Comments on: Chrysler won’t build Firepower http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: avlight http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-288532 avlight Sun, 24 Dec 2006 03:06:35 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-288532 What DC needs to do is to build this car and the Imperial concept. However, rename the Imperial concept with another name like Newport or Fifth Avenue and create a new luxury car division called Imperial. You hear Caddy and Lincoln drivers talk and when Chrysler comes up, it is talked down to the level of Buick or Mercury. Let Chrysler exist and go head to head with Buick and Mercury. What DC needs to do is to build this car and the Imperial concept. However, rename the Imperial concept with another name like Newport or Fifth Avenue and create a new luxury car division called Imperial. You hear Caddy and Lincoln drivers talk and when Chrysler comes up, it is talked down to the level of Buick or Mercury. Let Chrysler exist and go head to head with Buick and Mercury.

]]> By: GT40 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-288525 GT40 Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:52:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-288525 mercedes kills another chrysler sports car. mercedes kills another chrysler sports car.

]]> By: GL1 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287907 GL1 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:47:51 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287907 I agree the viper should be under 60k as it really isn't worth anymore than that.. If they dropped it to that they might actually sell enough of them to make it worth their time to produce them and start making some money... DUHHHHH!!... I agree the viper should be under 60k as it really isn’t worth anymore than that.. If they dropped it to that they might actually sell enough of them to make it worth their time to produce them and start making some money… DUHHHHH!!…

]]> By: Mojitos http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287903 Mojitos Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:38:29 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287903 A4- retarded. seriously. A4- retarded. seriously.

]]> By: Brendino http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287842 Brendino Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:42:17 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287842 A4 - brilliant. seriously. A4 – brilliant. seriously.

]]> By: novicius http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287836 novicius Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:27:06 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287836 Not a real loss. Would have sold about as well as the Crossfire (from former Crossfire customers). They should have built the Razor. Not a real loss. Would have sold about as well as the Crossfire (from former Crossfire customers).

They should have built the Razor.

]]> By: GMrules http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287830 GMrules Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:16:33 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287830 Thank you! Now if we can just get the GM haters to leave this site once and for all. This is a godamn Gm fansite, not some Nazi worshipping import humping fansite. While they are at it, they need to leave the country :) GMrules Thank you! Now if we can just get the GM haters to leave this site once and for all. This is a godamn Gm fansite, not some Nazi worshipping import humping fansite.

While they are at it, they need to leave the country :)

GMrules

]]> By: 90Z http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287818 90Z Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:59:54 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287818 For once you speak the truth GMrules. Kudos fella! For once you speak the truth GMrules. Kudos fella!

]]> By: GMrules http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287815 GMrules Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:58:09 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287815 Well said 1952! This nothing more than a Corvette wannabe. Everyone would rather have the GM product instead of this retarded Yugo. Well said 1952! This nothing more than a Corvette wannabe. Everyone would rather have the GM product instead of this retarded Yugo.

]]> By: A4 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287789 A4 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:07:08 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287789 oh and with regards to pricing, why not just drop the viper to $59,000 cause im sure they make a hefty profit on the 13 they sold last year, and make the firepower $65-70,000. If they can drop that viper motor into the SRT-10 Ram for $42k, what the hell are you paying double that for with the viper? Honestly? The cost of producing a viper body over a ram body certainly isnt an extra $42k. oh and with regards to pricing, why not just drop the viper to $59,000 cause im sure they make a hefty profit on the 13 they sold last year, and make the firepower $65-70,000. If they can drop that viper motor into the SRT-10 Ram for $42k, what the hell are you paying double that for with the viper? Honestly? The cost of producing a viper body over a ram body certainly isnt an extra $42k.

]]> By: Hyperion http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287773 Hyperion Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:27:43 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287773 It's no "ugly POS". I don't need to explain why. It’s no “ugly POS”. I don’t need to explain why.

]]> By: Renton http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287772 Renton Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:06:12 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287772 Would have been nice if they built it, but obviously the beancounters said NO. In 2005 it would have been good. Now it would be not so much..... Would have been nice if they built it, but obviously the beancounters said NO.

In 2005 it would have been good. Now it would be not so much…..

]]> By: Ricardo Head http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287767 Ricardo Head Wed, 20 Dec 2006 04:12:40 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287767 Since the pussies at Chrysler are not going to do this, can I have that bodywork and underlying chassis so I can rip the engine out of my truck and pop it in there? Baddest ass car in Austin. Since the pussies at Chrysler are not going to do this, can I have that bodywork and underlying chassis so I can rip the engine out of my truck and pop it in there? Baddest ass car in Austin.

]]> By: S-60-driver http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287752 S-60-driver Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:22:39 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287752 Sharif, u said POS, too. You can say POS if u've been in or driven any production vehicle. Not a concept car. Its really stupid and lame to say POS for that. (nothing to do with Firepower, just in general) Sharif, u said POS, too. You can say POS if u’ve been in or driven any production vehicle. Not a concept car. Its really stupid and lame to say POS for that. (nothing to do with Firepower, just in general)

]]> By: Sharif http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287750 Sharif Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:16:49 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287750 Although I do think its a nice car it is not in Chrysler's place to lose their mind to start diluting their line-up like Benz because Chrysler in all honesty gets no respect. Although i could see this car coming out in five years if Chrysler can start fixing their name just like Saturn started fixing their name this year. This car would have been crazy fast cause Chrysler does make good engines its just the car would never sell with such a lousy rep. When I said POS ^^^ I was not dissing the car, I was dissing the plan. Although I do think its a nice car it is not in Chrysler’s place to lose their mind to start diluting their line-up like Benz because Chrysler in all honesty gets no respect. Although i could see this car coming out in five years if Chrysler can start fixing their name just like Saturn started fixing their name this year. This car would have been crazy fast cause Chrysler does make good engines its just the car would never sell with such a lousy rep. When I said POS ^^^ I was not dissing the car, I was dissing the plan.

]]> By: Sharif http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287744 Sharif Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:07:12 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287744 Lets be honest, this POS of shit would never sell. First off if it is priced below a viper than every one would buy the corvette. If its priced with the viper then everyone is going to buy the viper or the corvette and keep the extra cash which is what i would do. If it's priced above the viper then everyone is going to buy the SL 500, and if its priced above the SL 500 everyone is going to buy an Aston Martin. And if it's priced above the Aston Martin everyone is going to point and laugh at it. Lets not forget that the areas in between the price levels of all of these cars are owned by Porsche. Regardless if its a nice car and if it is clearly better than its competition Chrysler is just a bad name. And if Chrysler wants to sell expensive cars they are going to have to work on their reputation issues. Not many people would think of putting anything over 50,000 on a Chrysler as a smart move. Lets be honest, this POS of shit would never sell. First off if it is priced below a viper than every one would buy the corvette. If its priced with the viper then everyone is going to buy the viper or the corvette and keep the extra cash which is what i would do. If it’s priced above the viper then everyone is going to buy the SL 500, and if its priced above the SL 500 everyone is going to buy an Aston Martin. And if it’s priced above the Aston Martin everyone is going to point and laugh at it. Lets not forget that the areas in between the price levels of all of these cars are owned by Porsche. Regardless if its a nice car and if it is clearly better than its competition Chrysler is just a bad name. And if Chrysler wants to sell expensive cars they are going to have to work on their reputation issues. Not many people would think of putting anything over 50,000 on a Chrysler as a smart move.

]]> By: GMrules http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287733 GMrules Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:43:04 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287733 Ugly POS. Buy a freakin Vette or a Pontiac G6 if you want a real ride. Ugly POS. Buy a freakin Vette or a Pontiac G6 if you want a real ride.

]]> By: Manster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287729 Manster Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:37:02 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287729 P.S. When I say possibly built off of the 300 platform, I am talking about the upcoming stretch 300 platform that was recently introduced by Chrysler aimed at the limousine/livery market that the aging Lincoln Town Car now holds a lucrative share in.... (you ever notice the amount of Lincoln Town Cars in NYC???? Reason one why the Town Car lives!) P.S.

When I say possibly built off of the 300 platform, I am talking about the upcoming stretch 300 platform that was recently introduced by Chrysler aimed at the limousine/livery market that the aging Lincoln Town Car now holds a lucrative share in…. (you ever notice the amount of Lincoln Town Cars in NYC???? Reason one why the Town Car lives!)

]]> By: Manster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287728 Manster Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:32:14 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287728 Well, there was a time when Chrysler would show a "concept" car at an auto show that was a lightly disguised version of the actual production car (Concorde, 300, Prowler, to name a few), but more than likely things are up in the air as Daimler will more than likely be selling off Chrysler, so to invest heavily in a platform for the Firepower wold not make any sense financially. However, it is more likely that the Imperial will come to production as there are those that are impressed with the styling (I myself think it is polarizing.....you either like it or you do not, which to me is the sign of good design.....it evokes an emotion or dry-heave, take your pick! :) ) Wit the Imperial, most of the tooling is in place as it would be built either off of the existing 300 platform or the rumored upcoming Mercedes R-Class platform. In either case, no huge financial investment would be necessary for the Imperial as opposed to the Firepower, and if Daimler does sell Chrysler, Chrysler will have thge Imperial flagship and will not have the current worry about Imperial pricing being too close to Mercedes offerings in that 50 - 60K price range... Just a logical thought..... Well, there was a time when Chrysler would show a “concept” car at an auto show that was a lightly disguised version of the actual production car (Concorde, 300, Prowler, to name a few), but more than likely things are up in the air as Daimler will more than likely be selling off Chrysler, so to invest heavily in a platform for the Firepower wold not make any sense financially.

However, it is more likely that the Imperial will come to production as there are those that are impressed with the styling (I myself think it is polarizing…..you either like it or you do not, which to me is the sign of good design…..it evokes an emotion or dry-heave, take your pick! :) )

Wit the Imperial, most of the tooling is in place as it would be built either off of the existing 300 platform or the rumored upcoming Mercedes R-Class platform. In either case, no huge financial investment would be necessary for the Imperial as opposed to the Firepower, and if Daimler does sell Chrysler, Chrysler will have thge Imperial flagship and will not have the current worry about Imperial pricing being too close to Mercedes offerings in that 50 – 60K price range…

Just a logical thought…..

]]> By: hockeygod1331 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287726 hockeygod1331 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:27:14 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287726 Good decision..now they just have to cancel any Imperial considerations and save themsevles another embaressment. Good decision..now they just have to cancel any Imperial considerations and save themsevles another embaressment.

]]> By: Vertical http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287724 Vertical Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:21:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287724 Why does DCX bother with auto shows? Why do we bother getting excited about their concepts? DCX: Here's the Gladiator. Whaddayathink? Auto show attendees: Yes! Yes! Yes! DCX decision: Nah, won't do it. DCX: Here's the Firepower. Whaddayathink? Attendees: Yes! Yes! Yes! DCX: Nah, won't do it. We'll do the Compiss. It never ends. Why does DCX bother with auto shows? Why do we bother getting excited about their concepts? DCX: Here’s the Gladiator. Whaddayathink? Auto show attendees: Yes! Yes! Yes! DCX decision: Nah, won’t do it. DCX: Here’s the Firepower. Whaddayathink? Attendees: Yes! Yes! Yes! DCX: Nah, won’t do it. We’ll do the Compiss. It never ends.

]]> By: chevy490 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287722 chevy490 Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:05:42 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287722 ahh man ahh man

]]> By: obsessedwithautos http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287694 obsessedwithautos Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:17:07 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287694 Good, they should rebuild the non-competitive 2007 Sebring instead. Good, they should rebuild the non-competitive 2007 Sebring instead.

]]> By: carsinamericanet http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287685 carsinamericanet Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:45:12 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287685 Yeah, I'm with GL1. This should have been built on the Viper platform, but with V-8 engines and geared toward greater roadability, and coupe only. It wouldn't have been an SL competitor; it would have rivalled the Corvette, which would have been fantastic. I had hoped that the Firepower would goad Ford into building the Mercury Messenger (maybe with a better name), from the Mustang platform, but shortened to a two-seater with IRS and a supercharged eight. THAT was a gorgeous vehicle. Yeah, I’m with GL1. This should have been built on the Viper platform, but with V-8 engines and geared toward greater roadability, and coupe only. It wouldn’t have been an SL competitor; it would have rivalled the Corvette, which would have been fantastic. I had hoped that the Firepower would goad Ford into building the Mercury Messenger (maybe with a better name), from the Mustang platform, but shortened to a two-seater with IRS and a supercharged eight. THAT was a gorgeous vehicle.

]]> By: GL1 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287683 GL1 Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:10:22 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287683 This is a piss poor and gutless decission on mopars part indeed. this was supposed to come out under the Viper at about 65k or so as I saw it at Barrett jackson and it is REALLY REALLY SWEET. They would have sold LOTS of these if it was in the 65k range and likely cut into Corvettes market share, which I thought was the WHOLE IDEA behind the Forepower in the first place.. The ONLY thing I didn't like about the Hemi powered firepower was the Name the rest was near perfect.. Whats wrong with Mopar no guts ? or what ? BUILD IT MOPAR.. IT'LL SELL.. This is a piss poor and gutless decission on mopars part indeed. this was supposed to come out under the Viper at about 65k or so as I saw it at Barrett jackson and it is REALLY REALLY SWEET. They would have sold LOTS of these if it was in the 65k range and likely cut into Corvettes market share, which I thought was the WHOLE IDEA behind the Forepower in the first place.. The ONLY thing I didn’t like about the Hemi powered firepower was the Name the rest was near perfect.. Whats wrong with Mopar no guts ? or what ? BUILD IT MOPAR.. IT’LL SELL..

]]> By: Hyperion http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287681 Hyperion Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:43:14 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287681 I say "Too bad, Chrysler." They could have done something to build a version of this car in the 30k range with a completely different engine. Or maybe they COULD have tried marketing the concept as is with the Hemi engine. Whatever. They are shooting themselves in the foot as far as I am concerned. I say “Too bad, Chrysler.”

They could have done something to build a version of this car in the 30k range with a completely different engine. Or maybe they COULD have tried marketing the concept as is with the Hemi engine. Whatever. They are shooting themselves in the foot as far as I am concerned.

]]> By: F451 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287673 F451 Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:18:19 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287673 The Firepower is beautiful design that if built would have done well in the high-end market. However, as others have pointed out, it would be competing with market segment that includes Mercedes, and since Daimler is prepping to sell-off Chrysler why would they want to have production tooling, buildings, etc. on the books for a prospective client? Also, the Firepower may very well go with Daimler and not Chrysler after the sale. The Firepower is beautiful design that if built would have done well in the high-end market. However, as others have pointed out, it would be competing with market segment that includes Mercedes, and since Daimler is prepping to sell-off Chrysler why would they want to have production tooling, buildings, etc. on the books for a prospective client? Also, the Firepower may very well go with Daimler and not Chrysler after the sale.

]]> By: Jazz http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287640 Jazz Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:24:39 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287640 I agree Scott. The Firepower should have been priced above a Viper. But that gets into MB SL500 territory which is a no-no Going below Viper would basically cannibalize the Viper and CL500 sales. Basically the Firepower was done in by its stablemates. They should offer a Vipoer-"Fireppower" package. Basically take a viper- Trick it out to look like a Firepower. I guess tha gets us back to the SL500 problem. Personally I don't see Firepower buyers crsoss shopping SL500's but I guess the daimler bean counters would Poor Firepower- we knew you not at all. I agree Scott.
The Firepower should have been priced above a Viper. But that gets into MB SL500 territory which is a no-no

Going below Viper would basically cannibalize the Viper and CL500 sales. Basically the Firepower was done in by its stablemates. They should offer a Vipoer-”Fireppower” package. Basically take a viper- Trick it out to look like a Firepower. I guess tha gets us back to the SL500 problem.

Personally I don’t see Firepower buyers crsoss shopping SL500′s but I guess the daimler bean counters would

Poor Firepower- we knew you not at all.

]]> By: James http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287636 James Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:20:43 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287636 Agreed it probably would have been a flop. Who gives a shit anyway. I have a hotwheels car of this. Agreed it probably would have been a flop. Who gives a shit anyway. I have a hotwheels car of this.

]]> By: jimothy http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287633 jimothy Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:11:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287633 I thought the Firepower was based on the Viper. So what's the need for a new architecture? I thought the Firepower was based on the Viper. So what’s the need for a new architecture?

]]> By: Scott Kempton http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287632 Scott Kempton Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:44:22 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287632 God I hope they don't build the Imperial. I think it'd be a real shame if they canceled the Firepower, which is beautiful, and decided to build the Imperial, which is hideous (I saw it in person at the Chicago Auto show last February). I really don't like the direction Chrysler's styling is taking these days. God I hope they don’t build the Imperial. I think it’d be a real shame if they canceled the Firepower, which is beautiful, and decided to build the Imperial, which is hideous (I saw it in person at the Chicago Auto show last February). I really don’t like the direction Chrysler’s styling is taking these days.

]]> By: Foster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287630 Foster Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:38:11 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287630 yes and no the mclaren would have been alot more and alot of people still dont know that alot of cars are almost the same but with different badges yes and no the mclaren would have been alot more and alot of people still dont know that alot of cars are almost the same but with different badges

]]> By: Stuart http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287628 Stuart Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:27:56 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287628 If Mercedes is considering buying Mclaren then it would make the Firepower a direct rival to the Mclaren if both are produced. If Mercedes is considering buying Mclaren then it would make the Firepower a direct rival to the Mclaren if both are produced.

]]> By: mrjones944 http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287627 mrjones944 Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:14:08 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287627 Sounds like more boring product heading our way from Chrysler. Sounds like more boring product heading our way from Chrysler.

]]> By: Foster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287624 Foster Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:00:48 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287624 FLop your the one who said if ford built the GT40 it would have been a flop what do you know??? and no not surprised they didnt have a mercedes platform to use like the crossfire did. FLop your the one who said if ford built the GT40 it would have been a flop what do you know???
and no not surprised they didnt have a mercedes platform to use like the crossfire did.

]]> By: Egbert Souse http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287621 Egbert Souse Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:51:21 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287621 It would have been a flop It would have been a flop

]]> By: gsh http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287620 gsh Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:48:06 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287620 is anyone really surprised? seriously.... is anyone really surprised? seriously….

]]> By: Foster http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler-wont-build-firepower.html#comment-287618 Foster Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:38:31 +0000 http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/19/chrysler-wont-build-firepower/#comment-287618 That sucks, looks pretty cool. I think that it would have done pretty well. I dont know about it being cheeper than a dodge Viper, It would have been more im sure do to having its own platform. But it would have been sweet. That sucks, looks pretty cool. I think that it would have done pretty well. I dont know about it being cheeper than a dodge Viper, It would have been more im sure do to having its own platform. But it would have been sweet.

]]>