<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge announces 2007 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 19:37:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Troy Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-263542</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-263542</guid>
		<description>I just purchased a dodge charger r/t,and i love it.At the moment i&quot;m not sure if i want to trade for srt8 for more hp or just wait for the challenger,but whatever i decide dodge has got me lovin them again, keep up the good work fellas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a dodge charger r/t,and i love it.At the moment i&#8221;m not sure if i want to trade for srt8 for more hp or just wait for the challenger,but whatever i decide dodge has got me lovin them again, keep up the good work fellas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tross</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-261147</link>
		<dc:creator>Tross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-261147</guid>
		<description>Crazy car, if it 500 horses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy car, if it 500 horses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-258205</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-258205</guid>
		<description>i have a 2006 go man go charger daytona i am 48 years old and have had alot of cool cars but this car has everything .it could of been a little cooler if it looked more like the older chargers.if you havr not test driven one you missing out great job dodge boys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a 2006 go man go charger daytona i am 48 years old and have had alot of cool cars but this car has everything .it could of been a little cooler if it looked more like the older chargers.if you havr not test driven one you missing out great job dodge boys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muscle mann</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-234152</link>
		<dc:creator>muscle mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-234152</guid>
		<description>Charger vs. Challenger.....we all know that back in the day, the charger was a the better muscle car(looks and power).  so why make the challenger the better muscle car of today.....are we trying to run 1/4 miles with 5 people in the car now days (extra 900lbs), hell no! so why does the charger have 4 damn doors. the designers of the charger should go work for honda along with the gto designers..... the &#039;06 charger should not exsist looking like it does.  but instead looking like the new challenger. great job on the challenger give that designer a better paycheck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charger vs. Challenger&#8230;..we all know that back in the day, the charger was a the better muscle car(looks and power).  so why make the challenger the better muscle car of today&#8230;..are we trying to run 1/4 miles with 5 people in the car now days (extra 900lbs), hell no! so why does the charger have 4 damn doors. the designers of the charger should go work for honda along with the gto designers&#8230;.. the &#8216;06 charger should not exsist looking like it does.  but instead looking like the new challenger. great job on the challenger give that designer a better paycheck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sneeky pete</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-220463</link>
		<dc:creator>sneeky pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-220463</guid>
		<description>Now i grew up in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s when all these bad ass muscle cars were pounding the streets  ...Face it guys Ford hit a major grand slam with the retro  mustang...understand why.....&quot;IT LOOKS LIKE THE OLD MUSTANG&quot; that is the whole  point in &quot;RETRO&quot; !!!!! Now I have seen the new challenger...much better job there... but the new charger is just another car. It brings to mind the guys at school who could not afford a Malibu SS...so they took grandmaws old 4 door Malibu and painted stripes on it... isn&#039;t that cool? Thats what i see in the new charger.....  lol  sorry try again PLEASE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now i grew up in the 60&#8217;s and 70&#8217;s when all these bad ass muscle cars were pounding the streets  &#8230;Face it guys Ford hit a major grand slam with the retro  mustang&#8230;understand why&#8230;..&#8221;IT LOOKS LIKE THE OLD MUSTANG&#8221; that is the whole  point in &#8220;RETRO&#8221; !!!!! Now I have seen the new challenger&#8230;much better job there&#8230; but the new charger is just another car. It brings to mind the guys at school who could not afford a Malibu SS&#8230;so they took grandmaws old 4 door Malibu and painted stripes on it&#8230; isn&#8217;t that cool? Thats what i see in the new charger&#8230;..  lol  sorry try again PLEASE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karel Frielink</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-174131</link>
		<dc:creator>Karel Frielink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-174131</guid>
		<description>Great that the car has 4 doors; that&#039;s why I would not buy a Ford Mustang!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great that the car has 4 doors; that&#8217;s why I would not buy a Ford Mustang!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigDawg2626</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-81008</link>
		<dc:creator>BigDawg2626</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-81008</guid>
		<description>I am a dodge fan. I owned a Dodge Ram 1500 SRT 10. Believe me there is nothing quite like sitting on top of a 500hp powder keg like that. I was forced to downsize my horsepower and upgrade my leg room with a growing family. So I purchased a Dodge Charger R/T. Make no mistake gents I love this car. My problem is that if you`re going to slap SUPERBEE on the side of this Charger why not give it 500hp? Drop a viper engine in it and see what happens. Just putting SUPERBEE on the side of a SRT8 is sort of reinventing the wheel so to speak. Dodge already has the auto world talking. Keep us interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a dodge fan. I owned a Dodge Ram 1500 SRT 10. Believe me there is nothing quite like sitting on top of a 500hp powder keg like that. I was forced to downsize my horsepower and upgrade my leg room with a growing family. So I purchased a Dodge Charger R/T. Make no mistake gents I love this car. My problem is that if you`re going to slap SUPERBEE on the side of this Charger why not give it 500hp? Drop a viper engine in it and see what happens. Just putting SUPERBEE on the side of a SRT8 is sort of reinventing the wheel so to speak. Dodge already has the auto world talking. Keep us interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-11522</link>
		<dc:creator>stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-11522</guid>
		<description>Has 4 doors kiddos in back and comfortable and oh by the way look at my taillights all the way to the next stoplight!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has 4 doors kiddos in back and comfortable and oh by the way look at my taillights all the way to the next stoplight!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalin Dorris</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-10561</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalin Dorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-10561</guid>
		<description>To day I just viewed the new dodge charger concept for 07 and I have to say the body designers got it wrong again. the charger concept car looks more like dodge&#039;s version of the corvette not a true charger. What the H E double hocky sticks is going. Thats all I have to ask for the charger body designers. Sorry guy but you need to go back to the drawing board and get the corvett off your minds and make the charger look like a true charger. again I sugest using the challenger and making it bigger to be a 4 door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To day I just viewed the new dodge charger concept for 07 and I have to say the body designers got it wrong again. the charger concept car looks more like dodge&#8217;s version of the corvette not a true charger. What the H E double hocky sticks is going. Thats all I have to ask for the charger body designers. Sorry guy but you need to go back to the drawing board and get the corvett off your minds and make the charger look like a true charger. again I sugest using the challenger and making it bigger to be a 4 door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dalin dorris</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-10104</link>
		<dc:creator>dalin dorris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-10104</guid>
		<description>Im sorry but I need to get some constructive criticism off my chest. dont get me wrong the equipment in the new super bee charger series is great, but my thoughts still linger with the total body design of the entire charger series. After seeing the dodge challenger concept car my first thoughts were that the challenger looked more like the old chargers than the new dodge chargers do. when I look at the body styling of the new chargers the side profile view of the car is too chunky compaired to the old 70s chargers. the front end dosent seem to sweep out far enough and has a side profile that is way too bulky horizontally.I do agree with others that the front end grill looks nothing like the old chargers due to the dodge theme symbolic grills. I would however like to see at least round headlights. next the rear end seems to be a tad bit to high and again dosent sweep out enough. the contour lines rear passenger windows and top seem to rise to dramatically loosing the swept back look of the 70s chargers. so altho this comment may never be read by the right people im still going to put my two cents in on what dodge should do. they should eather redesign the charger to look more like the 70s charger or take the dodge challenger concept car make it bigger and slapp the charger name on it because it look like the charger any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sorry but I need to get some constructive criticism off my chest. dont get me wrong the equipment in the new super bee charger series is great, but my thoughts still linger with the total body design of the entire charger series. After seeing the dodge challenger concept car my first thoughts were that the challenger looked more like the old chargers than the new dodge chargers do. when I look at the body styling of the new chargers the side profile view of the car is too chunky compaired to the old 70s chargers. the front end dosent seem to sweep out far enough and has a side profile that is way too bulky horizontally.I do agree with others that the front end grill looks nothing like the old chargers due to the dodge theme symbolic grills. I would however like to see at least round headlights. next the rear end seems to be a tad bit to high and again dosent sweep out enough. the contour lines rear passenger windows and top seem to rise to dramatically loosing the swept back look of the 70s chargers. so altho this comment may never be read by the right people im still going to put my two cents in on what dodge should do. they should eather redesign the charger to look more like the 70s charger or take the dodge challenger concept car make it bigger and slapp the charger name on it because it look like the charger any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-10061</link>
		<dc:creator>gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-10061</guid>
		<description>you old fashion one track mind guys crack me up!!! this car is as real as it get, the power and style alone kills everything in its price range not to mention it has 4 doors. created for the man  who wants a sport car but have little ones who want to ride too, like myself.i&#039;d like to call this car the american dream!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you old fashion one track mind guys crack me up!!! this car is as real as it get, the power and style alone kills everything in its price range not to mention it has 4 doors. created for the man  who wants a sport car but have little ones who want to ride too, like myself.i&#8217;d like to call this car the american dream!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charger supporter</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-9759</link>
		<dc:creator>Charger supporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-9759</guid>
		<description>The 4-doors just make it more fun to whoop up on people, esp people who think their great coupes are true muscle.  I think you guys are getting your panties in a knot over the rear doors.  This is the new age of muscle, and the Charger is here to stay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 4-doors just make it more fun to whoop up on people, esp people who think their great coupes are true muscle.  I think you guys are getting your panties in a knot over the rear doors.  This is the new age of muscle, and the Charger is here to stay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-7509</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-7509</guid>
		<description>The four door is great for the soccer mom, can anyone at Dodge figure out how to make a two door????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The four door is great for the soccer mom, can anyone at Dodge figure out how to make a two door????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin R Lines</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6629</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin R Lines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-6629</guid>
		<description>The &quot;BEE&quot; looks good guys....now make it a 2 door like the 68&#039; streatch it out some and your sales will kick ass even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;BEE&#8221; looks good guys&#8230;.now make it a 2 door like the 68&#8242; streatch it out some and your sales will kick ass even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Woessner</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-6414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Woessner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-6414</guid>
		<description>I feel the Super Bee model will make this car take off in the sales department. It has a Daytona and RT model too. One day it will have a six-speed too. Besides..How many 4 doors do you you know that will kick you ass and laugh at you? My order is in...PINK SLIPS WELCOME !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the Super Bee model will make this car take off in the sales department. It has a Daytona and RT model too. One day it will have a six-speed too. Besides..How many 4 doors do you you know that will kick you ass and laugh at you? My order is in&#8230;PINK SLIPS WELCOME !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve owned many Dodges, my first new car was a 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T (383 magnum), traded it for a 70 426 Road Runner (wish I still had them), I&#039;ve owned a 68 Charger R/T w/a 440 magnum, 68 Coronet and a 73 Charger S/E w/a 400 cu.in.  All of these were muscle cars, all of these were 2 (TWO) doors, you cannot have a muscle car with 4 doors, not yesterday, today or tomorrow.  The concept Dodge Challenger is awsome, and is something I would consider buying, and as shown has only two doors, if dodge stay&#039;s with two doors they have a winner.  Make any muscle car a four door and you have a dud.  Look at the Mustang, Camero, Chevelle, Corvette, GTO - they have never been available in tow doors, do you see any of those concepts available in a two door - NO.  I rest mu case!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned many Dodges, my first new car was a 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T (383 magnum), traded it for a 70 426 Road Runner (wish I still had them), I&#8217;ve owned a 68 Charger R/T w/a 440 magnum, 68 Coronet and a 73 Charger S/E w/a 400 cu.in.  All of these were muscle cars, all of these were 2 (TWO) doors, you cannot have a muscle car with 4 doors, not yesterday, today or tomorrow.  The concept Dodge Challenger is awsome, and is something I would consider buying, and as shown has only two doors, if dodge stay&#8217;s with two doors they have a winner.  Make any muscle car a four door and you have a dud.  Look at the Mustang, Camero, Chevelle, Corvette, GTO &#8211; they have never been available in tow doors, do you see any of those concepts available in a two door &#8211; NO.  I rest mu case!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>Since being announced, I have always felt they should have named it &quot;Coronet.&quot; Coronet would have still fit the bill. Coronet R/T and now Coronet Super Bee would have been perfect. Coronet 500 could have been a luxo model if they wanted to. The &quot;Charger&quot; namesake should have been saved for a much cooler car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since being announced, I have always felt they should have named it &#8220;Coronet.&#8221; Coronet would have still fit the bill. Coronet R/T and now Coronet Super Bee would have been perfect. Coronet 500 could have been a luxo model if they wanted to. The &#8220;Charger&#8221; namesake should have been saved for a much cooler car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator>dig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-3354</guid>
		<description>loose the rear doors</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loose the rear doors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>I am a big charger fan, and i feel that the new 4 door chargers, are an major insult. The dodge charger is and should all ways be 2 door, never 4 door. the charger is a muscle car not a family......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big charger fan, and i feel that the new 4 door chargers, are an major insult. The dodge charger is and should all ways be 2 door, never 4 door. the charger is a muscle car not a family&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a 2 door girls!  I&#039;ll take the Challenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a 2 door girls!  I&#8217;ll take the Challenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mopargirl65</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mopargirl65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>hey mike, you thing this car is boring, what is the matter with you? You must be a ford or Chevy guy!! That would explain everything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey mike, you thing this car is boring, what is the matter with you? You must be a ford or Chevy guy!! That would explain everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog&#8230; all about car and life&#8230; &#187; Dodge Charger Super Bee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2148</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog&#8230; all about car and life&#8230; &#187; Dodge Charger Super Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2148</guid>
		<description>[...] Further reference at worldcarfans.com or leftlanenews.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Further reference at worldcarfans.com or leftlanenews.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2139</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2139</guid>
		<description>Loose a couple doors!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loose a couple doors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>Hey .. Why was my earlier comment removed ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey .. Why was my earlier comment removed ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not bad considering it has four doors.  It would be much more appealing if it came with two doors and three pedals...and do something about those Mitsubishi Galant -style tail lights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not bad considering it has four doors.  It would be much more appealing if it came with two doors and three pedals&#8230;and do something about those Mitsubishi Galant -style tail lights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>im sure it might be a great drive but to me its just boring looking, like the gto remake...bleh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im sure it might be a great drive but to me its just boring looking, like the gto remake&#8230;bleh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill zomro</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>bill zomro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>i hope they do a better job on the Challenger than they did on the Charger.If they stay true to form and build it just like the concept they will surly have a winer. If they change it like they did from the charger concept to the charger production I will cancel the order i placed just for the challenger like i did with the charger. It will sell if they build it just like the concept just add a shaker option and they will fly out the showrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope they do a better job on the Challenger than they did on the Charger.If they stay true to form and build it just like the concept they will surly have a winer. If they change it like they did from the charger concept to the charger production I will cancel the order i placed just for the challenger like i did with the charger. It will sell if they build it just like the concept just add a shaker option and they will fly out the showrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikivee</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>nikivee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>The Charger seems to be the bastard child of all things Mopar retro. What next Charger GTX???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Charger seems to be the bastard child of all things Mopar retro. What next Charger GTX???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>go driveone!!!!! WOW,WOW,WOW
that car is awesome i just got a black one....nothing compares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go driveone!!!!! WOW,WOW,WOW<br />
that car is awesome i just got a black one&#8230;.nothing compares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee.html/comment-page-1#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/17/dodge-announces-2007-dodge-charger-srt8-super-bee/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>if it wasnt a 4 door it would be cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it wasnt a 4 door it would be cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
