Comments on: Brad Pitt drives BMW Hydrogen 7

By: Stridder44

Stridder44 — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:01:40 +0000

Madcapp you couldn’t be more of a jealous bitch.

By: fan

fan — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:38:04 +0000

envious? poor deantj…

By: fan

fan — Mon, 11 Jun 2007 10:08:10 +0000

oh are you and “angie” buddies, fan?
Comment by A4, posted on June8 at 9:03 am

actually, no. i dont even think shes a good actress, let alone good looking (but thats just my personal opinion). i just think insulting the kids is pathetic and lame.

By: W1ck3D

W1ck3D — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:15:39 +0000

*satirical mode on*

[b]pollute, pollute, pollute![/b]

At least with big cars we can destroy the ozon layer and get more warm summers

*satirical mode off*

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:58:51 +0000

speaking of hummers, i wouldnt ming angies lipstick on my dipstick.

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:58:13 +0000

h7 hear that hummer you dont get that one.

By: A4

A4 — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:03:22 +0000

oh are you and “angie” buddies, fan?

By: fan

fan — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:15:01 +0000

oh, yeah, go on bashing the kids jolie and pitt adopted… think about brad and angie whatever you like, but taking the kids into it is really pathetic

By: gitcypher

gitcypher — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:12:25 +0000

These comments were by far the funniest read on this site in a while.

By: CAPTAIN AMERICA

CAPTAIN AMERICA — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:45:04 +0000

deantj is the kind of moron who should have been aborted…what a waste of skin.

By: RicardoHead

RicardoHead — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:33:48 +0000

______THIS_ARTICLE_is_automotive_journalism’s_finest_moment._____
.
Now … can someone point me to a link explaining whether Brad Twit uses Charmin, or does the envirophuck wipe his sad ass with a dead leaf to save a tree?

By: autonutt

autonutt — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:43:27 +0000

Three or four more adoptions, and Brangelina can travel in any vehicle with the floor cut out.. ORPHAN power, Flintstones style!

By: Bryce

Bryce — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:38:23 +0000

I think the future is shaping to be a place where more than one basic fuel source will be used to power different vehicles. I bet that, like today, consumers will choose a manufacturer based upon what niche the company sells to. The new niche, however, will be fuel source. Some manufacturers might be known for battery power but with others for diesel, E85, hydrogen, or whatever else becomes available. It sounds kinda pie-in-the-sky, but I’m sure that at the least it won’t be like choosing between gas and diesel.

By: PrimeGTP

PrimeGTP — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:35:59 +0000

And afterwards he rode the Hydrogen 7 back to the airport where he took off in a private jet half-way around the world, burning thousands of gallons of fuel.

By: ottacontrol

ottacontrol — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:57:12 +0000

imageWIS has a good point

By: 1c3d0g

1c3d0g — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:44:08 +0000

Hydrogen IS the future, whether anyone thinks otherwise is irrelevant. Personally I really like BMW’s implementation of it: the same process as our tried-and-tested, good old ICE. If only we could find a way to cleanly produce hydrogen (very promising work is being done in this area currently) and distribute it, it’s a done deal.

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:40:17 +0000

it would only work if coal and fission were used to make the electricity to split the hydrogen, otherwise we are back to burning some sort of oil to make the electricity.

By: imageWIS

imageWIS — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:29:51 +0000

How is hydrogen only a partial cure? Imagine all the fuel pumps in the world pumping hydrogen…and gas problem solved, and the environment is going to be far better off to boot! And oh, yeah, the terrorists won’t have any funding for their acts of death, unless you think someone is going to buy billions of dollars worth of sand every year…

Jon.

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:24:26 +0000

it comes with free lip fatening shots too.

By: 400horseSS

400horseSS — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:18:08 +0000

does that car come with a orphan in the trunk LMFAO

By: Syrax

Syrax — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:16:21 +0000

wow, and the car didn’t explode?

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:14:48 +0000

lets not pick on them too much, more hollyassholes should follow their humanitarian example.

By: 400horseSS

400horseSS — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:08:25 +0000

could it be because he has a new movie iut and has to give it some juice DUHHHHHHH

By: Vdub

Vdub — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:40:33 +0000

rant rant rant rant liberals rant rant rant angelina rant rant rant rant rant rant rant rant rant gays rant rant rant.

By: rey323

rey323 — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:44:29 +0000

I wonder how long it took to get BMW people to talk to Brad’s people to make this photo op a reality.

Anyways, the technology already exists for modernized coal plants and next generation nuclear power. Upgrading the grid is far simpler than millions upon millions of cars as Random Jerk mentioned.

Hybrids point to the future because now auto manufacturers are putting money into battery research, not just the computer manufacturers. As range increases, the need for small internal combustion engine will diminish.

By: Wickedated

Wickedated — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:31:25 +0000

I’m sick of celebreties turn pro-activists. Hey Braaaad, you wanna save the environment? Ride a bike or rollerblade to the premier. Look at Hansel from Zoolander.

By: meanpants555

meanpants555 — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:52:03 +0000

Which would you rather have siting next to you on a plane, Brad Pitt or a BMW 7-series?

By: Random Jerk

Random Jerk — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:43:54 +0000

Why do the electric nay-sayers always fail to mention/realize that it’s alot easer and cheaper to control pollution at a handful of giant generating station burning dirty old coal than it is to do on millions of gasoline tailpipes?

Don’t forget, hydrogen is only a medium for energy, just like a battery. It still takes plenty of electric power to isolate hydrogen on a large scale.

By: Jazz

Jazz — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:10:20 +0000

Zer0, plug in electric is better because we’ll still be burning fossil fuels to make electricity huh?

nice post Bryce

By: Kenny W

Kenny W — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:04:50 +0000

Both GM & Honda are working on an in home refueling system for Hydrogen powered vehicles. Honda’s is a better more well thought out system (IMO) but GM’s is just as good in its own right. I could see a hydrogen/electric hybrid becoming a viable alternative to the ICE/electric car. With the weight of BMW, GM, & Honda behind hydrogen (as well as others I’m forgetting) plus GM, MB, & Chrysler developing their new hybrid transmission all teamed with regenerative breaking technology like what’s found in the Prius and a plug in electric motor like the Volt, I imagine that would be a very impressive and fuel efficient means of transportation that you could refill in the luxury of your own home. Of course that’s all just a pipe dream right now….

By: Fletch

Fletch — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:02:44 +0000

The Ocean’s series of movies are Hollywood turds.

Isn’t there enough room in the world for electric and hydrogen engine propulsion? Money talks though.

Fight Club was cool.

By: Bryce

Bryce — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:02:24 +0000

Zer0:
So, by your logic, the same could be said about gasoline. 20 years ago this would be true about electric vehicles (to misquote your statement):

‘If electricity is the future then where is the infrastructure? All gasoline cars are a better bet. By the time electricity is in place gasoline cars will have a range of 450+ miles per tank, will be cheaper becasue they did not need as much research, and will still and ALWAYS be more efficient because instead of using oil to produce electricity and then charging the batteries, you just put refined oil right into the car’s gas tank.’

By: Madcapp

Madcapp — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:58:58 +0000

Brad Pitt is a complete jackass.

By: Zer0

Zer0 — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:45:15 +0000

If hydrogen is the future then where is the infrastructure? All electric cars are a better bet. By the time hydrogen distribution is in place battery electrics will have a range of 500 miles per charge, will be cheaper because they did not need as much research, and will still and ALWAYS be more efficient because instead of using electricity to separate hydrogen and oxygen and then putting hydrogen in a tank,
you just put the electricity straight into the car’s batteries.

By: CTS DRIVER

CTS DRIVER — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:44:21 +0000

i agree lp640, hybrids are a band aid hydrogen is a partial cure.