Actor Brad Pitt arrived in a BMW Hydrogen 7 to the Warner Bros. premiere of the film “Ocean’s 13″ at Grauman’s Chinese Theatre yesterday in Hollywood, California.
The Hydrogen 7 is a production-ready prototype unveiled by BMW last year. Unlike many hydrogen-powered cars, the H7 does not use fuel cells and electric motors, but instead burns hydrogen in a typical internal combustion fashion.
BMW has apparently come through on its promise of building a limited number of Hydrogen 7s for use by celebrities and government officials.
The cruising range in the hydrogen mode is more than 125 miles, with another 300 miles in the gasoline mode. If there was no gasoline storage, hydrogen mode range could be significantly greater.
Although the H7 could be produced in a few years, the lack of a hydrogen infrastructure means most people probably won’t get their hands on one for quite some time.


06/06, 11:57 AM
posted by:
global_lightning
I guess BMW is now competing against Saab for the gay demographic. I don’t know about you, but when I think of Germans and hydrogen the Hindenberg comes to mind…
oh yeah, first post
06/06, 11:57 AM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
i wonder how many orphans will fit in there?
06/06, 11:58 AM
posted by:
A4
GOOD FOR BRAD PITT douche
06/06, 12:32 PM
posted by:
LP640
lol CTS DRIVER. hydrogen is the future not electric hybrids. this thing will propbably cost a tonne when its publicly released
06/06, 12:44 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
i agree lp640, hybrids are a band aid hydrogen is a partial cure.
06/06, 12:45 PM
posted by:
Zer0
If hydrogen is the future then where is the infrastructure? All electric cars are a better bet. By the time hydrogen distribution is in place battery electrics will have a range of 500 miles per charge, will be cheaper because they did not need as much research, and will still and ALWAYS be more efficient because instead of using electricity to separate hydrogen and oxygen and then putting hydrogen in a tank,
you just put the electricity straight into the car’s batteries.
06/06, 12:58 PM
posted by:
Madcapp
Brad Pitt is a complete jackass.
06/06, 1:02 PM
posted by:
Bryce
Zer0:
So, by your logic, the same could be said about gasoline. 20 years ago this would be true about electric vehicles (to misquote your statement):
‘If electricity is the future then where is the infrastructure? All gasoline cars are a better bet. By the time electricity is in place gasoline cars will have a range of 450+ miles per tank, will be cheaper becasue they did not need as much research, and will still and ALWAYS be more efficient because instead of using oil to produce electricity and then charging the batteries, you just put refined oil right into the car’s gas tank.’
06/06, 1:02 PM
posted by:
Fletch
The Ocean’s series of movies are Hollywood turds.
Isn’t there enough room in the world for electric and hydrogen engine propulsion? Money talks though.
Fight Club was cool.
06/06, 1:04 PM
posted by:
Kenny W
Both GM & Honda are working on an in home refueling system for Hydrogen powered vehicles. Honda’s is a better more well thought out system (IMO) but GM’s is just as good in its own right. I could see a hydrogen/electric hybrid becoming a viable alternative to the ICE/electric car. With the weight of BMW, GM, & Honda behind hydrogen (as well as others I’m forgetting) plus GM, MB, & Chrysler developing their new hybrid transmission all teamed with regenerative breaking technology like what’s found in the Prius and a plug in electric motor like the Volt, I imagine that would be a very impressive and fuel efficient means of transportation that you could refill in the luxury of your own home. Of course that’s all just a pipe dream right now….
06/06, 1:10 PM
posted by:
Jazz
Zer0, plug in electric is better because we’ll still be burning fossil fuels to make electricity huh?
nice post Bryce
06/06, 1:43 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
Why do the electric nay-sayers always fail to mention/realize that it’s alot easer and cheaper to control pollution at a handful of giant generating station burning dirty old coal than it is to do on millions of gasoline tailpipes?
Don’t forget, hydrogen is only a medium for energy, just like a battery. It still takes plenty of electric power to isolate hydrogen on a large scale.
06/06, 1:52 PM
posted by:
meanpants555
Which would you rather have siting next to you on a plane, Brad Pitt or a BMW 7-series?
06/06, 2:31 PM
posted by:
Wickedated
I’m sick of celebreties turn pro-activists. Hey Braaaad, you wanna save the environment? Ride a bike or rollerblade to the premier. Look at Hansel from Zoolander.
06/06, 2:44 PM
posted by:
rey323
I wonder how long it took to get BMW people to talk to Brad’s people to make this photo op a reality.
Anyways, the technology already exists for modernized coal plants and next generation nuclear power. Upgrading the grid is far simpler than millions upon millions of cars as Random Jerk mentioned.
Hybrids point to the future because now auto manufacturers are putting money into battery research, not just the computer manufacturers. As range increases, the need for small internal combustion engine will diminish.
06/06, 3:40 PM
posted by:
Vdub
rant rant rant rant liberals rant rant rant angelina rant rant rant rant rant rant rant rant rant gays rant rant rant.
06/06, 4:08 PM
posted by:
400horseSS
could it be because he has a new movie iut and has to give it some juice DUHHHHHHH
06/06, 4:14 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
lets not pick on them too much, more hollyassholes should follow their humanitarian example.
06/06, 4:16 PM
posted by:
Syrax
wow, and the car didn’t explode?
06/06, 4:18 PM
posted by:
400horseSS
does that car come with a orphan in the trunk LMFAO
06/06, 4:24 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
it comes with free lip fatening shots too.
06/06, 4:29 PM
posted by:
imageWIS
How is hydrogen only a partial cure? Imagine all the fuel pumps in the world pumping hydrogen…and gas problem solved, and the environment is going to be far better off to boot! And oh, yeah, the terrorists won’t have any funding for their acts of death, unless you think someone is going to buy billions of dollars worth of sand every year…
Jon.
06/06, 5:40 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
it would only work if coal and fission were used to make the electricity to split the hydrogen, otherwise we are back to burning some sort of oil to make the electricity.
06/06, 5:44 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Hydrogen IS the future, whether anyone thinks otherwise is irrelevant. Personally I really like BMW’s implementation of it: the same process as our tried-and-tested, good old ICE. If only we could find a way to cleanly produce hydrogen (very promising work is being done in this area currently) and distribute it, it’s a done deal.
06/06, 5:57 PM
posted by:
ottacontrol
imageWIS has a good point
06/06, 6:35 PM
posted by:
PrimeGTP
And afterwards he rode the Hydrogen 7 back to the airport where he took off in a private jet half-way around the world, burning thousands of gallons of fuel.
06/06, 6:38 PM
posted by:
Bryce
I think the future is shaping to be a place where more than one basic fuel source will be used to power different vehicles. I bet that, like today, consumers will choose a manufacturer based upon what niche the company sells to. The new niche, however, will be fuel source. Some manufacturers might be known for battery power but with others for diesel, E85, hydrogen, or whatever else becomes available. It sounds kinda pie-in-the-sky, but I’m sure that at the least it won’t be like choosing between gas and diesel.
06/06, 6:43 PM
posted by:
autonutt
Three or four more adoptions, and Brangelina can travel in any vehicle with the floor cut out.. ORPHAN power, Flintstones style!
06/06, 7:33 PM
posted by:
RicardoHead
______THIS_ARTICLE_is_automotive_journalism’s_finest_moment._____
.
Now … can someone point me to a link explaining whether Brad Twit uses Charmin, or does the envirophuck wipe his sad ass with a dead leaf to save a tree?
06/06, 9:45 PM
posted by:
CAPTAIN AMERICA
deantj is the kind of moron who should have been aborted…what a waste of skin.
06/07, 3:12 AM
posted by:
gitcypher
These comments were by far the funniest read on this site in a while.
06/08, 8:15 AM
posted by:
fan
oh, yeah, go on bashing the kids jolie and pitt adopted… think about brad and angie whatever you like, but taking the kids into it is really pathetic
06/08, 9:03 AM
posted by:
A4
oh are you and “angie” buddies, fan?
06/08, 2:58 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
h7 hear that hummer you dont get that one.
06/08, 2:58 PM
posted by:
CTS DRIVER
speaking of hummers, i wouldnt ming angies lipstick on my dipstick.
06/08, 4:15 PM
posted by:
W1ck3D
*satirical mode on*
[b]pollute, pollute, pollute![/b]
At least with big cars we can destroy the ozon layer and get more warm summers
*satirical mode off*
06/11, 5:08 AM
posted by:
fan
#
oh are you and “angie” buddies, fan?
Comment by A4, posted on June8 at 9:03 am
actually, no. i dont even think shes a good actress, let alone good looking (but thats just my personal opinion). i just think insulting the kids is pathetic and lame.
06/12, 2:38 AM
posted by:
fan
envious? poor deantj…
04/04, 9:01 PM
posted by:
Stridder44
Madcapp you couldn’t be more of a jealous bitch.