Comments on: Chrysler debuts new logo http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: A4 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321796 A4 Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:02:47 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321796 SNORE SNORE

]]> By: BLISS http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321649 BLISS Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:04:00 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321649 BACK TO WHAT THEY WERE BEFORE......GOOD. BACK TO WHAT THEY WERE BEFORE……GOOD.

]]> By: Get Real http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321064 Get Real Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:50:35 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321064 5 Points of Quality Transmission Engine Electrical Hardware Body Build not.... 5 Points of Quality

Transmission
Engine
Electrical
Hardware
Body Build

not….

]]> By: Deanster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321007 Deanster Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:36:20 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321007 Wait, I got one. The Audi 80. THAT was a good car from the late 80's. I still see them around today - their build quality was exceptional and one guy I know says his is essentially rattle-free after 2 decades. Wait, I got one. The Audi 80. THAT was a good car from the late 80′s. I still see them around today – their build quality was exceptional and one guy I know says his is essentially rattle-free after 2 decades.

]]> By: Deanster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321006 Deanster Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:35:17 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-321006 The K-cars came from the 80's. What car from the 80's was NOT a shitbox, other than some very high-end Benzes like the 500 SEC and SEL? Even BMWs from that era were rancid, and don't even mention Toyota and Honda, the little rustbuckets that couldn't. The K-cars came from the 80′s. What car from the 80′s was NOT a shitbox, other than some very high-end Benzes like the 500 SEC and SEL? Even BMWs from that era were rancid, and don’t even mention Toyota and Honda, the little rustbuckets that couldn’t.

]]> By: Me http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320902 Me Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:46:02 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320902 AmGoff, I'm not the one that created the K-car bashing. But they are bashed nonetheless because of what they were -not for what they enabled Chrysler to do. Certainly the cars I rode in were junk. They rattled, and the engine may have been reliable (I don't remember), but the rest of the drivetrain and suspension was anything but. The headliners dropped after a couple of years and the paint jobs were horrible. Those are just the things I remember as a kid. Again, my point was that the the new logo reminds me too much of those times in American auto history when the cars were crap. Your opinion may differ, but history will say otherwise. Also, I see Yugos on the street too every so often. Does that make it a good car? AmGoff, I’m not the one that created the K-car bashing. But they are bashed nonetheless because of what they were -not for what they enabled Chrysler to do. Certainly the cars I rode in were junk. They rattled, and the engine may have been reliable (I don’t remember), but the rest of the drivetrain and suspension was anything but. The headliners dropped after a couple of years and the paint jobs were horrible. Those are just the things I remember as a kid. Again, my point was that the the new logo reminds me too much of those times in American auto history when the cars were crap. Your opinion may differ, but history will say otherwise. Also, I see Yugos on the street too every so often. Does that make it a good car?

]]> By: Deanster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320893 Deanster Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:28:06 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320893 Guys, all this xxxxing bashing of the Compass and Patriot. I drove a Compass, it was totally fine. Quick, smooth, comfortable, surprisingly spacious. Build quality was fine. Not BMW territory, but it's a sub-20k box with 4WD, perfect for someone on a budget in a snowy climate. What's the xxxxing problem? It's not like they're gunning for Mercedes with it, it's an ENTRY LEVEL JEEP. Guys, all this xxxxing bashing of the Compass and Patriot. I drove a Compass, it was totally fine. Quick, smooth, comfortable, surprisingly spacious.

Build quality was fine. Not BMW territory, but it’s a sub-20k box with 4WD, perfect for someone on a budget in a snowy climate. What’s the xxxxing problem? It’s not like they’re gunning for Mercedes with it, it’s an ENTRY LEVEL JEEP.

]]> By: jackjimturkey http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320879 jackjimturkey Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:56:59 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320879 AMGoff, you're kind of right -- the K-car is supposed to be such crap, but from time to time, you see one that's still running. veda: I always wonder about that, why jews are so quick to buy benzes. maybe it's a nrevenge thing Me: The aries/reliant were probably chrysler's last crappy cars. Unless you consiuder the Neon crappy. Now some of their newer cars, the two small jeeps and the nitro, don't work for me, but they're almost certainly more sensible purchases than their toyonda "rivals." AMGoff, you’re kind of right — the K-car is supposed to be such crap, but from time to time, you see one that’s still running.

veda: I always wonder about that, why jews are so quick to buy benzes. maybe it’s a nrevenge thing

Me: The aries/reliant were probably chrysler’s last crappy cars. Unless you consiuder the Neon crappy.
Now some of their newer cars, the two small jeeps and the nitro, don’t work for me, but they’re almost certainly more sensible purchases than their toyonda “rivals.”

]]> By: AMGoff http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320877 AMGoff Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:55:42 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320877 Please define "junk?" They were reliable and economical. They were perfect for their time and it was the profits of those k-cars which help Chrysler to pay back their loans seven years ahead of schedule as it was the same profits which helped developed the LH cars. Trying looking at things in context. Certainly when we look back at them now they are pretty crappy but so is a Buick of that time, so is a Toyota of that time. But all of those cars served their purpose. If they were such junk then why do I see more k-cars on the road today than I do Toyondans from the same period? Please define “junk?” They were reliable and economical. They were perfect for their time and it was the profits of those k-cars which help Chrysler to pay back their loans seven years ahead of schedule as it was the same profits which helped developed the LH cars. Trying looking at things in context. Certainly when we look back at them now they are pretty crappy but so is a Buick of that time, so is a Toyota of that time. But all of those cars served their purpose. If they were such junk then why do I see more k-cars on the road today than I do Toyondans from the same period?

]]> By: Me http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320874 Me Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:23:39 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320874 AMGoff, You'd have to be a die-hard Mopar head to appreciate the K-car. They are the butt of jokes because they were crap. Anybody who says otherwise is delusional. More than anything, they remind me of the time when every car available was crap -they symbolize the industry at the time. They were the reason cab-foward was such a success. Everyone was tired of the boxy, cheaply made, crap that Chrysler was putting out for so many years prior to that. Aries, Reliant, LeBaron, -please, the only reason they sold was because they were cheap and nobody back then could afford anything else. The minivan is an entirely different story however. That was a great move by Chrysler. I am bit of a Chrysler fan too, but I know junk when I see it. The big three are guilty of producing junk more times than I care to count. AMGoff, You’d have to be a die-hard Mopar head to appreciate the K-car. They are the butt of jokes because they were crap. Anybody who says otherwise is delusional. More than anything, they remind me of the time when every car available was crap -they symbolize the industry at the time. They were the reason cab-foward was such a success. Everyone was tired of the boxy, cheaply made, crap that Chrysler was putting out for so many years prior to that. Aries, Reliant, LeBaron, -please, the only reason they sold was because they were cheap and nobody back then could afford anything else. The minivan is an entirely different story however. That was a great move by Chrysler. I am bit of a Chrysler fan too, but I know junk when I see it. The big three are guilty of producing junk more times than I care to count.

]]> By: Veda http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320860 Veda Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:27:07 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320860 Star of David? They can probably sell more cheap cars here in US with a cross instead of a star. So they should exchange logos with Mercedes since the Jews are the ones yelling holocaust but dig Mercedes. LOL Star of David? They can probably sell more cheap cars here in US with a cross instead of a star. So they should exchange logos with Mercedes since the Jews are the ones yelling holocaust but dig Mercedes. LOL

]]> By: zurus http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320858 zurus Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:11:52 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320858 noooooooo why! that looks ...... i dont now but i dont like it noooooooo why! that looks …… i dont now but i dont like it

]]> By: sharpie http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320856 sharpie Tue, 07 Aug 2007 06:46:22 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320856 jdasch1, Master the art of debadging. Just pray that there is no hole to fill afterward. jdasch1, Master the art of debadging. Just pray that there is no hole to fill afterward.

]]> By: jdasch1 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320848 jdasch1 Tue, 07 Aug 2007 04:58:23 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320848 I just hope they don't start putting this emblem on the front lower fender like GM is doing with all of their cars/trucks. The GM emblem on the fender must of came from Lutz or Wagner, or some other nucklehead board member at GM. I'm sure it didn't come from the stylists or designers. They need to stop worrying about their stock price and trading symbol and leave it off of the vehicle!! I just hope they don’t start putting this emblem on the front lower fender like GM is doing with all of their cars/trucks. The GM emblem on the fender must of came from Lutz or Wagner, or some other nucklehead board member at GM. I’m sure it didn’t come from the stylists or designers. They need to stop worrying about their stock price and trading symbol and leave it off of the vehicle!!

]]> By: TomF http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320839 TomF Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:25:44 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320839 Bring back the Murada. Bring back the Murada.

]]> By: obhatti http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320833 obhatti Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:28:17 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320833 Ricardo Head, why would a Star of David do anyone any good in Mecca? The Star of David is the symbol of Judaism, and Mecca is the holiest place in Islam, which is symbolized by a Cresent Moon. Did you mean Jerusalem instead? Ricardo Head, why would a Star of David do anyone any good in Mecca? The Star of David is the symbol of Judaism, and Mecca is the holiest place in Islam, which is symbolized by a Cresent Moon. Did you mean Jerusalem instead?

]]> By: MY Si http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320829 MY Si Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:05:29 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320829 ah i had no idea. thanks Commodore. ah i had no idea. thanks Commodore.

]]> By: motorheader http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320828 motorheader Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:59:05 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320828 Who cares about the logo when they make crappppy cars anyway? I have hardly ever seen new cars/crossovers/SUVs been slammed so much in tests/ test drives as the POS like the JEEP Compass and the Patriot and the Dodge Caliber and Nitro. And I personally agree whit those tests. It makes me think where the Korean cars where 15 years back. The interiors are just hideous and material quality sux. No wonder they are in trouble. I'm surprised that the Germans (Merc) were not able to get that part right, but it is probably because they are not used to designing cheep cars. ANY european brand makes better interiors, even the smalles Fiat, Renault, Peugeot, Seat, Skoda etc. have better quality feel and design in their interiors. And what about exterior design? How can a company that have designed cool prototypes, and even introduced cars like the Viper, 300/ Magnum, PT Cruiser (Starting to become quite outdated), ingenious mini-Vans, come up with ugly and bland cars/ SUVs like the Sebring, the Calibe, the Compass +++ Something is terribly wrong somewhere........ And the american consumers will continue showing that until they start getting things right. (Why would anyone buy a Korean car if the US made cars where better, or at least as good?) Personally I think that among the big 2 and a half these days, GM has the better vehicles (Even if Ford traditionally has been my favorite US car company), Ford is second and Chrysler is sadly behind. I hope that the new owners get things right, and remember that it is not GM and Ford who is the benchmark. Ahhh... good to get that off my chest..... Who cares about the logo when they make crappppy cars anyway? I have hardly ever seen new cars/crossovers/SUVs been slammed so much in tests/ test drives as the POS like the JEEP Compass and the Patriot and the Dodge Caliber and Nitro. And I personally agree whit those tests. It makes me think where the Korean cars where 15 years back. The interiors are just hideous and material quality sux. No wonder they are in trouble. I’m surprised that the Germans (Merc) were not able to get that part right, but it is probably because they are not used to designing cheep cars.

ANY european brand makes better interiors, even the smalles Fiat, Renault, Peugeot, Seat, Skoda etc. have better quality feel and design in their interiors.

And what about exterior design? How can a company that have designed cool prototypes, and even introduced cars like the Viper, 300/ Magnum, PT Cruiser (Starting to become quite outdated), ingenious mini-Vans, come up with ugly and bland cars/ SUVs like the Sebring, the Calibe, the Compass +++
Something is terribly wrong somewhere…….. And the american consumers will continue showing that until they start getting things right. (Why would anyone buy a Korean car if the US made cars where better, or at least as good?)

Personally I think that among the big 2 and a half these days, GM has the better vehicles (Even if Ford traditionally has been my favorite US car company), Ford is second and Chrysler is sadly behind. I hope that the new owners get things right, and remember that it is not GM and Ford who is the benchmark.

Ahhh… good to get that off my chest…..

]]> By: Commodore http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320823 Commodore Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:49:20 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320823 "Hate to see that on the front of a 300" You won't. This is just their corporate logo. Chrysler division will still use its winged logo. Kind of like GM with its corporate logo, you don't see it on the front of its cars in place of the Chevy bowtie. Anyway, I'm glad Chrysler is back to being an American company. “Hate to see that on the front of a 300″

You won’t. This is just their corporate logo. Chrysler division will still use its winged logo. Kind of like GM with its corporate logo, you don’t see it on the front of its cars in place of the Chevy bowtie. Anyway, I’m glad Chrysler is back to being an American company.

]]> By: bran http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320815 bran Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:42:46 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320815 Twenty minuted with photoshop, and I could have made something that is more eye-catching than this. I hope the term "engineered beautifully" doesnt relate to the new logo. Twenty minuted with photoshop, and I could have made something that is more eye-catching than this. I hope the term “engineered beautifully” doesnt relate to the new logo.

]]> By: AMGoff http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320814 AMGoff Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:41:51 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320814 It has nothing to do with what it looks like nor do I expect anyone who is not a Mopar fan to appreciate it. But to those who love the company and have spent years supporting them and buying their products the Pentastar is a beautiful thing. There is nothing wrong with reaching back to a company's past, especially if that company is as storied as Chrysler. What's wrong with being reminded of the K-car? How is it that the K-car has become the butt of so many jokes? As I've said many times before it was the k-car and the minivan which rescued Chrysler in the 80s. They were decent, practical, economical, dependable and just what Chrysler needed at the time. An 80's Toyondan is equally pathetic when compared to cars of today. The pentastar should go back where it belongs, right behind the wheel well of every new Chrysler product. If you don't like the company to begin with how can you possibly appreciate this? It has nothing to do with what it looks like nor do I expect anyone who is not a Mopar fan to appreciate it. But to those who love the company and have spent years supporting them and buying their products the Pentastar is a beautiful thing. There is nothing wrong with reaching back to a company’s past, especially if that company is as storied as Chrysler. What’s wrong with being reminded of the K-car? How is it that the K-car has become the butt of so many jokes? As I’ve said many times before it was the k-car and the minivan which rescued Chrysler in the 80s. They were decent, practical, economical, dependable and just what Chrysler needed at the time. An 80′s Toyondan is equally pathetic when compared to cars of today. The pentastar should go back where it belongs, right behind the wheel well of every new Chrysler product. If you don’t like the company to begin with how can you possibly appreciate this?

]]> By: jJayC08 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320801 jJayC08 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:25:14 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320801 I'm not impressed either. It's just too plain for me, I'm not asking for anything eye catching, but something that makes it NOT look like a cookie cutter. I’m not impressed either. It’s just too plain for me, I’m not asking for anything eye catching, but something that makes it NOT look like a cookie cutter.

]]> By: sharpie http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320793 sharpie Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:11:42 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320793 That'll do just fine. It's the cars that matter. That’ll do just fine. It’s the cars that matter.

]]> By: Jordan http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320790 Jordan Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:00:46 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320790 personally, i don't think it's that impressive. i was under the impression that this would be used only for corporate letterhead and is not for use on the actual vehicles. personally, i don’t think it’s that impressive.

i was under the impression that this would be used only for corporate letterhead and is not for use on the actual vehicles.

]]> By: Cooper http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320789 Cooper Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:58:46 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320789 Sorry Me, you beat me to it. Sorry Me, you beat me to it.

]]> By: illwill http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320787 illwill Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:47:54 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320787 Lovely! Glad the pentastar is back! Lovely! Glad the pentastar is back!

]]> By: Cooper http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320782 Cooper Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:26:19 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320782 The story doesn't say this will be the logo used on the front of their vehicles. I wonder if this is instead a side badge similar to the badge used on all GM built autos. The story doesn’t say this will be the logo used on the front of their vehicles. I wonder if this is instead a side badge similar to the badge used on all GM built autos.

]]> By: Me http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320781 Me Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:23:14 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320781 I wonder if they'll place these badges on the door of every Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep made like GM is doing the GM badge. I hope not. I see this logo and think K-car all over again. I wonder if they’ll place these badges on the door of every Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep made like GM is doing the GM badge. I hope not. I see this logo and think K-car all over again.

]]> By: Stridder44 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320780 Stridder44 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:12:29 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320780 Yeah, I'll take a "new" old chrysler logo with a side of boring and uninteresting. No ice please. Yeah, I’ll take a “new” old chrysler logo with a side of boring and uninteresting. No ice please.

]]> By: lyndon_h http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320779 lyndon_h Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:10:50 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320779 looks like a sanddollar. Ugly. looks like a sanddollar. Ugly.

]]> By: TOZO http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320776 TOZO Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:28:52 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320776 Wow. Chrysler really needs to spend more ad money on logos. I think the new CEO just got a ruler and sketched this thing himself with a pencil. Wow. Chrysler really needs to spend more ad money on logos. I think the new CEO just got a ruler and sketched this thing himself with a pencil.

]]> By: CTS DRIVER http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320775 CTS DRIVER Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:13:47 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320775 global it would be perfect for the demon. global it would be perfect for the demon.

]]> By: cookie4me http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320772 cookie4me Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:00:59 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320772 That is funny, I saw a similar treatment to the pontiac badge on the G8. That is funny, I saw a similar treatment to the pontiac badge on the G8.

]]> By: Saud http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320769 Saud Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:52:46 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320769 Ricardohead go xxxx yourself, but it's a nice logo nonetheless Ricardohead go xxxx yourself, but it’s a nice logo nonetheless

]]> By: LamborghiniZ http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320766 LamborghiniZ Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:30:16 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320766 Truly stunning. Nothing like 1980's design to set Chrysler back on track to make it to the top! Truly stunning. Nothing like 1980′s design to set Chrysler back on track to make it to the top!

]]> By: global_lightning http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320764 global_lightning Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:27:01 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320764 Yeah, PLYMOUTH! I'd put the new logo in a circle and turn the star upside-down :twisted: Yeah, PLYMOUTH!

I’d put the new logo in a circle and turn the star upside-down :twisted:

]]> By: Mitch Bangowitz http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320762 Mitch Bangowitz Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:20:32 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320762 hah... I want a 2008 Plymouth Satellite turbo diesel hybrid convertible. with a roadrunner horn in that acid green color hah… I want a 2008 Plymouth Satellite turbo diesel hybrid convertible.

with a roadrunner horn

in that acid green color

]]> By: Deanster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320760 Deanster Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:00:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320760 Agreed Veda, it looks too plain and dated. Agreed Veda, it looks too plain and dated.

]]> By: Veda http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320757 Veda Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:43:02 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320757 Should've made the backplate round. Looks too old and edgy, certainly far from elegant or beautiful. Better yet they should've made the star fatter so it doesn't look like the old logo. Should’ve made the backplate round. Looks too old and edgy, certainly far from elegant or beautiful. Better yet they should’ve made the star fatter so it doesn’t look like the old logo.

]]> By: sunshine1810 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320756 sunshine1810 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:23:54 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320756 It looks better than the logo in the 1980's but come on now, 2 points of the star are gone. Chrysler is calling itself the New Chrysler and they should have come up with a design for their logo that was all new. I hope that this does not show how backward this new company is. It looks better than the logo in the 1980′s but come on now, 2 points of the star are gone. Chrysler is calling itself the New Chrysler and they should have come up with a design for their logo that was all new. I hope that this does not show how backward this new company is.

]]> By: 55amg http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320753 55amg Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:20:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320753 doesn't look so professionally done doesn’t look so professionally done

]]> By: Bush http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320752 Bush Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:19:16 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320752 Its not new, its been revised. Its not new, its been revised.

]]> By: TomF http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320751 TomF Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:09:20 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320751 Those of us who miss the Reliant, the Cordoba and the Fury will appreciate the visual reminder. Those of us who miss the Reliant, the Cordoba and the Fury will appreciate the visual reminder.

]]> By: jackjimturkey http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320748 jackjimturkey Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:07:08 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320748 boring boring

]]> By: 5280 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320745 5280 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:01:20 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-debuts-new-logo.html#comment-320745 lame. couldn't come up with something new that's exciting..hmmm, maybe it is fitting for chrysler after all. lame. couldn’t come up with something new that’s exciting..hmmm, maybe it is fitting for chrysler after all.

]]>