<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dodge Tomahawk not approved for production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:53:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: linen and things coupon</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-288271</link>
		<dc:creator>linen and things coupon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-288271</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;linen and things coupon&lt;/strong&gt;

Dodge Tomahawk not approved for production &#124; Leftlane - Car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>linen and things coupon</strong></p>
<p>Dodge Tomahawk not approved for production | Leftlane &#8211; Car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free full adult movie</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-288235</link>
		<dc:creator>free full adult movie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-288235</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;free full adult movie&lt;/strong&gt;

Dodge Tomahawk not approved for production &#124; Leftlane - Car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>free full adult movie</strong></p>
<p>Dodge Tomahawk not approved for production | Leftlane &#8211; Car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luissalas541</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-278591</link>
		<dc:creator>Luissalas541</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 04:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-278591</guid>
		<description>I think that it should go through production. Any one how whants one better be ready to cough up the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it should go through production. Any one how whants one better be ready to cough up the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIGJAMESBO</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-277577</link>
		<dc:creator>BIGJAMESBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-277577</guid>
		<description>JAY LENO WOULD HAVE ONE FOR SURE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JAY LENO WOULD HAVE ONE FOR SURE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InvisibleEcho</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-268619</link>
		<dc:creator>InvisibleEcho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-268619</guid>
		<description>What is that 80/20 rule again? 80% of the victims will be hit by the 20% of customers in the market that can afford it? 
Or was it 80% of the people who will potentially buy and ride this thing only carry 20% of the brain cells necssary to drive it properly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is that 80/20 rule again? 80% of the victims will be hit by the 20% of customers in the market that can afford it?<br />
Or was it 80% of the people who will potentially buy and ride this thing only carry 20% of the brain cells necssary to drive it properly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Luc</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267441</guid>
		<description>They were never gonna build this thing. Too many stupid people out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were never gonna build this thing. Too many stupid people out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267373</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267373</guid>
		<description>Lucifer, I disagree.  The exciting cars from the japs never made it to US as they figured Americans buy their stuff the way they are anyway.  The ones that did are downgraded defaced versions of what they have there.  Just check out the overseas Odyssey...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucifer, I disagree.  The exciting cars from the japs never made it to US as they figured Americans buy their stuff the way they are anyway.  The ones that did are downgraded defaced versions of what they have there.  Just check out the overseas Odyssey&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucifer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267312</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267312</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not the designers that are the problem. the us has some of the worlds best design take a look at apple. detroit gives us stunnning concepts (especailly chrysler) but the production cars don&#039;t realise these dreams. the edge that american car makers have against the japanese is stunning car design. this is why the chrysler 300 is doing so well. let the japanese do thier boring camrys and accords, and let america go back to making stylish, expressive, emotional cars, like they used to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not the designers that are the problem. the us has some of the worlds best design take a look at apple. detroit gives us stunnning concepts (especailly chrysler) but the production cars don&#8217;t realise these dreams. the edge that american car makers have against the japanese is stunning car design. this is why the chrysler 300 is doing so well. let the japanese do thier boring camrys and accords, and let america go back to making stylish, expressive, emotional cars, like they used to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267306</link>
		<dc:creator>Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 01:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267306</guid>
		<description>That Bike showed that somewhere in the closets of American automakers lie people who are still ALIVE!!  PLEASE PLEASE find those people and let them design every single car that DCX makes!  That may seem a bit too radical but probably couldn&#039;t do them any harm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Bike showed that somewhere in the closets of American automakers lie people who are still ALIVE!!  PLEASE PLEASE find those people and let them design every single car that DCX makes!  That may seem a bit too radical but probably couldn&#8217;t do them any harm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey D</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267294</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267294</guid>
		<description>The Tomahawk would be stupid and reckless to produce. I&#039;m not worried about the idiot who buys it, but people like me who the idiot will slam into doing some insane speed. Doesn&#039;t the thing in theory do 300? You shouldn&#039;t ever give the general public something like that. I see to many idiots with Vipers that can&#039;t handel them, God help us if there is a Viper bike out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tomahawk would be stupid and reckless to produce. I&#8217;m not worried about the idiot who buys it, but people like me who the idiot will slam into doing some insane speed. Doesn&#8217;t the thing in theory do 300? You shouldn&#8217;t ever give the general public something like that. I see to many idiots with Vipers that can&#8217;t handel them, God help us if there is a Viper bike out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interphase</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267261</link>
		<dc:creator>interphase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267261</guid>
		<description>I love the look of it and the whole idea of designing something because you can and want to rather than because it&#039;s practical, but I don&#039;t know any bikers who&#039;d actually want to ride it more than just the once for the experience. Too many wheels, you see? :)

I think that you can make a much better case for buying a Boss Hoss if you want a ridicuously powerful and oversized car engined bike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the look of it and the whole idea of designing something because you can and want to rather than because it&#8217;s practical, but I don&#8217;t know any bikers who&#8217;d actually want to ride it more than just the once for the experience. Too many wheels, you see? <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think that you can make a much better case for buying a Boss Hoss if you want a ridicuously powerful and oversized car engined bike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hidden_Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267248</link>
		<dc:creator>Hidden_Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267248</guid>
		<description>a bike you could actually ride?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a bike you could actually ride?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267218</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267218</guid>
		<description>Go fetch us some fresh news then, Hal. :roll:


This thing would&#039;ve been perfect. The fastest bike on the planet, powered by an amazing engine...what more could you ask for? :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go fetch us some fresh news then, Hal. <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This thing would&#8217;ve been perfect. The fastest bike on the planet, powered by an amazing engine&#8230;what more could you ask for? <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267208</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267208</guid>
		<description>Its a slow news day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a slow news day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatstrat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267202</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatstrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267202</guid>
		<description>Weather they build it or not, this thing rocks. Just as well, the dead body count on the public roads would probably take quite a jump if it were priced at anything close to affordable.
But I&#039;d still like to take it for a run! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weather they build it or not, this thing rocks. Just as well, the dead body count on the public roads would probably take quite a jump if it were priced at anything close to affordable.<br />
But I&#8217;d still like to take it for a run! <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MotorFull en Español &#187; ¿Se acuerdan de la moto Dodge Tomahawk? Regresaría&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267200</link>
		<dc:creator>MotorFull en Español &#187; ¿Se acuerdan de la moto Dodge Tomahawk? Regresaría&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267200</guid>
		<description>[...] Left Lane News) Enlace Permanente &#124; Enviar por email a un amigo Más anotaciones de: Marcas: Dodge, Otros: Noticias, Otros: ConceptBikes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Left Lane News) Enlace Permanente | Enviar por email a un amigo Más anotaciones de: Marcas: Dodge, Otros: Noticias, Otros: ConceptBikes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris C.</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267197</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267197</guid>
		<description>Tomahawk: The answer to the question no one asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomahawk: The answer to the question no one asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267189</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267189</guid>
		<description>They were never going to build this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were never going to build this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-267184</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/09/11/dodge-tomahawk-not-approved-for-production/#comment-267184</guid>
		<description>You seem a little overly cautious NOT to mention Edmunds as the original source of todays rumor.

People everywhere were scratching their heads that they could make a business case for this and not for the Gladiator.

It has even been suggested that &#039;Tomahawk&#039; may be the production name for the &#039;Firepower!&#039;

Gotta love the internet, where the only thing that spreads faster than information is misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem a little overly cautious NOT to mention Edmunds as the original source of todays rumor.</p>
<p>People everywhere were scratching their heads that they could make a business case for this and not for the Gladiator.</p>
<p>It has even been suggested that &#8216;Tomahawk&#8217; may be the production name for the &#8216;Firepower!&#8217;</p>
<p>Gotta love the internet, where the only thing that spreads faster than information is misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
