<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrysler mulls new V6 engine program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:02:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-234676</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-234676</guid>
		<description>2001 silverado extended cab 5.3 4x4 drove everyday    120,000 miles   (still going strong)
1995 chrysler lebaron convertible 3.0   (shot headgasket)  96,500  miles
          YOU DO THE MATH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2001 silverado extended cab 5.3 4&#215;4 drove everyday    120,000 miles   (still going strong)<br />
1995 chrysler lebaron convertible 3.0   (shot headgasket)  96,500  miles<br />
          YOU DO THE MATH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Ladzinski</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-188224</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ladzinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-188224</guid>
		<description>Put a CDI Diesel in the 300 for the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put a CDI Diesel in the 300 for the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175772</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175772</guid>
		<description>the klane is  a bunch of sissy in wetted bed sheets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the klane is  a bunch of sissy in wetted bed sheets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V'duv Kux Klan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175284</link>
		<dc:creator>V'duv Kux Klan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175284</guid>
		<description>Chrysler Sucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler Sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175252</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175252</guid>
		<description>How about bringing back the old Slant 6 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about bringing back the old Slant 6 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM#1andAlwaysWillBe! :o)</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175241</link>
		<dc:creator>GM#1andAlwaysWillBe! :o)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175241</guid>
		<description>GM is the greatest car company in the world !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM is the greatest car company in the world !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175128</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175128</guid>
		<description>Sigh... nice to see all the fifth-graders are present and accounted for. Shouldn&#039;t you kids be in school? You might learn how to use punctuation.

Chrysler would do well to update its V6s. The 2.7 is looking sorely underpowered now that Camrys and Accords boast 250+ horses. In the Magnum, Charger, and 300, it&#039;s an embarrassment. The 3.5 is much better, but both engines have a coarse edge to them that most import V6s don&#039;t.

PJ
motoralley.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh&#8230; nice to see all the fifth-graders are present and accounted for. Shouldn&#8217;t you kids be in school? You might learn how to use punctuation.</p>
<p>Chrysler would do well to update its V6s. The 2.7 is looking sorely underpowered now that Camrys and Accords boast 250+ horses. In the Magnum, Charger, and 300, it&#8217;s an embarrassment. The 3.5 is much better, but both engines have a coarse edge to them that most import V6s don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>PJ<br />
motoralley.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-175009</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-175009</guid>
		<description>What are you talking about, Chrysler practically is European.  And their cars are a hell of a lot better than any of the junk that Ford or GM puts out these days, that&#039;s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about, Chrysler practically is European.  And their cars are a hell of a lot better than any of the junk that Ford or GM puts out these days, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174984</link>
		<dc:creator>stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174984</guid>
		<description>Geez how hard to you have to think about this one Chrysler.  Let&#039;s put it this way, Do you want to try to compete with the Japanese or don&#039;t you?  I&#039;d say you better make the decision to redesign your engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez how hard to you have to think about this one Chrysler.  Let&#8217;s put it this way, Do you want to try to compete with the Japanese or don&#8217;t you?  I&#8217;d say you better make the decision to redesign your engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174975</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174975</guid>
		<description>yea what the rest of you said..professional grade (A) JUNK!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea what the rest of you said..professional grade (A) JUNK!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STEVEN</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174974</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174974</guid>
		<description>GM PROFESSIONAL GRADE JUNK!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM PROFESSIONAL GRADE JUNK!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174973</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174973</guid>
		<description>GM PROFESSIONAL GRADE JUNK!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM PROFESSIONAL GRADE JUNK!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174972</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174972</guid>
		<description>GM PROFESSIOMAL GRADE JUNK!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM PROFESSIOMAL GRADE JUNK!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174927</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174927</guid>
		<description>They ought to work on coming up with a good inline 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They ought to work on coming up with a good inline 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174905</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174905</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m of the opinion that if you think you might need a redesign, you are already behind on the redesign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that if you think you might need a redesign, you are already behind on the redesign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174890</guid>
		<description>Toyota is perched to take over the number 1 spot regarding the amount of cars they manufacture…but they have already taken from GM the most important # 1 spot: the amount of profits they make. Unless you are going to tells us that GM is in a better financial position than Toyota…

Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota is perched to take over the number 1 spot regarding the amount of cars they manufacture…but they have already taken from GM the most important # 1 spot: the amount of profits they make. Unless you are going to tells us that GM is in a better financial position than Toyota…</p>
<p>Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Valenzuela</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174884</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Valenzuela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174884</guid>
		<description>Chrysler&#039;s CEO is Tommy LaSorda?  The ex-Dodgers manager?  He&#039;s a good buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler&#8217;s CEO is Tommy LaSorda?  The ex-Dodgers manager?  He&#8217;s a good buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174870</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174870</guid>
		<description>Chrysler could learn a thing or 10 from GM on how to build a decent automobile. Ever since Chrysler merge with Mercedes Chrysler is unreliable junk. GM is is #1 in the world, always will be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler could learn a thing or 10 from GM on how to build a decent automobile. Ever since Chrysler merge with Mercedes Chrysler is unreliable junk. GM is is #1 in the world, always will be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program.html/comment-page-1#comment-174828</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/20/chrysler-mulls-new-v6-engine-program/#comment-174828</guid>
		<description>How about buying them from GM? THey build a better engine and car than anyone. Give it up Chrysler, you have nothing on the General so stop trying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about buying them from GM? THey build a better engine and car than anyone. Give it up Chrysler, you have nothing on the General so stop trying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
