




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiat still considering low-cost brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rover3500</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rover3500</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382852</guid>
		<description>Fiat is already a budget brand as some posters have already suggested. Although they have a dose of Italian style that other low budget cars - Kia for example could never hope to achieve. they are very likeable cars and should just keep doing what they&#039;re doing. Don&#039;t muddy the waters by introducing a new bullshit brand - especially when you haven&#039;t sorted out Lancia yet and to a lesser extent Alfa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiat is already a budget brand as some posters have already suggested. Although they have a dose of Italian style that other low budget cars &#8211; Kia for example could never hope to achieve. they are very likeable cars and should just keep doing what they&#8217;re doing. Don&#8217;t muddy the waters by introducing a new bullshit brand &#8211; especially when you haven&#8217;t sorted out Lancia yet and to a lesser extent Alfa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zip</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382698</link>
		<dc:creator>Zip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382698</guid>
		<description>they&#039;re pushing upmarket. the new punto and 500 are much more premium than their predecessors.
the panda is the only &#039;low cost&#039; model.  i think they&#039;re going to try and rival the koreans for the cheapest sector (at least in europe, where kia + hyundai purchases are forms of social suicide)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re pushing upmarket. the new punto and 500 are much more premium than their predecessors.<br />
the panda is the only &#8216;low cost&#8217; model.  i think they&#8217;re going to try and rival the koreans for the cheapest sector (at least in europe, where kia + hyundai purchases are forms of social suicide)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaCaLover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382654</link>
		<dc:creator>LaCaLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382654</guid>
		<description>At approx $24000 the 500 is hardly low cost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At approx $24000 the 500 is hardly low cost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madcapp</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382613</link>
		<dc:creator>Madcapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382613</guid>
		<description>Point of order...isn&#039;t Fiat already a low cost brand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point of order&#8230;isn&#8217;t Fiat already a low cost brand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyunya</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382610</link>
		<dc:creator>xyunya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382610</guid>
		<description>Yep, they are Italian Chevy: Chevy brings to US cars from Korea, FIAT from Poland to Italy. FIAT is having renaissance. Maybe Chevy should bring cars from Poland instead of Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they are Italian Chevy: Chevy brings to US cars from Korea, FIAT from Poland to Italy. FIAT is having renaissance. Maybe Chevy should bring cars from Poland instead of Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382601</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382601</guid>
		<description>^Gotta agree with you.  I always thought Fiats were the affordable car for the Italian working family.  Perhaps they now see themselves as the Italian &#039;Chevy&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Gotta agree with you.  I always thought Fiats were the affordable car for the Italian working family.  Perhaps they now see themselves as the Italian &#8216;Chevy&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trooper1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382592</link>
		<dc:creator>trooper1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382592</guid>
		<description>^lame.    I always thought the Fiat as a whole was a low cost brand. Automakers that specialize in smaller fuel effecient cars will be the big success stories of the auto industry in the future. Brands like MB, BMW, and Lexus will also do very well despite their fast powerfull cars due the quality and prestige image. Domestic automakers are going to get hit even harder in the future because they don&#039;t have enough international appeal to keep afloat. They may be somewhat popular in the domestic market, but thats not enough to survive in a global economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^lame.    I always thought the Fiat as a whole was a low cost brand. Automakers that specialize in smaller fuel effecient cars will be the big success stories of the auto industry in the future. Brands like MB, BMW, and Lexus will also do very well despite their fast powerfull cars due the quality and prestige image. Domestic automakers are going to get hit even harder in the future because they don&#8217;t have enough international appeal to keep afloat. They may be somewhat popular in the domestic market, but thats not enough to survive in a global economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/fiat-still-considering-low-cost-brand.html#comment-382588</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=7483#comment-382588</guid>
		<description>I wish that Osama bin Laden had ordered attacks of FIAT factories instead of American targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that Osama bin Laden had ordered attacks of FIAT factories instead of American targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 243/244 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 16:53:24 -->
