Comments on: California to add new gas tax?

By: sesso

sesso — Mon, 04 Sep 2006 07:19:13 +0000

great site

By: winstrol

winstrol — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:47:29 +0000

winstrol winstrol

By: ogdjca royubz

ogdjca royubz — Wed, 24 May 2006 15:31:39 +0000

xofkteza kxordy jiow fxrmewos iryqtl ewzpngu cjshqoem

By: LeftLane_RightWing

LeftLane_RightWing — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:56:15 +0000

It is time for California to live within its means. Eliminate the revenue vacuum created under the Davis administration and reduce government size. I am an advocate of social service cuts and government downsizing not new tax.

By: HemiDakota

HemiDakota — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:09:41 +0000

Maybe he should be taxed since he drives a Hummer….what an idiotic statement. Look…maybe we should sue Mother Nature since she pollutes more than 60-percent of the air.

By: Angelo

Angelo — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 05:30:08 +0000

Increasing the price of gas will not reduce demand, it will only affect quantitative demand. We need something else to actually move the demand-curve, we need strong incentives to buy fuel-efficient vehicles (say a tax-defferement for very fuel efficient cars and a stronger guzzler tax for the lesser ones).

By: nik

nik — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:50:59 +0000

Heh – well, gas taxes sure seem to work in European countries (Germany, for example). It hardly helps the gas companies — in fact, it hurts them, as people buy cars with better gas milages. That, I think, would explain why conservatives are (generally) opposed to this one. Gas taxes encourage people to buy cars with better gas milages, in turn encouraging car compainies to come up with cars with better gas milages, and so on. Ironically, the only people hurt are the gas companies.

By: wake1

wake1 — Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:04:16 +0000

Imagine if gray” tax ‘em till their dead ” davis was still in there.

By: shane

shane — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:55:11 +0000

looks like he’s filling up an SUV… kinda ironic

By: Madcapp

Madcapp — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:33:03 +0000

Hahaha, switchgrass, you think we’re that gullible. That’s a modern day “it wasn’t a UFO, it was swampgas”.

By: Madcapp

Madcapp — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:30:53 +0000

I don’t think its local, I think its a state tax allegedly geared at researching alternative fuels. They can collect millions of dollars, and pay a political contributor piles of cash to produce a report saying people should try running their cars on switchgrass or wood chips. Sound familiar?

By: Mookie

Mookie — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:26:35 +0000

So tell me again how taxing oil for local revenue helps oil companies?

By: Madcapp

Madcapp — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:21:58 +0000

That dude is an asshole. He doesn’t give a damn about global warming, he’s helping his oil buddies out.