Take all the best memories you have of the original BMW 3-Series and the 2002, the now-almost-legendary model it replaced. Add what you remember about the original M3 as a quintessential performance coupe, with great suspension and performance. Recall how these pioneering sports coupes offered a reasonable ratio between price and performance. But alas, as the 3-Series advanced in years and added weight and girth, all of those attributes receded into memory. Until now.
Backstory
After a marvelous spring day in the coastal hills of northern California with the high-performance BMW 135i coupe and its sunny cruising counterpart, the 128i convertible, we can report that BMW has brought all of those great motoring capabilities back to life in the new 1-Series.
The basis for both of these models is the 125, marketed in Europe in a five-door hatchback model as an entry-level BMW and powered by BMW’s base 230 horsepower six-cylinder engine.
The opportunity for the introduction of this line into North America, where BMW carefully protects its reputation for premium high-performance automobiles, was the addition of the 300 horsepower twin-turbo version of the inline six to the 3-Series coupe last year and the development of the convertible body style on the 125 chassis.
Put these together, and you’ve got the perfect bookends for BMW’s reappearance in the $30,000 price range, which it had vacated as 3-Series prices pushed north.
Styling (3.5/5)
Starting out on a foggy, chilly Monterey morning, we grabbed the keys of a 135i coupe, pausing briefly to note that the designers had compressed all the BMW styling cues — kidney grilles, purposeful front end, and edgy cutlines — into a neat package.
The 135i comes standard with functional M-style aero panels that actually increase downforce and cool the brakes. In a bow to the 2002, a sharp ridge runs from the bonnet opening to the taillights just under the greenhouse.
Without the aero styling, the convertible is smoother and softer in profile, more sensual and less menacing in its appearance. Sharing many of the same panels and hard points as the original hatchback and the coupe siblings, the belt-line is slightly higher than a designer might prefer for a convertible, Nevertheless, it doesn’t detract from the pleasant appearance of the convertible, and with the soft-top up, the car is pleasingly proportioned.
Looking at the car as a whole, it does have a somewhat quirky appearance. It’s a little bit stumpy, but that’s not unusual for a car of this size. We just think it could be a little bit more slender in some areas.
Performance (5/5)
After a quick blast up Route 1, we headed inland on the twisty roads over Hecker Pass into the Almaden Valley south of San Jose. Within minutes, it was clear that the new BMW 1-Series is going to be a hit.
The freeway onramp provided an opportunity to feel the 5.3 second zero-60 speed as we merged into the morning rush. Slipping down a gear, it was easy to get get from 55 to 90 to slice through pokey freeway traffic, but the real fun was still ahead.
After clearing the morning bustle of small-town Watsonville, we climbed the switchbacks through the coastal hills, controlling the car’s sure-footed balance and responsive turn-in directly, rather than having it filtered through some electronic engineer’s idea of correct cornering.
By the time we hit Route 9 north up out of Saratoga (a road so well-known it has its own write-up in Wikipedia), we were totally in synch with the handling and gearing. We were in performance-car heaven as sweeping curves were punctuated by climbing switchbacks. Corners that should require second-gear were shoved behind us in third as the turbos of the engine sang pushing out 300 pound-feet of torque.
My only unfulfilled wish was with the shifter. While perfectly adequate, the throws are long, making the shift changes seem out of character with the tautness of the handling and power. It’s a safe bet that a short-shifter for this car is already in some online aftermarket catalog, since the six-speed transmission is shared with the 3-Series offerings.
With the sun now high in the sky and the temperatures within range of the climate control system, we swapped into a 128i convertible with the 230 horsepower naturally aspirated engine and six-speed automatic. In all respects, this package is the cruising complement to the track-capable 135i.
Not that there is anything wrong with an auto-box convertible. On the contrary, with the soft-top down, the grass green on the hills — a spring-only phenomenon in the Golden State — and the wild mustard already in bloom, those same tight curves above steep valley drop-offs could now be enjoyed as scenic vistas, rather than road-course apexes.
Though not offering neck-snapping acceleration, the non-turbo engine is more than capable of sustaining freeway speeds, even on steep uphill climbs, as we confirmed on precarious Highway 17 between San Jose and Santa Cruz. The same suspension that allows high speed handling on the 135i provides sure-footed stability in the 128i, counterpointing the smoothness of the automatic gearbox.
Cabin (5/5)
As we paused on Skyline Drive, a bikers’ mecca above Silicon Valley, to catch our breath admire the crystal-clear view over Stanford north to the towers of San Francisco and the Oakland Bay Bridge, we had a chance to survey the interior. After all, aotmotive satisfaction isn’t all about driving performance.
The rear seat, about the same size as in BMW’s Mini Clubman, isn’t going to encourage long trips with another couple, but the combination of trunk space and an opening through the rear seats will allow two golf clubs or skis and equipment to be carried with ease.
Our one real issue with the interior we had with some of the test cars is the shiny embossed metal trim accenting the console and dash. Luckily, there is another trim material available (shown in our gallery), and it’s a heck of a lot nicer looking.
Overall, the 1’s interior is excellent. We haven’t see anything else this good in this class. Not only does it have a nice feel, it looks great too. All BMWs share a similar interior design theme. On the $100,000 M6 it’s a bit underwhelming, but on a $30,000 sports coupe it’s absolutely fantastic.
Technology (4/5)
The interior is everything the BMW owners have come to expect, trimmed in functional black with purposive switches and knobs. The infamous BMW iDrive does come standard if the navigation option is checked, but We expect most 135i buyers will prefer to just toss an aftermarket nav system into the glove compartment for trips into uncharted territory.
The iDrive has gotten better over the years — at least it can be programmed by the owner to do standard things easily — but it doesn’t seem to fit the 135i. A puristic sports car like this could do without the unnecessary gadgetry.
Dynamic Stability Control and Dynamic Traction Control are standard, but set for a higher threshold than typical handling-meister systems, so we didn’t even bother to switch them off. Even with spirited driving, they didn’t intrude but it was nice to know they would be there to keep the car from going off the narrow road if we did hit a batch of early-morning moisture in a shady turn.
In many ways, the 1-Series scores well in the technology department for its restraint. Unlike BMW’s larger vehicles, electronics play a minor role, rather than a major one.
Bottom line
This won’t be just an entry point for budget-conscious admirers of the blue-and-white Roundel. We think it’s going to appeal to enthusiasts who still prefer to do their own driving in an appropriate machine rather than relying on high-tech wizardry to master a car too heavy or powerful for their capabilities.
We can’t wait to see how the 135i coupe does on the track. It may be the vehicle of choice for a whole new group of drivers to improve their driving skills and satisfy their need for speed within the growing track-day motorsports hobby.
Words by Gary Anderson; photos by Mark Elias



03/07, 3:22 PM
posted by:
Madcapp
That is easily one of the best cars available today. And it is the best car in BMW’s current lineup.
03/07, 3:31 PM
posted by:
howsmydriving
It won’t become iconic like the 2002, but a very nice offering nonetheless.
03/07, 3:54 PM
posted by:
mg198242
Yeah, Madcapp I agree. I hate the trend of today, bigger and bigger with every generation, I mean this car competes in compact class, but the measurements are the same with the BMW E30, which in the 80s competed in the medium class, and for me E30 it’s the best car when I think at measurements, not too small, not too big. The way to go today!
03/07, 4:08 PM
posted by:
acura_el2000
Too bad it weighs nearly the same as a 3-series.
03/07, 4:22 PM
posted by:
phiftywon
i want one – now!!
03/07, 5:03 PM
posted by:
bigp
it is an little too much weight. causes the car not to be what it can be.
03/07, 5:07 PM
posted by:
RicardoHead
If you guys want this, be sure to save your nickels and dimes, because after you buy any BMW you are going to need them.
03/07, 5:24 PM
posted by:
golf4me
This thing is not really 30k. A 128 with popular options is 35k and the 135 is around 38k with “options” that would come standard on other cars starting at “30k”. And, what’s with the only 28 mpg hwy? For such a small car, that’s not great. Guess it’s not bad for the performance, but jeez a Vette gets about the same with a 6L V-8!! I guess we are spoiled these days.
03/07, 6:07 PM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
I’d just like to compliment LLN on these mini road-test articles. Others on this site have accused some of the writing to be a little too ‘home team’, but in general they’re very informative.
This is the one BMW I could see myself in. It’s as close to a pocket rocket as we’re likely to see from Bavaria in this day and age. I especially like the c-pillar treatment. Don’t laugh but it’s reminiscent of the c-pillar on my ‘95 Neon coupe. I only noticed because the BMW’s the same shade of red as my Neon. If only the b-pillar were slanted the other way…never mind, I’m getting carried away. And I’m sure to get **** on for even mentioning it.
03/07, 6:21 PM
posted by:
DrFill
Better than the 2002.
The best coupe BMW makes.
To make it perfect, knock another 150 lbs off.
As close to perfect as coupes get.
Std Moonroof is 2 sweet!
Get Euro Delivery and have a sweet sub-$35k ride!
DrFill
03/07, 8:20 PM
posted by:
SS4LIFE
If the 135i didn’t cost almost 40k for a fully loaded one, I’d see myself getting one in about 3-4 years, and I’m sorry but I’m not going to get a 128i if I’m at a light and a Ford Mustang races me and kicks my ass, all that extra money I paid for getting a “BMW” isn’t going to make me feel better…
03/07, 8:40 PM
posted by:
DrFill
The 135 will smoke any Stang on any road circuit you can name.
The only thing fully loaded in my 1 will be me!
Lay off the butter!
DrFill
03/07, 10:08 PM
posted by:
autonut
Honorable Dr., if you get European delivery in anticipation to save some coins perhaps you will loose some weight as well: at $8.25/gallon of gas you will need all your coins to pay for it. And you have to spend at least few weeks in Europe to qualify for delivery. Last month in London cup of of coffee (Starbucks we are not talking Italian job) cost over 7 USD and a sandwich in pub was about $20. I don’t think the rest of Europe any cheaper at the moment. My office beancounters were upset with my expenses; I cant see how I can travel on my own in Europe today.
03/07, 10:12 PM
posted by:
autonut
Original 320 was much prettier automobile and 2002 if gorgeous. I view this creation as an ugly duckling, my subjective opinion. The cabin, however, looks very good especially without iDriveUcrazy
03/07, 10:26 PM
posted by:
SS4LIFE
well seeing that the 0-60 and quarter are nearly identical for the 35-40k 135i and and 25k for a 300hp Ford Mustang (DrFill I do not like Mustang’s, i’m just pointing out this fact) on a street from a light yeah maybe the 135i will go with it but, a Stang will beat a 128i which would cost similar to it.
Yeah on a track the 135i would own it.
03/08, 12:12 AM
posted by:
AxeHead
****, that’s one ugly car, BMW or otherwise, just my opinion but I’m not buying.
03/08, 12:21 AM
posted by:
The Stig
Nice but I want the DCT transmission. With a diesel. Now.
03/08, 9:50 AM
posted by:
Madcapp
Yeah I’m gonna have to agree Stig, I’m standing down until the DCT is available.
03/08, 8:17 PM
posted by:
LexusSoarer
I don’t think the car is “ugly” by any means, although no one will mistake it for a DB9 for sure. This is a fantastic car with a fantastic engine. If I were in the market I’d give it a strong look for sure.
03/09, 8:39 AM
posted by:
livelyjay
It’s still a porky car. 3252 pounds is way too much for a performance car. It’s only 32 pounds lighter than the 3-series sedan. Pretty sad if you ask me.
03/10, 1:27 PM
posted by:
Need more oil for GM
Would be better with a Turbo Ecotech that is found under the Solstice GXP. THis engine is pure garbage next to GM’s in house masterpiece.