<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW Trademark Filings: M10, 555, Progressive Activity Sedan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:21:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BLISS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-331754</link>
		<dc:creator>BLISS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-331754</guid>
		<description>LET SEE WHAT COMES OUT OF ALL THREE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LET SEE WHAT COMES OUT OF ALL THREE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LamborghiniZ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-331115</link>
		<dc:creator>LamborghiniZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-331115</guid>
		<description>Killroy: Yeah you&#039;re the only one. You&#039;re watchin&#039; too much TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Killroy: Yeah you&#8217;re the only one. You&#8217;re watchin&#8217; too much TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illwill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-331015</link>
		<dc:creator>illwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-331015</guid>
		<description>more like PUSsy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more like PUSsy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 55amg</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330887</link>
		<dc:creator>55amg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330887</guid>
		<description>nut SAC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nut SAC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330861</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330861</guid>
		<description>mkM3 - yea, I thought about why they would use the SAC acronym. I was like &quot;Why don&#039;t they replace the word &#039;activity&#039; with &#039;utility&#039;&quot; and then I realized that the new acronym would be SUK so I said to myself &quot;Yea, that&#039;s why&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mkM3 &#8211; yea, I thought about why they would use the SAC acronym. I was like &#8220;Why don&#8217;t they replace the word &#8216;activity&#8217; with &#8216;utility&#8217;&#8221; and then I realized that the new acronym would be SUK so I said to myself &#8220;Yea, that&#8217;s why&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killroy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330842</link>
		<dc:creator>Killroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330842</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that thinks of Domino&#039;s with the 555 (5-5-5 Deal)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that thinks of Domino&#8217;s with the 555 (5-5-5 Deal)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedated</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330834</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330834</guid>
		<description>M10 =  M5 Turbo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M10 =  M5 Turbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brocky</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330784</link>
		<dc:creator>brocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330784</guid>
		<description>SAC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkM3</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330757</link>
		<dc:creator>mkM3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330757</guid>
		<description>Hey SAC is still better than SUC (Sport Utility Coupe). :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey SAC is still better than SUC (Sport Utility Coupe). <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330754</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330754</guid>
		<description>I mostly agree with that. BMW will have 2 options in the future, a new larger displacement NA engine or tweaking the 3L twin turbo to surpass outputs made by the competitions 3.5L engines.

I thought you were stating the turbo would go away &amp; I dont see that happening anytime this decade.

Looking at the e36 to e46 basically no engine changes were made until a couple years into the e46 when the M54 engine was released. With some tweaking the current N54 engine could last as the top 3er model engine well into the next gen 3 series models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with that. BMW will have 2 options in the future, a new larger displacement NA engine or tweaking the 3L twin turbo to surpass outputs made by the competitions 3.5L engines.</p>
<p>I thought you were stating the turbo would go away &amp; I dont see that happening anytime this decade.</p>
<p>Looking at the e36 to e46 basically no engine changes were made until a couple years into the e46 when the M54 engine was released. With some tweaking the current N54 engine could last as the top 3er model engine well into the next gen 3 series models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e46Ne90</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330748</link>
		<dc:creator>e46Ne90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330748</guid>
		<description>well if you look at the 3series history(e46 to e90), it went from 2.5 inline-6 to 2.8 to 3.0...see where I am going with this. I&#039;m sure they will offer the turbos in the future too but stretching the engine to 3.5 liter doesn&#039;t seem to be too far fetched. Also MB and Audi offers bigger 3.5 to 3.2 respectively in their C350 and A4 3.2 today. I don&#039;t see why wouldn&#039;t BMW offer a bigger engine on their next model since MB and audi will increase theirs to match the 335is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if you look at the 3series history(e46 to e90), it went from 2.5 inline-6 to 2.8 to 3.0&#8230;see where I am going with this. I&#8217;m sure they will offer the turbos in the future too but stretching the engine to 3.5 liter doesn&#8217;t seem to be too far fetched. Also MB and Audi offers bigger 3.5 to 3.2 respectively in their C350 and A4 3.2 today. I don&#8217;t see why wouldn&#8217;t BMW offer a bigger engine on their next model since MB and audi will increase theirs to match the 335is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330740</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330740</guid>
		<description>e46ne90, were you joking about the next gen 335 being a 3.5L I-6 (as in no turbo)? The BMW 3L turbo is a hit. It won new engine of the year and it has been in high demand all year. BMW is looking to include turbos in more engines to increase HP and fuel efficiency. I dont see them getting rid of the 3L twin turbo engine for a long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>e46ne90, were you joking about the next gen 335 being a 3.5L I-6 (as in no turbo)? The BMW 3L turbo is a hit. It won new engine of the year and it has been in high demand all year. BMW is looking to include turbos in more engines to increase HP and fuel efficiency. I dont see them getting rid of the 3L twin turbo engine for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e46Ne90</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330734</link>
		<dc:creator>e46Ne90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330734</guid>
		<description>im thinking next gen 3series, 335i will be a 3.5 liter inline-6. As of M10, yes this thing will be lengendary just like m1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im thinking next gen 3series, 335i will be a 3.5 liter inline-6. As of M10, yes this thing will be lengendary just like m1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamaicandude</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330728</link>
		<dc:creator>jamaicandude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330728</guid>
		<description>I love the sound of 555.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the sound of 555.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bmwrulz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330725</link>
		<dc:creator>Bmwrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330725</guid>
		<description>The &quot;5&quot; in the 335i nomenclature doesn&#039;t signify a turbocharger. The name 330i Turbo doesn&#039;t sit well with BMW. Turbos weren&#039;t a good name when the 745i came about and thus, stopping turbos on petrol engines.

Although the M10 sounds awesome, hopefully an R8 fighter. I hope the PAS is NOT a van.

Hmm, maybe the PAS will adjust the wheelbase given driving style, short for sport and long for comfort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;5&#8243; in the 335i nomenclature doesn&#8217;t signify a turbocharger. The name 330i Turbo doesn&#8217;t sit well with BMW. Turbos weren&#8217;t a good name when the 745i came about and thus, stopping turbos on petrol engines.</p>
<p>Although the M10 sounds awesome, hopefully an R8 fighter. I hope the PAS is NOT a van.</p>
<p>Hmm, maybe the PAS will adjust the wheelbase given driving style, short for sport and long for comfort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bmwrulz</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bmwrulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330723</guid>
		<description>The &quot;5&quot; in the 335i nomenclature doesnt signify a turbocharger. The name 330i Turbo doesnt sit well with BMW. Turbos went a good name when the 745i came about and thus, stopping turbos on petrol engines. 

Although the M10 sounds awesome, hopefully an R8 fighter. I hope the PAS is NOT a van.

Hmm, maybe the PAS will adjust the wheelbase given driving style, short for sport and long for comfort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;5&#8243; in the 335i nomenclature doesnt signify a turbocharger. The name 330i Turbo doesnt sit well with BMW. Turbos went a good name when the 745i came about and thus, stopping turbos on petrol engines. </p>
<p>Although the M10 sounds awesome, hopefully an R8 fighter. I hope the PAS is NOT a van.</p>
<p>Hmm, maybe the PAS will adjust the wheelbase given driving style, short for sport and long for comfort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330715</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330715</guid>
		<description>The M10 will probably be the successor of the M1. &#039;555&#039; could be something like a hybrid, that&#039;s quite fashionable lately, or a bad-ass 5 turbo, 5.5 V10 lightweight M5. Progressive Activity Sedan will be a van designed for hauling around senior citizens and the chairs will stimulate laxative movements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M10 will probably be the successor of the M1. &#8216;555&#8242; could be something like a hybrid, that&#8217;s quite fashionable lately, or a bad-ass 5 turbo, 5.5 V10 lightweight M5. Progressive Activity Sedan will be a van designed for hauling around senior citizens and the chairs will stimulate laxative movements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 55amg</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330713</link>
		<dc:creator>55amg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330713</guid>
		<description>Ur right the person who thought of &quot;Progressive Activity Sedan&quot; should be stabbed. As for the M10, cool, i hope its a successor to the M1 supercar. 555 is a thai way of saying hahaha on chat lines lol. http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Thailand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ur right the person who thought of &#8220;Progressive Activity Sedan&#8221; should be stabbed. As for the M10, cool, i hope its a successor to the M1 supercar. 555 is a thai way of saying hahaha on chat lines lol. <a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Thailand" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Thailand</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP640</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330712</link>
		<dc:creator>LP640</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330712</guid>
		<description>M10??? SWEET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M10??? SWEET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330709</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330709</guid>
		<description>The last one is really gay. The M10 better be a competitor to the R8 and the 555 is probably just a supercharged variation or a 5.5 L version of the 5 series (which needs a complete redesign)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last one is really gay. The M10 better be a competitor to the R8 and the 555 is probably just a supercharged variation or a 5.5 L version of the 5 series (which needs a complete redesign)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R1GHT30U5</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330707</link>
		<dc:creator>R1GHT30U5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330707</guid>
		<description>Progressive Activity Sedan... sounds like a piece of equipment you would find in a retirement home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressive Activity Sedan&#8230; sounds like a piece of equipment you would find in a retirement home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aston Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330706</link>
		<dc:creator>Aston Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330706</guid>
		<description>Yes!! An M10! 
A turbo&#039;d, V8 5-series! 



Progressive Activity Sedan. I&#039;d love to have dinner with the person who thought of that. More bureaucratic bullshit. What the hell is that meant to be.

DEATH TO ALL IDIOTIC ACRONYMS!! WE JUST DO NOT NEED THEM!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!! An M10!<br />
A turbo&#8217;d, V8 5-series! </p>
<p>Progressive Activity Sedan. I&#8217;d love to have dinner with the person who thought of that. More bureaucratic bull****. What the hell is that meant to be.</p>
<p>DEATH TO ALL IDIOTIC ACRONYMS!! WE JUST DO NOT NEED THEM!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330705</link>
		<dc:creator>Deanster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330705</guid>
		<description>PRogressive activity sedan? Awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PRogressive activity sedan? Awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWM335</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html/comment-page-1#comment-330702</link>
		<dc:creator>SWM335</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/bmw-trademark-filings-m10-555-progressive-activity-sedan.html#comment-330702</guid>
		<description>I hope they put turbo&#039;s on the 4.8l V8.  That would be only sweet engine for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they put turbo&#8217;s on the 4.8l V8.  That would be only sweet engine for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
