Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

10/15/2008, 12:22 PM

Chevrolet

Quick Spin: 2008 Chevrolet Traverse LT

From a business perspective, General Motors’ strategy of re-trimming a basic platform and selling it across lines should be commended. It cuts research, development and assembly costs, and, theoretically, spreads a good vehicle across a wide spectrum of buyers. But, as we’ve learned in the past, it can sometimes spread the automaker a little too thin.

GM has been doing this for ages, perhaps most notoriously in the 1980s with the J-platform Buick (Skyhawk), Cadillac (Cimarron), Chevrolet (Cavalier), Oldsmobile (Firenza), Pontiac (2000/J2000/Sunbird). Even the most died-in-the-wool GM enthusiast has a hard time telling them apart from 10 feet.

So it was with some trepidation that we approached GM’s latest Lambda platform SUV, the Chevrolet Traverse (pronounced Truh-verse, not Tra-verse, unlike the Michigan resort town). First launched as the GMC Acadia, the platform spawned Saturn (Outlook) and Buick (Enclave) variants before the General slapped a bow-tie on the grille and called it a Chevy. For what it’s worth, the next-generation Cadillac Escalade will almost certainly ride on this platform.

What’s notable?
The Traverse is the least expensive of the four Lambdas, starting a hair under $29,000 for a front-wheel-drive model, about $400 less than the next-closest Outlook. GM says it is aimed squarely at soccer moms, but we suspect the GMC and Saturn demographics are about the same.

Traverse gets unique interior and exterior trim, as well as specific suspension tuning. We had the opportunity to drive the Traverse and Outlook back-to-back and our seat-of-the-pants impressions suggest that the Traverse might ride just a little softer than the Outlook, but the difference is really negligible.

Firm, accurate steering surprised us, though the body leans heavily in corners even for a large crossover. The Traverse has no problem getting up to speed and seems to be geared for acceleration. Its 3.6-liter direct-injection V6 is as sweet here as it is in the Cadillac CTS. GM claims that the Buick Enclave is the quietest of the quartet, but despite back-to-back drives, our ears detected little difference.

Where the Traverse will likely conquer cross-shoppers is its combination of unique style and its low base price. Traverse takes its interior and exterior style from the Malibu – not a bad starting point if you ask us. A similar “in your face” grille and sporty tail lamps give the Traverse more flair than its simpler Saturn and GMC cousins. Like the Saturn and GMC, however, the Traverse does a poor job of masking its length from the side. Long doors and short overhangs make it look a bit like a stretched limo, a trait we noticed during a Quick Spin in the Saturn Aura.

Climb aboard – it’s not too high of a step – and the Traverse greets you with an interior again inspired by the Malibu. A two-tone, dual-cowl-style fascia adds some style to a class of bland-by-convention interiors. The materials choices won’t make you think you’re in a Maserati, but they’re fine for the price and seem durable enough to hold up to the abuse likely to be inflicted by the rugrats of the aforementioned demographic.

The view out the back is unnecessarily obscured by a wide D-pillar and short last-row windows. Blind-spot rearview mirrors – like the kind we’ve seen sold at truck stops for ages – help the situation a lot and we hope GM spreads the feature across its lineup. Either that, or we hope automakers stop designing family cars with massive blind spots.

The middle seat is roomy and offers an optional center console that will almost certainly be coated in Juicy Juice by the time the odometer clicks four digits. A surprisingly roomy third row is easily accessible thanks to one of the best folding seats we’ve encountered. One lever flops the middle seat up and moves it forward, revealing a wide path to the third class seats. Adults should have no problem getting in and out and the space is sufficient for short trips. That last bench is sparsely padded, however, and wouldn’t be comfortable for anything more than a 15 minute ride. The seats fold out of the way easily when not in use, revealing a flat and wide cargo space. Even with the third row up, there’s room for groceries and small duffel bags full of soccer equipment.

Traverse strikes us as the best of the Lambdas – due primarily to the fact that it costs less than the others. The Saturn and GMC have a hard time making a case for the extra cash they demand. Dealership location and certainly sales practices are probably enough to pursuade many buyers into parting with a few more Benjamins by buying the Outlook and Acadia.

Still, the fact that all three are so close to each other in price and design makes them obviously redundant in our eyes.

Fortunately, unlike those J-Bodies, most of which have rusted away, the Lambdas are impressive vehicles that make way more sense for most families than thirstier, poorer-handling and riding big SUVs like the Chevrolet Tahoe. Compared to their peers from other manufacturers, the Lambdas are top-notch efforts highlighted most by the latest value-laden entry, the Traverse.

2009 Chevrolet Traverse LT AWD (2LT Package) base price, $38,025. As tested, $39,495.
Rear DVD player, $1,470.

Words and photos by Andrew Ganz.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

10/15, 12:44 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

Those tail lights look pretty lame square on.

10/15, 1:18 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

I just don’t know. I sure like those minivan sliding doors better than the standard arrangement if the vehicle’s mission is primarily that of a kiddy limo. Not only are they eminently more practical, but you tend to catch far better poses when you’re on milf watch without that door getting in the way.

10/15, 3:35 PM

posted by:

tzu13

Why is it that GM just can’t seem to design decent-looking rear ends for Chevy’s as of late? First the Malibu, then the Cruze (most retarded car name, ever), and now this bland piece of crap. Their fronts all seem to have so much promise, but it seems like the designers just give up once their reach the tail.

10/15, 4:30 PM

posted by:

RTT10

tzu is gotta point there so simple specially on the malibu

10/15, 5:06 PM

posted by:

bigp

well the flex is better in ecoboost form, plus im sick of seeing lambas the all look alike so get in

10/15, 7:24 PM

posted by:

TomF

$40k as tested for the “cheap” Lambda? As we head into a depression with higher borrowing rates and a smaller pool of eligible buyers? GM must be operating in an alternate universe.

The Buick - GMC dealership I drive past on my morning commute has fleets of new Enclaves and Acadias lined up hopefully / sadly on the front lot, all marked down to the low $30s. They’ve been sitting there for weeks. Nobody’s even driven one.

Badge engineering is unwise at the best of times. In times like these, it really doesn’t make any sense — because dealer markdowns and price incentives at the individual divisions are going to scramble the brand hierarchy and make Chevys cost more than Buicks.

10/15, 10:00 PM

posted by:

Get Real

GM should hand over the unibody and let each division design and build it’s own version.

Wait.

That was how GM used to be.

Harley Earl is crying.

10/16, 9:08 AM

posted by:

Andrew

TomF,

The Traverse we tested is one step below top-of-the-line. I have spent time crawling around a base 2WD Traverse LS and, other than a rear differential (GM expects that well over half of all Traverses will be 2WD, limiting their ability to traverse…) and some creature comforts, it’s the same basic vehicle.

johnnycanuck,

I tend to agree with you on those sliding doored vehicles, but the market doesn’t. GM has never been able to do well with a minivan. And that’s just what these Lambdas are - “butch” vans without sliding doors.

10/16, 9:52 AM

posted by:

roy

I checked the inventory online of the nearest Chevy dealer. the one thye had in stock was a brand spankin’ one with an MSRP of $46,475. That’s going to be there a long time. Whoever did the ordering needs to get a load of reality. An Enclave for $46K - maybe. Definitely not a Traverse.

10/16, 11:57 AM

posted by:

TomF

Roy — exactly. It’s like these people don’t read the newspapers. The financial world as we know it is coming to an end, and here come these poor fools with their $46,000 Chevrolets.

10/16, 8:17 PM

posted by:

jayjc08

Wait… is this a mistype? 38k? I thought you said it starts a hair under 29k, and you have it starting at 39k?

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.