Comments on: Cerberus looking for full ownership of GMAC?

By: beatusmongous

beatusmongous — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:20:23 +0000

Yardog, I’m sure they get plenty of voice mails from ex-employees saying exactly that, but in every language. Either that, or their secretaries get those voice mails. They probably just erase them, though.

By: yarddog82abn

yarddog82abn — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:07:23 +0000

Some times I fill like calling up the heads of the Big 3 and tell them, “PENDEJOS”

By: yarddog82abn

yarddog82abn — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:06:13 +0000

GM only needs to sell GMAC, Let Nissan have It’s way with Chrysler….

By: johnnycanuck

johnnycanuck — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:40:47 +0000

Oh yeah, everyone’s a winner baby. Ask all those Chrysler employees what they think the odds are they’ll still have jobs in ‘09.

By: Z06ified

Z06ified — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:02:44 +0000

Maryann isn’t too bright. The only way Cerberus would win is if they sold Chrysler for more than what they paid for it. I don’t see GM or anyone else for that matter, paying more for Chrysler than Cerberus paid. At least not yet. Cerberus would have to turn Chrysler around, showing a profit for 3 consecutive years before they could sell it at a premium. Right now, that seems a LONG way off.

By: jayjc08

jayjc08 — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:55:25 +0000

Sad, when a capital management company can’t even turn around Chrysler. Really though, I don’t believe Cerberus was in any way serious about developing Chrysler. Very few new models in the pipeline. And we have yet to see that redone Chrysler Sebring and other models…