<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cadillac to replace DTS, STS; introduce entry-level model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:53:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SSTRFSTR</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-330419</link>
		<dc:creator>SSTRFSTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-330419</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really because most of the DTS customers are going to die soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really because most of the DTS customers are going to die soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tconeab</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-330391</link>
		<dc:creator>tconeab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-330391</guid>
		<description>Anybody that has even looked at or test driven a 2008 CTS, will quickly realize what a bunch of non-informed folks are out there.  It is more than competitive feature for feature and at a significant $ savings over both the 3 series BMW or the Camry (oops, Lexus)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody that has even looked at or test driven a 2008 CTS, will quickly realize what a bunch of non-informed folks are out there.  It is more than competitive feature for feature and at a significant $ savings over both the 3 series BMW or the Camry (oops, Lexus)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLISS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-330303</link>
		<dc:creator>BLISS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-330303</guid>
		<description>SOMETHING FRESH COMING OUR WAY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOMETHING FRESH COMING OUR WAY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-330008</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-330008</guid>
		<description>Yea that made sense. You are the one obsessed with another man. A little homosexual Go back on the loading dock lunch break is over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea that made sense. You are the one obsessed with another man. A little homosexual Go back on the loading dock lunch break is over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamboz get a life</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-329929</link>
		<dc:creator>lamboz get a life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-329929</guid>
		<description>I did. But I was manufatured by Toyota and I can&#039;t seem to die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did. But I was manufatured by Toyota and I can&#8217;t seem to die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-329870</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-329870</guid>
		<description>Kill yourself lamboz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kill yourself lamboz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-329004</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-329004</guid>
		<description>Cire: I think I misunderstood you.

You said &quot;entry-level,&quot; and i though &quot;cobalt.&quot; What you meant was &quot;smaller luxury,&quot; and I&#039;m OK with that, as long as it&#039;s close to the 3-series and S-class. i&#039;d hate to see them go the japanese route and slap a caddy badge on a Malibu/Aura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cire: I think I misunderstood you.</p>
<p>You said &#8220;entry-level,&#8221; and i though &#8220;cobalt.&#8221; What you meant was &#8220;smaller luxury,&#8221; and I&#8217;m OK with that, as long as it&#8217;s close to the 3-series and S-class. i&#8217;d hate to see them go the japanese route and slap a caddy badge on a Malibu/Aura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328994</link>
		<dc:creator>Cire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328994</guid>
		<description>If the CTS is nearly the size of a 5-Series or E-Class, then I don&#039;t see why it would be a bad idea to offer something to directly compete against the 3-Series and C-Class (as well as the Lexus IS). For Cadillac to be a competitive full scale luxury brand, it must offer products in all core segments of the luxury car market. I still think this product would be a little more crucial in Europe than here, but there might be some people in the U.S. that would appreciate a well made, rear wheel drive, compact Cadillac sedan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the CTS is nearly the size of a 5-Series or E-Class, then I don&#8217;t see why it would be a bad idea to offer something to directly compete against the 3-Series and C-Class (as well as the Lexus IS). For Cadillac to be a competitive full scale luxury brand, it must offer products in all core segments of the luxury car market. I still think this product would be a little more crucial in Europe than here, but there might be some people in the U.S. that would appreciate a well made, rear wheel drive, compact Cadillac sedan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328980</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328980</guid>
		<description>You &quot;new&quot; a guy? Knew is the proper word since you like to harp on spelling so much Idiot
 Back in the 60&#039;s people didn&#039;t have any choice but to buy American. Any of those cars that are on the road today have crate engines or they were driven gingerly with the original  
I saw an idiot in a Grand Cherokee that had a bumper sticker that read&quot; I buy it where I make it&quot; Those are the types of idiots that buy something bc its American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You &#8220;new&#8221; a guy? Knew is the proper word since you like to harp on spelling so much Idiot<br />
 Back in the 60&#8217;s people didn&#8217;t have any choice but to buy American. Any of those cars that are on the road today have crate engines or they were driven gingerly with the original<br />
I saw an idiot in a Grand Cherokee that had a bumper sticker that read&#8221; I buy it where I make it&#8221; Those are the types of idiots that buy something bc its American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328934</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328934</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen an old-ass buick (park next to a &#039;60s model daily) 


Never seen an old ass &quot;A---a&quot;


reminds me of a commercial: anybody (even honda&#039;s faux-luxury division) can make a new car. 
What about when it gets to be an old car.

I new a guy back in &#039;95 that drove an acc-, um &quot;Legend,&quot; and it was already a POS


Cire: No &quot;entry-level&quot; Caddies! Bad idea. If they want something affordable at the stores, make &#039;em all Chevy/Cadillac or Cadillac/Pontiac dealers, but preserve the Caddy badge for REAL LUXURY CARS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen an old-ass buick (park next to a &#8217;60s model daily) </p>
<p>Never seen an old ass &#8220;A&#8212;a&#8221;</p>
<p>reminds me of a commercial: anybody (even honda&#8217;s faux-luxury division) can make a new car.<br />
What about when it gets to be an old car.</p>
<p>I new a guy back in &#8216;95 that drove an acc-, um &#8220;Legend,&#8221; and it was already a POS</p>
<p>Cire: No &#8220;entry-level&#8221; Caddies! Bad idea. If they want something affordable at the stores, make &#8216;em all Chevy/Cadillac or Cadillac/Pontiac dealers, but preserve the Caddy badge for REAL LUXURY CARS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cire</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328857</link>
		<dc:creator>Cire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328857</guid>
		<description>I think Cadillac is finally finding some focus. The 2008 CTS is a good starting point from which to drive the second stage of their revival.

Offering two uncompetitive sedans above the CTS was wasteful and did nothing to reestablish Cadillac in the luxury segment. Hopefully the new sedan will combine the roominess of the DTS with the rear wheel drive layout of the STS (along with some knockout styling via the Sixteen Concept). Throw in some performance engine/transmission combos along with some available fuel efficient technology (hybrid and/or diesel) and Cadillac may finally have a winner in this segment.

Cadillac needs an entry level sedan. However, the front wheel drive BLS was definitely not the correct product. If Cadillac can give an Alpha based rear wheel drive sedan some 2008 CTS DNA, then it should have a competitive product in this segment. Proper execution of this product would be especially crucial to the European luxury market to repair the image massacre caused by the front wheel drive BLS.

I think Cadillac should also seriously consider (if it hasn&#039;t already) expanding the model lines. For example, the CTS line should be expanded to include a coupe, convertible (or coupe-cabrio), and a wagon. This would make the brand more competitive on a global scale.

I think a smaller crossover is a good idea, as long as it is properly differentiated from any lower platform mates. I also think the SRX crossover should continue in the lineup; it needs a serious redesign so that it looks less like a bloated, extended station wagon. A redesigned SRX would be more crucial to the lineup in the U.S. than it would be elsewhere.

I think a less expensive hardtop roadster would be a nice addition to the lineup. I am not sure if the Kappa platform could be made upscale enough to handle a Cadillac product, though. The XLR could be retained to serve as the brand&#039;s halo product.

I would like to see the truck based Escalade products disappear. If people want luxury truck products, then GMC can offer them with their Denali trim levels. I know at one time these products probably saved Cadillac from extinction, but they look ridiculous in a post cheap gas world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cadillac is finally finding some focus. The 2008 CTS is a good starting point from which to drive the second stage of their revival.</p>
<p>Offering two uncompetitive sedans above the CTS was wasteful and did nothing to reestablish Cadillac in the luxury segment. Hopefully the new sedan will combine the roominess of the DTS with the rear wheel drive layout of the STS (along with some knockout styling via the Sixteen Concept). Throw in some performance engine/transmission combos along with some available fuel efficient technology (hybrid and/or diesel) and Cadillac may finally have a winner in this segment.</p>
<p>Cadillac needs an entry level sedan. However, the front wheel drive BLS was definitely not the correct product. If Cadillac can give an Alpha based rear wheel drive sedan some 2008 CTS DNA, then it should have a competitive product in this segment. Proper execution of this product would be especially crucial to the European luxury market to repair the image massacre caused by the front wheel drive BLS.</p>
<p>I think Cadillac should also seriously consider (if it hasn&#8217;t already) expanding the model lines. For example, the CTS line should be expanded to include a coupe, convertible (or coupe-cabrio), and a wagon. This would make the brand more competitive on a global scale.</p>
<p>I think a smaller crossover is a good idea, as long as it is properly differentiated from any lower platform mates. I also think the SRX crossover should continue in the lineup; it needs a serious redesign so that it looks less like a bloated, extended station wagon. A redesigned SRX would be more crucial to the lineup in the U.S. than it would be elsewhere.</p>
<p>I think a less expensive hardtop roadster would be a nice addition to the lineup. I am not sure if the Kappa platform could be made upscale enough to handle a Cadillac product, though. The XLR could be retained to serve as the brand&#8217;s halo product.</p>
<p>I would like to see the truck based Escalade products disappear. If people want luxury truck products, then GMC can offer them with their Denali trim levels. I know at one time these products probably saved Cadillac from extinction, but they look ridiculous in a post cheap gas world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328780</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328780</guid>
		<description>Deanster that sealskin with clubmarks remark is funny as hell 
Thats a joke Armandohead and Lamboz take note</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deanster that sealskin with clubmarks remark is funny as hell<br />
Thats a joke Armandohead and Lamboz take note</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328777</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328777</guid>
		<description>yes a front drive Acura, which is better than an old ass Buick 
STFU Old man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes a front drive Acura, which is better than an old ass Buick<br />
STFU Old man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMGoff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328760</link>
		<dc:creator>AMGoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328760</guid>
		<description>They suck compared to what? A front-drive acura? please... maybe once your other testicle descends you&#039;ll wake up and join the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They suck compared to what? A front-drive acura? please&#8230; maybe once your other testicle descends you&#8217;ll wake up and join the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328734</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328734</guid>
		<description>Well they have the hybrid Escalade coming out dumbass They can buy Toyotas technolgy and make hybrids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they have the hybrid Escalade coming out dumbass They can buy Toyotas technolgy and make hybrids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328728</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328728</guid>
		<description>&quot;I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#039;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking&quot; - that is the most contradictory statement ever. You basic said to focus on SUVs while increasing fuel-efficiency. LOL!

And the Catera is actually a good example of how far GM has come from the original Catera (a POS) to the last gen CTS which was a success to the 2008 CTS aka &quot;my next car&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#8217;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking&#8221; &#8211; that is the most contradictory statement ever. You basic said to focus on SUVs while increasing fuel-efficiency. LOL!</p>
<p>And the Catera is actually a good example of how far GM has come from the original Catera (a POS) to the last gen CTS which was a success to the 2008 CTS aka &#8220;my next car&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328696</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328696</guid>
		<description>Caddy trucks do not interest me, why make a truck youre afraid to bang up.
lexus has the elderly croud now, and caddy is marketing the cts to 30 year olds like me, the dts and sts need to be killed for a slightly larger sporty comfortable sedan priced rite below bmw and mb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caddy trucks do not interest me, why make a truck youre afraid to bang up.<br />
lexus has the elderly croud now, and caddy is marketing the cts to 30 year olds like me, the dts and sts need to be killed for a slightly larger sporty comfortable sedan priced rite below bmw and mb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328694</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328694</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget.. the only reason Cadillac went to full alphanumerics was that they didn&#039;t want to retain their elderly audience with a CateraCTS!  And as far as segmenting the market, after the male-biased STD sports sedan it would only be right to offer a companion soccer-mom-friendly HPV sport-utility!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget.. the only reason Cadillac went to full alphanumerics was that they didn&#8217;t want to retain their elderly audience with a CateraCTS!  And as far as segmenting the market, after the male-biased STD sports sedan it would only be right to offer a companion soccer-mom-friendly HPV sport-utility!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328646</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328646</guid>
		<description>Just so long as they don&#039;t put a Caddy badge on a cobalt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so long as they don&#8217;t put a Caddy badge on a cobalt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328640</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328640</guid>
		<description>Havent we discussed this before? I thought it meant Cimmaron Touring sedan. Either way it sucks bc you know why. I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#039;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Havent we discussed this before? I thought it meant Cimmaron Touring sedan. Either way it sucks bc you know why. I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#8217;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328631</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328631</guid>
		<description>I realized that and that was the point. Either way it sucks bc you know why. I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#039;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized that and that was the point. Either way it sucks bc you know why. I will say that Cadillac should capitalize on their SUV&#8217;s and try and get some fuel efficiency throughout the lineup and keep on trucking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328614</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328614</guid>
		<description>tripleonefive - you realized that the CTS IS the catera

Catera
Touring
Sedan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tripleonefive &#8211; you realized that the CTS IS the catera</p>
<p>Catera<br />
Touring<br />
Sedan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rompn4x</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328600</link>
		<dc:creator>Rompn4x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328600</guid>
		<description>Makes BMW the laziest they use numbers to name theyre cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes BMW the laziest they use numbers to name theyre cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328595</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328595</guid>
		<description>Lamboz what are you driving since you are so interesting in what you THINK I drive ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamboz what are you driving since you are so interesting in what you THINK I drive ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sik59rt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328584</link>
		<dc:creator>sik59rt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328584</guid>
		<description>wasnt it the Caddy that ZIGS? not Zings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wasnt it the Caddy that ZIGS? not Zings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328583</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328583</guid>
		<description>L-88: You&#039;re kind of right
No entry-level&quot; Caddies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L-88: You&#8217;re kind of right<br />
No entry-level&#8221; Caddies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 67_L-88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328573</link>
		<dc:creator>67_L-88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328573</guid>
		<description>* sorry two mistakes bring buick back to were it belongs
and would weaken the whole brand.

Also, maybe even AWD as an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* sorry two mistakes bring buick back to were it belongs<br />
and would weaken the whole brand.</p>
<p>Also, maybe even AWD as an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 67_L-88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328572</link>
		<dc:creator>67_L-88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328572</guid>
		<description>They should build a top notch 28,000-32,000$ dollar car, built it to top notch specs like the new cts, make it rwd, give it good strong motors, but make it a Buick. Bring buick make were it belongs, just below Cadallic. An Cadallic at that price is just to cheap, (but still out of my price range). A new cheaper model would weaken the who brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should build a top notch 28,000-32,000$ dollar car, built it to top notch specs like the new cts, make it rwd, give it good strong motors, but make it a Buick. Bring buick make were it belongs, just below Cadallic. An Cadallic at that price is just to cheap, (but still out of my price range). A new cheaper model would weaken the who brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOZO</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328554</link>
		<dc:creator>TOZO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328554</guid>
		<description>Ha! HA! STD! Well for the big Cadillac sedan lovers, it was nice to pick between FWD DTS &amp; RWD STS.  The STS is the better looking one for the guy with taste, but now that the new CTS looks a lot like the STS &amp; is RWD anyway, I suppose it&#039;s time to bring it down to one big Caddy sedan.  But bring no BS &quot;BLS.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! HA! STD! Well for the big Cadillac sedan lovers, it was nice to pick between FWD DTS &amp; RWD STS.  The STS is the better looking one for the guy with taste, but now that the new CTS looks a lot like the STS &amp; is RWD anyway, I suppose it&#8217;s time to bring it down to one big Caddy sedan.  But bring no BS &#8220;BLS.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328541</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328541</guid>
		<description>^^^^whatever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^^^whatever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripleonefive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328535</link>
		<dc:creator>tripleonefive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328535</guid>
		<description>Ill never give up my Cadillac OOPs Cadilac is giving up on themselves lol 
A car slotted UNDER the CTS ?? Thats makes sense It makes as much sense as the Catera. 
Since they seem to know how to make SUV&#039;s (that get recalled) they should redesign the SRX  smooth like they did with the CTS. Hurry up and make the BRX small SUV for all the posers who want an Equinox in a Cadillac tux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ill never give up my Cadillac OOPs Cadilac is giving up on themselves lol<br />
A car slotted UNDER the CTS ?? Thats makes sense It makes as much sense as the Catera.<br />
Since they seem to know how to make SUV&#8217;s (that get recalled) they should redesign the SRX  smooth like they did with the CTS. Hurry up and make the BRX small SUV for all the posers who want an Equinox in a Cadillac tux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedated</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328529</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328529</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cadillac sold 33,368 DTS sedans through the first seven months of 2007,&quot;

All to Livery companies.  Who wants to drive a cab?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cadillac sold 33,368 DTS sedans through the first seven months of 2007,&#8221;</p>
<p>All to Livery companies.  Who wants to drive a cab?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMGoff</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328517</link>
		<dc:creator>AMGoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328517</guid>
		<description>this would work fine but only if they come out with a new high-end sedan. This would however be the last step in alienating all of Cadillac&#039;s traditional customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this would work fine but only if they come out with a new high-end sedan. This would however be the last step in alienating all of Cadillac&#8217;s traditional customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EVOQ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328516</link>
		<dc:creator>EVOQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328516</guid>
		<description>LMAO @ STD! Whatever they name it, I hope it has an actual NAME. All these ABC and XYZ names is annoying and lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO @ STD! Whatever they name it, I hope it has an actual NAME. All these ABC and XYZ names is annoying and lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-328511</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/cadillac-to-replace-dts-sts-introduce-entry-level-model.html#comment-328511</guid>
		<description>thanks lamboz get a life for being fair and unbiased, 1115 is just flaming again, the new 08 cts rocks, the sts and dts are outdated and could use a replacement, why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks lamboz get a life for being fair and unbiased, 1115 is just flaming again, the new 08 cts rocks, the sts and dts are outdated and could use a replacement, why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
