<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DaimlerChrysler to consider name change; Chrysler spin-off within year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:37:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: whoopee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303455</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303455</guid>
		<description>all the american car brands instantly connotate GARBAGE for most consumers, even cadillac (CIMMARON, CATERA) evokes garbage - go look where wealthy people live and see how many prefer cadillac over bmw

whats worse is that everything they touch turns to turd too. jaguar, saab, etc are on a long list of brands tainted by US car companies

the only US car company with positive prospects is Tesla, its the only company run by people who don&#039;t look like &quot;businessman&quot; clipart

american cars are strictly marketed at poor people now for a reason, everyone with financial mobility (save hardcore &quot;i ain&#039;t buyin no jap or kraut car!&quot; rednecks) has moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the american car brands instantly connotate GARBAGE for most consumers, even cadillac (CIMMARON, CATERA) evokes garbage &#8211; go look where wealthy people live and see how many prefer cadillac over bmw</p>
<p>whats worse is that everything they touch turns to turd too. jaguar, saab, etc are on a long list of brands tainted by US car companies</p>
<p>the only US car company with positive prospects is Tesla, its the only company run by people who don&#8217;t look like &#8220;businessman&#8221; clipart</p>
<p>american cars are strictly marketed at poor people now for a reason, everyone with financial mobility (save hardcore &#8220;i ain&#8217;t buyin no jap or kraut car!&#8221; rednecks) has moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303316</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303316</guid>
		<description>SERSteve, 

I have to agree for the most part, DCX really should have kept to certain themes, RWD but smaller... less funky looking (see Avenger as opposed to Charger) and a few other odds and ends. 

&quot;Give the people what they want and they will give what you need.&quot; Apparently not enough of them want LX cars or trucks to cover the huge expenses they have. But I hope they can get a clue and maybe really look at the markets and take a hint. 

Caliber is funky looking, that can be fixed, but isn&#039;t small enough. A  new Neon is called for.

The 300C, Charger and Magnum  are cool but almost too big, heavy 4200lbs), and thirsty (you can get 25 MPG if you get the V6). Updating the LH platform as they did for the 1999 Charger Concept gave us a slicker, lighter, faster, and more fuel efficient.. what ever... 

The new Sebring is a awkward, awful looking heap, the Avenger actually looks pretty cool (what the devil happened there?) One hope the Nassau Concepts design language helps fix that. Still want RWD or AWD for those cars. Both cars are, I think based on the Mitsubishi Galant again... not the Caliber which is actually based on the Lancer

Lay off the HEMIs some. Build more fuel efficient motors and seriously pursue Hybrids, remember the Citadel concept? AWD using electric motors on the front wheels and a, yep V8 to drive the rear. 

Jeep... Not much to fix there except dropping the Compass. Stop trying to make the division so cosmopolitan and keep focus. The GC is a reasonable exception. The Commander is one too far and yet not far enough. Build the Rescue and the Gladiator and bring back the Comanche. 

We could go on forever but the truth is, Chrysler has no mission and so no direction to pursue and so it is failing. 

Name suggestion after so thought: &quot;Another victim of the Germans.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SERSteve, </p>
<p>I have to agree for the most part, DCX really should have kept to certain themes, RWD but smaller&#8230; less funky looking (see Avenger as opposed to Charger) and a few other odds and ends. </p>
<p>&#8220;Give the people what they want and they will give what you need.&#8221; Apparently not enough of them want LX cars or trucks to cover the huge expenses they have. But I hope they can get a clue and maybe really look at the markets and take a hint. </p>
<p>Caliber is funky looking, that can be fixed, but isn&#8217;t small enough. A  new Neon is called for.</p>
<p>The 300C, Charger and Magnum  are cool but almost too big, heavy 4200lbs), and thirsty (you can get 25 MPG if you get the V6). Updating the LH platform as they did for the 1999 Charger Concept gave us a slicker, lighter, faster, and more fuel efficient.. what ever&#8230; </p>
<p>The new Sebring is a awkward, awful looking heap, the Avenger actually looks pretty cool (what the devil happened there?) One hope the Nassau Concepts design language helps fix that. Still want RWD or AWD for those cars. Both cars are, I think based on the Mitsubishi Galant again&#8230; not the Caliber which is actually based on the Lancer</p>
<p>Lay off the HEMIs some. Build more fuel efficient motors and seriously pursue Hybrids, remember the Citadel concept? AWD using electric motors on the front wheels and a, yep V8 to drive the rear. </p>
<p>Jeep&#8230; Not much to fix there except dropping the Compass. Stop trying to make the division so cosmopolitan and keep focus. The GC is a reasonable exception. The Commander is one too far and yet not far enough. Build the Rescue and the Gladiator and bring back the Comanche. </p>
<p>We could go on forever but the truth is, Chrysler has no mission and so no direction to pursue and so it is failing. </p>
<p>Name suggestion after so thought: &#8220;Another victim of the Germans.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SERSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303224</link>
		<dc:creator>SERSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303224</guid>
		<description>I actually had to register to leave a comment on this article. I think most of you are correct (except for the idiots that are leaving the meanless one liners). But what you&#039;re missing is the bread and butter. Take a look at what&#039;s selling, it&#039;s not Muscle Cars, and Gas Guzzling SUV, people are shying away from both of those categories in record numbers. 

What&#039;s really selling is what Chrysler (And Ford, for that matter) don&#039;t have. A good Camry / Accord / Corolla / Civic competitor. What has Daimler/Chrysler brought to the party?  Nothing, they killed the neon and brought in the Caliber? WTF? And to do battle with the Camry / Accord they bring bring two giant gas guzzling V8 powered monsters, The 300 and the Magnum? When they aren&#039;t V8 powered they are underpowered, and lets face it, they are interesting to look at, but the 300 is basically just a square brick of a car with a lowered roof and a cool grille. And the Magnum well that&#039;s a station wagon!

Now they are bringing out the new midsize line, The Sebring could have been great, but they tuned it all wrong. I haven&#039;t heard yet about the Avenger. Still both cars appear to be based upon the Caliber, so the quality of both is suspect. 

It seems GM is the only one of the big three that has finally dropped it&#039;s ego, taken off the blinder, and started building the kind of high volume MONEY MAKING cars, crossovers, and trucks that people need and want. 

Chrysler is failing because of it&#039;s Management decisions, that can&#039;t be said enough. It&#039;s failing because of it&#039;s German Corporate Ego, that&#039;s can&#039;t be said enough either, and in laymans terms what that all means is that it&#039;s failing because it has no product. (minivans excluded, of course) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had to register to leave a comment on this article. I think most of you are correct (except for the idiots that are leaving the meanless one liners). But what you&#8217;re missing is the bread and butter. Take a look at what&#8217;s selling, it&#8217;s not Muscle Cars, and Gas Guzzling SUV, people are shying away from both of those categories in record numbers. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s really selling is what Chrysler (And Ford, for that matter) don&#8217;t have. A good Camry / Accord / Corolla / Civic competitor. What has Daimler/Chrysler brought to the party?  Nothing, they killed the neon and brought in the Caliber? WTF? And to do battle with the Camry / Accord they bring bring two giant gas guzzling V8 powered monsters, The 300 and the Magnum? When they aren&#8217;t V8 powered they are underpowered, and lets face it, they are interesting to look at, but the 300 is basically just a square brick of a car with a lowered roof and a cool grille. And the Magnum well that&#8217;s a station wagon!</p>
<p>Now they are bringing out the new midsize line, The Sebring could have been great, but they tuned it all wrong. I haven&#8217;t heard yet about the Avenger. Still both cars appear to be based upon the Caliber, so the quality of both is suspect. </p>
<p>It seems GM is the only one of the big three that has finally dropped it&#8217;s ego, taken off the blinder, and started building the kind of high volume MONEY MAKING cars, crossovers, and trucks that people need and want. </p>
<p>Chrysler is failing because of it&#8217;s Management decisions, that can&#8217;t be said enough. It&#8217;s failing because of it&#8217;s German Corporate Ego, that&#8217;s can&#8217;t be said enough either, and in laymans terms what that all means is that it&#8217;s failing because it has no product. (minivans excluded, of course) <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avlight</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303043</link>
		<dc:creator>avlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303043</guid>
		<description>Mercedes worst mistakes:

Never improving Dodge and Chrysler&#039;s overall quality and reliability. When the merger came about, the public expected &#039;American Mercedes&#039; and dreamed of reliable, long-life cars with high resale value but instead got the same stagnant products of poor quality that eventually drug the quality of Mercedes down. Too many people bought their products expecting a Mercedes and got torqued off when the quality was just like the old days at the Pentastar.

Dropping Plymouth. They needed a &#039;econo-box&#039; entry-level&#039; division that competed with Chevy and Ford and when it killed Plymouth and tried to swing customers over to Chrysler, it backfired because of the costs. They could have made Plymouth into &#039;econo-Saturn&#039;.

Not developing a version of the 4.7 V8 (Dodge Truck engine) for the 300C with less torque, good fuel economy, and better distributed power band for acceleration and horsepower. You got either the underpowered 2.7 or 3.7 V6 for that heavy car or the overpowered, overpriced, gas guzzling hemi. No in-between engine. If an &#039;in-between&#039; engine offering was available and priced in line, they would have sold even more vehicles and could have turned around to be a even bigger success.



When Mercedes is finally able to spin off Chrysler, here&#039;s how they could do it?

Bring back the Imperial name, not as another car within the Chrysler brand, but as the new flagship luxury brand name with it&#039;s own exquisite models. Chrysler to a GM owner was always viewed as being an uglier Oldsmobile and Ford owners viewed it as an uglier Mercury for those who couldn&#039;t afford Cadillac or Lincoln. The Chrysler name was never held in high esteem in American luxury as Cadillac and Lincoln. Even Cadillac owners had some level of respect for Lincoln and Lincoln had some respect for Cadillac but both Cadillac and Lincoln owners snubbed their noses at Chrysler viewing them as inferior and never in their league.

Focus Chrysler to compete along the lines of Buick and Mazda (the eventual Mercury replacement for MErcury will be phazed out). 

Make Dodge the performance division and truck division. Give Dodge a Tahoe/Expedition vehicle called Prospector (one of their more likable names for a high-end package on the old Dodge trucks) and a Suburban/Excursion vehicle called Power Wagon

Make Jeep the SUV and 4x4 division and offer them in  the &#039;very stripped&#039;  line like old Jeep and the  &#039;upscale&#039; line like GMC and give Jeep a Tahoe/Expedition vehicle called Wagoneer and a Suburban/Excursion vehicle called Grand Wagoneer. A small pickup called Commander and a full size truck called Pioneer with the new trademark grill.

Bring back Plymouth as the &#039;econo-box&#039;.

Give the Chinese car it&#039;s own brand name and let all the Pentastar dealers compete hard to sell it. This isn&#039;t the first time Pentastar had badged foreign cars. The omni/horizon was actually Renault/Citroen cars Americanized and the LH cars (Intrepid, New Yorker, etc) was a Renault car that Chrysler snuck the parts out in the middle of the night from the Renault Ontario plant (to reverse engineer) after Renault sold the plant to Chrysler when Renault left the American market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes worst mistakes:</p>
<p>Never improving Dodge and Chrysler&#8217;s overall quality and reliability. When the merger came about, the public expected &#8216;American Mercedes&#8217; and dreamed of reliable, long-life cars with high resale value but instead got the same stagnant products of poor quality that eventually drug the quality of Mercedes down. Too many people bought their products expecting a Mercedes and got torqued off when the quality was just like the old days at the Pentastar.</p>
<p>Dropping Plymouth. They needed a &#8216;econo-box&#8217; entry-level&#8217; division that competed with Chevy and Ford and when it killed Plymouth and tried to swing customers over to Chrysler, it backfired because of the costs. They could have made Plymouth into &#8216;econo-Saturn&#8217;.</p>
<p>Not developing a version of the 4.7 V8 (Dodge Truck engine) for the 300C with less torque, good fuel economy, and better distributed power band for acceleration and horsepower. You got either the underpowered 2.7 or 3.7 V6 for that heavy car or the overpowered, overpriced, gas guzzling hemi. No in-between engine. If an &#8216;in-between&#8217; engine offering was available and priced in line, they would have sold even more vehicles and could have turned around to be a even bigger success.</p>
<p>When Mercedes is finally able to spin off Chrysler, here&#8217;s how they could do it?</p>
<p>Bring back the Imperial name, not as another car within the Chrysler brand, but as the new flagship luxury brand name with it&#8217;s own exquisite models. Chrysler to a GM owner was always viewed as being an uglier Oldsmobile and Ford owners viewed it as an uglier Mercury for those who couldn&#8217;t afford Cadillac or Lincoln. The Chrysler name was never held in high esteem in American luxury as Cadillac and Lincoln. Even Cadillac owners had some level of respect for Lincoln and Lincoln had some respect for Cadillac but both Cadillac and Lincoln owners snubbed their noses at Chrysler viewing them as inferior and never in their league.</p>
<p>Focus Chrysler to compete along the lines of Buick and Mazda (the eventual Mercury replacement for MErcury will be phazed out). </p>
<p>Make Dodge the performance division and truck division. Give Dodge a Tahoe/Expedition vehicle called Prospector (one of their more likable names for a high-end package on the old Dodge trucks) and a Suburban/Excursion vehicle called Power Wagon</p>
<p>Make Jeep the SUV and 4&#215;4 division and offer them in  the &#8216;very stripped&#8217;  line like old Jeep and the  &#8216;upscale&#8217; line like GMC and give Jeep a Tahoe/Expedition vehicle called Wagoneer and a Suburban/Excursion vehicle called Grand Wagoneer. A small pickup called Commander and a full size truck called Pioneer with the new trademark grill.</p>
<p>Bring back Plymouth as the &#8216;econo-box&#8217;.</p>
<p>Give the Chinese car it&#8217;s own brand name and let all the Pentastar dealers compete hard to sell it. This isn&#8217;t the first time Pentastar had badged foreign cars. The omni/horizon was actually Renault/Citroen cars Americanized and the LH cars (Intrepid, New Yorker, etc) was a Renault car that Chrysler snuck the parts out in the middle of the night from the Renault Ontario plant (to reverse engineer) after Renault sold the plant to Chrysler when Renault left the American market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303037</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303037</guid>
		<description>DIF.. I agree with that comment.. not only would enthusiasts dislike the badge engineering, but using the very American brand name Plymouth on a line of Chinese cars would likely be considered sacrilege!  Too bad Mitsubishi is in the sorry financial state they are.. I&#039;d love to see them team up with Chrysler once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DIF.. I agree with that comment.. not only would enthusiasts dislike the badge engineering, but using the very American brand name Plymouth on a line of Chinese cars would likely be considered sacrilege!  Too bad Mitsubishi is in the sorry financial state they are.. I&#8217;d love to see them team up with Chrysler once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drivingisfun</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303034</link>
		<dc:creator>drivingisfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303034</guid>
		<description>autonut-- I actually have to agree with you on the Dodge issue and we seem to agree about the Chrysler brand, however, while the prospect of a revived Plymouth brand sounds nice, too many enthusiasts would decry our way of thinking in that chinese models could be badge engineered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>autonut&#8211; I actually have to agree with you on the Dodge issue and we seem to agree about the Chrysler brand, however, while the prospect of a revived Plymouth brand sounds nice, too many enthusiasts would decry our way of thinking in that chinese models could be badge engineered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-303031</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-303031</guid>
		<description>Drivingisfun.. you make some good points but I would tweak the future product somewhat.. Chrysler should be upheld as the premium product line, with a future Imperial as its flagship and its entry-level product deleted with the next PT being built on the upcoming Sebring-based crossover platform.  Dodge&#039;s lineup is filling out nicely, and it should be allowed to keep the car and truck models it currently offers, with the crossover and Challenger nice additions.  Jeep really needs to get back to its core SUV and truck products, with the silly Compass deleted entirely.  And finally, the entry-level Chery models could be marketed as the new Plymouth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drivingisfun.. you make some good points but I would tweak the future product somewhat.. Chrysler should be upheld as the premium product line, with a future Imperial as its flagship and its entry-level product deleted with the next PT being built on the upcoming Sebring-based crossover platform.  Dodge&#8217;s lineup is filling out nicely, and it should be allowed to keep the car and truck models it currently offers, with the crossover and Challenger nice additions.  Jeep really needs to get back to its core SUV and truck products, with the silly Compass deleted entirely.  And finally, the entry-level Chery models could be marketed as the new Plymouth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drivingisfun</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302993</link>
		<dc:creator>drivingisfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302993</guid>
		<description>Mercedes went through a crisis in the 90s and early 00s where it was building cars to a price and not to a standard...now MB is back to its old standards with price thrown to the wind, good for the krauts.  Regardless of selling or spinning-off, Chrysler needs to re-organize its own brands if it wants to compete: Chrysler will make entry-level luxury and luxury cars, Jeep will make the SUVs and Dodge will make the trucks, not SUVs or cars.  If they want to produce cheaper cars, they will need a fourth brand, otherwise any of the other three will suffer, perhaps marketing Chinese cars when they become feasible?  GM is in a similar over-overlap situation, and we all know FoMoCo has a cancer called Mercury.  If the big three want to remain the big three, regardless of who owns them, they need to get their shit together and seriously rethink what each brand&#039;s purpose should be in today&#039;s car market.  Otherwise we&#039;ll (in the US) all be driving Toyotas in about 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes went through a crisis in the 90s and early 00s where it was building cars to a price and not to a standard&#8230;now MB is back to its old standards with price thrown to the wind, good for the krauts.  Regardless of selling or spinning-off, Chrysler needs to re-organize its own brands if it wants to compete: Chrysler will make entry-level luxury and luxury cars, Jeep will make the SUVs and Dodge will make the trucks, not SUVs or cars.  If they want to produce cheaper cars, they will need a fourth brand, otherwise any of the other three will suffer, perhaps marketing Chinese cars when they become feasible?  GM is in a similar over-overlap situation, and we all know FoMoCo has a cancer called Mercury.  If the big three want to remain the big three, regardless of who owns them, they need to get their **** together and seriously rethink what each brand&#8217;s purpose should be in today&#8217;s car market.  Otherwise we&#8217;ll (in the US) all be driving Toyotas in about 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTS DRIVER</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302991</link>
		<dc:creator>CTS DRIVER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302991</guid>
		<description>daimler shafted chrysler from the begining, why else does the 300 use the old leftover parts from the 1990`s and the benz division uses fresh modern parts, its like a cruel joke. now that they have the diesel technology  desperately needed they flee at the first sign of trouble, i would expect the french to run and the germans to stand firm. come on benz you blew a good chance at making good money off chrysler, but instead you cheaped out and blew a good thing. i know i will NEVER EVER consider a daimler product because of this, bmw and audi are better anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daimler shafted chrysler from the begining, why else does the 300 use the old leftover parts from the 1990`s and the benz division uses fresh modern parts, its like a cruel joke. now that they have the diesel technology  desperately needed they flee at the first sign of trouble, i would expect the french to run and the germans to stand firm. come on benz you blew a good chance at making good money off chrysler, but instead you cheaped out and blew a good thing. i know i will NEVER EVER consider a daimler product because of this, bmw and audi are better anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomicbri</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302978</link>
		<dc:creator>atomicbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302978</guid>
		<description>If I had the cash I would buy Chrysler from those idiots. Daimler dumped all of Chrysler&#039;s management once the &quot;Merger Of Equals&quot; took place. I remember all the hoopla surrounding that event. Now DaimlerChrysler shareholders complain that the Chrysler name is bringing their reputation down? I find that rich considering that Daimler&#039;s Mercedes Division ranks LAST in almost all initial quality, quality and over time quality sureys. It is no secret Mercedes cut corners starting in the early 90&#039;s so they could keep cars at the same price levels, and to do that they cut engineering and quality of materials. Chrysler was basically absorbed into Daimler and all those German bosses that took over did a lousy job (except the 300/Charger which I like). You can&#039;t tell me Chrysler guys were like, sure let&#039;s use the old SLK Platform to make a Crossfire. That was Daimlers doing, as were the other vehicles that have since came out. Look at how Daimler mucked up the smart car company, and how they freaked with Mistubishi and didnt even bother to try to help. Mercedes has too many of their own problems I assume....and really should not have taken on Chrysler. If I were an independent company, I would make sure if I was having to sell, to make sure Daimler was NOT a bidder.\

Daimler is the culprit here. I feel sorry for Chrysler. They had cool concepts and Daimler approves warmed over or totally different production versions. I agree with you other posters, Daimler basically raped Chrysler for its cash in the bank, now it wants to shove them out into the wild blue yonder to fend for itself while Mercedes is getting back into the black. See if I ever purchase another Daimler product....They suck anyway, I would take a BMW or Lexus anyday over those stodgy cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had the cash I would buy Chrysler from those idiots. Daimler dumped all of Chrysler&#8217;s management once the &#8220;Merger Of Equals&#8221; took place. I remember all the hoopla surrounding that event. Now DaimlerChrysler shareholders complain that the Chrysler name is bringing their reputation down? I find that rich considering that Daimler&#8217;s Mercedes Division ranks LAST in almost all initial quality, quality and over time quality sureys. It is no secret Mercedes cut corners starting in the early 90&#8217;s so they could keep cars at the same price levels, and to do that they cut engineering and quality of materials. Chrysler was basically absorbed into Daimler and all those German bosses that took over did a lousy job (except the 300/Charger which I like). You can&#8217;t tell me Chrysler guys were like, sure let&#8217;s use the old SLK Platform to make a Crossfire. That was Daimlers doing, as were the other vehicles that have since came out. Look at how Daimler mucked up the smart car company, and how they freaked with Mistubishi and didnt even bother to try to help. Mercedes has too many of their own problems I assume&#8230;.and really should not have taken on Chrysler. If I were an independent company, I would make sure if I was having to sell, to make sure Daimler was NOT a bidder.\</p>
<p>Daimler is the culprit here. I feel sorry for Chrysler. They had cool concepts and Daimler approves warmed over or totally different production versions. I agree with you other posters, Daimler basically raped Chrysler for its cash in the bank, now it wants to shove them out into the wild blue yonder to fend for itself while Mercedes is getting back into the black. See if I ever purchase another Daimler product&#8230;.They suck anyway, I would take a BMW or Lexus anyday over those stodgy cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonstew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302972</link>
		<dc:creator>jonstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302972</guid>
		<description>the best part is that MB also helped drive the final nail in the confin for Studebaker - Packard too.  Studebaker was going to rebadge Facel Vegas but MB would not allow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best part is that MB also helped drive the final nail in the confin for Studebaker &#8211; Packard too.  Studebaker was going to rebadge Facel Vegas but MB would not allow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302971</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302971</guid>
		<description>obsessedwithautos: the only tumor present here is you. Get a life, loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obsessedwithautos: the only tumor present here is you. Get a life, loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eam3</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302968</link>
		<dc:creator>eam3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302968</guid>
		<description>TimG is 100% correct.  Chrysler needed help with their R&amp;D and actually had money in the bank when they &quot;merged&quot;.  Daimler got medieval on Chrysler&#039;s bank account, fixed their own issues and left Chrysler to rot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TimG is 100% correct.  Chrysler needed help with their R&amp;D and actually had money in the bank when they &#8220;merged&#8221;.  Daimler got medieval on Chrysler&#8217;s bank account, fixed their own issues and left Chrysler to rot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: car-a-holic</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302964</link>
		<dc:creator>car-a-holic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302964</guid>
		<description>MB top brass is at fault. Lets see this turd get turned around by auto savy, sharp business minded American Investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MB top brass is at fault. Lets see this turd get turned around by auto savy, sharp business minded American Investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonstew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302963</link>
		<dc:creator>jonstew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302963</guid>
		<description>TimG, you hit the nail right on the head, Chrysler&#039;s money gave MB the cash they needed to reorganize.  When these two companies merged Chrysler had money in the bank and MB was struggling now the money is gone and MB is back on their feet so it&#039;s time to dump off Chrysler.  I love reading comments on here about how it&#039;s going to be so great for MB to be rid of that lame duck Chrysler when it was their money who helped save MB in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TimG, you hit the nail right on the head, Chrysler&#8217;s money gave MB the cash they needed to reorganize.  When these two companies merged Chrysler had money in the bank and MB was struggling now the money is gone and MB is back on their feet so it&#8217;s time to dump off Chrysler.  I love reading comments on here about how it&#8217;s going to be so great for MB to be rid of that lame duck Chrysler when it was their money who helped save MB in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimG</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302957</link>
		<dc:creator>TimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302957</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the &quot;merger of equals&quot; was BS right from the start.  Everyone admitted it later.  MB never seemed to put any effort into fixing the engineering issues at Chryco.  My guess is, that like a LOT of companies, MB was looking for the CASH and used it to fix what ailed MB.  Now that Chryco is the one with issues, they decide to dump them like a red-headed stepchild.  

I would LOVE to see an independent come in and buy them out.  Jerry Flint, are you listening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the &#8220;merger of equals&#8221; was BS right from the start.  Everyone admitted it later.  MB never seemed to put any effort into fixing the engineering issues at Chryco.  My guess is, that like a LOT of companies, MB was looking for the CASH and used it to fix what ailed MB.  Now that Chryco is the one with issues, they decide to dump them like a red-headed stepchild.  </p>
<p>I would LOVE to see an independent come in and buy them out.  Jerry Flint, are you listening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SRT-4Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302948</link>
		<dc:creator>SRT-4Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302948</guid>
		<description>-------------&gt;lol you can tell Cobradreamer427 prolly 12 years old.............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&gt;lol you can tell Cobradreamer427 prolly 12 years old&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anyclearer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302944</link>
		<dc:creator>anyclearer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302944</guid>
		<description>i think some of you are mistaken.  The mercedes group would be known again at Damiler Benz, and Crystler when sold of would then just be chryler or whoever buys it. And gbb you took the words right out of my mouth. Cant and shouldnt blame anyone but whos at the top. Chrysler was failure.......... blame the tops at benz who were suppose to make the company over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think some of you are mistaken.  The mercedes group would be known again at Damiler Benz, and Crystler when sold of would then just be chryler or whoever buys it. And gbb you took the words right out of my mouth. Cant and shouldnt blame anyone but whos at the top. Chrysler was failure&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. blame the tops at benz who were suppose to make the company over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbb</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302941</link>
		<dc:creator>gbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302941</guid>
		<description>&quot;failer of the Chrysler group&quot;..............I call BS. In ANY corporation, failure (or anything else for that matter) comes right down from the top. If Chrysler is such a &quot;failure&quot;, the HNIC at Diamler-Chrysler is responsible. Dont lay that crap off on someone else. When Enron blew up, the guys at the top level (Lay, Skilling etc.) caused it, NOBODY else. They had the stroke to do anything they liked so they caused/let it happen. The Diamler-Chrysler deal is just the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;failer of the Chrysler group&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..I call BS. In ANY corporation, failure (or anything else for that matter) comes right down from the top. If Chrysler is such a &#8220;failure&#8221;, the HNIC at Diamler-Chrysler is responsible. Dont lay that crap off on someone else. When Enron blew up, the guys at the top level (Lay, Skilling etc.) caused it, NOBODY else. They had the stroke to do anything they liked so they caused/let it happen. The Diamler-Chrysler deal is just the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302940</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302940</guid>
		<description>I thought the Germans could fix any car company. What&#039;s the Problem? Lazyness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Germans could fix any car company. What&#8217;s the Problem? Lazyness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302939</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302939</guid>
		<description>Daimler ... sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daimler &#8230; sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302938</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302938</guid>
		<description>Dainler Crapler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dainler Crapler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrimeGTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302935</link>
		<dc:creator>PrimeGTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302935</guid>
		<description>No way would Mercedes le them have a name so close to Mercedes Benz.
Comment by Cobradreamer427, posted on March16 at 6:56 am

Is that a joke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way would Mercedes le them have a name so close to Mercedes Benz.<br />
Comment by Cobradreamer427, posted on March16 at 6:56 am</p>
<p>Is that a joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cobradreamer427</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302932</link>
		<dc:creator>Cobradreamer427</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302932</guid>
		<description>No way would Mercedes le them have a name so close to Mercedes Benz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way would Mercedes le them have a name so close to Mercedes Benz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obsessedwithautos</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302929</link>
		<dc:creator>obsessedwithautos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302929</guid>
		<description>Good to see that Daimler is getting rid of that American tumor known as Chrysler. I should of seen this coming when the merger occurred. Instead of Chrysler products getting better (they did at first, with the 300 and the Benz Diesels in Europe) Mercedes products got worse. No wonder why BMW and Porsche do so well when they are both independent and don&#039;t have to answer to execs who may remove funding and transfer it to an inferior branch of the company. I don&#039;t know if this actually happened during the merger; this is just my take on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that Daimler is getting rid of that American tumor known as Chrysler. I should of seen this coming when the merger occurred. Instead of Chrysler products getting better (they did at first, with the 300 and the Benz Diesels in Europe) Mercedes products got worse. No wonder why BMW and Porsche do so well when they are both independent and don&#8217;t have to answer to execs who may remove funding and transfer it to an inferior branch of the company. I don&#8217;t know if this actually happened during the merger; this is just my take on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302923</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302923</guid>
		<description>BAck to the basics and best - Daimler-Benz

Autonutt - By separating the brands its doesn&#039;t mean  that it will be successful. They still have the cancer called the UAW as the same as Ford/GM. By the time they sort the UAW out the chinese will be attacking from all angles together with the japanese and Koreans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAck to the basics and best &#8211; Daimler-Benz</p>
<p>Autonutt &#8211; By separating the brands its doesn&#8217;t mean  that it will be successful. They still have the cancer called the UAW as the same as Ford/GM. By the time they sort the UAW out the chinese will be attacking from all angles together with the japanese and Koreans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302912</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302912</guid>
		<description>Jas173, 

I kinda doubt it. You&#039;ll see more four letter words than a first grade book report before this one passes. 

But I&#039;ll start anyway... 

Chrysler-Dodge Group or CDG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jas173, </p>
<p>I kinda doubt it. You&#8217;ll see more four letter words than a first grade book report before this one passes. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll start anyway&#8230; </p>
<p>Chrysler-Dodge Group or CDG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302904</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302904</guid>
		<description>Despite some great product, the ten-year German occupation of Chrysler seems long enough.. sell it off to a company (or investment group) that isn&#039;t ashamed of it and let&#039;s watch it thrive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite some great product, the ten-year German occupation of Chrysler seems long enough.. sell it off to a company (or investment group) that isn&#8217;t ashamed of it and let&#8217;s watch it thrive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jas173</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html/comment-page-1#comment-302903</link>
		<dc:creator>jas173</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/daimlerchrysler-seeks-name-change-expects-chrysler-spin-off-within-year.html#comment-302903</guid>
		<description>i bet this post will become a competition for who can come up with the best name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet this post will become a competition for who can come up with the best name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
