




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Columnist drives Chrysler Imperial Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-31439</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 05:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-31439</guid>
		<description>Besides the blatant copying of a rolls, what is the point of this car?, they already have the 300, why not offer an upgraded version or just redo it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides the blatant copying of a rolls, what is the point of this car?, they already have the 300, why not offer an upgraded version or just redo it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: que</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30711</link>
		<dc:creator>que</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30711</guid>
		<description>Yikes!!! I haven&#039;t seen a Road-Toad like this since AMC was cranking them out in 1970&#039;s and 80&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes!!! I haven&#8217;t seen a Road-Toad like this since AMC was cranking them out in 1970&#8242;s and 80&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouthDriver 24</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30704</link>
		<dc:creator>YouthDriver 24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30704</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone what to buy a car that looks like a Chinese rip off of a Rolls Royce. If I&#039;m going to spend 45k+ on a car it had best have its own identity, not a cheep clone of a really expensive car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone what to buy a car that looks like a Chinese rip off of a Rolls Royce. If I&#8217;m going to spend 45k+ on a car it had best have its own identity, not a cheep clone of a really expensive car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30623</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 17:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30623</guid>
		<description>yes, it&#039;s a vulgar rip-off, but so what? It&#039;s not quite a design infringement, either.

people will buy it. It&#039;s a big american sedan with some kind of point to it, something that can&#039;t really be said of a deville (or a town car), which is generic as hell, regardless of how successful a redesign the current look is. If you can&#039;t easily draw a cartoon of a car and know exactly what it is, the car doesn&#039;t have an image. This car (and the other LX&#039;s) is a cartoon in full-scale, no reproportioning required. I dig it, and it&#039;ll hardly steal sales from Rolls, so who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it&#8217;s a vulgar rip-off, but so what? It&#8217;s not quite a design infringement, either.</p>
<p>people will buy it. It&#8217;s a big american sedan with some kind of point to it, something that can&#8217;t really be said of a deville (or a town car), which is generic as hell, regardless of how successful a redesign the current look is. If you can&#8217;t easily draw a cartoon of a car and know exactly what it is, the car doesn&#8217;t have an image. This car (and the other LX&#8217;s) is a cartoon in full-scale, no reproportioning required. I dig it, and it&#8217;ll hardly steal sales from Rolls, so who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 87 635CSI</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30620</link>
		<dc:creator>87 635CSI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30620</guid>
		<description>what kind of new drug was this guy on. I saw the Imperial at the NY Auto Show and It looked as bad as the pictures of it (except the interior). The 300c grew on me, but this thing is UG-LY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what kind of new drug was this guy on. I saw the Imperial at the NY Auto Show and It looked as bad as the pictures of it (except the interior). The 300c grew on me, but this thing is UG-LY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30595</link>
		<dc:creator>canut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30595</guid>
		<description>Chrysler must be stupid to put this Rolls wannabe to production. I expect more from them- not 
 blatant copying of other designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler must be stupid to put this Rolls wannabe to production. I expect more from them- not<br />
 blatant copying of other designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30570</guid>
		<description>That car is grotesque.  I hate to say it but DC&#039;s styling department has to stop smoking whatever they&#039;ve been smoking and start building good looking cars - the Challenger prototype is a step in the right direction, that car is outright sexy.  The proportions of the current cars (Charger and 300) are pretty good but the actual shape or style (or lack thereof) is downright horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That car is grotesque.  I hate to say it but DC&#8217;s styling department has to stop smoking whatever they&#8217;ve been smoking and start building good looking cars &#8211; the Challenger prototype is a step in the right direction, that car is outright sexy.  The proportions of the current cars (Charger and 300) are pretty good but the actual shape or style (or lack thereof) is downright horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 16:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30564</guid>
		<description>It is. And the 300 C is the biggest rip-off of Bentley. Pathetic, really. 

Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is. And the 300 C is the biggest rip-off of Bentley. Pathetic, really. </p>
<p>Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30471</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30471</guid>
		<description>How is that car not the biggest copy of a Rolls Royce?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that car not the biggest copy of a Rolls Royce?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept.html#comment-30376</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/05/15/columnist-drives-chrysler-imperial-concept/#comment-30376</guid>
		<description>Fine move the car up brand and fight Cadillac, I’m sure the quality will be on par, which is to say: horrific.

Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine move the car up brand and fight Cadillac, I’m sure the quality will be on par, which is to say: horrific.</p>
<p>Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 265/266 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 15:33:19 -->
