The U.S. sate of California filed a lawsuit today against GM, Ford, Honda, Chrysler, Toyota, and Nissan for the “public nuisance” they have created by building and selling millions of vehicles that contribute to global warming. “Vehicle emissions are the single most rapidly growing source of the carbon emissions contributing to global warming, yet the federal government and the automakers have refused to act,” Attorney General Bill Lockyer said.
“It is time to hold these companies responsible for their contribution to this crisis,” Lockyer said.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California, is seeking damages for air pollution, damage to the water supply, and beach erosion. The suit claims the pollution and climate change are costing California millions. Lockyer said the lawsuit is a first of its kind.
“Global warming is causing significant harm to California’s environment, economy, agriculture and public health. The impacts are already costing millions of dollars and the price tag is increasing,” said Lockyer.
The complaint alleges that under federal and state common law the automakers have created a public nuisance by producing “millions of vehicles that collectively emit massive quantities of carbon dioxide,” a greenhouse gas that traps atmospheric heat and causes global warming. Under the law, a “public nuisance” is an unreasonable interference with a public right, or an action that interferes with or causes harm to life, health or property. The complaint asks the court to hold the defendants liable for damages, including future harm, caused by their ongoing, substantial contribution to the public nuisance of global warming.
As stated in the complaint, the automakers produce vehicles that emit a combined 289 million metric tons of carbon dioxide in the United States each year. Those emissions, the complaint alleges, currently account for nearly 20 percent of the carbon dioxide emissions in the United States and more than 30 percent in California. The defendants rank “among the world’s largest contributors to global warming and the adverse impacts on California,” according to the complaint.
“Global warming has already injured California, it environment, its economy, and the health and well-being of its citizens,” the complaint alleges. “California is responding to the ongoing impacts and the inevitable additional future impacts of global warming. The State is spending millions of dollars on planning, monitoring, and infrastructure changes to address a large spectrum of current and anticipated impacts, including reduced snow pack, coastal and beach erosion, increased ozone pollution, sea water intrusion into Delta drinking supplies, response to impacts on wildlife, including endangered species and fish, wildfire risks, and the long-term need to monitor on-going and inevitable impacts. California has already begun to address the decline in the snow pack and earlier melting of the snow pack in order to avert water shortages and flooding in the future.” Dealing with global warming’s harmful effects, the complaint adds, “will almost certainly cost millions more.”
Today’s filing comes as Lockyer fights the auto industry’s attempt to invalidate California’s landmark global warming regulations curbing tailpipe emissions. In their federal-court lawsuit, the automakers claim the regulations, adopted in 2005 through legislation sponsored by Assembly Member Fran Pavley, are pre-empted by federal law. Lockyer is defending the rules against the industry’s legal challenge.
Lockyer noted the Bush Administration’s inaction on global warming has forced California and other states to take action on their own. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing a lawsuit filed by Lockyer, 11 other Attorneys General, two cities and major environmental groups challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) refusal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Numerous parties have submitted amicus briefs supporting the states, including climate scientists, three former EPA Administrators, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and environmental and religious groups.
In addition, Lockyer, along with nine other state Attorneys General, the District of Columbia and the City of New York, filed a lawsuit earlier this year challenging the Bush Administration’s new fuel economy standards for SUVs and light trucks. That complaint alleges the rules fail to address the effects on the environment and global warming.
California is particularly vulnerable to global warming impacts. According to a report recently submitted by the Climate Action Team to Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature, the consequences of climate change in California will be “severe.”
“We are seeing the harmful impacts of global warming today, and if we continue with ‘business as usual,’ we can expect to see more and larger impacts in the future,” said Lockyer. “As a coastal state, an agricultural state, and a state that relies on its Sierra snow pack, California has an enormous stake in acting now to combat global warming.”


09/20, 2:45 PM
posted by:
oZ
What
09/20, 2:48 PM
posted by:
novicius
This lawsuit is a public nuisance.
09/20, 2:50 PM
posted by:
James
Exactly novicus, America isn’t polluting Southeast Asia is. Bunch of dumb****s, god damn liberals and hippies.
09/20, 2:54 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
What would be funny is if those manufactures now banned any type of allocation of their cars to California. Let’s see how fast that lawsuit would drop.
09/20, 2:56 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
What the hell?!? So how are we supposed to move around here? This is the type of BS lawsuits that need to be killed, permanently.
09/20, 3:02 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
I really think they should do that. Stop sending them cars. California’s economy would plumet, then they’d rethink this rediculous lawsuit.
Clearly there must be other ways to address this issue. The money the state puts in to taking them to court and all, could instead, be put toward further research on alternative fuel technologies.
09/20, 3:05 PM
posted by:
Brendino
Oh boy, this is Hyundai’s big chance!
Chery, make your move!
So this is gonna mean that global warming goes on trial, right?
Reminds me of Crichton’s “State of Fear.”
Or this will just get thrown out. Ridiculous.
09/20, 3:05 PM
posted by:
Toy Yoda
My guess is it’s politically safer to sue car companies than to sue the voters who choose to drive the cars that contribute to global warming. Why not just have a pollution tax just like they do a luxury tax on high priced vehicles? I would actually like to see a pollution/heavy vehicle tax so that there would be less soccer moms driving SUVs and minivans.
09/20, 3:06 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
You go California! The rest of America will thank you in the future, it’s not their fault they are ignorant
09/20, 3:09 PM
posted by:
Brendino
Oh, and how is taking money from the Big Six going to help them with R&D for better emissions?
09/20, 3:09 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
James, why are Americans so against anyone intelligent these days? Like its a crime to be smart all of a sudden
09/20, 3:11 PM
posted by:
Hyperion
I’m not even going to try this one. Wow.
09/20, 3:14 PM
posted by:
Vdub
because you are suppose to think with your gut! not with your head. Americans are not a fan of facts you know.
09/20, 3:14 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
They would probably loose more money by not selling cars in California than they would going to court and loosing.
Like it or not California defines many aspects of the U.S. auto market. California deals with congestion, over population, and pollution in ways that most other states can’t comprehend. California has the “consumer power” to cause drastic changes in the U.S. auto market - it’s done it before.
However, a lawsuit against the manufactuers is not the right way to go, especially when a good chunk of its citizens have been “accomplices” in the alleged offense. Change the laws, don’t sue after the fact.
09/20, 3:21 PM
posted by:
dmanero
Hahaha, the judge is going to have a good laugh at this. whats next, we going to sue the government for stupid toward the american people.
09/20, 3:23 PM
posted by:
Phileas Fogg
You guys do realize that this is actually a very smart move on California’s part. First off, it’s never been really done to this scale before so it’s getting media attention. Media attention means people are reading about/seeing it, etc. Which means their cause is getting wide out in the open to the “ignorant” American public. Secondly, you nothing is going to come of this, most likely it will be settled or something outside of court; it’s a media stunt to get on the automakers asses. They have the technology to make more efficient cars, but for some reason they’re not using it on all of their cars. So you do something like this, it gets out in the open and the automakers have no where to go now. Plus it’s a kick in the nuts to the dumbasses in office right now (AKA The Bush Administration), so it’s an all around winner. Like it was said earlier, why is it so looked down upon to be smart these days. It’s an international world people, the US of A isn’t the only country.
09/20, 3:25 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
I’m reclaiming the word liberal, it is no longer an insult. I am a liberal in the educated informed european sense and proud of it. Quit this dumbing down of america. It’s not big and it’s not clever.
09/20, 3:25 PM
posted by:
Veda
They can start by suing their own Hummer hugging governator…
09/20, 3:26 PM
posted by:
British_Rover
Wow…
That is just stupid global warming is probably happening but I don’t think there is really enough evidence yet to prove it but I guess in California courts you don’t need that much evidence to file a lawsuit.
09/20, 3:28 PM
posted by:
Ricardo Head
THREE DAYS! I MOVE OUT OF THIS RETARDED STATE OF CAL IN THREE DAYS!
Phuck California.
09/20, 3:35 PM
posted by:
indigo
Give me a break, sue the man who invented the internal combustion engine, and the person or w/e that designed the earth and made it suseptible to automobile emissions.
What a waste of money and time.
09/20, 3:40 PM
posted by:
Toy Yoda
I think a far more effective way in getting results, is to introduce an ‘inefficiency tax’ on vehicles with less MPG than a specified target. Make the tax go up exponentially based on the how far a car is not meeting the MPG target. Nothing motivates people and companies like getting hit in the wallet.
09/20, 3:41 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
Thank god and good riddance to bad rubbish Ricardo Head.
California is awesome, we just don’t like dumb idiots like you. Go back to your bible classes and intelligent design seminars in Iowa you’ll be much happier ignoring the facts of modern life
09/20, 3:44 PM
posted by:
YourNameHere
they have Gas Guzzelers tax… which is what your decribing. i guess its time to bump that up. Maybe something about seating. something to discourage ppl from buying SUVs with 9 seats and filling 2 of them. there are plenty of ways to get better MPG out of the manufactuers.
09/20, 3:51 PM
posted by:
Robert
It’s all about publicity. I live in CA. Most of what goes on is not a liberal or conservative thing… it’s a special interest thing. And EVERYONE has special interests.
However, I have to admit, that this is probably the boldest move I’ve ever seen by environmentalists. Suing the companies will lead to nothing, but my guess is that it will reveal two things: 1) that emissions from vehicles lead directly to forms of harmful pollutiion and 2) that major auto makers have continually lobbied against better emissions standards. And while I believe that a more market-based approach (higher gas prices, real or government induced) is ALWAYS the best way to get results, this will go a long way to educating people about what is true and false.
For example, making cars 100 mpg tomorrow is impossible, but making cars 30% more efficient in the next 2-3 years is possible.
Emissions from cars damage our environment. Emissions from U.S. cars are only a very small part of the global issue. And other such assertions.
If this suit goes to settlement, my guess is that there will be some money pumped into environmental education, raising mileage of cars and reduction of direct lobbying efforts. But, there is a good chance this will be thrown out.
Should be interesting, if, generally, a fairly frivolous lawsuit.
09/20, 3:52 PM
posted by:
Hal
This is about an ambitious AG grandstanding for the media. All the Prius driving celebs will love him and host findraisers for his next statewide campaign. Never mind that it’s a stunt he’ll get his publicity.
09/20, 4:02 PM
posted by:
Oldsmobile
****HEAD JACKSON, GET OVER YOURSELF.
09/20, 4:03 PM
posted by:
Don
get rid of SUVs, small cars can stay
09/20, 4:04 PM
posted by:
Stuart
I’ve heard it all now lol Whats next walking tax? breathing tax? living tax? thinking tax? talking tax?
09/20, 4:11 PM
posted by:
trevorcarpenter
It’s called a free-market system. If we shouldn’t have the right to purchase a 4 ton diesel truck to go to the supermarket, then the government should pass laws to forbit such purchases. If we don’t like those laws, then we should elect new lawmakers. It goes like that.
This makes me ashamed to say I live in California.
09/20, 4:13 PM
posted by:
Toy Yoda
I thought VW already made a 100mpg car called the Lupo? is it less?
09/20, 4:17 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
Vw doesn’t make the lupo any more.
Hey Trevor Carpenter I’m Californian and PROUD, if you don’t like it here you know what you can do….and yes it involves bible classes in Iowa
09/20, 4:19 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
Oldsmobile does my middle name really spell ****head if you remove the hyphen? Well I never noticed duh!
09/20, 4:21 PM
posted by:
anti_analog
So they’re suing the car makers who are partially responsible to a large minority part of carbon dioxide emmissions instead of suing the oil companies who voluntarily release all this carbon fuel into the world and make tons and tons of money off of it. And surely it isn’t smart to sue the utilities who are responsible for a much larger portion of global warming emmissions (well, and the people who use those utilities). Yes, I can see clearly how just these 6 car companies are really so completely responsible for the drastic consequences California has currently suffered from global warming.
I’m somewhat of an advocate of certain reforms to counter the possible dangers of global warming, but this certainly appears to be crack headed behaviour, even as a publicity stunt.
Makes as much sense to me as buying 3 priuses so you always have an efficient vehicle when you are at your various residences. Not that having multipe cars and houses doesn’t make more carbon emmissions and use more resources than a Prius could ever hope to preserve in it’s full life as a working car.
09/20, 4:29 PM
posted by:
bryanb
The 3L Lupo uses a 1.2-liter, turbocharged, three-cylinder diesel engine linked to an unusual transmission.
–from: http://www.usatoday.com/money/consumer/autos/mareview/mauto497.htm
Its a Diesel, and would need that clean diesel that ain’t around these parts… Even if its not made anymore, and not sold here, the article I mention is 7 years old! What does VW have these days?
09/20, 4:31 PM
posted by:
wcnhl57
haha, it does make you laugh when u read it at first
However, first off, an attorney general would never submit something like this without having some substance and reason behind it. He either knows, or has been told by his associates, that it’s got an incredible chance of going through because of reasons the public knows, such as this will draw huge media attention, or reasons we don’t know, political reasons. Theres no way an attorney general, especially of a state such as cal, is going to risk screwing up his chance for re-election or running for another spot in government by submitting a stupid ass lawsuit like this.
However, personally, i don’t think this is any where near the right way to go about this. first, in the fairly remote possibility this lawsuit turns into a major pain in the ass for the manufactures(my bets on it doesn’t ever go to court and they settle some sort of monetary deal outside of court) however, if it does go to court and the manufacures are charged, it could be the final end for domestic car manufactures. Nissan, toyota, and honda, i have no doubt, can handle something like this. Ya, it’s going to hurt them, but i don’t think a single domesitic company, at this time, would be able to withstand this type of ‘bump’ in the road. The companies extremly unstable, the stocks extremly unstable, there at there most vulnerable points, there at the bottem they’ve been in for years, attempting to restructure and re-create there companies, a hitch in it such as this i think will send them out. However, i think the possiblity of this happening is kind of slim. The solution to the problem is not suing them, it’s not hydrogen, it’s not fuel cell’s or any other alternative fuel. Oil has been along to long, is to easily accessable (ya, ya, ya, we’ll b out of fuel in 70 years my ass, if you put all the oil companies togeather, there reserves would last longer then 70 years). The answer is going to be ethenol, and hybrids, and things such as that. An average internal combustion engine is 20 percent efficient, at best, new technology will increase that to 99 percent, then it will make it even better, 6 stroke engines are already on the way making engines that are closer to 40 percent efficient. Those will b the solution, oil companies would never let something like ‘hydrogen’ or ‘fuel cells’ take over the market, neither will governments, and neither will people. People are to set in their ways. Unless a miracle ‘energy’ is created, which it very possibly could, i personally don’t believe we will be changing away from fuel any time in the next couple centuries. I think E85 is a great ’semi-alternative’ fuel. More efficient. Like they say, you can’t re-invent the wheel, just make it better
09/20, 4:32 PM
posted by:
Oldsmobile
****HEAD JACKSON, you will have to excuse me, I’m a little slow. You see, I’m from the midwest and go to church so, you know, I’m not smart.
09/20, 4:42 PM
posted by:
auto.observer
ya know wat, you might as well sue all the furniture companies for using wood in their products resulting in the clear-cutting of trees!
screw that! everybody’s sued for being human!
09/20, 4:42 PM
posted by:
lanapat7
Why don’t the state sue Hollywood? They blow up houses, cars, etc. for entertainment purposes and contribute to the greenhouse effect.
Do you recall the Governor in Terminator- they blew up so many things, half the picture revolved around fire.
Or what about Rolls Royce, Bentley, Ferrari, Porsche- the darlings of Rodeo Drive?
Why don’t the state sue the cows that reside within their limit?
Next thing, they will sue American Airlines, Delta, etc. for contributing to the greenhouse effect.
So much BS- it’s incredible.
09/20, 4:45 PM
posted by:
Endurancevm
This is what happens when “Save the Whales”, “Save the Rainforest”, “Save our planet”, “Save the californian left hind footed monkey” groups run the state. Im gonna sue the state of California for public nuisance allowing homosexuals to roam the streets. I mean cars that go to california are already worse than cars in the rest of the US due to emission controls. Suing the companie that make cars is just rediculous.
The next step is that california will be filled with millions of 2box class cars from japan running on AA batteries…How exciting.
09/20, 4:51 PM
posted by:
Scudetto
Must be nearing election time in Kalifornia.
I wonder if Attorney General Bill Lockyer drove to the court house to file his complaint.
09/20, 4:56 PM
posted by:
Piablo
Bonquisha Sheneequah is a walking paradox. He or she considers themselves an intellectual elite, as most liberals do, yet has a stereotyping name on here and has something against Christians. Because Christians from Iowa must be less intelligent than liberals in California.
Not only is this lawsuit liberal, hysterical, madness, but at it’s core I have no doubt there is a politician who is using the United States legal system to gain notoriety and fame. Just as Elliot Sptizer of NY has done, just as the DA in charge of the Duke rape case has done, and the list goes on.
I am going to sue God for putting liberals on this earth. It’s quite funny actually. A state attorney general creates a lawsuit, and the greenie weenies come running forward charging everyone is ignorant, and all this attorney general is interested in is self promotion. Let me here your war cry!!
09/20, 4:58 PM
posted by:
Detroit Dude !
This lawsuit should be against Toyota only, as it seems that’s all Californian’s drive,,,,,
09/20, 5:21 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
My name only exposes your prejudices about what type of person you believe has a name like this. Yes most people assume I am black with a name like this, where does it say that I am black? That is your prejudice and stereotyping not mine.
Christians from Iowa must be less intelligent for a start they believe a book of fairy tails and they live in Iowa how stupid is that?
I’m a white Californian native, I love LA I love California, I love the diversity that you right wing neo cons can’t stand, it actually makes it a very interesting place to live.
If Ricardo Head wants to live in whites only christian only gated community thats up to him. I hope he dies of boredom.
09/20, 5:34 PM
posted by:
Ferg
Don’t they first have to absolutely PROVE that global warming not only exsists, but is the effect of the polutants put out solely by these companys’ products? What a complete waste of time and tax payer money.
09/20, 5:34 PM
posted by:
Piablo
Actually dink, I figured you were a white dirtbag. No black person would ever have that name. And by the way, oh so clever trick my friend… luring me into your trap of hypocrisy. I fell right into it! You really are smart!
Oh, and speaking of diversity, I love your acceptance of Christians. Must be diversity only means skin color, not thoughts or speech… again, another liberal trait.
09/20, 5:48 PM
posted by:
Gogogodzilla
I should file a lawsuit sueing the state of California for the Carbon Dioxide emissions of it’s human population.
All the carbon dioixde exhaled by the millions of Californians is a ‘dangerous threat’ that causes global warming.
Maybe I can find a judge that’ll then rule that Californians must stop breathing… to save the planet, of course.
09/20, 5:51 PM
posted by:
Webran61
Wow. The Governator supports the suit? What a hypocrite!
09/20, 5:55 PM
posted by:
Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson
Yeah because the conservatives and the right wing fundamenatlist christians love freedom of thought, questioning the bible and different ways of living, don’t they Piablo?
09/20, 6:00 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Don: that’s the most rificulous idea ever. How about ALL auto manufacturers doing more to improve fuel economy, how about that? Like, for instance, mass-produce Carbon Fiber so that it becomes economically feasible to make new car bodies out of it. Less weight = less fuel consumed.
09/20, 6:01 PM
posted by:
Jesus
California is the promised land, it is where I shall return
09/20, 6:03 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
ridiculous*
Damn keyboard.
09/20, 6:22 PM
posted by:
Piablo
I’m not the one playing the diversity card. I’m throwing your hypocrisy back in your face. And I don’t hear the conservatives or Christians crying about diversity. Religous followers by nature do not follow diversity of thought, otherwise they would not seggregate themselves to one religion, one line of thinking. But you, you are the one criticizing others for lack of acceptance to diversity, while criticizing Christians. Intellectual, no. Hypocrite, yes. How do you think the liberals of the 60 and 70s got their nick-name?? Hmmm???? Hippies?? It’s the nature of a liberal.
09/20, 6:37 PM
posted by:
jamey
This whole thing is just funny
Calafornia and extemests make me laugh
09/20, 6:39 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
James leave this website, PLEASE spare us all your racist, bigoted bull****, noone likes you here, your comments are not wanted, seriously leave this website alone you dip**** because all you say is at the very least offensive as hell.
09/20, 6:41 PM
posted by:
GL1
This is a clear cut example of their being FAR to many sleazball lawyers running around loose in this world. the next thing you know the F**ing lawyers will sue ALL of us citizens for contributing to the pollution of the environment every time we take a ****… Lawyers are the problem here they should all be dumped into the North sea just north of iceland and see how well they can all swim and stand the cold.. Of course the sharks would never eat a one of them out of professional courtesy.
09/20, 6:41 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
And i deeply respect California for this, this is a step in the right direction, hardly anyone is making any effort to get emissions down other than Toyota and Honda, so if the manufactureres cant figure it out themselves this might be what it comes down to
09/20, 6:44 PM
posted by:
Ricardo Head
OHHH YEAHHHHHahahaha! “CA is the only state in the union with non-whites!” ****head you basically just admitted you are a blithering idiot, man. Must be sniffing too much smelL-A. There are plenty of equally or more diverse places than Cal, muchacho.
09/20, 8:32 PM
posted by:
Ricardo Head
HAA! Looks like California must sue ALL Californians now, because each person emits 2.5 pounds of CO2 per day.
.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060920/sfw188.html?.v=1
.
Attorney General’s Suit Against Automakers Should Also Name ALL Californians
.
Humans Emit 2.5 Pounds of CO2, a Greenhouse Gas, Every Day
.
SACRAMENTO, Calif., Sept. 20 /PRNewswire/ — All comments may be attributed to John Merchant, chairman, California Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse:
“In his latest crusade, Attorney General Bill Lockyer has decided to sue automakers, arguing they have created a public nuisance by building cars - cars which emit greenhouse gases. He’s requesting that a jury award monetary damages as well as attorney fees and costs, but he’s missing out on the really big money with this one.
.
“The AG’s complaint overlooks 36 million other sources of greenhouse gas emissions — the human beings occupying California who ought to be sued for ‘negligent breathing.’
“Californians each emit about 2.5 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2 - a greenhouse gas) every day just by breathing. If you multiply 2.5 pounds of CO2 per day by 36 million Californians by 365 days, that’s more than 16 million tons of CO2 just from breathing. Talk about a public nuisance … and don’t even get me started on the methane people produce.
.
“This lawsuit is a public nuisance. Activist attorneys general who abuse our legal system and impose a system of ‘government by lawsuit’ to gain publicity and further their own political agenda do so at the expense of the people they are paid to represent. Inevitably the costs of litigation in cases like this will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Just what we all need.”
09/20, 8:55 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
LamborghiniZ: I knew you were gonna say something like that. Know this: *every* car manufacturer is just as responsible in this mess we’re in, so don’t give me that “except xyz” bull****. Just don’t.
09/20, 9:11 PM
posted by:
James
Phil I like you we are on the same page about california. California can crumble into the ocean as long as they move the US Bank Tower out of the state from Los Angeles.
09/20, 9:33 PM
posted by:
Detroit Dude !
White ? Christian ?? Diversity ?? I thought this site was a forum to talk about cars, trucks & SUV’s ?????
09/20, 11:00 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
1c3d0g, its not bull****, and im not giving you any bull****, im stating the facts, that CERTAIN car manufacturers of asian origin whom you have an unjustified hatred towards happen to make more steps towards improving the environment than other car manufacturers of domestic origins whom you just adore, for no real apparent reason.
09/20, 11:01 PM
posted by:
LamborghiniZ
James, i dont care if someone was talking to me or not, racism is offensive, you’re a racist, what you say on your posts is often racist (i’ve seen it before on other articles) so if you’re going to make bigoted comments, expect for me to comment on you. knock the prejudice **** off
09/20, 11:41 PM
posted by:
Veda
Oh fun fun fun…. where the hell is Renton? Is he Piablo today? I swear, all leftlanenews.com needs to get this site active and going is to post some political piece remotely related to cars.
Ok, regarding the lawsuit, you all know the bottom line is for CA to get some extra $ from some big corps. The whole thing is a big excuse…
09/20, 11:44 PM
posted by:
James
I didn’t start it so what I say is irrelevant. Lambo its called freedom of speech, I will say what I want and I will ignore everything to have to say in response. Futile reponses as they will be. I can say whatever I want and I will. Yes you can reply, yes I can ignore it like irrelevant worthless ****.
09/21, 12:00 AM
posted by:
Hal
Hey James your 1st amendment right to “freedom of speech” doesn’t apply here - it’s a private forum. Most websites would have blocked your IP address by now, but I guess LLN doesn’t have lawyers to warn them about letting racists spew on their site.
Bonquisha Iowa is a fine place with lots of people who are concerned about the environment, some of them are even Christian. If you want to rag on a state that has too many fundamentalist Christian Republicans pick IN
09/21, 12:05 AM
posted by:
Veda
“Know this: *every* car manufacturer is just as responsible in this mess we’re in, so don’t give me that “except xyz” bull****. Just don’t.”
What mess? The only ones to be blamed are the _consumers_ who continue to buy big gas guzzling products that happens to bear the logo of GM or Ford.
09/21, 2:42 AM
posted by:
WonbyOne
Having lurked here for some time (posting very little) I find I have to put my two cents worth in.
I have read some interesting threads here to say the least, but this one has eclipsed most.
I find it hard to believe the degree of the hate being spewed here towards various countries, political affiliations and of all things Christians.
With all that is going on in the world today and western culture under attack, people who should be allies are here cursing each other over automotive news.
It is enough to turn ones stomach.
I have always held out hope that the now dwindling “Greatest Generation” would not be the last one, that another generation would rise up with equal resolve, and integrity and sense of selflessness and duty.
This is far from our finest hour. Winston would roll in his grave.
09/21, 2:45 AM
posted by:
anonymous
only in america!
09/21, 6:06 AM
posted by:
Veda
Far from our finest hour indeed. Though since the arabs are the ones supplying us with the dope called oil, maybe instead of blaming the manufacturers we can find a common ground and start attacking them instead. Ha ha… wishful thinking given the situation we’re in…
09/21, 7:46 AM
posted by:
Jesus
I love California because the conservatives and the religious right hate it so much
09/21, 8:43 AM
posted by:
Joey D
Someone should sue Wyoming for having all those cattle, which emit gas into the air that harms the o-zone.
09/21, 8:51 AM
posted by:
Carnut4ever
The stupid staff of California apparently has nothing much to do except find ways to milk more money out of ridiculous lawsuits. Instead of doing this, why don’t they find ways of easing traffic in their cities? California emission controls are one of the strictest in the world, maybe next time Californians should drive small electric cars like golf carts LoL!
09/21, 9:02 AM
posted by:
James
Hal the typical pinhead, jump on others’ coat tails when they attack someone for some alleged comments that never took place. They are just mad because they can’t win. This is a car site unfortunately it has a few trouble makers, lamborghini, bonquisha hal and however wants to attack me. heh. Veda hit the bullseye, I wish car companies would stop making SUV’s period. They get in my way on the road and guzzle gas.
09/21, 9:06 AM
posted by:
James
Btw they must not have anti flaming rules either because those three are still here. You three are not in the right so you might as well forget about that. case closed.
09/21, 9:21 AM
posted by:
Piablo
heaven forbid you use your brain Jesus.
Veda, nice to see you chime in finally! Even though, once again you are wrong
This whole thing reminds me of the episode on South Park where they all jump on the global warming bandwagon. It’s hilarious, pointing to the sky -”LOOOOK!! It’s GLOOOOBALLL WARMMINGGGG!!!” Hysterical non-sense.
I don’t think there is anyone who says it is NOT happening. Me, a red blooded, George Bush voting, Conservative believes there is “global warming”. There is plenty of irrefutable data to say so over the past 100 years. What I do disagree with is WHY it’s happening. It’s so easy to look at the news and see a hurricane is coming and decide, ‘yep, Global Warming is upon us!!’ It’s so easy to pin global warming on “gas guzzlers” because vehicles are so familiar to everyone. What is not familiar to everyone is the science behind it all. Actual Science. Solar radiation is the biggest factor behind atmospheric warming. Solar radiation is what causes holes in the ozone, not hair spray. What effect does the earth’s magnetic core have on ocean currents? What effect does the overall salination of the oceans have on the global weather patterns? Did you know mowing your lawn once a week for a half hour puts out more **** into the air than driving your truck all year?? Where’s the lawn mower patrol?? There is alot of bad misinformation out there. There is also alot of good information. There are ways to do your part and help the environment, but sueing the manufacturers is not the right way. Try car pooling for one. Try not leaving the computer on all night long. Try doing YOUR part, and not worry so much about others.
09/21, 9:36 AM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
I love certain car manufacturers as everyone else does here… but this is a very valid case guys. Either way; this is not the end for any of these corporations.
09/21, 9:43 AM
posted by:
Jesus
California Uber Alles
09/21, 10:40 AM
posted by:
1c3d0g
LamborghiniZ: I don’t know where you pull your “facts”, but they’re as contorted as an asian car in a wreck. ALL car companies are responsible. Period. If you cannot even acknowledge this simple fact, then I have the perfect site for you:
http://www.turnofftheinternet.com/
09/21, 12:25 PM
posted by:
dalemf
The earth’s climate has been scientifically proven to warm and cool in cycles, and we are in a warming cycle. That’s it, pure and simple. And for every scientific study that shows ice caps getting smaller in one area, there is another much, much less publicized study showing ice caps increasing in another area. If you don’t know that, then you are the ones who are close-minded and lacking in sufficient intellectual curiousity — not the conservative Christians in Iowa. Cruel, idiotic, un-American attacks like that those I’ve read on this thread are always made by those who claim to be non-judgemental, openminded, and non-descriminating. In my experience, liberals are the MOST hateful, condesending, arrogant, and closeminded people I’ve ever met or heard from. Yes, Christians take absolute stands on certain issues because they actually BELIEVE in something. But, for the most part, they are also kinder, more helpful, more sacrificial in their lives and toward others than any East or West Coast lefty with a “European intellectual” superiority chip on their shoulder. A racist is NOT a Christian. And Christian influence in this country has done far less to interfer with your rights and freedoms than liberal influence, as this lawsuit so clearly demonstrates.
Global warming is nothing more than the left’s newest means to attack corporate America and the individual buying and living rights of Americans. Those who fall for it and who are so easily willing to potentially destroy America’s economy — especially when we are NOT the world’s biggest polluters — are the gullible ones, not those asking for and demanding more proof. It’s so easy to cry wolf and act like everyone else is the fool. Just like Y2K — those who believed were so right and everyone who refused to worry were blind fools. Yet, 1-1-00 came and went without a single problem. This was going to be the biggest, dealdiest Hurricane season ever, yet — I’m still waiting. It’s time for those who say they’re so smart and act so smart to actually BE smart and stop falling for the dribble your puppet masters keep feeding you.
09/21, 1:07 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
Amen dalemf.
Now, how about we get back to cars.
09/21, 1:28 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
I disagree with everything dalemf states and claim it is he who needs to BE smart and stop falling for the dribble his puppet masters keep feeding him. Does that make me any more right than it makes him?
On a side note:
“Christian influence in this country has done far less to interfer with your rights and freedoms than liberal influence”
Hahahahahaahahahah. Now that is funny.
09/21, 1:40 PM
posted by:
Saud
Fine, YOU can walk 20 miles to work & we drive there. Damn hIppy.
09/21, 2:00 PM
posted by:
dalemf
Give me an example that causes your laughter, Random Jerk. Abortion is still legal, pornography is everywhere, homesexuality is pushed on us as an acceptable lifestyle, gay marriage movements are growing, TV shows are all about teeenage and premarital sex, the public and university school systems are rampant with anti-Christian and anti-right bigotry, and you continue to have the freedom to say, do, think and become whatever you wish. You’re even free to ridicule and demean anyone who claims to be a Christian. Yet, let’s see, a Christian student CAN’T pray in school, even silently, and can’t talk about the Bible with other students for fear of being suspended. A teacher dare not even suggest that evolution is an unproven theory and that students should open their minds to other possibilities — because, you know, just saying that would break the separation of church and state. In some areas, smokers — and I’m not one of them — can’t smoke on public beaches (that’s OUTSIDE, in case you didn’t know). You can’t cut down trees on your own property in many areas, or build a refinery, or drill for oil, or open a Wal-Mart, or run a business they way you want…and on and on and on. And yes, to keep it focused on cars, the left would like nothing more than to outlaw SUVs and regulate what you drive.
09/21, 2:04 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
Funny though how Scientist/Geologists come out with these studies which are usually followed by a solution to the problem, yet polititions rather take it to their own hands and go through our court system. When will they learn.
09/21, 2:31 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
But here is the kicker - the “Christian Right” (and I think it’s important to distinguish the “Right” and the “Christian Right”) would like nothing more than to reverse all the freedoms you list and I enjoy. If not, why are they such issues with you now? You are simply the pot calling the kettle black. Again, I am amused. I’m not even sure why I bother to write - there is no changing your mind, just as you won’t change mine.
The left as a ideology does many things that I don’t agree with. However If I had to choose I’d rather have a liberal, pluralistic, enviormentally clean society than one based on the modern day reinterpretation of a often mistranslated/rewritten book of fairy tales. A liberal pluralistic society has room for the “Christian Right” to live as they see fit, the society yearned for by the “Christian Right” doesn’t offer the same accomdations. Hence all those freedoms you list that somehow assault the “Christian Right” lifestyle.
09/21, 2:42 PM
posted by:
Jesus
Dalemf just because YOU don’t like things doesn’t make them wrong.
09/21, 2:56 PM
posted by:
MiracleGro
Dale I dont want to live in your narrow minded little world that believes fairy stories in book, and would rather believe in things for which there is no proof than things for which there is some evidence.
Being gay is not a lifestyle choice, I don’t see anything wrong with treating gay people as equals and giving them the same rights that I have, you obviously believe in second class citizens.
I see no evidence persuading me that creationism is more valid than evolution, but you won’t even entertain evolution as valid from the start.
I don’t want you and your kind telling me how to live.
Smoking on beaches creates litter
Cutting down trees on my property may spoil the neighborhood
SUVs are wasteful from the use of resources when they are manufactured, to the amount of energy they consume whilst being used
Schools and universitys should not tolerate the promotion of any religion on campus
Why on earth would you want a Wal Mart in your area?
It sounds like if your people were in power my rights and those of many other non-christian Americans would be severely curtailed by your bigotted beliefs and behaviour
09/21, 2:58 PM
posted by:
dalemf
Random Jerk — You mean like the liberal left has reversed and constricted so many of MY freedoms? So the real kicker is: you’re afraid of what we might do — meaning the Christian right is not yet interfering with your freedom, which was my point that you found so amusing — while I’m worried about what the left has already done and continues to do. And for Jesus — I hope that’s your real name — great comeback. I’m stunned by your logic.
09/21, 3:09 PM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
100th comment!
09/21, 3:14 PM
posted by:
dalemf
MiracleGro, you prove my point. I guess you have no problem living in a liberal narrow-minded world? And I didn’t say promote creationism, did I? I said invite the kids to look at all possibilities, since nothing has been proven and there is no evidence in the fossil record to support evolution. NONE. And what about the true scientific evidence that comes out yearly to support intelligent design? Do you want to just ignore it? Is that being openminded or narrowminded — I’m probably not smart enough to know the difference. And your kind can tell me how to live, right? That’s OK. And while I think killing an unborn baby is murder and barbaric — how dare I try to do something about it. Yet you’ll stop me from cutting down a tree because it might spoil the neighborhood? That’s being civilized. And school’s should not “promote” a religion — absolutely not — but they shouldn’t “hinder the free practice of” religion, either, such as a child saying a prayer before they eat lunch. I think both parts are in the Constitution, not just your part.
09/21, 3:16 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
dalemf has it exactly right.
Every group has its individuals that can sometimes taint the whole group. As a Christian conservative I recognize that the assorted zelots that want to bomb abortion clinics, or scream at gays etc tend to put the whole group in a bad light. But fact are, Evangelical Christianity as a whole is not out to coerce anyone into doing anything really. We prefer that what we consider to be imoral acts not get legislated into common and acceptable practice…so what? we use legal and non violent and constitutional means to go about this rather than ‘jihad’.
The left is afraid of what MIGHT happen. Ignorance and often hatred is the driving force behind the vitriolic smack from the left here. Crys of ‘fairy tales’ and ‘mistranslations’ are obvious indicators of the uneducated and fearful.
The tenants of Christianity are to not to HATE anyone. I have a friend at church that struggles with alcoholism, he is openly embraced there, as are folks of sexual addictions as well.
In any case those of you speaking from a position of ignorance on the Bible should pick up ‘Evidence That Demands a Verdict’ by Josh McDowell. He, as a shinning star law student, set out to disprove the Bible once and for all with this book. If you do not like to be challenged intellectually then avoid it at all costs.
09/21, 3:20 PM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
“Christian influence in this country has done far less to interfer with your rights and freedoms than liberal influence, as this lawsuit so clearly demonstrates.”
So in the Constitution there is a right “All peoples shall drive cars” ???? Well guess what smart guy; their isn’t a right to drive a far. Its a privilege (you get a license don’t you??).
Thats some straight up dumb ****. I learned about the Constitution in like 2nd grade bro.
Dalemf; you did a half-assed job labeling lefts and rights. of course, leftist people believe in something; why the hell do you think they stand for it?
09/21, 3:24 PM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
“About this law suit, if CA wants more efficient cars this is the wrong way to do it. if i want my brother to grab me a soda out of the fridge i dont hit him with a baseball bat…” - yournamehere
your example is not accurate. lets say hes made $50,000 off the butler service he offers you. then you say hes been tracking dirt in the house and needs you to pay for damages.
That would be a much more parallel situation.
09/21, 3:25 PM
posted by:
MiracleGro
I don’t want anyone with a religious agenda in power.
Dalefm you won’t even entertain evolution as a possibility will you and I bet you don’t teach it to your kids as a possible alternative to the fairy stories
09/21, 3:26 PM
posted by:
Random Jerk
Not what you “might do” but what you are TRYING to do. As if the act of trying curb the freedoms I enjoy is any different that actually doing it. Either way I have to fight for MY freedom.
May I ask, what freedoms has the liberal left stripped from you Dale? Besides the freedom to define the freedoms of others.
09/21, 3:28 PM
posted by:
Jimbo - G Mill$
Damn randomjerk!!
“May I ask, what freedoms has the liberal left stripped from you Dale? Besides the freedom to define the freedoms of others.”
Very appropriately worded.
Kudos.
09/21, 3:34 PM
posted by:
YourNameHere
Jimbo - Whatim trying to say is if CA wants better cars they should help. tax breaks. incetives. funding.after this law suit what do they expect? the automakers would have less moeny to do what CA wants them to do! you catch more flys with sugar…also you example is far out there its laughable. who said anything about a butler or dirt? have you ever asked someone for a favor? asking nicely is the best way to get what you want, thats all im trying to say. stop trying to sue everyone. what is CA said they would give $1bil to the 1st car company that can sell 250,000 cars that get over 75mpg. i bet you everyone and there mother would be on that.
09/21, 4:06 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
Ok random
exactly what rights have Christians removed from you? (or tried to remove) Or anyone else for that matter?
09/21, 4:13 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
By the way, all students that go to the ‘narrow minded’ public schools in the US get evolution as the only option. What are they afraid of?
09/21, 4:26 PM
posted by:
YourNameHere
i have seen plenty of christain groups attempt to tell ME what video games are ok to play. that goes for CDs i can listen to as well as Movies i can watch.
09/21, 4:31 PM
posted by:
YourNameHere
…to complete my though…i don’t understand why Christian groups think they have the right to police what i can and cant play/hear/see. if you don’t want your kid to be exposed to it then don’t let him. but no way are you making any decision for me. this goes back to my previous comment that i don’t care if your gay or Christian, don’t push your beliefs on me and im fine. but this is Christians telling me its not ok to do what I want because they don’t think it is.
09/21, 4:42 PM
posted by:
Fatstrat
Uh, yournamehere
when and where exactly did Christian try to keep you from getting Duke Nukem and your favorite Hip Hop cd?
If I remember right, some groups wanted package labeling to help parents make informed choices, in fact, wasnt that Tipper and Al gore that were all about that?
Better try again.
09/21, 5:21 PM
posted by:
MiracleGro
I’m with Random Jerk all the way on this one.
09/21, 5:31 PM
posted by:
Andre Neves
This is so stupid. I bet 80% of the vehicles which are used in law enforcement are Ford Crown Vics. Aren’t they con