




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spied: Ford Flex-based Lincoln CUV mule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-350612</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-350612</guid>
		<description>mazdaman: &quot;Ford&#039;s top tier U.S. brand deserves better treatment than to receive badge engineered Ford clones to fill up Lincoln&#039;s lineup.&quot;

You&#039;re always talking sense, but this just had to be singled out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mazdaman: &#8220;Ford&#8217;s top tier U.S. brand deserves better treatment than to receive badge engineered Ford clones to fill up Lincoln&#8217;s lineup.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re always talking sense, but this just had to be singled out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwerveEarly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349891</link>
		<dc:creator>SwerveEarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349891</guid>
		<description>Wouldnt want one, even with the twin-turbo and awd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldnt want one, even with the twin-turbo and awd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richt62167</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349882</link>
		<dc:creator>richt62167</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349882</guid>
		<description>Hate it! Hate it! Hate it! I can’t believe there going through with this Car/SUV/Crossover. I think the Flex is the ugliest thing ever, and I’ve seen my shit before and that looks nicer. And I think putting a Lincoln grill on it and calling it a Lincoln MKYUTC1234…… is not going to make it better. Lincoln please fix what you already have before you start making “NEW” (warmed over) Fords because you will be fixing this in a year and changing the name and call it “The all new” (INSERT NAME HERE) ala…..Sable/ Taurus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate it! Hate it! Hate it! I can’t believe there going through with this Car/SUV/Crossover. I think the Flex is the ugliest thing ever, and I’ve seen my shit before and that looks nicer. And I think putting a Lincoln grill on it and calling it a Lincoln MKYUTC1234…… is not going to make it better. Lincoln please fix what you already have before you start making “NEW” (warmed over) Fords because you will be fixing this in a year and changing the name and call it “The all new” (INSERT NAME HERE) ala…..Sable/ Taurus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoomzoomr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349767</link>
		<dc:creator>zoomzoomr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349767</guid>
		<description>Commodore.. why does it have to be called MKF?  Wouldn&#039;t F just remind people this is a rebodied Flex?  MKV is too obvious, why would they want to remind us it is basically a van without any of the usefulness of a van (sliding doors, raised roof, removable seating)?  I&#039;m guessing they&#039;ll opt for something like MKC (crossover), MKL (luxury or long), MKXL or MKX L (long-wheelbase MKX) or maybe the MKT Robert suggested, though i have no idea what the T would stand for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commodore.. why does it have to be called MKF?  Wouldn&#8217;t F just remind people this is a rebodied Flex?  MKV is too obvious, why would they want to remind us it is basically a van without any of the usefulness of a van (sliding doors, raised roof, removable seating)?  I&#8217;m guessing they&#8217;ll opt for something like MKC (crossover), MKL (luxury or long), MKXL or MKX L (long-wheelbase MKX) or maybe the MKT Robert suggested, though i have no idea what the T would stand for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349744</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349744</guid>
		<description>I hope all the idiots on this board realize that the only thing the real Lincoln MKT will retain is the front grille.

The body is supposed to be quite swoopy like the Mercedes R-class when it debuts.  I think we&#039;ll see it in NY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope all the idiots on this board realize that the only thing the real Lincoln MKT will retain is the front grille.</p>
<p>The body is supposed to be quite swoopy like the Mercedes R-class when it debuts.  I think we&#8217;ll see it in NY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP640</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349741</link>
		<dc:creator>LP640</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349741</guid>
		<description>wow yet more tedious, dull crossover for shit for soccer moms to lull over, Nice (!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow yet more tedious, dull crossover for shit for soccer moms to lull over, Nice (!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mazdaman</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349737</link>
		<dc:creator>mazdaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349737</guid>
		<description>I agree with jayjc08: this test mule is not fully representative of the final product&#039;s styling. The camouflage is only covering the front end of the vehicle. The rest of the vehicle should hopefully look quite a bit different from this test mule. 

My biggest hope is that they follow the MKS practice of platform sharing and give this vehicle its own unique exterior/interior design. If Ford just slaps a Lincoln front/rear styling treatment on the Flex and tries to pass it off as a Lincoln like they did with the MKX/Edge and MKZ/Milan/Edge, then I will totally give up on Ford&#039;s long term survival. Ford&#039;s top tier U.S. brand deserves better treatment than to receive badge engineered Ford clones to fill up Lincoln&#039;s lineup. They ruined Mercury by utilizing this practice; I sincerely hope they have learned their lesson about how to properly share platforms among divisions. For Lincoln to become and remain relevant as a near luxury division (Ford has appeared to have completely given up on restoring Lincoln to a true full luxury brand), they will need to offer products that are distinct and upscale from their Ford brand platform mates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with jayjc08: this test mule is not fully representative of the final product&#8217;s styling. The camouflage is only covering the front end of the vehicle. The rest of the vehicle should hopefully look quite a bit different from this test mule. </p>
<p>My biggest hope is that they follow the MKS practice of platform sharing and give this vehicle its own unique exterior/interior design. If Ford just slaps a Lincoln front/rear styling treatment on the Flex and tries to pass it off as a Lincoln like they did with the MKX/Edge and MKZ/Milan/Edge, then I will totally give up on Ford&#8217;s long term survival. Ford&#8217;s top tier U.S. brand deserves better treatment than to receive badge engineered Ford clones to fill up Lincoln&#8217;s lineup. They ruined Mercury by utilizing this practice; I sincerely hope they have learned their lesson about how to properly share platforms among divisions. For Lincoln to become and remain relevant as a near luxury division (Ford has appeared to have completely given up on restoring Lincoln to a true full luxury brand), they will need to offer products that are distinct and upscale from their Ford brand platform mates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349726</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349726</guid>
		<description>What about SHT ?  For fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about SHT ?  For fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 441Zuke</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349725</link>
		<dc:creator>441Zuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349725</guid>
		<description>maybe MKC for Crap</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe MKC for Crap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendino</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349723</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349723</guid>
		<description>Maybe MKV since it&#039;s a van alternative?
MKC for crossover?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe MKV since it&#8217;s a van alternative?<br />
MKC for crossover?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commodore</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349708</link>
		<dc:creator>Commodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349708</guid>
		<description>zoomzoom - yes, but you have to follow the genius naming-scheme; it will be MKF

Needless to say, this wagon/minivan/truck/car will not beat the Lambdas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zoomzoom &#8211; yes, but you have to follow the genius naming-scheme; it will be MKF</p>
<p>Needless to say, this wagon/minivan/truck/car will not beat the Lambdas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoomzoomr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349685</link>
		<dc:creator>zoomzoomr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349685</guid>
		<description>Now the big controversy.. what will they call it?  Considering the state of Ford&#039;s Lincoln Mercury division and the apparent infighting between the brands for exclusive product.. the only logical name would be FLUX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the big controversy.. what will they call it?  Considering the state of Ford&#8217;s Lincoln Mercury division and the apparent infighting between the brands for exclusive product.. the only logical name would be FLUX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeansterTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349677</link>
		<dc:creator>DeansterTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349677</guid>
		<description>Ford&#039;s incredibly talented design team strikes again! LMFAO!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford&#8217;s incredibly talented design team strikes again! LMFAO!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349671</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349671</guid>
		<description>My gosh it is a Ford!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gosh it is a Ford!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmaster4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349664</link>
		<dc:creator>carmaster4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349664</guid>
		<description>to be honest lincoln has way to many SUVs/CUVs for a &quot;luxury&quot; company.

they should focus on more sedans ! 
maybe a coupe perhaps.

it looks like an extended taurus X 

and the american companies have a bad habit of making the same vehicle just adding luxury stuff on it. i dont see honda  doing that to acura lol

although the civic is re-badged as a acura in canada!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be honest lincoln has way to many SUVs/CUVs for a &#8220;luxury&#8221; company.</p>
<p>they should focus on more sedans !<br />
maybe a coupe perhaps.</p>
<p>it looks like an extended taurus X </p>
<p>and the american companies have a bad habit of making the same vehicle just adding luxury stuff on it. i dont see honda  doing that to acura lol</p>
<p>although the civic is re-badged as a acura in canada!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349663</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349663</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s just been so little to talk about that I&#039;m just being stupid to kick up so dust to talk about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s just been so little to talk about that I&#8217;m just being stupid to kick up so dust to talk about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349661</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349661</guid>
		<description>&quot;The mule is identical to the lengthened Taurus X-based mules&quot;

Does that shed some light, blakkar &amp; Ricardohead?

So far, I think it&#039;s a dumbfounded idea but they could get it right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The mule is identical to the lengthened Taurus X-based mules&#8221;</p>
<p>Does that shed some light, blakkar &amp; Ricardohead?</p>
<p>So far, I think it&#8217;s a dumbfounded idea but they could get it right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349660</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349660</guid>
		<description>I agree, Blakkarr.  Looks more like teh TaurusX and we all know what a big seller that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Blakkarr.  Looks more like teh TaurusX and we all know what a big seller that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349652</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349652</guid>
		<description>Say this ten times fast: 
&quot;the front fascia features a sleeker and more flowing design than the one found on the Ford Flex&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say this ten times fast:<br />
&#8220;the front fascia features a sleeker and more flowing design than the one found on the Ford Flex&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349651</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349651</guid>
		<description>Why&#039;d they bother with any camo at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why&#8217;d they bother with any camo at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349650</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349650</guid>
		<description>The front end is gonna look just like that of the new MKS except a tiny bit taller. I can already see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front end is gonna look just like that of the new MKS except a tiny bit taller. I can already see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349648</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349648</guid>
		<description>It looks like an enlarged Freestyle/Taurus X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like an enlarged Freestyle/Taurus X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonnycat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349646</link>
		<dc:creator>jonnycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349646</guid>
		<description>It looks like Nacho Libre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Nacho Libre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349638</link>
		<dc:creator>TomF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349638</guid>
		<description>Note that this car is NOT a Mercury -- another clear sign that Merc is a dead brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that this car is NOT a Mercury &#8212; another clear sign that Merc is a dead brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6ix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349636</link>
		<dc:creator>6ix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/flex-based-lincoln-mule.html#comment-349636</guid>
		<description>Cool, a Lincoln minivan!

Seriously, I hope they don&#039;t just do a simple reskin of the Flex for Lincoln.  Hasn&#039;t everyone learned yet that badge-engineering is an inherently bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, a Lincoln minivan!</p>
<p>Seriously, I hope they don&#8217;t just do a simple reskin of the Flex for Lincoln.  Hasn&#8217;t everyone learned yet that badge-engineering is an inherently bad thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.054 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 430/431 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 12:16:16 -->
