would have built this version. Truth is, the V10 is a road-proven powerhouse that can put down roughly the same horsepower and weigh less at the same time. In my book, that is a winner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, first of all, I don&#8217;t trust &#8220;prototype reviews&#8221;. I&#8217;ve seen a couple of so called reviews for the W12 Golf which said the car was awesome and could beat a lot of &#8220;supercars&#8221;, but when everyone&#8217;s favourite car a*****, Jeremy,  tested it on Top Gear, the car was extremely unstable and near impossible to control in the turns. The Lamborghini Reventon reviews also come to mind: the cars were limited to 120 km/h for the purpose of the reviews. The Enzo cannot be reviewed by the press without the written accept of Ferrari. The owner even signs a contract stating he&#8217;s not going to leave anyone review it without Ferrari&#8217;s approval.<br />
What I mean to say is that a &#8220;prototype review&#8221; is just that! I doubt Audi let the one V12 TDI showcar get pushed hard enough by the press to prove that the extra 200kg doesn&#8217;t make any difference. My take: it&#8217;s just PR, magazines do it all the time. The praise a newly released cars to please the manufacturer and later bash for not being reliable. looking to dull after one year, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>My point is, if the V12 TDI would have made both economical and performance sense, Audi would have built this version. Truth is, the V10 is a road-proven powerhouse that can put down roughly the same horsepower and weigh less at the same time. In my book, that is a winner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380982</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380982</guid>
		<description>acctually V12 diesel has top speed of 200+ mph. the current V8 version is capable of 190mph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>acctually V12 diesel has top speed of 200+ mph. the current V8 version is capable of 190mph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moto-racer13</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380980</link>
		<dc:creator>moto-racer13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380980</guid>
		<description>sounds amazing! If I was to buy this car, I would get the upcoming 500hp diesel. Although this V10 will be quicker than the diesel version, the diesel can still hit 60mph in 4 seconds flat and has a top speed of 190mph, and great fuel economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds amazing! If I was to buy this car, I would get the upcoming 500hp diesel. Although this V10 will be quicker than the diesel version, the diesel can still hit 60mph in 4 seconds flat and has a top speed of 190mph, and great fuel economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrax</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380976</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380976</guid>
		<description>GS400, the RS6 has 580HP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GS400, the RS6 has 580HP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astonman12</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380975</link>
		<dc:creator>Astonman12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380975</guid>
		<description>damn this R8 V10 is gonna own!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn this R8 V10 is gonna own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380968</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380968</guid>
		<description>The V12 R8 exists and its complately working, read article on AUTOCAR about road test of this car. Yes its heavy but its also lower for better handling and massive 1000Nm pulls 200Kg overweight without any problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The V12 R8 exists and its complately working, read article on AUTOCAR about road test of this car. Yes its heavy but its also lower for better handling and massive 1000Nm pulls 200Kg overweight without any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyunya</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380966</link>
		<dc:creator>xyunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380966</guid>
		<description>Turbos were borrowed from V2 rocket. Didn&#039;t work all that  well in the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turbos were borrowed from V2 rocket. Didn&#8217;t work all that  well in the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stinky007</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380963</link>
		<dc:creator>Stinky007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380963</guid>
		<description>1. I like how PR spins the V10 as being &quot;the one in the RS6 without turbos&quot;. Translation: Gallardo engine!

2. Stop dreaming about a V12 TDI R8! That engine is to heavy for this application! Search wikipedia for the weight facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I like how PR spins the V10 as being &#8220;the one in the RS6 without turbos&#8221;. Translation: Gallardo engine!</p>
<p>2. Stop dreaming about a V12 TDI R8! That engine is to heavy for this application! Search wikipedia for the weight facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmiles</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380961</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380961</guid>
		<description>Booooooo bring it with the turbos, fuckers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Booooooo bring it with the turbos, ****ers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS400</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380952</link>
		<dc:creator>GS400</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380952</guid>
		<description>How can Audi be so stupid, when they know the Skyline GT-R is coming out?  But then again, the RS6 Turbo V10 only made 520HP--20 more than what they are expecting without turbo.
It&#039;s interesting--many journalists compared this car to the 911 Carrera.  I some how doubt this car will keep pace with 911 Turbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Audi be so stupid, when they know the Skyline GT-R is coming out?  But then again, the RS6 Turbo V10 only made 520HP&#8211;20 more than what they are expecting without turbo.<br />
It&#8217;s interesting&#8211;many journalists compared this car to the 911 Carrera.  I some how doubt this car will keep pace with 911 Turbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliteski2</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380947</link>
		<dc:creator>eliteski2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380947</guid>
		<description>full-bannana v10?  how is this not &quot;full-bannana&quot;?

I agree though that the V12 TDI will be the shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>full-bannana v10?  how is this not &#8220;full-bannana&#8221;?</p>
<p>I agree though that the V12 TDI will be the ****.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380938</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380938</guid>
		<description>This is a bit of dissapointment. I was expecting to see full-bannana V10. If this is true, V12 TDI will be the best choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit of dissapointment. I was expecting to see full-bannana V10. If this is true, V12 TDI will be the best choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiemco</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380937</link>
		<dc:creator>tiemco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380937</guid>
		<description>Yes, the twin turbo R8 burned to the frame because of overheating.  I imagine there isn&#039;t a lot they can do to make more room in a mid engined car&#039;s engine bay except for lengthening the chassis, which is probably cost prohibitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the twin turbo R8 burned to the frame because of overheating.  I imagine there isn&#8217;t a lot they can do to make more room in a mid engined car&#8217;s engine bay except for lengthening the chassis, which is probably cost prohibitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380936</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380936</guid>
		<description>Weren&#039;t the turbos cooking the car during testing? Maybe they never resolved that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t the turbos cooking the car during testing? Maybe they never resolved that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380935</link>
		<dc:creator>F451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380935</guid>
		<description>I suspect no turbos to keep the Lambos top dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect no turbos to keep the Lambos top dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jumpoffit</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380928</link>
		<dc:creator>jumpoffit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380928</guid>
		<description>R10 works for me- but why no turbos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R10 works for me- but why no turbos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F3INT))AP3X</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html/comment-page-1#comment-380922</link>
		<dc:creator>F3INT))AP3X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-r8-to-get-52l-v10-from-rs6-avant-minus-the-turbos.html#comment-380922</guid>
		<description>Audi is the shit.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audi is the ****&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
