<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Spin: 2008 Chevrolet Traverse LT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:46:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413865</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413865</guid>
		<description>Wait... is this a mistype? 38k? I thought you said it starts a hair under 29k, and you have it starting at 39k?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230; is this a mistype? 38k? I thought you said it starts a hair under 29k, and you have it starting at 39k?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413713</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413713</guid>
		<description>Roy -- exactly. It&#039;s like these people don&#039;t read the newspapers. The financial world as we know it is coming to an end, and here come these poor fools with their $46,000 Chevrolets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy &#8212; exactly. It&#8217;s like these people don&#8217;t read the newspapers. The financial world as we know it is coming to an end, and here come these poor fools with their $46,000 Chevrolets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413687</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413687</guid>
		<description>I checked the inventory online of the nearest Chevy dealer.  the one thye had in stock was a brand spankin&#039; one with an MSRP of $46,475.  That&#039;s going to be there a long time.  Whoever did the  ordering needs to get a load of reality.  An Enclave for $46K - maybe.  Definitely not a Traverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked the inventory online of the nearest Chevy dealer.  the one thye had in stock was a brand spankin&#8217; one with an MSRP of $46,475.  That&#8217;s going to be there a long time.  Whoever did the  ordering needs to get a load of reality.  An Enclave for $46K &#8211; maybe.  Definitely not a Traverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413676</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413676</guid>
		<description>TomF, 

The Traverse we tested is one step below top-of-the-line. I have spent time crawling around a base 2WD Traverse LS and, other than a rear differential (GM expects that well over half of all Traverses will be 2WD, limiting their ability to traverse...) and some creature comforts, it&#039;s the same basic vehicle.

johnnycanuck,

I tend to agree with you on those sliding doored vehicles, but the market doesn&#039;t. GM has never been able to do well with a minivan. And that&#039;s just what these Lambdas are - &quot;butch&quot; vans without sliding doors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TomF, </p>
<p>The Traverse we tested is one step below top-of-the-line. I have spent time crawling around a base 2WD Traverse LS and, other than a rear differential (GM expects that well over half of all Traverses will be 2WD, limiting their ability to traverse&#8230;) and some creature comforts, it&#8217;s the same basic vehicle.</p>
<p>johnnycanuck,</p>
<p>I tend to agree with you on those sliding doored vehicles, but the market doesn&#8217;t. GM has never been able to do well with a minivan. And that&#8217;s just what these Lambdas are &#8211; &#8220;butch&#8221; vans without sliding doors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413616</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413616</guid>
		<description>GM should hand over the unibody and let each division design and build it&#039;s own version.

Wait.

That was how GM used to be.  

Harley Earl is crying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM should hand over the unibody and let each division design and build it&#8217;s own version.</p>
<p>Wait.</p>
<p>That was how GM used to be.  </p>
<p>Harley Earl is crying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413584</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413584</guid>
		<description>$40k as tested for the &quot;cheap&quot; Lambda? As we head into a depression with higher borrowing rates and a smaller pool of eligible buyers? GM must be operating in an alternate universe.

The Buick - GMC dealership I drive past on my morning commute has fleets of new Enclaves and Acadias lined up hopefully / sadly on the front lot, all marked down to the low $30s. They&#039;ve been sitting there for weeks. Nobody&#039;s even driven one.

Badge engineering is unwise at the best of times. In times like these, it really doesn&#039;t make any sense -- because dealer markdowns and price incentives at the individual divisions are going to scramble the brand hierarchy and make Chevys cost more than Buicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$40k as tested for the &#8220;cheap&#8221; Lambda? As we head into a depression with higher borrowing rates and a smaller pool of eligible buyers? GM must be operating in an alternate universe.</p>
<p>The Buick &#8211; GMC dealership I drive past on my morning commute has fleets of new Enclaves and Acadias lined up hopefully / sadly on the front lot, all marked down to the low $30s. They&#8217;ve been sitting there for weeks. Nobody&#8217;s even driven one.</p>
<p>Badge engineering is unwise at the best of times. In times like these, it really doesn&#8217;t make any sense &#8212; because dealer markdowns and price incentives at the individual divisions are going to scramble the brand hierarchy and make Chevys cost more than Buicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413544</link>
		<dc:creator>bigp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413544</guid>
		<description>well the flex is better in ecoboost form, plus im sick of seeing lambas the all look alike so get in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the flex is better in ecoboost form, plus im sick of seeing lambas the all look alike so get in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTT10</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413531</link>
		<dc:creator>RTT10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413531</guid>
		<description>tzu is gotta point there so simple specially on the malibu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tzu is gotta point there so simple specially on the malibu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tzu13</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413512</link>
		<dc:creator>tzu13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413512</guid>
		<description>Why is it that GM just can&#039;t seem to design decent-looking rear ends for Chevy&#039;s as of late? First the Malibu, then the Cruze (most retarded car name, ever), and now this bland piece of crap. Their fronts all seem to have so much promise, but it seems like the designers just give up once their reach the tail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that GM just can&#8217;t seem to design decent-looking rear ends for Chevy&#8217;s as of late? First the Malibu, then the Cruze (most retarded car name, ever), and now this bland piece of crap. Their fronts all seem to have so much promise, but it seems like the designers just give up once their reach the tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413488</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413488</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t know. I sure like those minivan sliding doors better than the standard arrangement if the vehicle&#039;s mission is primarily that of a kiddy limo. Not only are they eminently more practical, but you tend to catch far better poses when you&#039;re on milf watch without that door getting in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t know. I sure like those minivan sliding doors better than the standard arrangement if the vehicle&#8217;s mission is primarily that of a kiddy limo. Not only are they eminently more practical, but you tend to catch far better poses when you&#8217;re on milf watch without that door getting in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayer_ray_nagin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chevrolet-traverse-quick-spin.html/comment-page-1#comment-413481</link>
		<dc:creator>mayer_ray_nagin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=10489#comment-413481</guid>
		<description>Those tail lights look pretty lame square on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those tail lights look pretty lame square on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
