NEW FUTURE MARKET
  • Chrysler to source next-gen EV batteries from A123 Systems

    By Drew Johnson

    Chrysler may be lagging behind its cross-town rivals on hybrid vehicle technology, but the Michigan automaker has no plans to be left behind when it comes to electric and plug-in vehicles. As such, Chrysler announced on Monday that A123 Systems will be providing the next-generation lithium-ion batteries for its forthcoming electric vehicles.

    A123′s batteries are based on the ‘lithium iron phosphate’ chemistry, which promises a number of significant advantages over traditional lithium batteries. For one, the batteries are able to endure 2000 deep cycles, which is double the capability of ‘lithium cobalt oxide’ batteries, which are common to consumer electronics and used in the Tesla Roadster. Moreover, the batteries can withstand rapid charging without damage, which means an electric car’s battery could be filled in as little as 10 minutes if a high-output plug is available.

    A123 is also working on a version of its battery that could last for 8,000 deep cycles, which could equate to a useful lifespan of 1.6 million miles for an EV with a 200-mile battery pack. It’s worth pointing out that the lifespan is defined as the period of time battery is able to hold at least 80 percent of its original advertised capacity. So after 2,000 or 8,000 deep cycles the batter would not be garbage — it simply would hold 20 percent less energy than when it was new.

    As part of the alliance, A123 will establish a new facility in Michigan for battery production. Earlier this year General Motors announced a similar deal with LG Chem to produce batteries for its upcoming Chevrolet Volt, making Michigan a hotbed for lithium-ion battery production. A123 also worked on GM’s Volt project.

    “The most significant challenge to electric vehicles is battery technology,” said Frank Klegon,vice president of Chrysler’s product development. “The diligent selection of strategic partners like A123 Systems helps Chrysler achieve its leadership in electric-drive systems and vehicles.”

    Officially dubbed Nanophosphate Lithium ion prismatic battery cells, Chrysler has yet to announce what vehicle the A123 batteries will debut in, but Chrysler hopes to have an electric vehicle in showrooms by 2010. Chrysler’s first EV will likely be based on the Dodge Circuit, but range-extending electric vehicles, such as the Chrysler 200C EV concept, likely won’t be far behind.

    12 COMMENTS

    1. photo
      A4479 days ago

      was A123 that massachusetts company?

    2. photo
      Borat479 days ago

      Why bother? Chrysler has 25 days left to be acquired by FIAT. Is it gonna happen? Everything else is superficial news.

    3. photo
      Bubs Solo479 days ago

      word of advice to A123 don’t accept personalized cheques

    4. photo
      05Z88Path479 days ago

      I said it before, and I’ll say it again…Jeeze ‘A123 Systems’ is an unoriginal name! Hell it would have been better to name the company “We-Sell-Batteries Corporation”…

    5. photo
      RaineMan479 days ago

      This “Michigan automaker” is about to be left behind period. No electric vehicles needed.

    6. photo
      A4479 days ago

      well LG Chem must sound much more suited to your naming needs, 05Z88.

    7. photo
      johnnycanuck479 days ago

      The fact Chrysler chose to go with the supplier GM turned down makes me like their chances all that much more.

    8. photo
      SHOspeed479 days ago

      Good! Bring more jobs to Michigan!

    9. photo
      jdasch1479 days ago

      All VAPORWARE. EPA testing, DOT, and validation testing…2 years out at best. Look what both GM and Tesla has had to go through to get the governments Okey dokey. Don’t count on this tech to come to the current Chrysler…maybe the FiatChrysler…should be some garbage at best with that hookup.

    10. photo
      teahead479 days ago

      All you Domestic haters, you will soon be serving me hamburgers and tacos b/c that’s all the jobs you’ll get b/c of your buy-only-foreign mentality.

    11. photo
      Need more oil for GM478 days ago

      Yes, A123 is in Massachusetts which is great for America. Too bad that area of the Country is filled with ignorant, scummy import humpers. Both coasts of this great Country get zero respect from me because of thier import humping ways. They need to learn Patriotism and protectionism if they ever want to be looked upon by everyone as American.

      Buy American. Buy GM. It is your patriotic duty

    12. photo
      shane train478 days ago

      NMOFGM- Again your ignorance is put out there for all to see.

      Massachusetts is in large part responsible for your independence from Great Britain. If it weren’t for the state of Massachusetts and many of the American heroes from here, you would still be paying a massive tax to a nation across the ocean on everything you buy, and speaking with a British accent.

      How American and patriotic would that be?

      PS- Nobody on either coast respects you either, what with your ignorant, scummy, GM humping ways.

      PPS- Protectionism? That would put into place export and import subsidies. Since many GMs are made in Mexico, they would be heavily taxed. How patriotic is that?

      Not to mention the fact that protectionism would discourage international companies like GM totally. They would no longer be able to use their resources in Europe and Asia, which they rely on for design and other aspects of manufacturing. Like the Chevy COUGH Daewoo Kalos COUGH Aveo/ Pontiac G6. OR the mighty Pontiac COUGH Holden COUGH GTO. American muscle? LOL. OR the Pontiac COUGH Holden again COUGH G8. Europeans and Asians have huge influence over GM. They are not an American company at all. They are an international company.

      Please, stop talking forever.

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • REVIEW:

  • FEATURES:

  • SPECS:

  • SAFETY:

  • PRICING:


Recently Commented

  • Mark KleisThanks for the feedback jayjc08 - we do this for you guys. We'll try and
  • Mark KleisHow very weird, I must have missed that in the presentation they gave us. Good
  • saabaru1LeftLane has every right to limit links, they are not here to spread the love
  • jayjc08Very good article. I'm really liking the contrast between Marks more factual articles and Jacks
  • Welty RoundelI wished him well on the last post, (and was sincere) How many well wishes