




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford approves Fairlane van replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-178234</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-178234</guid>
		<description>YUCK!!! That has got to be the ugliest van I have ever seen in my entire life.  If Ford wants to boast sales this isn&#039;t the way to do it.  Not even weed could make this van look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YUCK!!! That has got to be the ugliest van I have ever seen in my entire life.  If Ford wants to boast sales this isn&#8217;t the way to do it.  Not even weed could make this van look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-177048</link>
		<dc:creator>canut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-177048</guid>
		<description>I think you mean the new GM platform for Suvs by GM(Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook). These improved people movers show us GM might have learned something about its past forays in  badge engineering. Stop that illusion that ALL things GM are good. If they are that good then why is GM struggling now? GM can&#039;t seem to defend its market share against the competition. It is the products that will make or break an automaker. The current GM minivans are horrendous. No amount of grafting at the front could save a minivan design that was inferior from the start. Ancient ohv v6&#039;s coupled with indifferent styling how could that compare with the usual Japanese competition? Even the new Sedona/Entourage looks better than these GM vans destined for the rental car fleet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean the new GM platform for Suvs by GM(Buick Enclave, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook). These improved people movers show us GM might have learned something about its past forays in  badge engineering. Stop that illusion that ALL things GM are good. If they are that good then why is GM struggling now? GM can&#8217;t seem to defend its market share against the competition. It is the products that will make or break an automaker. The current GM minivans are horrendous. No amount of grafting at the front could save a minivan design that was inferior from the start. Ancient ohv v6&#8242;s coupled with indifferent styling how could that compare with the usual Japanese competition? Even the new Sedona/Entourage looks better than these GM vans destined for the rental car fleet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176462</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176462</guid>
		<description>Or you could all just smarten up and buy a Saturn Relay, Pontiac SV6, or Buick Terazza which about a superior minivan as you can buy. Or if you want an ass kicking SUV check out the best in the business, the Chevrolet Equinocks or Pontiac Torent. 

Real Americans only buy GM, not Ford junk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could all just smarten up and buy a Saturn Relay, Pontiac SV6, or Buick Terazza which about a superior minivan as you can buy. Or if you want an ass kicking SUV check out the best in the business, the Chevrolet Equinocks or Pontiac Torent. </p>
<p>Real Americans only buy GM, not Ford junk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176430</link>
		<dc:creator>canut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176430</guid>
		<description>I agree with post#7 but make it the Ford Galaxy which is slightly bigger than the S-max. Forget about this Fairlane. The design doesn&#039;t connect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with post#7 but make it the Ford Galaxy which is slightly bigger than the S-max. Forget about this Fairlane. The design doesn&#8217;t connect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176103</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 04:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176103</guid>
		<description>If if has at least 250hp and RWD I&#039;ll nut on the brochure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If if has at least 250hp and RWD I&#8217;ll nut on the brochure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thing2</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176064</link>
		<dc:creator>Thing2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176064</guid>
		<description>hm a people mover priced for twenty somethings? Sounds like an Element with actual seating...it will sell well, its not half bad. I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing it on the road, its sporty and classy enough to not look cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm a people mover priced for twenty somethings? Sounds like an Element with actual seating&#8230;it will sell well, its not half bad. I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing it on the road, its sporty and classy enough to not look cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176057</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176057</guid>
		<description>Detroit: WAKE UP, it doesn&#039;t matter what it looks like now...it is going to look OLD in Feb 2008...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit: WAKE UP, it doesn&#8217;t matter what it looks like now&#8230;it is going to look OLD in Feb 2008&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176002</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 01:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176002</guid>
		<description>Rover is a crappy name too.....reminds me of an old dog.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rover is a crappy name too&#8230;..reminds me of an old dog&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volvo-S60driver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-176000</link>
		<dc:creator>Volvo-S60driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 01:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-176000</guid>
		<description>Hey, just be glad that the name didnt end with &quot;-star&quot; (Freestar, Windstar, Aerostar) It might take off in sales. Doesnt have &quot;soccer mom&quot; look to it. No embarassment of driving the van.  

GM is gonna shit with thier lame ass identical minivans. Hope GM stop making them! Just horrible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just be glad that the name didnt end with &#8220;-star&#8221; (Freestar, Windstar, Aerostar) It might take off in sales. Doesnt have &#8220;soccer mom&#8221; look to it. No embarassment of driving the van.  </p>
<p>GM is gonna shit with thier lame ass identical minivans. Hope GM stop making them! Just horrible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175940</link>
		<dc:creator>British_Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175940</guid>
		<description>There have been a lot of complaints that the Fairlane concept looks too much like the current Gen Range Rover. I will have to see one in person though to really say one way or the other. Also agreed that Fairlane is a bad name because of the history. Ford sells a crappy minivan thing called the Galaxie in Europe as well. Just bad name choices all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been a lot of complaints that the Fairlane concept looks too much like the current Gen Range Rover. I will have to see one in person though to really say one way or the other. Also agreed that Fairlane is a bad name because of the history. Ford sells a crappy minivan thing called the Galaxie in Europe as well. Just bad name choices all around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pugsly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175898</link>
		<dc:creator>Pugsly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175898</guid>
		<description>I like it.  It&#039;s just different enough to succeed.  Go for it Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.  It&#8217;s just different enough to succeed.  Go for it Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175888</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna build this one in Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna build this one in Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175806</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175806</guid>
		<description>The Fairlame looks like an Explorer with new sheet metal.  Wow, what a concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fairlame looks like an Explorer with new sheet metal.  Wow, what a concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETE PETERSEN</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175619</link>
		<dc:creator>PETE PETERSEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175619</guid>
		<description>#5 - Agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 &#8211; Agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175594</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175594</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d make a deposit today: if they&#039;ll give me a diesel.    ....that is: as long as it&#039;s not 2/3rds size like the HHR, etc...

j i m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d make a deposit today: if they&#8217;ll give me a diesel.    &#8230;.that is: as long as it&#8217;s not 2/3rds size like the HHR, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>j i m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niels</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175584</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175584</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind if they put it into production, but calling it Fairlane is a disgrace to the classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind if they put it into production, but calling it Fairlane is a disgrace to the classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175559</link>
		<dc:creator>peter g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175559</guid>
		<description>It looks kinda cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks kinda cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim in LA</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim in LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175541</guid>
		<description>like the name. it has the big-Scion look to it. hopefully it won&#039;t be too late, timing-wise, for that market segment of 20-somethings-having-kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like the name. it has the big-Scion look to it. hopefully it won&#8217;t be too late, timing-wise, for that market segment of 20-somethings-having-kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement.html#comment-175531</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/06/21/ford-approves-fairlane-van-replacement/#comment-175531</guid>
		<description>if it looks like that they might actually be able to compete against toyota, honda, and chrysler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it looks like that they might actually be able to compete against toyota, honda, and chrysler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.025 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 364/365 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 15:56:36 -->
