Chevrolet says that Corvette number 1,500,000, a white convertible with a red interior and a black top, has rolled off the automaker’s Bowling Green, Kentucky, assembly line. Outfitted in the same color scheme as the first, 500,000th and millionth Corvette, the latest car is expected to stay in General Motors’ Heritage Collection.
“The 1.5 millionth Corvette is a great example of how Chevy is America’s Brand,” Chevrolet Marketing Director Karen Rafferty said in a statement released by the automaker. “For nearly 60 years we have built America’s Sports Car and this milestone is a solid proof point.”
The first production Corvette rolled off the assembly line on June 30, 1953, while the 500,000th car was built in 1977 and the one millionth in 1992.



06/10, 2:50 PM
posted by:
CADDY-V
I’ll take a ZR1 thank you.
06/10, 2:54 PM
posted by:
yarddog82abn
Congrats GM…
06/10, 3:31 PM
posted by:
KarLoveBoy88
^Yea really. Who really cares
06/10, 3:40 PM
posted by:
A4
it only took them 15 years to sell 500,000 when the atrocious C4 was out? I guess the mullet must have really been in style back then.
06/10, 3:53 PM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
Yay… I guess.
06/10, 3:56 PM
posted by:
Mutant@DCX
According to research by Specialty Equipment Market Association and Experian Automotive, as of 2009, there were approximately 750,000 Corvettes of all model years registered in the United States. Corvette owners were fairly equally distributed throughout the country, with the highest density in Michigan (3.47 per 1000 residents) and the lowest density in Utah, Mississippi, and Hawaii (1.66, 1.63, and 1.53 registrations per 1000 residents). 47% of them hold college degrees (significantly above the nationwide average of 27%), and 82% are between ages of 40 and 69 (median age being 53).
06/10, 3:57 PM
posted by:
Mutant@DCX
C8 will be 4 door and electric, tree huggers rejoice
06/10, 4:20 PM
posted by:
hummah
I’m not a person who blindly loves domestic cars by any means, but you have to admit that the Corvette is a phenomenal car for the money. Nothing else in it’s class can deliver so much punch for so little cash. It does have pushrods and leaf-springs, and the rear bumper does appear to be made of tupperware- but for under $50K you can blow the doors off of foreign cars that cost twice as much.
06/10, 4:28 PM
posted by:
HoosierHero
Beautiful picture of the corvettes!
06/10, 4:31 PM
posted by:
A4
…well the pushrod has been proven to be some of the best technology when properly applied, and the C6 suspension is a double-wishbone setup both front and rear, and simply uses leaf springs as a secondary means to prevent body roll, so while it is a different style of technology, it isnt by any means inferior.
06/10, 4:49 PM
posted by:
jackjimturkey
Well done!
06/10, 5:25 PM
posted by:
zfenderguy
Looks like the 2 millionth Corvette will still be a C6, seeing how development is going. As previously stated, it will probably be Voltec powered and ahve a 0-60 time somewhere around 9 seconds though.
06/10, 5:46 PM
posted by:
andy
congrats Chevy, and congrats to the Bowling Green plant… A4, leaf springs are also lighter, and with you can use lighter anti-roll bars, and they are also positioned better on the car for lower center of gravity and wide mounting
06/10, 6:06 PM
posted by:
Rafa LL
-Yawns-
06/10, 6:31 PM
posted by:
Hyperion
I thought there were more total Corvettes than 1.5 million. Great news!
06/10, 10:51 PM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Awesome. The Corvette rules, you bastards! Anyone who’s pumping red blood in his body and has at least half a brain knows this.
06/10, 11:22 PM
posted by:
spg900
1c3d0g- Still not impressed that it takes a 7.0 litre engine to compete with the other big boys. Thats like being impressed by a senior playing against high schoolers. Their interiors need work too.
06/11, 12:47 PM
posted by:
RaineMan
I thought they sold off like half of their “heritage” collection?
Though… if GM is taxpayer owned… let’s just go ask for the keys.
06/11, 1:45 PM
posted by:
davebo
Why do people consider using a larger sized engine to be some sort of cheating? Sure the Ferrari F430 has a V8 that takes up only 4.3 liters compared to the Z06’s 7.0 liters. But it produces less torque, less horsepower, gets worse milage and the car weighs 16lbs more. Sounds like the “high schoolers” just need to grow up a little : P
But you’re right, the interiors stink. I’m just glad I got my Corvette at age 25 while I was young enough to appreciate it. I don’t see many of the 82% of older Corvette owners passing anyone on the highway or doing doughnuts in parking lots. The other Corvette owners around here don’t even have the decency to remove the top in nice weather.
06/11, 5:35 PM
posted by:
2WheeledSpeed
“Attention Tax-Payers who are bailing us out, instead of selling our 1.5 millionth Corvette and perhaps even selling it at auction as a special buy, we’re sticking it in our personal museum so we can be so proud we’ve done something cool while our company goes bankrupt and we stick you with the bill”
Lovingly, GM
06/11, 5:45 PM
posted by:
2WheeledSpeed
And on another note, I agree with davebo that you shouldn’t bash a car because of it’s engine, if there was a perfect engine size/configuration for sports cars wouldn’t we have found it by now? I don’t care if it’s a 7 liter, a 4.3 liter, a 2.4 liter w/turbo, whatever. Fast is fast, different people just take different approaches to doing it and that’s what makes cars so damned interesting.
I mean if you REALLY want to start talking about vehicles with small engines humiliating vehicles with huge engines I know a 1.4 liter vehicle that only costs 12 grand that runs sub 10 second quarter mile times stock…
06/11, 9:00 PM
posted by:
spg900
2Wheeled Speed- I’m not trying to bash (well, maybe a little) but i am a tech nut. If you can get the performance you state from a 1.4 litre, now that’s impressive (unless it’s a 3 hundred pound motorcycle).You have to agree that it’s just TOO EASY to do it with 7 liters.
06/12, 11:14 AM
posted by:
2WheeledSpeed
I’m not really trying to defend the ‘Vette, the last time I thought they looked cool was in the 60s or 70s (Here come the ‘Vette worshippers to kill me! All between the ages of 40-69!). But maybe you can look at it another way, maybe GM can offer the ‘Vette for reasonably low prices (Compared to other super car competitors) because instead of focusing on packing the same amount of horsepower into 3 or 4 or 5 liters, they do it with 7. Or maybe they like the torque characteristics of a huge big block V8.
I’m no expert and I don’t know, just tossing those ideas out there for the sake of argument. But you know, when I’m driving my car and I get whipped at a stoplight race by a ‘Vette I’m not sitting there complaining “Well that didn’t count, too easy for him!”
Plus big blocks are part of American history ya know? Who wants a 4 liter ‘Vette?
06/13, 12:08 AM
posted by:
spg900
2Wheeled – All your points are well taken but if the vette could whip my ass with a 4 litre… IWOULD be impressed.
06/13, 11:33 AM
posted by:
2WheeledSpeed
Well, isn’t it the Viper and Corvette who hold the record at the Nurburgring? While high technology Nissan and Porsche fight it out for the number three spot?
http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-claims-new-nurburgring-lap-record-for-gt-r.html
“Winning is winning, whether it’s by an inch or a mile” You might not be impressed, but you’re still paying more money to lose…
06/13, 5:56 PM
posted by:
spg900
2 Wheeled – Do you not think the Europeans and Japanese could not build 7 liter engines (without the 1970’s technology) if they decided to go that route? Gas is too expensive there and all the gas-guzzler taxes mean that the manufacturers are forced to go small displacement. It just seems the brightest minds in the US seem go to NASA instead of the big 3. Or maybe, it’s just that the bean-counters have too much power.
Happy wheeling !