Comments on: Exposed: 2007 Dodge Avenger R/T

By: Hyperion

Hyperion — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:38:49 +0000

Wow. More heavyweight FWD sporty cars from the company that was beginning to get it right with the 300C/Charger/Magnum.

Very sad and completely not worth the money if you want a “muscle” car.

By: poop head

poop head — Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:48:03 +0000

poop head says: poop on all yall, this cars my favourite car in da whoooooooole world!

By: Half & Half

Half & Half — Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:09:59 +0000

I think it looks nice. It has the bold Dodge look, but isn’t a copy of the Charger in my eyes. The headlights on this pulls back into the hood. A Charger’s headlights slope down into the grill. The rear isn’t bad, but you can see a lot of Stratus flavor back there.

By: oswald did not do it!!!

oswald did not do it!!! — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:19:35 +0000

looks good!! cant wait to see the coup!!!

By: 2006300C

2006300C — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:05:56 +0000

I would love it if French cars came over here. I could open up a towing company and make a fortune. The reliability of French cars is appalling. The workers spend more time striking than actually assembling the vehicle. Alfa Romeo is more than welcome however.

By: MS

MS — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:53:04 +0000

Too many people are jumping to conclusions with this car. All we have are five photos, which were leaked just yesterday. No one here has seen the interior or, more importanly, driven the vehicle. Thus, no one has the right to dismiss it as a piece of ****. In time, perhaps, but until then, let’s be fair.

By: Cheese

Cheese — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:50:22 +0000

The back is ugly like cereal!

By: face facts

face facts — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:50:06 +0000

It looks better than a Toyota Camry or Honda Accord.

By: Me

Me — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:14:32 +0000

“I shall call him -mini charger “

By: Watcher Cock!

Watcher Cock! — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:58:48 +0000

Can anybody else see Plymouth Cricket/Hillman Avenger in this thing?

By: Is that a gun in your pocket?

Is that a gun in your pocket? — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:52:44 +0000

You don’t know what your missing. At least you can try all those cars when you are on vacation in Mexico. A cheap european car is 20 times better than a cheap American one

By: 2006300C

2006300C — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:44:09 +0000

Chrysler does not care about euro sales; Mercedes has this stupid idea of trying to pan off cars in markets that don’t want them, like they’re doing with SMART over here on the good side of the Atlantic. It’s is indisputable that euro luxury and exotic cars are second to none, but you people can keep your peugeots, renaults, citiroens, skodas, seats, and fiats.

By: Shit Cars

Shit Cars — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:26:49 +0000

Thats why your cars are **** and don’t compete 2006300C. Chrysler cares about European sales or it wouldn’t be tying to dump these pieces of **** on us

By: 2006300C

2006300C — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:22:44 +0000

Who cares about European sales? The US is the biggest market and we buy the most fully optioned cars with the biggest engines.

By: Jenny Aniston

Jenny Aniston — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:56:18 +0000

I’m predicting 0% finance over 120 months on this one

By: Shickelgruber

Shickelgruber — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:52:53 +0000

But even though this sucks it is way better than the malformed bastard of a car the Caliber. Why on earth would you want a mini-durango front on this?

By: Not Gonna Say

Not Gonna Say — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:42:20 +0000

Said it b4. Gonna say it once more. This is where the Caliber fenders should be; with some hotter looking headlights (both the Caliber and this thing headlights sucks’ looks wise). With the same cut at the beginning of the a-pillars on the Caliber on this. Can anyone here, or does anyone here know someone, who can photoshop a Caliber’s front end on the 2nd photo in this blog? Put some better looking headlights (even the Charger’s lights would do), keep the bumper, and then post a link to it here.

By: Shahbazz

Shahbazz — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:41:43 +0000

why would I want these pictures on my hard drive? it’s vile I hope dcx does a round up of the dealerships so I won’t have to see any on the street as well.

By: 1952 MG TD

1952 MG TD — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:37:29 +0000

Looks like DCX is doing a roundup and starting to request sites take down the links/pictures.

better right-click save-as while there is time.

By: rod

rod — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:32:07 +0000

where did this idea come up that there is going to be a coupe?a convertible yes,but chrysler has already said previously they are not making any coupes other than viper and challenger.allpar has said there may be a possibility of a small coupe called rebel based on the caliber but that is just a rumour.

By: Fingal McGingle

Fingal McGingle — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:27:29 +0000

Shockingly poor detailing not qhite as bad as a Caliber or Compass or Patriot though

By: Carsey Polari

Carsey Polari — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:26:16 +0000

Did they release the Sebring first so this wouldn’t look so bad when it finally shows?

By: Shagadelic

Shagadelic — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:15:37 +0000

My eyes my eyes I’ve gone blind, they’d only just recovered after Caliber Compass and Sebring. Chrysler I’m gonna sue.

By: StudMuffin

StudMuffin — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:13:03 +0000

Another hit!!! No way, you are so up Chryslers ass you can’t see **** for stepping in it 1952 MG TD. They will sell 3 of these in Europe and 2 Sebrings after ther massive hit of 5 Calibers

By: Saud

Saud — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:10:17 +0000

much more cooler than the sebring.

By: 1952 MG TD

1952 MG TD — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:05:19 +0000

May God protect this man’s job.

I love it, and think it will be another chrysler group hit.

production starts in december.

oh, Sebring production started 8-30-06.

By: GarbageMotorsCorp

GarbageMotorsCorp — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:34:01 +0000

Has a corporate look to it that is instantly recognizable. It works, call it “Charger-lite”. Can’t be nearly as bad as other cars in this class i.e. Malibu or Pontiac G6 but if history is any indication, it won’t take much of a bite out of your typical Camcord market.

By: MM

MM — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:21:42 +0000

Looks really sweet, but kinda seems small from photos. This is definitely the best looking midsize to come since the Fusion.

By: JW

JW — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:19:39 +0000

when i think of avenger, the word flashes: “COUPE!”
Comment by Kendall Richardson, posted on September4 at 6:54 pm

Well the Charger was a two door at one time too…no luck on that one either…I say bring back the cloud cars. I’m happy with mine.

By: Jerry Mahoney

Jerry Mahoney — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:14:34 +0000

^ As another original Avenger owner I am going to complain about the number of doors. I like the look but it would be so much smoother with just two doors.

By: Ketamin Addict

Ketamin Addict — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:14:32 +0000

It is better than Sebring and Caliber, but thats about all you can say. The rear window line clashes with the kink in the door. Front end much better resolved than Caliber. Hmmm me thinks my money gets spent elsewhere. looking forward to 1952 MG TDs defense of it.

By: David

David — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:57:02 +0000

I, as a current generation Dodge Avenger owner, must say that I’m very disappointed. What happened? I expected a seriously looking car, but this is just retarded. At the very least they could have been more creative and left out the Dodge Charger C-Pillar. I won’t complain about the number of doors, because I’m sure a coupe will follow shortly.

And is it just me, or does is seem like Dodge has been throwing their cross-hair grille on as an after thought on their new vehicles. If you’re gonna put it on, atleast design it into the vehicle so it looks like it belongs there.

By: ss

ss — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:41:15 +0000

sweet a FWD charger….

By: Richard L.

Richard L. — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:39:00 +0000

I expected more from DCX. The Sebring was so-so, but that is Chrysler and aimed at moms. The Avenger needed to be similar in character to the Challenger- a striking car that glued your eyes to it. This is not it. And if you add to the mix that the next Mitsubishi Lancer- same car platform- will be extraordinary, I think DCX wasted their money on this one.

By: Carnut4ever

Carnut4ever — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:32:16 +0000

Better than the Sebring sister car but the C pillar with the rear fender bulge just doesn’t cut it. DCX designers should know a terms like “design overkill” and “trying too hard to be retro” which obviously doesn’t work here. Maybe if this car is a hatch, maybe it will work. Looks like the best front drive compact affordable family car will be the Saturn Aura.