<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cadillac Provoq: Fuel Cell power, BRX preview rolled into one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:34:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anyclearer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-354072</link>
		<dc:creator>anyclearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-354072</guid>
		<description>this car says alot of cadillac, more then just the taillights, and the srx refreshening....why not come out with something better that would attract more people .........hence the brx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this car says alot of cadillac, more then just the taillights, and the srx refreshening&#8230;.why not come out with something better that would attract more people &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;hence the brx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1966_GTO_</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-351253</link>
		<dc:creator>1966_GTO_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-351253</guid>
		<description>Nothing about this car says Cadillac except the taillights. A freshening of the SRX would be sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about this car says Cadillac except the taillights. A freshening of the SRX would be sufficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350712</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350712</guid>
		<description>Well the Vue and the Tb are two differnet sized vehicles. The Vue is a Crv sized truck and the Trailblazer is midsize. The Saab 9-7x was a copy off the Rainier more so than the Trailblazer  
The GMT 360 and Cadillac SRX are larger so they are being replaced with smaller vehicles
It doesnt matter but I just thought they would make them bigger or the same size as their predecessors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Vue and the Tb are two differnet sized vehicles. The Vue is a Crv sized truck and the Trailblazer is midsize. The Saab 9-7x was a copy off the Rainier more so than the Trailblazer<br />
The GMT 360 and Cadillac SRX are larger so they are being replaced with smaller vehicles<br />
It doesnt matter but I just thought they would make them bigger or the same size as their predecessors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350697</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350697</guid>
		<description>Another great post 1115

This is based off the Saturn Vue so it is almost exactly that size. And yes, it replaces the 9-7x which was a Trailblazer rebadge. So if you compare the TB and the VUE, this should be about the same size therefore it is an approriate 9-7x replacement. Tail lights are just signiture Caddy design, if they smooth them out it will be more like the VUE and it would just be boring. I like them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post 1115</p>
<p>This is based off the Saturn Vue so it is almost exactly that size. And yes, it replaces the 9-7x which was a Trailblazer rebadge. So if you compare the TB and the VUE, this should be about the same size therefore it is an approriate 9-7x replacement. Tail lights are just signiture Caddy design, if they smooth them out it will be more like the VUE and it would just be boring. I like them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350425</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350425</guid>
		<description>This is a winner. I like this better than the EX35 Great interior as well! The only thing is the taillights stick up a little too much on the top They should have smoothed that out 
What size are these things? (This and the Saab) Are they compact like the x3 and Rdx or are they midsize ?
If this and the Saab are replacing the 9-7x and the SRX(which only needs a redesign) then they have to be bigger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a winner. I like this better than the EX35 Great interior as well! The only thing is the taillights stick up a little too much on the top They should have smoothed that out<br />
What size are these things? (This and the Saab) Are they compact like the x3 and Rdx or are they midsize ?<br />
If this and the Saab are replacing the 9-7x and the SRX(which only needs a redesign) then they have to be bigger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stick2clutch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350405</link>
		<dc:creator>stick2clutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350405</guid>
		<description>OK. I dig this. I stand correct when I said I trusted this wasn&#039;t going to be another straight up rebadge job. Good Job GM.

FAN: Don&#039;t you mean, this is how Dodge should have made the Caliber look?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I dig this. I stand correct when I said I trusted this wasn&#8217;t going to be another straight up rebadge job. Good Job GM.</p>
<p>FAN: Don&#8217;t you mean, this is how Dodge should have made the Caliber look?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350403</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350403</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that kind of tire tread design doesn&#039;t make it to the market. The car would go sideways into a tree with slight precipitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that kind of tire tread design doesn&#8217;t make it to the market. The car would go sideways into a tree with slight precipitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350399</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350399</guid>
		<description>Looks very nice. Now we know what the next SRX is gonna look like. The future looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very nice. Now we know what the next SRX is gonna look like. The future looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshprentice</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350376</link>
		<dc:creator>joshprentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350376</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person to notice that behind the sunroof, there looks to be some sort of solar panel?  Am I freaking crazy or is that complete genius?  Great design though.  They&#039;re really hitting their stride at Cadillac and i&#039;m likin it.  I&#039;m still drooling over the CTS-V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person to notice that behind the sunroof, there looks to be some sort of solar panel?  Am I freaking crazy or is that complete genius?  Great design though.  They&#8217;re really hitting their stride at Cadillac and i&#8217;m likin it.  I&#8217;m still drooling over the CTS-V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350370</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350370</guid>
		<description>Very nice design, handsome and well thought, and really nice interior. Nothing radical with the exception of the power train and a few design details, it looks very close to production ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice design, handsome and well thought, and really nice interior. Nothing radical with the exception of the power train and a few design details, it looks very close to production ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350359</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350359</guid>
		<description>Amazing design. I was worried that the BRX will look way too much like a Vue, but it does not at all. Great interior as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing design. I was worried that the BRX will look way too much like a Vue, but it does not at all. Great interior as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350341</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350341</guid>
		<description>The hatchback design is reminiscent of 70s hatchbacks. This CUV does look like a Caliber with a hint of Vibe or Matrix. Not a bad looking, but the concept is getting boring.
I agree with golf4me: hydrogen is not the best fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hatchback design is reminiscent of 70s hatchbacks. This CUV does look like a Caliber with a hint of Vibe or Matrix. Not a bad looking, but the concept is getting boring.<br />
I agree with golf4me: hydrogen is not the best fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHW</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350308</link>
		<dc:creator>MHW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350308</guid>
		<description>Very nice! Cadillac&#039;s design language sets them apart from the rest of the jellybean crowd. Both the interior and exterior look bold and upscale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! Cadillac&#8217;s design language sets them apart from the rest of the jellybean crowd. Both the interior and exterior look bold and upscale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inline6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350258</link>
		<dc:creator>inline6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350258</guid>
		<description>Beautiful!

And do I see a small pair of fins on the back? Well-integrated fins? Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful!</p>
<p>And do I see a small pair of fins on the back? Well-integrated fins? Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazdaman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350249</link>
		<dc:creator>mazdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350249</guid>
		<description>This is one nice looking luxury crossover! If this is any indication as to the design direction of the BRX, then it will be one sweet ride. I think the fin treatment on the taillights looks appropriate and unique; I wouldn&#039;t change a thing on them. The only design element that I&#039;m a little concerned about is the fender vent; it is too similar to the one on the Saturn Vue (this design element is also becoming too common and cliche&#039;). If the designers believe that the BRX must have a fender vent, then why not install one that is similar to the one on the CTS? This would at least create a sense of cohesiveness across Cadillac&#039;s lineup.

I think the BRX should supplement the SRX, not replace it. The SRX needs a CTS-style redesign to make it more competitive. I think there is room in Cadillac&#039;s lineup for both crossovers.

Some of the other auto makers need to take notice, this is an example of properly executed platform sharing (except for the minor fender vent blunder). Hopefully this is a sign that GM has finally learned its lesson about how to do this without diluting the image of its brands. I don&#039;t expect to see any more badge engineered Cobalt/G5 or Equinox/Torrent clone products in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one nice looking luxury crossover! If this is any indication as to the design direction of the BRX, then it will be one sweet ride. I think the fin treatment on the taillights looks appropriate and unique; I wouldn&#8217;t change a thing on them. The only design element that I&#8217;m a little concerned about is the fender vent; it is too similar to the one on the Saturn Vue (this design element is also becoming too common and cliche&#8217;). If the designers believe that the BRX must have a fender vent, then why not install one that is similar to the one on the CTS? This would at least create a sense of cohesiveness across Cadillac&#8217;s lineup.</p>
<p>I think the BRX should supplement the SRX, not replace it. The SRX needs a CTS-style redesign to make it more competitive. I think there is room in Cadillac&#8217;s lineup for both crossovers.</p>
<p>Some of the other auto makers need to take notice, this is an example of properly executed platform sharing (except for the minor fender vent blunder). Hopefully this is a sign that GM has finally learned its lesson about how to do this without diluting the image of its brands. I don&#8217;t expect to see any more badge engineered Cobalt/G5 or Equinox/Torrent clone products in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwerveEarly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350236</link>
		<dc:creator>SwerveEarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350236</guid>
		<description>Tail fins?  Seems a bit like a despirate attempt at envoking once great passed.  Other wise this rig looks 75% production ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tail fins?  Seems a bit like a despirate attempt at envoking once great passed.  Other wise this rig looks 75% production ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hateful83</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350230</link>
		<dc:creator>hateful83</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350230</guid>
		<description>The only thing that bugs me is the fender vents. They&#039;re essentially the same as the ones on the saturn vue. Aside from that it looks pretty damn good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that bugs me is the fender vents. They&#8217;re essentially the same as the ones on the saturn vue. Aside from that it looks pretty damn good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z06ified</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350226</link>
		<dc:creator>Z06ified</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350226</guid>
		<description>It looks great.  The only thing I would change is those taillights.  The tail fin theme just doesn&#039;t work on a modern looking crossover, and they look out of place on this vehicle.  Just have the taillights flush like on the CTS, and it will work great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks great.  The only thing I would change is those taillights.  The tail fin theme just doesn&#8217;t work on a modern looking crossover, and they look out of place on this vehicle.  Just have the taillights flush like on the CTS, and it will work great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucklaster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350218</link>
		<dc:creator>lucklaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350218</guid>
		<description>Cadillac sure has their mojo working.
This thing can become a lot of things - All of them good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadillac sure has their mojo working.<br />
This thing can become a lot of things &#8211; All of them good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350215</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350215</guid>
		<description>The exterior is a mixed bag, but I LOVE how the CTS&#039;s design language translates to a larger interior. It looks fantastic. Redesign the STS already!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exterior is a mixed bag, but I LOVE how the CTS&#8217;s design language translates to a larger interior. It looks fantastic. Redesign the STS already!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SS4LIFE</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350211</link>
		<dc:creator>SS4LIFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350211</guid>
		<description>I like, The SRX was a good attempt by Cadillac for the luxury crossover market, but it&#039;s starting to show its age. I think something like this will do nicely. Especially if priced right. 

Is this built on the same platform as the new Saturn VUE? If you look at it it has the same lines on the window as the new Saturn VUE and the fender accent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like, The SRX was a good attempt by Cadillac for the luxury crossover market, but it&#8217;s starting to show its age. I think something like this will do nicely. Especially if priced right. </p>
<p>Is this built on the same platform as the new Saturn VUE? If you look at it it has the same lines on the window as the new Saturn VUE and the fender accent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350208</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350208</guid>
		<description>why build a dedicated nuclear plant?  How about onboard nuclear power?  The car will literally run forever.  Accidents would be a bitch, however...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why build a dedicated nuclear plant?  How about onboard nuclear power?  The car will literally run forever.  Accidents would be a bitch, however&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeFX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350207</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350207</guid>
		<description>Love child of CTS and FX35, which is a good looking baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love child of CTS and FX35, which is a good looking baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golf4me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350198</link>
		<dc:creator>golf4me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350198</guid>
		<description>Only until &quot;someone&quot; builds a dedicated nuclear electric plant to produce hydrogen will a hydrogen infrastructure make sense, and I&#039;ll tell ya, that ain&#039;t gonna happen. Unfortunately, the production of hydrogen is very energy intensive, making it probably less efficient and less clean than oil using conventional power. I wish the domestics would spend all the money they spend on this wishful technology on clean diesel. Same goes for plug-in Hype-rids. Where do you think that power comes from? For me, it&#039;d be a COAL plant! Yeah, THAT&#039;s gonna clean up the planet. 

And the BRX...reminds me of the Cimmaron all over again...just a dressed up Vue. C&#039;mon, GM, at LEAST use the CTS platform!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only until &#8220;someone&#8221; builds a dedicated nuclear electric plant to produce hydrogen will a hydrogen infrastructure make sense, and I&#8217;ll tell ya, that ain&#8217;t gonna happen. Unfortunately, the production of hydrogen is very energy intensive, making it probably less efficient and less clean than oil using conventional power. I wish the domestics would spend all the money they spend on this wishful technology on clean diesel. Same goes for plug-in Hype-rids. Where do you think that power comes from? For me, it&#8217;d be a COAL plant! Yeah, THAT&#8217;s gonna clean up the planet. </p>
<p>And the BRX&#8230;reminds me of the Cimmaron all over again&#8230;just a dressed up Vue. C&#8217;mon, GM, at LEAST use the CTS platform!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvette</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350193</link>
		<dc:creator>corvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350193</guid>
		<description>soon all GM&#039;s will be hydrogen or electric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soon all GM&#8217;s will be hydrogen or electric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richt62167</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350191</link>
		<dc:creator>richt62167</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350191</guid>
		<description>WOW!!!! that is soooooooooo nice!! Cadillac keep them coming......

Note.... are those tail fins hmmmmmmmm????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!! that is soooooooooo nice!! Cadillac keep them coming&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Note&#8230;. are those tail fins hmmmmmmmm????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfblue42</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350186</link>
		<dc:creator>rfblue42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350186</guid>
		<description>I like the interior and overall the vehicle looks good.  It&#039;ll look unique on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the interior and overall the vehicle looks good.  It&#8217;ll look unique on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny W</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350184</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350184</guid>
		<description>That is sek say! I&#039;ve always been baffled by the slow sales of the SRX, it&#039;s a great vehicle with good powertrains, a nice interior, and to me a good looking exterior design. It&#039;s won numerous comparisons and if it doesn&#039;t win it&#039;s usually in the top 2 or 3. Surrounded by the CTS &amp; the Escalade I just couldn&#039;t figure out why this CUV wouldn&#039;t sell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is sek say! I&#8217;ve always been baffled by the slow sales of the SRX, it&#8217;s a great vehicle with good powertrains, a nice interior, and to me a good looking exterior design. It&#8217;s won numerous comparisons and if it doesn&#8217;t win it&#8217;s usually in the top 2 or 3. Surrounded by the CTS &amp; the Escalade I just couldn&#8217;t figure out why this CUV wouldn&#8217;t sell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350182</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350182</guid>
		<description>Ok - the gray is ugly, but the design is a pleasant surprise.  It looks pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok &#8211; the gray is ugly, but the design is a pleasant surprise.  It looks pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purdue</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350180</link>
		<dc:creator>purdue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350180</guid>
		<description>This is a very well done design, in my opinion. Interesting and good to see some of my own personal friend&#039;s designs still are in these. Too bad he is not still with them. 

That being said, I tire of a roofline that slopes from the zenith that is usually directly above the driver&#039;s head, then proceeds to slope downward to give the rear a tapered look. Couple that with the C or D pillar (whichever is final on that style) has a sloped/thickening/hoff-kink and it just adds to ever diminishing rearward visibility.  Given that teenage offspring can often supersede their parental-units&#039; height, it would seem to me that having a sloping roofline would diminish the second/third row&#039;s headroom just when the situation might call for more headroom. 

I recall the previous generation of Dodge Durango&#039;s had a hump in the room to INCREASE 2nd/3rd row headroom. That actually makes SENSE to me. Especially in the third row, where the seats is often times located immediately above the rear axle, which in turns offers even more encroached seating room. They &#039;hid&#039; this hump by integrating the roof-rack&#039;s horizontal tracks onto the outwardly-facing sides of the hump. 

But, then I am a much more utilitarian, sensible auto buyer. As a design purely from aesthetic judging, I like this concept a LOT. It progresses the Saturn Vue&#039;s design into a more balanced look, again in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very well done design, in my opinion. Interesting and good to see some of my own personal friend&#8217;s designs still are in these. Too bad he is not still with them. </p>
<p>That being said, I tire of a roofline that slopes from the zenith that is usually directly above the driver&#8217;s head, then proceeds to slope downward to give the rear a tapered look. Couple that with the C or D pillar (whichever is final on that style) has a sloped/thickening/hoff-kink and it just adds to ever diminishing rearward visibility.  Given that teenage offspring can often supersede their parental-units&#8217; height, it would seem to me that having a sloping roofline would diminish the second/third row&#8217;s headroom just when the situation might call for more headroom. </p>
<p>I recall the previous generation of Dodge Durango&#8217;s had a hump in the room to INCREASE 2nd/3rd row headroom. That actually makes SENSE to me. Especially in the third row, where the seats is often times located immediately above the rear axle, which in turns offers even more encroached seating room. They &#8216;hid&#8217; this hump by integrating the roof-rack&#8217;s horizontal tracks onto the outwardly-facing sides of the hump. </p>
<p>But, then I am a much more utilitarian, sensible auto buyer. As a design purely from aesthetic judging, I like this concept a LOT. It progresses the Saturn Vue&#8217;s design into a more balanced look, again in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rover3500</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350174</link>
		<dc:creator>Rover3500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350174</guid>
		<description>No I don&#039;t state this car as just proof of that. Its yet another great car after a string of nice new models. We&#039;ve had Malibu, CTS, Enclave, The AUra and Astra, the other Lambdas, the Sky and the G8. All great cars...thats plenty proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I don&#8217;t state this car as just proof of that. Its yet another great car after a string of nice new models. We&#8217;ve had Malibu, CTS, Enclave, The AUra and Astra, the other Lambdas, the Sky and the G8. All great cars&#8230;thats plenty proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350173</link>
		<dc:creator>fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350173</guid>
		<description>gm on a role design wise? maybe, but do you really state that this car is proof for that? just looks like an overblown dodge caliber with a cts-frontend slapped to it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gm on a role design wise? maybe, but do you really state that this car is proof for that? just looks like an overblown dodge caliber with a cts-frontend slapped to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rover3500</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rover3500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350167</guid>
		<description>GM is truly ona  role design wise..at the moment, each division is scoring hit after hit. Well done for getting back to producing cars that inspire people..this thing looks production ready with merely a smattering of showcar details to disguise it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM is truly ona  role design wise..at the moment, each division is scoring hit after hit. Well done for getting back to producing cars that inspire people..this thing looks production ready with merely a smattering of showcar details to disguise it <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MY Si</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html/comment-page-1#comment-350166</link>
		<dc:creator>MY Si</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-provoq-concept.html#comment-350166</guid>
		<description>Very Slick. Cadillac does this Art And Science thing well. Love that front end and its a very handsome C.U.V. too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Slick. Cadillac does this Art And Science thing well. Love that front end and its a very handsome C.U.V. too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
