<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge Demon Concept [update]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon,  9 Nov 2009 05:53:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scurvy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-441972</link>
		<dc:creator>scurvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-441972</guid>
		<description>why would they make such a little girl car and call it a demon the 70&#039;s demon was no little roadster it was full of awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would they make such a little girl car and call it a demon the 70&#8217;s demon was no little roadster it was full of awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prelude4life</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-431386</link>
		<dc:creator>prelude4life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-431386</guid>
		<description>Kinda strange, some softer audi TT like body lines and then the typical chrysler aggresive lines, very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda strange, some softer audi TT like body lines and then the typical chrysler aggresive lines, very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 67wildbill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-336230</link>
		<dc:creator>67wildbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-336230</guid>
		<description>how bout a little more copperhead styling.how bout killer v6 rearwheel drive or v8 maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how bout a little more copperhead styling.how bout killer v6 rearwheel drive or v8 maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLISS</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322909</link>
		<dc:creator>BLISS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322909</guid>
		<description>MAKE THE PRODUCTION BE POSSIBLE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAKE THE PRODUCTION BE POSSIBLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buytheredcar</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322903</link>
		<dc:creator>buytheredcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322903</guid>
		<description>Looked good at first glance when it came out.
Looking at it closely, it reminds me of the Mercury Capri.
Just super dated form language, esp the dated rear fender. Looks very
80s to me.
Not pretty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked good at first glance when it came out.<br />
Looking at it closely, it reminds me of the Mercury Capri.<br />
Just super dated form language, esp the dated rear fender. Looks very<br />
80s to me.<br />
Not pretty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtv6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322896</link>
		<dc:creator>gtv6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322896</guid>
		<description>/\  It&#039;s mean looking and it&#039;s called demon. I don&#039;t think it will be a &quot;chick car.&quot; Also, men aren&#039;t the only ones who consider performance in buying a car...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/\  It&#8217;s mean looking and it&#8217;s called demon. I don&#8217;t think it will be a &#8220;chick car.&#8221; Also, men aren&#8217;t the only ones who consider performance in buying a car&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paging_the_real_BARTMACK</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322886</link>
		<dc:creator>paging_the_real_BARTMACK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322886</guid>
		<description>All I can say is, whether they charge $15K or $30K, it had better perform like a #@*&amp;! or it will be a chick car in 10 minutes flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is, whether they charge $15K or $30K, it had better perform like a #@*&amp;! or it will be a chick car in 10 minutes flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mclaren19p</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mclaren19p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322885</guid>
		<description>This is ugly as sin. I guess that&#039;s  why they called it the Demon!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ugly as sin. I guess that&#8217;s  why they called it the Demon!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtv6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322883</link>
		<dc:creator>gtv6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 00:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322883</guid>
		<description>ha, that hood does look a little phallic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, that hood does look a little phallic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322879</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 19:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322879</guid>
		<description>This car is f*cking awesome. For all the sorry losers out there moaning about this beautiful roadster, GTFO! :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car is f*cking awesome. For all the sorry losers out there moaning about this beautiful roadster, GTFO! <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jJayC08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322876</link>
		<dc:creator>jJayC08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322876</guid>
		<description>I think they should have gone with the Dodge Razor, as someone already mentioned they should have come out with it around the time of Sky/Solstice. With a few touch ups, the Dodge Razor would look much better. A cleaner design, much more unique but I think it looks nicer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should have gone with the Dodge Razor, as someone already mentioned they should have come out with it around the time of Sky/Solstice. With a few touch ups, the Dodge Razor would look much better. A cleaner design, much more unique but I think it looks nicer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdasch1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322873</link>
		<dc:creator>jdasch1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322873</guid>
		<description>Car companies need volumes at least 100k to make a profit on a vehicle. Since this vehicle is a roadster and a two seater, it better have a powerful thrifty motor, or its doomed. Getting that volume in a crowded 2 seater market (low volume), is a hard business plan. It will make it if it has underpinnings of other 4 banger Chrysler models...currently yuk! Interesting top picture of the hood...looks like xxxx and balls...marketing to the females again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Car companies need volumes at least 100k to make a profit on a vehicle. Since this vehicle is a roadster and a two seater, it better have a powerful thrifty motor, or its doomed. Getting that volume in a crowded 2 seater market (low volume), is a hard business plan. It will make it if it has underpinnings of other 4 banger Chrysler models&#8230;currently yuk! Interesting top picture of the hood&#8230;looks like xxxx and balls&#8230;marketing to the females again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozyran</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322869</link>
		<dc:creator>ozyran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 09:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322869</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s definitely NOT the same car as the &#039;70s production vehicle that wore the same namesake (like this one: http://www.hubcapcafe.com/ocs/pages01/dodg7101.htm ), but I think it may be a step in the right direction, and I think it&#039;s time that Chrysler explores a new genre that they&#039;ve not tapped into.

Maybe Cerebrus can turn Chrysler around and undo the damage Daimler-Benz did to the brand after the merger back in &#039;99-&#039;00</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s definitely NOT the same car as the &#8217;70s production vehicle that wore the same namesake (like this one: <a href="http://www.hubcapcafe.com/ocs/pages01/dodg7101.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hubcapcafe.com/ocs/pages01/dodg7101.htm</a> ), but I think it may be a step in the right direction, and I think it&#8217;s time that Chrysler explores a new genre that they&#8217;ve not tapped into.</p>
<p>Maybe Cerebrus can turn Chrysler around and undo the damage Daimler-Benz did to the brand after the merger back in &#8216;99-&#8217;00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ///m</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322854</link>
		<dc:creator>///m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322854</guid>
		<description>^^Nobody gives lightweight rwd cars a chance, I for one love them. And I think it would be awesome if they made it with 2.4 turbo, and good handling, it would dominate. I really hope they do build it, and a coupe version as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^Nobody gives lightweight rwd cars a chance, I for one love them. And I think it would be awesome if they made it with 2.4 turbo, and good handling, it would dominate. I really hope they do build it, and a coupe version as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322853</link>
		<dc:creator>cwwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 02:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322853</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve driven a Solstice. It was quite fun, I can see now why people buy these kind of cars. Dodge needs to build this. Not sure of the concept&#039;s styling, but I&#039;m excited as to what the production version comes to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve driven a Solstice. It was quite fun, I can see now why people buy these kind of cars. Dodge needs to build this. Not sure of the concept&#8217;s styling, but I&#8217;m excited as to what the production version comes to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322847</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322847</guid>
		<description>Stuart- why? The Miata has lived out its greatness. It&#039;s still nice, but the Solstice, Sky, and now this are gonna be big competition. They are already, the Solstice outsold the MX-5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart- why? The Miata has lived out its greatness. It&#8217;s still nice, but the Solstice, Sky, and now this are gonna be big competition. They are already, the Solstice outsold the MX-5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322845</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322845</guid>
		<description>Rather buy a MX-5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather buy a MX-5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322843</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322843</guid>
		<description>From what I see here, this is a winner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I see here, this is a winner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swamprat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322836</link>
		<dc:creator>swamprat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322836</guid>
		<description>I would like a mini 4 door version of this car. Make it with a 4 cyl diesel engine and I&#039;ll put a Dodge in my garage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a mini 4 door version of this car. Make it with a 4 cyl diesel engine and I&#8217;ll put a Dodge in my garage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtv6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322830</link>
		<dc:creator>gtv6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d buy one as long as it doesn&#039;t feel anything like the caliber on the road. Design actually looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d buy one as long as it doesn&#8217;t feel anything like the caliber on the road. Design actually looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322823</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322823</guid>
		<description>This just seems like it will be Dodge&#039;s version of the Crossfire. And also there is too much Audi styling in the back. Regardless, like the two guys above me pointed out, that kind of weight with that much power is a winning combo regardless of platforms or styling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just seems like it will be Dodge&#8217;s version of the Crossfire. And also there is too much Audi styling in the back. Regardless, like the two guys above me pointed out, that kind of weight with that much power is a winning combo regardless of platforms or styling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musclemustang94</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322820</link>
		<dc:creator>musclemustang94</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322820</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys, if you don&#039;t like it too bad. This thing is going to be a hit, finally, a roadster with attitude. I dont like roadsters, but a 300 hp 2600 lb car? Where do I sign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys, if you don&#8217;t like it too bad. This thing is going to be a hit, finally, a roadster with attitude. I dont like roadsters, but a 300 hp 2600 lb car? Where do I sign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 67_L-88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322818</link>
		<dc:creator>67_L-88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322818</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m usually not much of a dodge man, but that is one sweet car. 2600 lbs, 300 hp, whats not to like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m usually not much of a dodge man, but that is one sweet car. 2600 lbs, 300 hp, whats not to like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322806</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322806</guid>
		<description>Cerebrus may not be so clueless after all.. if Daimler&#039;s big Achilles&#039; heel with Chrysler was meeting the upcoming CAFE standards with the bulk of their lineup selling only with gas-hogging HEMI motors, it makes total sense to scrap the similarly motored Imperial and instead finding another way to sell the Caliber platform and more 4-cylinders with the Demon!  With a little design consolidation and a folding top that actually fits the body, this could take lots of Solstice/Sky sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cerebrus may not be so clueless after all.. if Daimler&#8217;s big Achilles&#8217; heel with Chrysler was meeting the upcoming CAFE standards with the bulk of their lineup selling only with gas-hogging HEMI motors, it makes total sense to scrap the similarly motored Imperial and instead finding another way to sell the Caliber platform and more 4-cylinders with the Demon!  With a little design consolidation and a folding top that actually fits the body, this could take lots of Solstice/Sky sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322803</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322803</guid>
		<description>another miata knockoff. I like it!
Eclipse is #1 car choice for stupid people. That is, counting stupid things they do after choosing a car. Truly stupid people pick hondas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another miata knockoff. I like it!<br />
Eclipse is #1 car choice for stupid people. That is, counting stupid things they do after choosing a car. Truly stupid people pick hondas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322800</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322800</guid>
		<description>Build it, and learn from GM&#039;s mistakes.  The Solstice is a good looking car but lacks the Miata&#039;s maneuverabilty and is cursed with an unlivable interior.  If it comes to market Dodge should know it will be compared against the Miata and Solstice (and maybe the Mustang and Eclipse convertibles), so be prepared to take #1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Build it, and learn from GM&#8217;s mistakes.  The Solstice is a good looking car but lacks the Miata&#8217;s maneuverabilty and is cursed with an unlivable interior.  If it comes to market Dodge should know it will be compared against the Miata and Solstice (and maybe the Mustang and Eclipse convertibles), so be prepared to take #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driven</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322790</link>
		<dc:creator>Driven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322790</guid>
		<description>Looks like a hack job from the ghetto pimp-your-ride shops. A Solstice with a Dodge grill.

Its not original but it will sell since it looks like a rip off of the competitors.

Reminds me of the motion picture industry. When one company makes a film there are 3 knock offs with similar plots released within 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a hack job from the ghetto pimp-your-ride shops. A Solstice with a Dodge grill.</p>
<p>Its not original but it will sell since it looks like a rip off of the competitors.</p>
<p>Reminds me of the motion picture industry. When one company makes a film there are 3 knock offs with similar plots released within 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322779</link>
		<dc:creator>maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322779</guid>
		<description>nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-322777</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-322777</guid>
		<description>I like Cerberus, the Imperial was absolute GARBAGE and the Demon is something that needs to be rushed to the showroom, but finished properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Cerberus, the Imperial was absolute GARBAGE and the Demon is something that needs to be rushed to the showroom, but finished properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tibble_420</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-310557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibble_420</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 22:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-310557</guid>
		<description>Kay i might only be like 17 years old. But when somebody says Dodge Demon, in my mind pops up the original Dodge Demon with the 340 in it. WHOS FRICKEN IDEA WAS IT TO TAKE THAT NAME AND GIVE IT TO A ROADSTER. Cars like those are what i consider &quot;Chick Cars&quot;. like COME ON, PICK A DIFFERENT NAME, DONT DISGRACE THE DODGE PAST.

(EDITED FOR LANGUAGE)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kay i might only be like 17 years old. But when somebody says Dodge Demon, in my mind pops up the original Dodge Demon with the 340 in it. WHOS FRICKEN IDEA WAS IT TO TAKE THAT NAME AND GIVE IT TO A ROADSTER. Cars like those are what i consider &#8220;Chick Cars&#8221;. like COME ON, PICK A DIFFERENT NAME, DONT DISGRACE THE DODGE PAST.</p>
<p>(EDITED FOR LANGUAGE)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMadDoctor</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-305401</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMadDoctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-305401</guid>
		<description>I like this car but I hate to say it, if Chrysler/Dodge wanted to get in the small convertible game they should have jumped in there with the Pronto Spyder or Copperhead.  But I forgot that&#039;s when the folks at Plymouth were still around Sorry.  Daimler-Benz just parted out who they didn&#039;t need anymore, Chrysler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this car but I hate to say it, if Chrysler/Dodge wanted to get in the small convertible game they should have jumped in there with the Pronto Spyder or Copperhead.  But I forgot that&#8217;s when the folks at Plymouth were still around Sorry.  Daimler-Benz just parted out who they didn&#8217;t need anymore, Chrysler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian944</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-304501</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian944</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-304501</guid>
		<description>I love this car! The body has hints of every car i have ever wanted. If they keep the baseline price in the 15k ball park these things will be more popular than the Ford Mustang. Makes me wonder about the price tag on a SRT version. Those looks and 300hp turbo charged 4 cyclinder, whats not to love. Surely this car will make it in to production, and when they hit my local dealership  I will be there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this car! The body has hints of every car i have ever wanted. If they keep the baseline price in the 15k ball park these things will be more popular than the Ford Mustang. Makes me wonder about the price tag on a SRT version. Those looks and 300hp turbo charged 4 cyclinder, whats not to love. Surely this car will make it in to production, and when they hit my local dealership  I will be there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DialM4Speed</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-299537</link>
		<dc:creator>DialM4Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-299537</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Dodge had a perfect 2 seater ready to go at about the same time the Solstice was on the drawing board it was called the Razor. But they chose to throw that away and roll this piece of crap out! Few years ago when the Razor was on tour I asked a Dodge rep if the car was ever going into production. He said he didn&#039;t know but everyone loved the car.  Hmmm so what happened??  Few things I don&#039;t like about this car... those stupid slanted headlight, the dull as dishwater interior and that god awful rear end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Dodge had a perfect 2 seater ready to go at about the same time the Solstice was on the drawing board it was called the Razor. But they chose to throw that away and roll this piece of crap out! Few years ago when the Razor was on tour I asked a Dodge rep if the car was ever going into production. He said he didn&#8217;t know but everyone loved the car.  Hmmm so what happened??  Few things I don&#8217;t like about this car&#8230; those stupid slanted headlight, the dull as dishwater interior and that god awful rear end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-299475</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-299475</guid>
		<description>For those who may not have known, The Dodge Copperhead was a Concept car by Dodge back int 1998 meant to be a &quot;cheap&quot; Viper. It had a 3.5L V6 RWD and was presented as a Roadster. It was also almost the same color as the Demon, but looked a bit like a baby Viper... or a Panoz Esperante. They should have built that one the more I think of it.

The Dodge Venom was a RWD concept going back to 1994. It had a V6 but also looked very producible, and given that the Viper had come out not long before, Many thought it would make it. Built with Pt Prowler drive components, even I thought it was a no-brainer. This car easily could and can be the basis for Dodge and Chrysler mid-sized cars. 

Oh well... Maybe it isn&#039;t too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who may not have known, The Dodge Copperhead was a Concept car by Dodge back int 1998 meant to be a &#8220;cheap&#8221; Viper. It had a 3.5L V6 RWD and was presented as a Roadster. It was also almost the same color as the Demon, but looked a bit like a baby Viper&#8230; or a Panoz Esperante. They should have built that one the more I think of it.</p>
<p>The Dodge Venom was a RWD concept going back to 1994. It had a V6 but also looked very producible, and given that the Viper had come out not long before, Many thought it would make it. Built with Pt Prowler drive components, even I thought it was a no-brainer. This car easily could and can be the basis for Dodge and Chrysler mid-sized cars. </p>
<p>Oh well&#8230; Maybe it isn&#8217;t too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulfen</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010.html/comment-page-3#comment-299434</link>
		<dc:creator>ulfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/02/12/dodge-demon-concept-2009-2010/#comment-299434</guid>
		<description>Is does look like it is using the MB SLK base (which would make sense cost wise and follow the platform sharing concept. Both the interior and the metal folding roof points to this.  If this really is the case, then a V6 can be crammed in there easy since it is already in the SLK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is does look like it is using the MB SLK base (which would make sense cost wise and follow the platform sharing concept. Both the interior and the metal folding roof points to this.  If this really is the case, then a V6 can be crammed in there easy since it is already in the SLK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
