RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Chrysler considering dropping Mopar, Chrysler Transport

08/29/2007, 8:20 AM

By Drew Johnson

In an effort to get Chrysler’s financial situation on the right track, the automaker has proposed dropping non-core assets in recent United Auto Worker contract talks. Chrysler has proposed shutting down or selling its high-performance parts division, Mopar, as well as Chrysler Transport, the division responsible for managing deliveries of supplies to Chrysler plants.

According to Automotive News, the UAW opposes the divestments as Mopar and Chrysler Transport employ about 1,300 workers. It remains unclear if the divestments will remain as part of the final agreement.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

08/29, 8:43 AM

posted by:

Deanster

I don’t know what Mopar does, but if all they do is stock and install bolt-on visuals like skirt kits for the Caliber SRT, then xxxx’em. Out they go.

The transport group, I don’t know anything about that.

08/29, 9:03 AM

posted by:

Andre Neves

WOW!
Deanster, it is not just about bolt-on visuals. Mopar is and has been the Performance division for years. Mopar is a huge chunk of chrysler’s history. This is just sad news, especialy for the older crowd.
This is like BMW saying that their “M” division is shutting down.

08/29, 9:15 AM

posted by:

55amg

WHAT!!!!??? I LIKE SRT

08/29, 9:35 AM

posted by:

global_lightning

Standard business practice. Identify what’s core and sell off everything else. In this case, what they’re weighing is the increased sales they get through MOPAR. If MOPAR is a profit generator, it stays. If it’s breaking even or just ‘bringing intagible value’, then it goes.
But to agree with Neves, letting MOPAR go would be a sad, sad day for performance enthusiasts

08/29, 9:38 AM

posted by:

jJayC08

It’s true, Andre Nerves put it into a conservative sort of view.

Mopar to me is what Shebly is to Ford, although there’s not much of a comparison between cars since Shelby isn’t unique to Ford, it’s the just of the message.

Currently though, I haven’t seen much of Mopar lately. I say downsize Mopar, and make it a more independant tuning company but more or less specifically for Chrysler, such as Shelby is. This would make Mopar more independent, but still intertwined with Chrysler and it’s history. Usually when designing or tuning firms go private, or reduce in size

08/29, 9:40 AM

posted by:

jJayC08

* or reduce in size, they become more adventurous (es) in the products they produce.

08/29, 10:18 AM

posted by:

Karkat

Make Mopar what AMG used to be for Mercedes. A separate organization but still cooperating to produce.

08/29, 10:23 AM

posted by:

Commodore

Dropping Mopar will make Chrysler a worthless shell for me. MOPAR and Chrysler are synomyms

08/29, 10:38 AM

posted by:

Deanster

OK guys, sorry. I didn’t realize they were so important to Chrysler! Then they should stay LOL!

08/29, 10:49 AM

posted by:

HoosierHero

Chrysler will definitely survive something like that, but it IS a part of their history. While I don’t use MOPAR (and never have), I’d hate to see something so storied just dropped like that. They should have it integrated like Ford does with their SVT.

08/29, 11:00 AM

posted by:

A4

Hoosier look where SVT is now, they may as well have flushed that turd down years ago.

08/29, 12:23 PM

posted by:

1c3d0g

Killing Mopar will definitely be the end of Chrysler as we know it. Without them Chrysler is worthless. Don’t do it, Cerberus!

08/29, 12:56 PM

posted by:

AMGoff

ugh… you people…. not quite, yes they make Performace parts… but they’re not equivalent to “M” or “AMG” in that respect, you would compare those to SRT. Mopar is Chryslers parts and service division… period. You want a stock replacement alternator, you go through Mopar. Hence the reason they are called “Mopars” because they’re made from “Mopar” parts. I really don’t give a flying-f about the Transport division, but they’re going to sell their soul if they drop Mopar. If they go through with this I’m afraid all of the “slash and burn” worries may indeed be coming true. This is a sad sad day indeed.

08/29, 12:58 PM

posted by:

AMGoff

Mopar… by the way, was started back in the 20s and stands for MOtor PARts…

08/29, 1:33 PM

posted by:

sik59rt

if they sell Mopar Parts or any part of the name to anyone else, i will have lost all faith in the world. MOPAR can only be associated with Chrysler. its like saying your AMG really isnt a Mercedes or you M isnt a Bimmer, or your Honda…well who cares about Hondas.

but then again, im sure this is LLN reporting on something that isnt true, so im not too worried

08/29, 2:02 PM

posted by:

purdue

I would think that the overlap between Mopar and what other parts of Cerberus would make them ideal to look at combining/cutting them as needed.

08/29, 6:34 PM

posted by:

BMan1113VR

Mopar = Ford Performance Racing Parts/GM Performance . . . they carry crate engines and such. . . still wouldn’t like to see it dropped though

08/29, 6:45 PM

posted by:

67_L-88

I’m not a dodge man at all, but damn, if this is true, it’s sad day for many car enthusiasts

08/29, 8:30 PM

posted by:

jdasch1

Just the beginning of what Cerberus is going to do to this company!! Slice and dice. Shedding and splitting until its a shell for someone else to buy for some more profit. Not one real car guy is at the helm now, and that will lead to its destruction. Car companies need both car nuts and bean counters…will they learn that in time??

08/30, 9:20 AM

posted by:

Get Real

Isn’t Cerbus doing what raiders did in the 80’s and 90’s ? Buy companies in trouble then sell the valuable assets.

Next they will sell “Jeep”, then sell what remains to another car company.

08/30, 11:50 AM

posted by:

jackjimturkey

AMGoff: My uncle, in his arkansas accent. I though “Mopar,” ment “Mo’ Pawr,” or “more power.”

Sik: I care about hondas, as long as they only have 2 tires!

jdasch: I’d say “a bean counter,”

Get Real: I was surprised Daimler didn’t sell Jeep

08/31, 6:11 PM

posted by:

Captain Spadaro

Dropping Mopar is a bad idea. As for Chrysler Transport, no comment.

09/03, 12:20 AM

posted by:

DialM4Speed

This is the kind of stupidity I expected when Cerebus (or whatever it’s called) took over. Thanks for not disapointing me!

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel