EPA approves California waiver to regulate greenhouse gas emissions
06/30/2009, 1:48 PM
By Drew Johnson
Reversing a previous decision by the Bush administration, the Environmental Protection Agency has granted the state of California the power to regulate vehicle greenhouse gas emissions. The news comes just weeks after President Obama set a new 35.5 mpg fleet requirement by 2016.
As part of the agreement, California – along with the other 13 states that have adopted California’s air standards – will abide by the federal standards until 2016, but will have the power to enact new regulations thereafter.
The waiver approval “moves us towards a policy that ensures that consumers in all 50 states have access to highly fuel efficient vehicles at an affordable price,” Dave McCurdy, president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, told The Detroit News.
“We are hopeful the granting of this waiver will not undermine the enormous efforts put forth to create the national program.”
The auto industry as a whole has been against such regulations as it will create a virtual patchwork of varying regulations. The decision to approve California’s waver could ultimate cost the auto industry billions in additional costs per year.



06/30, 2:11 PM
posted by:
ojfl
Well, I hope Californians like small cars because I see no technical way for tougher regulations without smaller cars.
06/30, 2:23 PM
posted by:
JakeK66
Again, I tell people to buy up as many V-8’s as fiscally possible and store in a cheap, foreclosed warehouse only to wait and be millionaires in 10 years. Mark my words – the muscle cars now are the next generation’s collectors and will post huge $$$.
06/30, 2:33 PM
posted by:
slider5634
Whatever happened to that guy in Ohio that was posting something like 70+ MPG in his 80’s Mustang 5.0? Isn’t he running in the X-Prize competition? If there’s anything to what he’s doing, he’s really set to make a ton of money and change the auto industry forever. Just think, with this kind of tech, super strict emissions regs in Cali wouldn’t prevent you from driving a super car or other large engine vehicle.
06/30, 2:45 PM
posted by:
JakeK66
^^^ And I thought pulling in 30 mpg in mixed driving with the AC on in my GTI was good…
06/30, 2:46 PM
posted by:
skyaficionado
Welcome to California, new home of the world’s slowest 0-60 times!
06/30, 3:38 PM
posted by:
foamypirate
Please, just fall into the ocean already…
06/30, 4:12 PM
posted by:
shaver
Those who hate CARB should have been there. I grew up in LA and cant tell you how much I miss the smog alerts we used to have. The good old days, sometimes you could not even see the Hollywood sign from 3 miles away.
06/30, 4:16 PM
posted by:
jayjc08
“moves us towards a policy that ensures that consumers in all 50 states have access to highly fuel efficient vehicles at an affordable price,”
Dave McCurdy must enjoy living in his own little world, where this will:
A. Keep vehicles at an “affordable price” and
B. The 10 states that will adopt this actually equal 50, as this will not ensure consumers in 50 states but on a small handful.
Ridiculous. Just utterly and pathetically ridiculous…
Oh, does he realize that the emissions coming from the tail pipe of a Porsche 911 are cleaner than the air in California? He should be grateful to have cars in these states!!!
06/30, 4:31 PM
posted by:
skyaficionado
@jayjc08
They don’t care about smog producing pollutants anymore, that’s yesterday’s news. Now they’re worried about the evil, invisible, odourless, tasteless, menace that will eventually kill us all! On the plus side, if the ocean does rise the insane amount they claim, most of California should be underwater anyway. Then they’ll start regulating the fuel mileage on your boat.
06/30, 4:47 PM
posted by:
davebo
Well, I’m glad to see states actually striving for their own states’ rights instead of every little thing being mandated by our federal government. Let the environmentally conscious states have access to the tiny cars and fuel-efficient diesels that Europe gets, and let states like Kentucky ban teaching evolution. What are Kentuckians gonna do with that knowledge anyway… evolve?
Frequently I see people here complain about government messing with the auto industry, and that consumer demand and simple capitalism should decide what kind of cars get made. Well, this is it. 13 states saying we want a certain type of car, and if the auto giants want to make money in those states, they’ll build them. If it’s not profitable for them to make these cars, then you’ll see 13 states worth of very fit people who have to ride bikes to work.
jayjc08: I think by saying consumers in all 50 states having access to highly fuel efficient cars, McCurdy was implying that they could certainly get access to one if they wanted and it would be perfectly road legal in their home state. If automakers are forced to design CA emmisions-compliant vehicles for sale in 13 states, there’s certainly nothing stopping them from being sold in the other 37, or someone who wants one just flying a few states over and driving one home. I’m assuming Hawaii is probably one of the 13, right? You’d have a hell of a time driving one back there.
06/30, 4:59 PM
posted by:
Sgt Pepper
I agree foamy I’m gonna do an earth quake dance. AHH maybe the Japanese will buy Cali since its bankrupt.
06/30, 5:28 PM
posted by:
aexcorp
This is just stupid, I’m all for states having the latitude to make their own rules, but in this case, this whole thing started because the Federal Government and the EPA, under our beloved Bush, did not take any leadership in acting out a general and broad-based agreement on gas mileage and CO2 production.
Cali and the other states who made the decision should really try and sit down with Obama and his administration to try and compromise a country-wide agreement on both of these.
Having different rules for different states is going to be a nightmare for car manufacturers, the secondary market for used cars (like buying a car from Cali in Va) and the price of new models that will carry with them the increased cost of doing business in the US as a whole.
Stupid people, for once, just admit that having a generally agreed upon standard is much smarter, just like EURO4 and EURO6 which will at least cover all the members and make life sooo much easier.
06/30, 5:45 PM
posted by:
howsmydriving
Asscorp, you fall within your own description of “stupid people.”
06/30, 6:36 PM
posted by:
aexcorp
You might disagree with me, and that’s fine, but the fact remains that from a policy standpoint, it is much smarter to have a single set of standards, setup by a proactive and intelligent government.
And next time you talk trash, at least take the time to, after you insult people freely as you did, at least explain your position for the greater good.
06/30, 6:55 PM
posted by:
A4
If people want “access” to these cars, they’ll buy them on their own. **** you california.
06/30, 7:29 PM
posted by:
RaineMan
This is rediculous. Differing emissions standards across the 50 states are costing auto manufacturers (and thus taxpayers) millions of dollars every year. The Federal Govt needs to stop giving in to California’s every whim.
Can we vote them out of the union?
06/30, 10:10 PM
posted by:
sharpie
State should be allowed to experiment with policies that affect their own citizens. This is the essence of having a bicarmeral system. Of course, there is no denying that automobile emission affects Interstate commerce, which is within the jurisdiction of the Federal Congress, but if an administrative agency, acting with delegated authority, sees fit to allow such state experiment, then so be it.
06/30, 10:22 PM
posted by:
Nazenail
On the few days a year that I miss living in California, it’s good to read articles like these to remind me of why I left. California is a bankrupt failure.
06/30, 10:29 PM
posted by:
zoomzoomer
Interesting.. especially since California can’t afford to pay state employees as it is.. where are they gonna come up with the cash to pay people to enforce these new regulations? FAIL.
07/01, 10:18 AM
posted by:
enthusiast89
i read an article a while back about how having california lower greenhouse emissions level to unrealistically low levels will cause low volume automakers like lambo and ferrari whose cars emit lots of greenhouse emissions to pull out of the states entirely because a majority of their american sales are in california and it would be too costly to redesign the cars to meet the regulations. I’m all for states rights, but with the new cafe regulations, what are they really looking for? **** you california.
07/03, 1:16 PM
posted by:
Z06ified
Stupid idiots the EPA is. The ONLY good thing is it doesn’t happen until 2016. Everything else is a complete disaster. California will be completely bankrupt long before 2016 though – probably before 2010.