<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford details business plan to Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:19:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quiet American</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422247</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422247</guid>
		<description>Realistically, It is a big mistake for the big three to gamble their future on &quot;electrification&quot; for the next few model years. ELECTRIC CARS ARE NOT GOING TO APPEAL TO ANYONE BUT FRINGE CONSUMERS FOR MANY YEARS. How many people are going to buy a really expensive car that can&#039;t pull highway speeds for more than a few miles with an AC going and a couple of passengers.

People will flock to Ford to buy internal combustion cars if they do it correctly. Start by Developing a contemporary and desirable American design language. The ovalesque 2nd generation taurus and the skull numbingly mundane J. Mays follow-up attempts were not desirable. They did not represent anything definable as even style, much less American style. To making the running gear &quot;right&quot;, start with European chassis dynamics with some lightweight materials used for construction. Saving weight is less expensive and more practical than technology that doesn&#039;t really exist. Add IC engines that are competitive and practical. Make HP ample but not excessive. Today&#039;s family sedans can out accelerate most 60&#039;s era muscle cars and Ferrari&#039;s made more than 20 years ago. I&#039;d rather have my car lose a little bit of time in irrelevant magazine slalom, roll-on and 0-60 acceleration tests than pay lots of money to haul around batteries that only get charged during deceleration. Factor in the requisite narrow, high pressure, hard compound tires that makes stopping this mass in an emergency so much fun and hybrids become even more of a car for those who don&#039;t get physics.

By the way, UAW people, you have to be competitive in cost with employees at the non-big three domestic plants. All of us who aren&#039;t nuts (dang, I hope that&#039;s me) want to see you survive. Your standing in heavy traffic, you have to take of the blinders to not fall out of the occupational gene pool. You have proven that you can be as productive and as successful at quality as any other employees in the world. Now you have to cross the competitive cost threshold.

Get real Ford and the UAW.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realistically, It is a big mistake for the big three to gamble their future on &#8220;electrification&#8221; for the next few model years. ELECTRIC CARS ARE NOT GOING TO APPEAL TO ANYONE BUT FRINGE CONSUMERS FOR MANY YEARS. How many people are going to buy a really expensive car that can&#8217;t pull highway speeds for more than a few miles with an AC going and a couple of passengers.</p>
<p>People will flock to Ford to buy internal combustion cars if they do it correctly. Start by Developing a contemporary and desirable American design language. The ovalesque 2nd generation taurus and the skull numbingly mundane J. Mays follow-up attempts were not desirable. They did not represent anything definable as even style, much less American style. To making the running gear &#8220;right&#8221;, start with European chassis dynamics with some lightweight materials used for construction. Saving weight is less expensive and more practical than technology that doesn&#8217;t really exist. Add IC engines that are competitive and practical. Make HP ample but not excessive. Today&#8217;s family sedans can out accelerate most 60&#8217;s era muscle cars and Ferrari&#8217;s made more than 20 years ago. I&#8217;d rather have my car lose a little bit of time in irrelevant magazine slalom, roll-on and 0-60 acceleration tests than pay lots of money to haul around batteries that only get charged during deceleration. Factor in the requisite narrow, high pressure, hard compound tires that makes stopping this mass in an emergency so much fun and hybrids become even more of a car for those who don&#8217;t get physics.</p>
<p>By the way, UAW people, you have to be competitive in cost with employees at the non-big three domestic plants. All of us who aren&#8217;t nuts (dang, I hope that&#8217;s me) want to see you survive. Your standing in heavy traffic, you have to take of the blinders to not fall out of the occupational gene pool. You have proven that you can be as productive and as successful at quality as any other employees in the world. Now you have to cross the competitive cost threshold.</p>
<p>Get real Ford and the UAW.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregsy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422227</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422227</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s pretty funny that Congress, who is over $10,000,000,000,000 in debt and spends over $621,000,000 on a Capitol Welcome Center, is trying to tell the auto companies how to run their business.  Irony is hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty funny that Congress, who is over $10,000,000,000,000 in debt and spends over $621,000,000 on a Capitol Welcome Center, is trying to tell the auto companies how to run their business.  Irony is hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lariat Luxury Locomotive Liner No.3</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422124</link>
		<dc:creator>Lariat Luxury Locomotive Liner No.3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422124</guid>
		<description>@johnnycancuck, dammit JC, I&#039;m liking my Canadian friend more and more as you understand the real problems!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@johnnycancuck, dammit JC, I&#8217;m liking my Canadian friend more and more as you understand the real problems!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422107</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422107</guid>
		<description>Any financial assistance to Ford should require that they kill Mercury and stop pretending that Lincoln is a luxury brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any financial assistance to Ford should require that they kill Mercury and stop pretending that Lincoln is a luxury brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422096</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422096</guid>
		<description>Actually I think the education system in the US and Canada needs to change so that our future labour force isn&#039;t as dependent on unions to make a decent wage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think the education system in the US and Canada needs to change so that our future labour force isn&#8217;t as dependent on unions to make a decent wage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP92804</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422085</link>
		<dc:creator>CP92804</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422085</guid>
		<description>And I suppose that you folks commenting on what the union is going to give up in wages are taking big pay cuts also? I think EVERYONE in this country makes more than they should so we should all take a cut in pay so that the CEO of the company you work for can make more 14,000,000 just is not enough to live on for guys like Mullaly and Wagoner. No I am not union nor do I wish to join one, I am simply tired of the American working man being demonised for wanting more pay and benefits. Many of you obviously are to young to have had grandparents that worked in the steel mills in the early 1900&#039;s with dangerous working conditions and very minimal pay, without unions we would still be there. Yes the unions need to change with the times but we sure dont need them to go away completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suppose that you folks commenting on what the union is going to give up in wages are taking big pay cuts also? I think EVERYONE in this country makes more than they should so we should all take a cut in pay so that the CEO of the company you work for can make more 14,000,000 just is not enough to live on for guys like Mullaly and Wagoner. No I am not union nor do I wish to join one, I am simply tired of the American working man being demonised for wanting more pay and benefits. Many of you obviously are to young to have had grandparents that worked in the steel mills in the early 1900&#8217;s with dangerous working conditions and very minimal pay, without unions we would still be there. Yes the unions need to change with the times but we sure dont need them to go away completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yarddog82abn</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422063</link>
		<dc:creator>yarddog82abn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422063</guid>
		<description>Ford has step-up! now if the head of of the UAW can work of a $1.00...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford has step-up! now if the head of of the UAW can work of a $1.00&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Collaziano</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422062</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Collaziano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422062</guid>
		<description>No changes with the UAW contract, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No changes with the UAW contract, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-details-business-plan-to-congress.html/comment-page-1#comment-422060</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12171#comment-422060</guid>
		<description>isnt that what its supposed to be broken up into? cost saving a future products? what did you expect lln? the lollipop guild to start building their cars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isnt that what its supposed to be broken up into? cost saving a future products? what did you expect lln? the lollipop guild to start building their cars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
