California already working on emission regulations for beyond 2016
05/21/2009, 3:20 PM
By Drew Johnson
President Barack Obama unveiled a new plan to raise CAFE standards to 35.5 mpg by 2016 just days ago, but California is already working on a new set of standards for 2017 and beyond. California has historically been one of the toughest states when it comes to fuel economy standards and was a great influence on the President’s latest mandate.
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s 35.5 mpg by 2016 is already a difficult standard, reaching the 35 mpg mark a full four years before previously scheduled. However, with California likely to influence CAFE standards for 2017 and beyond, required targets could become even more aggressive.
“California will be immediately getting to work on what the standards should be for beyond 2016,” Mary Nichols, who chairs the California Air Resources Board, told Reuters. Nichols added future regulations will like be “much more stringent”.
California is by far the most aggressive state when it come to vehicle emissions and will likely become the first to regulate exhaust emissions this June. The California Air Resources Board hasn’t indicated what standards it will push for beyond 2016, but a number in the 40 mpg range would not be out of the question for the early 2020s



05/21, 3:23 PM
posted by:
05Z88Path
Well they have no money…and they’re going to force themselves to drive around in little eco-bubbles…have fun with that California!
05/21, 3:25 PM
posted by:
shane train
CALIFORNIA’s standard should be whatever AMERICA’s standard is.
Stop fooling around with this one-up BS and wasting our time with extra catalytic converters and whatever else, enacting different regulations than the CAFE standard is only hurting the economy when it’s already vulnerable.
35.5 is good enough for 49 other states. Please!
05/21, 3:42 PM
posted by:
CADDY-V
I live in Cali and have my whole life. this state is something else. It has it’s pros and a lot of cons. What Cali needs to do is get that big vacuum from the movie space balls and suck all the fu*king smog out of the air. Then let us drive what ever we want. Sh*t we pay enough to live here. If I want to drive a car that gets 10mpg than that’s my choice. Stop putting regulations on sh*t.
05/21, 3:47 PM
posted by:
Dwide Schrude
Why? Oh well, by 2017 there will be little more than welfare recipients and illegal immigrants living in California.
05/21, 3:54 PM
posted by:
Rafa LL
Seriously don’t be haters, 35.5 mpg is good for the environment, stop thinking to your own good and, as you aren’t doing something for yourself, let somebody else force you to.
05/21, 4:04 PM
posted by:
Hyperion
After living in CA for a few months now I am perplexed and annoyed by their government budget problems and their continual attack on cars (they want to repeal the emissions test exemption for 1973 and older cars now– how greedy and shortsighted).
35.5MPG is going to be hard to reach for everything BUT existing econoboxes. By the time 2016 rolls around the manufacturers will just have started to figure out how to deliver a driving experience we are used to that reaches that mileage goal. And that’ll be expensive.
40+ MPG by 2020 is going to make most people drive weedwhackers because the cost of getting V6 or V8 style performance from a 40MPG car is going to cost quite a bit in such a short timeframe.
The folks who are elected into office here seem to really think Californians want to drive the little bubble cars from Demolition Man.
05/21, 4:08 PM
posted by:
A4
California is going to end up in a bunch of Twike’s.
05/21, 4:09 PM
posted by:
mayer_ray_nagin
Cali should just look forward to filing bankruptcy
05/21, 4:15 PM
posted by:
yarddog82abn
HAY I LIVE IN CALI. Just because the car you but is ECO-Friendly, dose not make you a better person. Also once you drive the car off the dealer lot, YOUR ON YOUR OWN! I own about 5 cars right now, and I will say NONE OF THEN WILL PASS SMOG! Every car I own I have modified for performance, and I can give a RAT-AS if they don’t pass smog, when that time comes I just trade the car in.
Besides, the MPG standard is only applicable to that year’s model car, and the smog law is for that model year car. A 2000 model year car has to pass 2000 year regulations. Not the new ones imposed. So 35.5MPG by 2016, who care’s? Auto makers will put out High Performance cars and the after market will make performance parts for the track and the street.
05/21, 4:15 PM
posted by:
JakeK66
@Rafa LL -
Try forcing me to. I dare you! That kind of talk is, and I’m not one to usually get this way, Pinko-Commie talk. You can force me if you have a gun to my head, otherwise you can get a huge can of STFU.
@A4 – I’m already buying stock in Big Wheels in anticipation that it’s going to be the only thing you can drive in Cali.
@Hyperion – Too bad those bubble cars were all Oldsmobiles :/
05/21, 4:19 PM
posted by:
atoms
I can see it already, coming out of a store only to find that every car in the lot is a gloss white Aptera
05/21, 4:21 PM
posted by:
yarddog82abn
Ohooo ya and one more thing…. When Arnaold is out of office you guys can have him….
05/21, 4:33 PM
posted by:
leftwingagenda
but caddy, how did that smog get there in the first place? ;P you want the smog gone, but you want to drive a smog machine…can’t have both, basically…life is full of tough choices!
i’m not too scared of the mpg numbers going up…these are fleet averages, right? there will still be a niche for sportier cars, but there may be fewer choices…or perhaps we’ll see some more sophisticated drivetrains with cylinder deactivation to get good highway numbers, yet give you the oomph you want when you need it…
i’m sort of a pay-as-you-go guy…go ahead and buy that camaro ss, but pay your enviro impact tax, which is based on how much of a smog machine or gas hog your car is…that wouldn’t make performance cars disappear, but you’d have to pay to play…
05/21, 4:45 PM
posted by:
CADDY-V
Leftwingagenda:
I live in SD by the beach I don’t deal with smog unless I go up to LA. The smog doesn’t bother me I was just making a comment. Not a good one I guess.
05/21, 4:53 PM
posted by:
andy
leftwing… didnt most of cali’s pollution originate in china/ asia?… or so i have heard people claim
05/21, 5:09 PM
posted by:
Madcapp
California is not only finantially bankrupt, but mentally bankrupt. I’ve thought many times, than I’m glad to NOT be a Californian.
05/21, 6:20 PM
posted by:
iSupport AMERICA
Sholdn’t they be working on balancing their budget? They already have some of the strictest emission regulations in the nation. They’re even trying to ban black cars… They’re inevitabely going to lose money with all this regulation. California leads the nation, but it seems that they’re leading us in the wrong direction. Sure, we need more efficient cars, but if people don’t WANT them, and prefer to drive Escalades and Tahoes, then that’s their choice. They’re paying for the gas, insurance, etc, right? It’s a free country, let’s keep it that way.
first post
05/21, 8:21 PM
posted by:
Get Real
This is how a state collapses when the government has no respect for the voters and their wishes.
California will sink into the ocean with the next earthquake and a new seacoast of states will form, maybe they can use the natural beauty for the good of people instead on crushing the human spirit.
05/21, 10:13 PM
posted by:
elviososa
I like California.
05/21, 10:53 PM
posted by:
Hyperion
I live in California but I will never feel like a Californian. I do love the beautiful landscape, mountains and desert though.
05/22, 12:14 PM
posted by:
Rafa LL
JakeK6, Easy dog! I ain’t talking about me forcing you, I’m talking about those organizations that support laws that will make you drive a fuching 35 mpg car, wether you like it or not, and they will put up some other toughest things than a gun in your head.
What the hell with these kids that think they rule the world by talking like big men…
05/22, 1:07 PM
posted by:
davebo
I only clicked on this article because of the picture. I love my Corvette Corsa exhaust with tiger shark tips.
Also, you all realize that CAFE standards haven’t changed since they were created, whereas EPA mpg ratings have changed to reflect more realistic driving habits? Hitting the higher CAFE standards isn’t going to be all that difficult for car manufacturers. It’s not like they need to get 35.5mpg by EPA standards.
05/22, 10:58 PM
posted by:
RaineMan
So… exactly how soon is California going to drop off into the ocean. Seriously… these guys have all lost it.