<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford announces F-150 SFE &#8220;superior fuel economy&#8221; edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jimothy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409527</link>
		<dc:creator>jimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409527</guid>
		<description>mulletmaster: Oops, sorry. I guess I&#039;m the idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mulletmaster: Oops, sorry. I guess I&#8217;m the idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: volvo240dl</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409485</link>
		<dc:creator>volvo240dl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409485</guid>
		<description>Some midrange super/sportd cars that werent intended for fuel economy get equal to better L/KM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some midrange super/sportd cars that werent intended for fuel economy get equal to better L/KM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeepGuyNC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409465</link>
		<dc:creator>JeepGuyNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409465</guid>
		<description>well with a 6 speed that could help.. as someone said low flow exhaust or duals (Dodge) would help.. how much does it take to move a plastic truck down the highway??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well with a 6 speed that could help.. as someone said low flow exhaust or duals (Dodge) would help.. how much does it take to move a plastic truck down the highway??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler_is_aero_tt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409450</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler_is_aero_tt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409450</guid>
		<description>Um, this is an improvement for Ford. I don&#039;t know about any of you but I think this smart to make the most fuel efficient truck in its class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, this is an improvement for Ford. I don&#8217;t know about any of you but I think this smart to make the most fuel efficient truck in its class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inline6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409439</link>
		<dc:creator>inline6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409439</guid>
		<description>The Cobalt/G5 XFE are standard on all 2.2/5MT-equipped Cobalts/G5s. Same goes for all Silverados, Sierras, Tahoes, and Yukons in 2WD with the 5.3/6AT (according to the GM release). All models with those features will be &quot;XFEs&quot;. GM won&#039;t be charging more for the XFE treatment.

Ford, however, will be charging $1095 for base XL models, and nothing for XLTs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cobalt/G5 XFE are standard on all 2.2/5MT-equipped Cobalts/G5s. Same goes for all Silverados, Sierras, Tahoes, and Yukons in 2WD with the 5.3/6AT (according to the GM release). All models with those features will be &#8220;XFEs&#8221;. GM won&#8217;t be charging more for the XFE treatment.</p>
<p>Ford, however, will be charging $1095 for base XL models, and nothing for XLTs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yarddog82abn</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409438</link>
		<dc:creator>yarddog82abn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409438</guid>
		<description>If You Are Worried About MPG, then a truck is the last thing you need buy, I&#039;m just saying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If You Are Worried About MPG, then a truck is the last thing you need buy, I&#8217;m just saying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mulletmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409436</link>
		<dc:creator>mulletmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409436</guid>
		<description>I am well aware of the low rolling resistance concept, however I was pointing out a typo.

Let me know when you are able to mount a 16&quot; tire on a 18&quot; wheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am well aware of the low rolling resistance concept, however I was pointing out a typo.</p>
<p>Let me know when you are able to mount a 16&#8243; tire on a 18&#8243; wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimothy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409430</link>
		<dc:creator>jimothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409430</guid>
		<description>mulletmaster says:
“chrome 18 inch wheels with low rolling resistance P265/60R-16 tires bump fuel economy up from 14/19″
The difference in tire and wheel size must create some sort of net forward force vector resulting in free energy.


----

OR, the low rolling resistance tires, hmm, roll with less resistance, thus improving fuel economy. Ya think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mulletmaster says:<br />
“chrome 18 inch wheels with low rolling resistance P265/60R-16 tires bump fuel economy up from 14/19″<br />
The difference in tire and wheel size must create some sort of net forward force vector resulting in free energy.</p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>OR, the low rolling resistance tires, hmm, roll with less resistance, thus improving fuel economy. Ya think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mulletmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409427</link>
		<dc:creator>mulletmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409427</guid>
		<description>You are all missing the most important point.

&quot;chrome 18 inch wheels with low rolling resistance P265/60R-16 tires bump fuel economy up from 14/19&quot;

The difference in tire and wheel size must create some sort of net forward force vector resulting in free energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all missing the most important point.</p>
<p>&#8220;chrome 18 inch wheels with low rolling resistance P265/60R-16 tires bump fuel economy up from 14/19&#8243;</p>
<p>The difference in tire and wheel size must create some sort of net forward force vector resulting in free energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beatusmongous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409424</link>
		<dc:creator>beatusmongous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409424</guid>
		<description>Nah, that&#039;s cool.  I&#039;m glad you responded with humor and fun, because I hate when people get all stuffy and offended.  These places are for opinions, and it&#039;s good to share them.  We all learn from each other.  It&#039;s not a waste of time at all.

I actually read the post through, and you&#039;re right, it is a marketing ploy.  It&#039;s unfortunate that anyone would need to resort to such tactics in order to sell cars.  However, people are buying heavily on the criteria of MPG at this time, and in order to get a piece of that pie, these guys have to make this type of adjustment and then advertise the hell out of them.  The Big 3 have a reputation to destroy, and that reputation is that they only make big pig cars.  For many years, that was true.  So now, GM has ads on the radio talking about the &quot;future of driving technology&quot; with music that sounds like something out of an Apple commercial.

Oh, and sorry for thinking your blog post was an article.  It looks pretty official.

But your posts need to start learning to respect you more.  Those disrespectful posts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, that&#8217;s cool.  I&#8217;m glad you responded with humor and fun, because I hate when people get all stuffy and offended.  These places are for opinions, and it&#8217;s good to share them.  We all learn from each other.  It&#8217;s not a waste of time at all.</p>
<p>I actually read the post through, and you&#8217;re right, it is a marketing ploy.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that anyone would need to resort to such tactics in order to sell cars.  However, people are buying heavily on the criteria of MPG at this time, and in order to get a piece of that pie, these guys have to make this type of adjustment and then advertise the hell out of them.  The Big 3 have a reputation to destroy, and that reputation is that they only make big pig cars.  For many years, that was true.  So now, GM has ads on the radio talking about the &#8220;future of driving technology&#8221; with music that sounds like something out of an Apple commercial.</p>
<p>Oh, and sorry for thinking your blog post was an article.  It looks pretty official.</p>
<p>But your posts need to start learning to respect you more.  Those disrespectful posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409418</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409418</guid>
		<description>beater, I prefer to get respect FOR my posts.  I&#039;m not interested in getting respect from the posts.  They aren&#039;t capable of respecting, because they&#039;re posts.  Since you like lists:

1) the whole point of an opinion is to express a bias supported by facts
2) I dont write articles, its (*gasp*) a blog and you&#039;re more than welcome to be my editor, I can&#039;t afford one.

To bring it full circle and keep it relevant (gosh is that spelled right?) to this post, many comments on many blogs express a bias.  I&#039;m biased towards japanese vehicles partly because they don&#039;t create BS trim levels like XFE and SFE to raise the marketed fuel economy of a car.

I invite you to contact me privately to continue this discussion, my information is on my site.  I&#039;m sorry for wasting everyone else&#039;s time, this was not my intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beater, I prefer to get respect FOR my posts.  I&#8217;m not interested in getting respect from the posts.  They aren&#8217;t capable of respecting, because they&#8217;re posts.  Since you like lists:</p>
<p>1) the whole point of an opinion is to express a bias supported by facts<br />
2) I dont write articles, its (*gasp*) a blog and you&#8217;re more than welcome to be my editor, I can&#8217;t afford one.</p>
<p>To bring it full circle and keep it relevant (gosh is that spelled right?) to this post, many comments on many blogs express a bias.  I&#8217;m biased towards japanese vehicles partly because they don&#8217;t create BS trim levels like XFE and SFE to raise the marketed fuel economy of a car.</p>
<p>I invite you to contact me privately to continue this discussion, my information is on my site.  I&#8217;m sorry for wasting everyone else&#8217;s time, this was not my intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409407</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409407</guid>
		<description>they arent charging money for them if you get anything besides the XL which is a stripped down very basic truck with practically nothing on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they arent charging money for them if you get anything besides the XL which is a stripped down very basic truck with practically nothing on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409406</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409406</guid>
		<description>inline6: GM&#039;s aren&#039;t free either, at least on the trucks. Not sure what the deal on the Cobalt is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>inline6: GM&#8217;s aren&#8217;t free either, at least on the trucks. Not sure what the deal on the Cobalt is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inline6</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409401</link>
		<dc:creator>inline6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409401</guid>
		<description>At least GM&#039;s XFE models aren&#039;t option packages that cost anything. Ford is really silly for charging money for their SFE models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least GM&#8217;s XFE models aren&#8217;t option packages that cost anything. Ford is really silly for charging money for their SFE models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beatusmongous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409399</link>
		<dc:creator>beatusmongous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409399</guid>
		<description>Hey, Weakonomist, if you&#039;re going to get respect from your articles:

1) Get rid of the obvious bias, and

2) Proofread and eliminate the poor spelling.  &quot;it requires more breaking to stop.&quot;  I hope that doesn&#039;t mean the car must fall apart in order to stop...  They are &quot;brakes&quot;, not &quot;breaks.&quot;  Tough break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Weakonomist, if you&#8217;re going to get respect from your articles:</p>
<p>1) Get rid of the obvious bias, and</p>
<p>2) Proofread and eliminate the poor spelling.  &#8220;it requires more breaking to stop.&#8221;  I hope that doesn&#8217;t mean the car must fall apart in order to stop&#8230;  They are &#8220;brakes&#8221;, not &#8220;breaks.&#8221;  Tough break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaineMan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409395</link>
		<dc:creator>RaineMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409395</guid>
		<description>Actually Shaver I think most all radiator fans are electric by now... I haven&#039;t looked under the hood of an F-150 lately to check. Good point on the TB spacer though... 

Beatusmongous --&gt; Hillarious... I&#039;ll have to remember that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Shaver I think most all radiator fans are electric by now&#8230; I haven&#8217;t looked under the hood of an F-150 lately to check. Good point on the TB spacer though&#8230; </p>
<p>Beatusmongous &#8211;&gt; Hillarious&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to remember that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409393</link>
		<dc:creator>shaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409393</guid>
		<description>Raineman, dont forget too change out the mech radiator fan for an electric one $250 and the TBI spacer $45-$65.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raineman, dont forget too change out the mech radiator fan for an electric one $250 and the TBI spacer $45-$65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409390</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409390</guid>
		<description>Lame marketing attempt

http://weakonomics.com/2008/09/15/general-motors-and-the-bs-marketing-blitz/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lame marketing attempt</p>
<p><a href="http://weakonomics.com/2008/09/15/general-motors-and-the-bs-marketing-blitz/" rel="nofollow">http://weakonomics.com/2008/09/15/general-motors-and-the-bs-marketing-blitz/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409388</link>
		<dc:creator>shaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409388</guid>
		<description>They should go back to shorter leaf springs, un-boxed frame rails, smaller bolts for the bed and 5 lug wheels.  Also air bags are heavy and dont do anything for MPG, loose them to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should go back to shorter leaf springs, un-boxed frame rails, smaller bolts for the bed and 5 lug wheels.  Also air bags are heavy and dont do anything for MPG, loose them to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beatusmongous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409386</link>
		<dc:creator>beatusmongous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409386</guid>
		<description>You know people are going to think &quot;stupid ****er edition&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know people are going to think &#8220;stupid ****er edition&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaineMan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409384</link>
		<dc:creator>RaineMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409384</guid>
		<description>What an absolute waste. You could put an intake and high-flow exhaust on any current truck and get 3-5MPG improvement for way less than $1000... more performance too. I can&#039;t believe that people are falling for this... well, wait... yes I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an absolute waste. You could put an intake and high-flow exhaust on any current truck and get 3-5MPG improvement for way less than $1000&#8230; more performance too. I can&#8217;t believe that people are falling for this&#8230; well, wait&#8230; yes I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409379</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409379</guid>
		<description>I guess the rest of their trucks should carry IFE badging for inferior fuel economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the rest of their trucks should carry IFE badging for inferior fuel economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-f-150-sf.html/comment-page-1#comment-409375</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=9609#comment-409375</guid>
		<description>oh cmon... thats just a blatant rip off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh cmon&#8230; thats just a blatant rip off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
