




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustang</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-444445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-444445</guid>
		<description>We made the mistake of buying the 2005 Ford Mustang GT Premium, Black on Black, It&#039;s beautiful looking, it was a blast to drive, we loved our car for the first few months. Now that we have owned it for about 4 yrs. I would never buy a Ford product ever again! I would never recommend one to anyone.
Carefully review the T.S.B.s for this car, any year model of the Mustang. We had an engine ignition misfire from the time that we owned it. Ford failed to fix the problem. The transmission went out at 27,000 miles, Ford did not stand behind their product. The repair cost us $4,000. The car completely died on the road and would not start...twice. The first time was the fuel tank that failed, the next time was on a trip 2,000 miles from home, the charging system failed and the car was running off the battery until it just stopped and had to be towed into the closest Ford dealer. They replaced the Alternator and the battery under the warranty, but still found away to charge us $600. The A/C compressor failed and had to be replaced, the power steering unit failed and had to be replaced, and ... When I wash the car, or it rains... The water leaks into the interior, it fills the dashboard and when you drive the car the next time,
the water leaks onto the passanger floor like a race horse, completely soaks the floor and carpet and the water is about an inch deep!  I&#039;m not even close to being the only Mustang owner with all these problems,
check out the internet, search &#039;FORD Mustang complaints&#039;  many, many of the same complaints.
PASS ON FORD MUSTANGS... Do youself a big favor!  The quality is just not there.
Mustangs are 65% Foreign Made. The Honda Accord is more American made!
I have purchased 4 new cars in the past 20 yrs. I still own all 4, The last one was the Mustang in 2005.
I have put more repair money into the  MUSTANG, Then the other 3 COMBINED.
Mustang was my first Ford and my last Ford!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We made the mistake of buying the 2005 Ford Mustang GT Premium, Black on Black, It&#8217;s beautiful looking, it was a blast to drive, we loved our car for the first few months. Now that we have owned it for about 4 yrs. I would never buy a Ford product ever again! I would never recommend one to anyone.<br />
Carefully review the T.S.B.s for this car, any year model of the Mustang. We had an engine ignition misfire from the time that we owned it. Ford failed to fix the problem. The transmission went out at 27,000 miles, Ford did not stand behind their product. The repair cost us $4,000. The car completely died on the road and would not start&#8230;twice. The first time was the fuel tank that failed, the next time was on a trip 2,000 miles from home, the charging system failed and the car was running off the battery until it just stopped and had to be towed into the closest Ford dealer. They replaced the Alternator and the battery under the warranty, but still found away to charge us $600. The A/C compressor failed and had to be replaced, the power steering unit failed and had to be replaced, and &#8230; When I wash the car, or it rains&#8230; The water leaks into the interior, it fills the dashboard and when you drive the car the next time,<br />
the water leaks onto the passanger floor like a race horse, completely soaks the floor and carpet and the water is about an inch deep!  I&#8217;m not even close to being the only Mustang owner with all these problems,<br />
check out the internet, search &#8216;FORD Mustang complaints&#8217;  many, many of the same complaints.<br />
PASS ON FORD MUSTANGS&#8230; Do youself a big favor!  The quality is just not there.<br />
Mustangs are 65% Foreign Made. The Honda Accord is more American made!<br />
I have purchased 4 new cars in the past 20 yrs. I still own all 4, The last one was the Mustang in 2005.<br />
I have put more repair money into the  MUSTANG, Then the other 3 COMBINED.<br />
Mustang was my first Ford and my last Ford!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KaySMG</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-427063</link>
		<dc:creator>KaySMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-427063</guid>
		<description>Hey there,

I just wanted to let you know that your post made it on to Ford&#039;s Weekly Roundup - http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/mustang/#headline . The content is refreshed 2x weekly, so just look under the Weekly Roundup Archive to see your snippet. 

Each week we look for the best of the web mustang stuff - anything that&#039;s made by mustang lovers. All of the items get tagged in delicious, &quot;mustangbestoftheweb&quot; and from that list, Ford chooses their faves!

Our agency works closely with Ford on their social media efforts. We are heading up this project so I wanted to let you know.

Happy Holidays and congrats!

~K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,</p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that your post made it on to Ford&#8217;s Weekly Roundup &#8211; <a href="http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/mustang/#headline" rel="nofollow">http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/mustang/#headline</a> . The content is refreshed 2x weekly, so just look under the Weekly Roundup Archive to see your snippet. </p>
<p>Each week we look for the best of the web mustang stuff &#8211; anything that&#8217;s made by mustang lovers. All of the items get tagged in delicious, &#8220;mustangbestoftheweb&#8221; and from that list, Ford chooses their faves!</p>
<p>Our agency works closely with Ford on their social media efforts. We are heading up this project so I wanted to let you know.</p>
<p>Happy Holidays and congrats!</p>
<p>~K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-425410</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-425410</guid>
		<description>Oh please this is a piece of junk. Why ford limits the gt to 300-320HP is beyond me. If the camaro comes out it will eat this car for lunch. And then, when this mustang comes out, can you say SURCHARGE? No one has learned anything and this is why I am against the bailout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please this is a piece of junk. Why ford limits the gt to 300-320HP is beyond me. If the camaro comes out it will eat this car for lunch. And then, when this mustang comes out, can you say SURCHARGE? No one has learned anything and this is why I am against the bailout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-425022</link>
		<dc:creator>humphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-425022</guid>
		<description>I guess my major point is that Ford&#039;s actions are very much reactionary. FNA has hardly been what anyone would call innovative or groundbreaking. It can be done. Look at BMW, Audi, Merc and the technological tour de forces these guys are. The rest seem to follow.

Only with their backs to the wall, do they come out with plans - plans that have been available for perhaps decades - to fix the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my major point is that Ford&#8217;s actions are very much reactionary. FNA has hardly been what anyone would call innovative or groundbreaking. It can be done. Look at BMW, Audi, Merc and the technological tour de forces these guys are. The rest seem to follow.</p>
<p>Only with their backs to the wall, do they come out with plans &#8211; plans that have been available for perhaps decades &#8211; to fix the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424974</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424974</guid>
		<description>jsurfer- I don&#039;t get your point. I was pointing out that he was comparing the base 370Z to a &quot;Premium&quot; GT, which is more expensive than the normal &quot;GT&quot;. And for all the equipment this thing is coming standard with for 37k, it&#039;s not a major deal breaker but a pretty good bargain. 0-60 faster than this new BMW Z4, while having two rear seats, and imo more character. You can&#039;t argue that ones stuck in the past, because their both trying to emulate cars from forty, fifty years ago.

humphrey- Ford of Europe isn&#039;t nearly the only part of Ford that isn&#039;t making any &quot;sense&quot;.

What isn&#039;t making sense is most of you guys.

I can&#039;t understand how most of you can&#039;t comprehend the major leaps and changes Ford has been making in the past few years. Their quality and reliability has improved ten times over, yet it was ALREADY fairly good before this whole mess, and it seems that will only continue. What do you guys want exactly?

They&#039;ve got an almost totally fresh product line aside from an old Focus and (extremely) old Ranger, which both will be replaced and kick the bucket in the next two to three years.

Obviously they have some good designs on the table, already out to eat AND in the oven. The Flex, Mustang, Fusion, Edge, Escape to name their best. They have some VERY good designs that are very likely making it to production, some being tested right now, such as the Explorer, a new large sedan, the Fiesta and the MKT.

They&#039;ve cut their costs dramatically over the last 4 years. I&#039;m not kidding, go look at the figures, the savings are ridiculous and it&#039;s sad they won&#039;t even recoup them until another year or two.

They have some WONDERFUL engines on the drawing board. Who would have ever thought a 1.4 liter would make its way into the Fusion? Who would have thought their going to launch a 3~ liter V-6 that will churn out 350 horsepower?

I don&#039;t get it, what do you guys want Ford to do? Come out with an 40 mile per gallon, good looking small car? Oh, they have that on the board already! How about a 400 horsepower truck with a 6~ liter engine, that&#039;ll outrun the desert itself while banshee helicopters prey overhead? Just don&#039;t let the Saudis get ahold of an SVT Raptor! How about a good mid-size sedan? They&#039;ve had one for a while now, just lacking some safety features and refinement. Now, they have it. How about cutting their costs by a couple billion? Yep, they&#039;ve done that too.

And humphrey, I have to totally disagree with what you said about the 370Z being unique. There are loads of Japanese coupes that used to be produced in the same vein as the Z car. There are still two or three surviving. 

What is it that it offers that makes you think it&#039;s so unique? The Z car and the Japanese performance coupes pretty much started out as Japanese iterations of the American small sports car. Not to say they were copies, but the Japanese saw a great way to take their boring sedans, spice them up a bit and turn a good profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jsurfer- I don&#8217;t get your point. I was pointing out that he was comparing the base 370Z to a &#8220;Premium&#8221; GT, which is more expensive than the normal &#8220;GT&#8221;. And for all the equipment this thing is coming standard with for 37k, it&#8217;s not a major deal breaker but a pretty good bargain. 0-60 faster than this new BMW Z4, while having two rear seats, and imo more character. You can&#8217;t argue that ones stuck in the past, because their both trying to emulate cars from forty, fifty years ago.</p>
<p>humphrey- Ford of Europe isn&#8217;t nearly the only part of Ford that isn&#8217;t making any &#8220;sense&#8221;.</p>
<p>What isn&#8217;t making sense is most of you guys.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand how most of you can&#8217;t comprehend the major leaps and changes Ford has been making in the past few years. Their quality and reliability has improved ten times over, yet it was ALREADY fairly good before this whole mess, and it seems that will only continue. What do you guys want exactly?</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got an almost totally fresh product line aside from an old Focus and (extremely) old Ranger, which both will be replaced and kick the bucket in the next two to three years.</p>
<p>Obviously they have some good designs on the table, already out to eat AND in the oven. The Flex, Mustang, Fusion, Edge, Escape to name their best. They have some VERY good designs that are very likely making it to production, some being tested right now, such as the Explorer, a new large sedan, the Fiesta and the MKT.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve cut their costs dramatically over the last 4 years. I&#8217;m not kidding, go look at the figures, the savings are ridiculous and it&#8217;s sad they won&#8217;t even recoup them until another year or two.</p>
<p>They have some WONDERFUL engines on the drawing board. Who would have ever thought a 1.4 liter would make its way into the Fusion? Who would have thought their going to launch a 3~ liter V-6 that will churn out 350 horsepower?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get it, what do you guys want Ford to do? Come out with an 40 mile per gallon, good looking small car? Oh, they have that on the board already! How about a 400 horsepower truck with a 6~ liter engine, that&#8217;ll outrun the desert itself while banshee helicopters prey overhead? Just don&#8217;t let the Saudis get ahold of an SVT Raptor! How about a good mid-size sedan? They&#8217;ve had one for a while now, just lacking some safety features and refinement. Now, they have it. How about cutting their costs by a couple billion? Yep, they&#8217;ve done that too.</p>
<p>And humphrey, I have to totally disagree with what you said about the 370Z being unique. There are loads of Japanese coupes that used to be produced in the same vein as the Z car. There are still two or three surviving. </p>
<p>What is it that it offers that makes you think it&#8217;s so unique? The Z car and the Japanese performance coupes pretty much started out as Japanese iterations of the American small sports car. Not to say they were copies, but the Japanese saw a great way to take their boring sedans, spice them up a bit and turn a good profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424966</link>
		<dc:creator>humphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424966</guid>
		<description>I know there&#039;ll be a lot of people who will get upset about this, but this STUPID car (and others like it) is exactly why the big 3 are collapsing.

Why oh why, do you need yet another hi-po muscle car that harks back to a bygone era?? Stop living in your own wet dream guys and look forward, not backward. when you move forward and keep on looking over your shoulder, you bump into things.

I personally can&#039;t fathom how Ford can sleep at night knowing that it sold 20% of Mazda off to fund this POS.

Ford of Europe is the only facet of this organisation that is making any sense at the moment, and the sooner you consumers get your @rses into these (or similar) cars the better.

The big 3 needs to shake off the UAW and get on with the business of selling responsible cars. I don&#039;t mean boring, I mean responsible. F trucks? Hummers? Suburbans? Avalanches? You guys should be ashamed.

There&#039;s a lot of comparisons with the 370 going on - case in point. Have a look at Nissan&#039;s global market content and see where the 370 fits in. It&#039;s a real niche model that&#039;s far removed from the mainstream product mix. With Ford, the Mustang is just another of their big cars.

Remember, the term &#039;Yank Tank&#039; has been around for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there&#8217;ll be a lot of people who will get upset about this, but this STUPID car (and others like it) is exactly why the big 3 are collapsing.</p>
<p>Why oh why, do you need yet another hi-po muscle car that harks back to a bygone era?? Stop living in your own wet dream guys and look forward, not backward. when you move forward and keep on looking over your shoulder, you bump into things.</p>
<p>I personally can&#8217;t fathom how Ford can sleep at night knowing that it sold 20% of Mazda off to fund this POS.</p>
<p>Ford of Europe is the only facet of this organisation that is making any sense at the moment, and the sooner you consumers get your @rses into these (or similar) cars the better.</p>
<p>The big 3 needs to shake off the UAW and get on with the business of selling responsible cars. I don&#8217;t mean boring, I mean responsible. F trucks? Hummers? Suburbans? Avalanches? You guys should be ashamed.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of comparisons with the 370 going on &#8211; case in point. Have a look at Nissan&#8217;s global market content and see where the 370 fits in. It&#8217;s a real niche model that&#8217;s far removed from the mainstream product mix. With Ford, the Mustang is just another of their big cars.</p>
<p>Remember, the term &#8216;Yank Tank&#8217; has been around for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t-ak-box</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424929</link>
		<dc:creator>t-ak-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424929</guid>
		<description>Two Grand for a glass roof. Really!
I can see if it slide in the back window.  It doesn&#039;t even vent.  

Come on FORD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Grand for a glass roof. Really!<br />
I can see if it slide in the back window.  It doesn&#8217;t even vent.  </p>
<p>Come on FORD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wakeNbake</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424893</link>
		<dc:creator>wakeNbake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424893</guid>
		<description>And people wonder why American car companies are dying. The &quot;new&quot; Mustang is a case in point. If I have 35K to spend, it won&#039;t be on this car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And people wonder why American car companies are dying. The &#8220;new&#8221; Mustang is a case in point. If I have 35K to spend, it won&#8217;t be on this car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjimid</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424879</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjimid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424879</guid>
		<description>Does anybody else see what I see?!! They finally, finally, FINALLY! moved the radio antenna off of the front fender!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody else see what I see?!! They finally, finally, FINALLY! moved the radio antenna off of the front fender!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjimid</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424876</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjimid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424876</guid>
		<description>^ Yes, unless you failed to see that $2k was on a glass roof alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Yes, unless you failed to see that $2k was on a glass roof alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSurfer1451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424856</link>
		<dc:creator>JSurfer1451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424856</guid>
		<description>@ IGC: I agree with you 100%, I would much rather have a 370Z than a mustang.
@jayjc08: It&#039;s not a comparison between a base Z and a &quot;premium gt.&quot; The as tested price LLN news listed was above 37K. Like I said earlier in the thread you can get a much better car for that price than a mustang gt. 

Whether you&#039;re looking for straight out performance or convenience that kind of money will get you a lot more than a mustang. I do not know what the future holds for the powerplants in the mustangs but the engine options have not drastically changed in a LONG time. And for those who would like the backseat and trunk space you can look at the g37 coupe or the g35/37 sedan (which out performs the coupe in acceleration) if the money isn&#039;t as much as an issue. But when comparing the Z to the GT it all comes down to what you want and are willing to compromise. If you want excellent handling and control go for the Z. If you want straight line performance with a trunk and backseat go for the GT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ IGC: I agree with you 100%, I would much rather have a 370Z than a mustang.<br />
@jayjc08: It&#8217;s not a comparison between a base Z and a &#8220;premium gt.&#8221; The as tested price LLN news listed was above 37K. Like I said earlier in the thread you can get a much better car for that price than a mustang gt. </p>
<p>Whether you&#8217;re looking for straight out performance or convenience that kind of money will get you a lot more than a mustang. I do not know what the future holds for the powerplants in the mustangs but the engine options have not drastically changed in a LONG time. And for those who would like the backseat and trunk space you can look at the g37 coupe or the g35/37 sedan (which out performs the coupe in acceleration) if the money isn&#8217;t as much as an issue. But when comparing the Z to the GT it all comes down to what you want and are willing to compromise. If you want excellent handling and control go for the Z. If you want straight line performance with a trunk and backseat go for the GT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424853</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424853</guid>
		<description>Andrew, it&#039;s tough isn&#039;t it? Personally I&#039;m thrilled that there will soon be three American icons to choose from. If indeed the tide is to turn back in Detroit&#039;s favor (what goes around, comes around) then the Mustang, Camaro and Challenger could once again be major players. That said, sales volume isn&#039;t everything, getting people into the showrooms is.

Borat, that was a Canadian 10% which works out to be about 8% American.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, it&#8217;s tough isn&#8217;t it? Personally I&#8217;m thrilled that there will soon be three American icons to choose from. If indeed the tide is to turn back in Detroit&#8217;s favor (what goes around, comes around) then the Mustang, Camaro and Challenger could once again be major players. That said, sales volume isn&#8217;t everything, getting people into the showrooms is.</p>
<p>Borat, that was a Canadian 10% which works out to be about 8% American.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424851</link>
		<dc:creator>Borat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424851</guid>
		<description>Johnny, I think reports that 10% of population are homos are exaggerations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny, I think reports that 10% of population are homos are exaggerations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424848</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424848</guid>
		<description>johnny, I&#039;d generally agree - but with the current state of General Motors and Chrysler, I figured we needed to look a little further for Mustang rivals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johnny, I&#8217;d generally agree &#8211; but with the current state of General Motors and Chrysler, I figured we needed to look a little further for Mustang rivals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424847</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424847</guid>
		<description>Andrew uses the 370Z and the RX8 as comparison fodder for the Mustang. I&#039;m not so sure about that. The RX8 is way off base unless we&#039;re talking about a segment of the population that thinks torque is still one of the Monkees. The Z better fits the bill on paper until you put the actual cars side by side. Take 100 guys and put them in front of both and it shouldn&#039;t take more than 5 seconds before 90 of them have picked one or the other. The other ten probably need their boyfriends to help them decide. Each is a great car in its own rite, but if there is still a niche in the automotive world where, for lack of a better word, prejudice still plays a predominant role in preference it&#039;s this one. Most fans of Japanese- and European sports cars for that matter- wouldn&#039;t be caught dead driving an American &#039;lead sled&#039; and Detroit loyalists figure &#039;rice rockets&#039; are where their beer cans go when they die. 

This makes it all the more interesting when the Camaro comes out because I can&#039;t see a lot of 370Z/RX8 guys switching camps for it either. So either we&#039;ll have 3 players-Mustang, Camaro and Challenger- all vying for that piece of the pie the Mustang used to have all to itself or there&#039;s going to have to be one hell of a lot of GM fanboys that have been patiently waiting for the better part of a decade.

Of course there&#039;s another huge part of the demographic that a lot of us don&#039;t even consider when talking about cars of this ilk. A lot of women buy Mustangs (and yes I know I&#039;ve just set myself up) and a lot of them bought primarily the V6 Camaros and Firebirds in the past as well. This is where the real sales war may be won or lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew uses the 370Z and the RX8 as comparison fodder for the Mustang. I&#8217;m not so sure about that. The RX8 is way off base unless we&#8217;re talking about a segment of the population that thinks torque is still one of the Monkees. The Z better fits the bill on paper until you put the actual cars side by side. Take 100 guys and put them in front of both and it shouldn&#8217;t take more than 5 seconds before 90 of them have picked one or the other. The other ten probably need their boyfriends to help them decide. Each is a great car in its own rite, but if there is still a niche in the automotive world where, for lack of a better word, prejudice still plays a predominant role in preference it&#8217;s this one. Most fans of Japanese- and European sports cars for that matter- wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead driving an American &#8216;lead sled&#8217; and Detroit loyalists figure &#8216;rice rockets&#8217; are where their beer cans go when they die. </p>
<p>This makes it all the more interesting when the Camaro comes out because I can&#8217;t see a lot of 370Z/RX8 guys switching camps for it either. So either we&#8217;ll have 3 players-Mustang, Camaro and Challenger- all vying for that piece of the pie the Mustang used to have all to itself or there&#8217;s going to have to be one hell of a lot of GM fanboys that have been patiently waiting for the better part of a decade.</p>
<p>Of course there&#8217;s another huge part of the demographic that a lot of us don&#8217;t even consider when talking about cars of this ilk. A lot of women buy Mustangs (and yes I know I&#8217;ve just set myself up) and a lot of them bought primarily the V6 Camaros and Firebirds in the past as well. This is where the real sales war may be won or lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loveless0214</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424842</link>
		<dc:creator>loveless0214</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424842</guid>
		<description>Kinda funny how everyone says that GM and the Camaro are so much superior to the Mustang but here is one fact.......Mustang has been in production since May 1964 without interruption and Camaro hasn&#039;t been produced since 2002 and their concept has been around for 3 years and has not even gone into production yet. You say it is so superior but has anyone driven a 2010 Camaro yet? Thanks.....enough said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda funny how everyone says that GM and the Camaro are so much superior to the Mustang but here is one fact&#8230;&#8230;.Mustang has been in production since May 1964 without interruption and Camaro hasn&#8217;t been produced since 2002 and their concept has been around for 3 years and has not even gone into production yet. You say it is so superior but has anyone driven a 2010 Camaro yet? Thanks&#8230;..enough said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424839</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424839</guid>
		<description>IGC,

Which one has the backseat, a usable trunk, and has more 3rd party support than a 3-year-old desktop computer? The Mustang hands down. Mustangs get off on upgrades more than imports, anyway. If you want fast, make it fast.

Also 5sec 0-60 with &quot;only&quot; 315hp is a car that undoubtedly heavier and being notably less aerodynamically slick is not bad considering that the 370Z has more power, is supposed to be lighter, and is slicker. Heaven forbid Mustangs get an upgrade to the Hurricane 400hp engine, or the TwinForce turbo six. The 370Z would lose left right and center.

Frankly, given my need for some actual utility from my performance cars, the 370Z is out immediately. No backseat, or at least one fit for half grown humans, not much of a trunk if there is a back seat...and the fact I really don&#039;t find the 370Z attractive at any angle. The 350Z grew on me but the 370Z, like the GT-R35 is an profound failure in styling and function the GT-R gets away with being damnably quick and agile but not much else) in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IGC,</p>
<p>Which one has the backseat, a usable trunk, and has more 3rd party support than a 3-year-old desktop computer? The Mustang hands down. Mustangs get off on upgrades more than imports, anyway. If you want fast, make it fast.</p>
<p>Also 5sec 0-60 with &#8220;only&#8221; 315hp is a car that undoubtedly heavier and being notably less aerodynamically slick is not bad considering that the 370Z has more power, is supposed to be lighter, and is slicker. Heaven forbid Mustangs get an upgrade to the Hurricane 400hp engine, or the TwinForce turbo six. The 370Z would lose left right and center.</p>
<p>Frankly, given my need for some actual utility from my performance cars, the 370Z is out immediately. No backseat, or at least one fit for half grown humans, not much of a trunk if there is a back seat&#8230;and the fact I really don&#8217;t find the 370Z attractive at any angle. The 350Z grew on me but the 370Z, like the GT-R35 is an profound failure in styling and function the GT-R gets away with being damnably quick and agile but not much else) in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424832</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424832</guid>
		<description>IGC- So your comparing the Premium GT that LLN just tested over a &lt;i&gt;base&lt;/i&gt; 370Z?

I would better compare the Premium Mustang to the Nismo 370Z trim. The 370Z Nismo &quot;trim&quot; is going to start around $2k. Really, the price difference isn&#039;t going to be a selling point.

Different lifestyles. That&#039;s what makes the decision between two cars like this since, not price or performance. I would agree the 370Z is going to be faster, but imo it&#039;s not all too great looking, perceived a little bit too much as a &quot;ricer&quot;, and uncomfortable (that&#039;s not to say the new one isn&#039;t better, but the 350Z wasn&#039;t what I would describe as comfortable).

What I&#039;m curious about... What did they do to the V-6? Does anybody know if it&#039;s still that neglected truck engine they slapped in there years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IGC- So your comparing the Premium GT that LLN just tested over a <i>base</i> 370Z?</p>
<p>I would better compare the Premium Mustang to the Nismo 370Z trim. The 370Z Nismo &#8220;trim&#8221; is going to start around $2k. Really, the price difference isn&#8217;t going to be a selling point.</p>
<p>Different lifestyles. That&#8217;s what makes the decision between two cars like this since, not price or performance. I would agree the 370Z is going to be faster, but imo it&#8217;s not all too great looking, perceived a little bit too much as a &#8220;ricer&#8221;, and uncomfortable (that&#8217;s not to say the new one isn&#8217;t better, but the 350Z wasn&#8217;t what I would describe as comfortable).</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m curious about&#8230; What did they do to the V-6? Does anybody know if it&#8217;s still that neglected truck engine they slapped in there years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IGC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424826</link>
		<dc:creator>IGC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424826</guid>
		<description>Ford Mustang GT

0-60: 5 secs.
hp: 315.
price: $31845

Nissan 370Z

0-60: 4.7 secs.
hp: 332.
price: $29,930
http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-370z.html


mmm which one should I buy? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford Mustang GT</p>
<p>0-60: 5 secs.<br />
hp: 315.<br />
price: $31845</p>
<p>Nissan 370Z</p>
<p>0-60: 4.7 secs.<br />
hp: 332.<br />
price: $29,930<br />
<a href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-370z.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.leftlanenews.com/nissan-370z.html</a></p>
<p>mmm which one should I buy? <img src='http://www.leftlanenews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mutant@DCX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424816</link>
		<dc:creator>Mutant@DCX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424816</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong this car.... that a Wipple can&#039;t fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong this car&#8230;. that a Wipple can&#8217;t fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbent</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424790</link>
		<dc:creator>wbent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424790</guid>
		<description>howsmydriving It is entirely possible that Ford has held back a tad do to it&#039;s hypersensitive legal council. Had Ford engineers out and they eluded to this on product and advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>howsmydriving It is entirely possible that Ford has held back a tad do to it&#8217;s hypersensitive legal council. Had Ford engineers out and they eluded to this on product and advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbent</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424788</link>
		<dc:creator>wbent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424788</guid>
		<description>I 100% agree that the 4.0 is crude and for the most part a truck motor. However you can not dispute that from a businees stand point as a manufacturer it is the envy of all who try the &quot;pony car&quot; format. Camaro and Challenger strive to be BMW&#039;s nto &quot;Pony Cars&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 100% agree that the 4.0 is crude and for the most part a truck motor. However you can not dispute that from a businees stand point as a manufacturer it is the envy of all who try the &#8220;pony car&#8221; format. Camaro and Challenger strive to be BMW&#8217;s nto &#8220;Pony Cars&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424786</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424786</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve owned V8 Mustangs and Camaro&#039;s. With Camaro, it&#039;s as if GM turned their car guys loose. With Mustang, it&#039;s as if Ford was holding back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned V8 Mustangs and Camaro&#8217;s. With Camaro, it&#8217;s as if GM turned their car guys loose. With Mustang, it&#8217;s as if Ford was holding back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vortec4200</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424785</link>
		<dc:creator>vortec4200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424785</guid>
		<description>This is coming from a GM guy&#039;s mouth. I really like it. My old &#039;98 GT 4.6L got its ass whooped by every single 1993-2002 Z28 and Trans Am out there, and encountered even some close calls with the 3800 Series II V6 powered Camaros and Firebirds. Despite losing many traffic light drag races, the Mustang GT always delivered by putting a grin on my face. Dollar for dollar, it&#039;s a fairly comfortable sports car and a well rounded performer for the money. The 2010 Camaro and Challenger are overweight piles of high tech crap. Who gives a flying fruitbasket if they are indeed more powerful? They don&#039;t even justify as affordable &quot;true driver&#039;s car(s).&quot; But rather as overpriced 2-door luxury large coupes with nostalgic body styling. Jesus Christ, at least the Mustang has evolve no further than what it always has been to the roots: cheap, light, and quick. Which is why it will outsell every other competitor regardless of horsepower handicaps. But wait...oh no, the Mustang now offers stability control...blasphemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is coming from a GM guy&#8217;s mouth. I really like it. My old &#8217;98 GT 4.6L got its ass whooped by every single 1993-2002 Z28 and Trans Am out there, and encountered even some close calls with the 3800 Series II V6 powered Camaros and Firebirds. Despite losing many traffic light drag races, the Mustang GT always delivered by putting a grin on my face. Dollar for dollar, it&#8217;s a fairly comfortable sports car and a well rounded performer for the money. The 2010 Camaro and Challenger are overweight piles of high tech crap. Who gives a flying fruitbasket if they are indeed more powerful? They don&#8217;t even justify as affordable &#8220;true driver&#8217;s car(s).&#8221; But rather as overpriced 2-door luxury large coupes with nostalgic body styling. Jesus Christ, at least the Mustang has evolve no further than what it always has been to the roots: cheap, light, and quick. Which is why it will outsell every other competitor regardless of horsepower handicaps. But wait&#8230;oh no, the Mustang now offers stability control&#8230;blasphemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DetroitWatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424781</link>
		<dc:creator>DetroitWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424781</guid>
		<description>According to edmunds.com, Mustang GT&#039;s will start at $28,845. Through in leather, and you&#039;re still probably around $30k even. At that price, it becomes more reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to edmunds.com, Mustang GT&#8217;s will start at $28,845. Through in leather, and you&#8217;re still probably around $30k even. At that price, it becomes more reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424768</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424768</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll have to wait another 18 months for Ford to field a competitive engine in F-150 or Mustang
EcoBoost hits in 2010
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll have to wait another 18 months for Ford to field a competitive engine in F-150 or Mustang<br />
EcoBoost hits in 2010<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSurfer1451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424766</link>
		<dc:creator>JSurfer1451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424766</guid>
		<description>A little while back when Ford was talking about that eco-boost V6 with the turbos for the gt, was that going to be a completely redesigned engine or a carry over 4.0L?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little while back when Ford was talking about that eco-boost V6 with the turbos for the gt, was that going to be a completely redesigned engine or a carry over 4.0L?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424755</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424755</guid>
		<description>wbent
But when your V6 is a truck-based pile of Monkey crap........YOU missed
Camaro&#039;s new V6 is light years better than this
This car isn&#039;t for players
It&#039;s for the played-out
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbent<br />
But when your V6 is a truck-based pile of Monkey crap&#8230;&#8230;..YOU missed<br />
Camaro&#8217;s new V6 is light years better than this<br />
This car isn&#8217;t for players<br />
It&#8217;s for the played-out<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F250swb</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424753</link>
		<dc:creator>F250swb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424753</guid>
		<description>new challenger kills this. but all these new american muscle cars r still crap. I would take a &#039;69 camaro z28 over any of these any day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new challenger kills this. but all these new american muscle cars r still crap. I would take a &#8217;69 camaro z28 over any of these any day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbent</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424749</link>
		<dc:creator>wbent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424749</guid>
		<description>Howsmydriving If you can&#039;t make a business case last for the duration what is the sense. Mustang has will outlast both the Camero and Challenger for one simple reason. Price point. The Mustang was never and still is not designed as a V8 car. By its very definition &quot;Pony Car&quot; was and is a 6cyl coupe with the availability of a V8. Where Chrysler and GM have always missed and are missing again is they design their cars as V8&#039;s that can have a V6. When 70-80% of &quot;Pony car&quot; sales are 6cyl price point becomes pretty dang important. Mustang will dominate all in its class for this very reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howsmydriving If you can&#8217;t make a business case last for the duration what is the sense. Mustang has will outlast both the Camero and Challenger for one simple reason. Price point. The Mustang was never and still is not designed as a V8 car. By its very definition &#8220;Pony Car&#8221; was and is a 6cyl coupe with the availability of a V8. Where Chrysler and GM have always missed and are missing again is they design their cars as V8&#8242;s that can have a V6. When 70-80% of &#8220;Pony car&#8221; sales are 6cyl price point becomes pretty dang important. Mustang will dominate all in its class for this very reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TiNDeR</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424748</link>
		<dc:creator>TiNDeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424748</guid>
		<description>Nice update.
-----
$38K MSRP?
-----
No Thanks.
-----</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice update.<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
$38K MSRP?<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
No Thanks.<br />
&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerHumboldt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424745</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerHumboldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424745</guid>
		<description>Oh and the v6 is unchanged, so it doesn&#039;t perform any closer to the outgoing GT now than it did then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and the v6 is unchanged, so it doesn&#8217;t perform any closer to the outgoing GT now than it did then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424743</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424743</guid>
		<description>and lets see a picture of that glass roof LLN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and lets see a picture of that glass roof LLN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424742</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424742</guid>
		<description>wow ive been focused on the front but the more i look at that new rear end the better it looks, especially in that blue color</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow ive been focused on the front but the more i look at that new rear end the better it looks, especially in that blue color</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424738</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424738</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had 5 Mustangs/Capris over the last 25 years so I guess you could say I picked my poison a long time ago. This is easily the best one since the Mustang II debacle and it&#039;s probably just a matter of time before there&#039;s one in my garage. If I have one criticism it&#039;s that it really would be nice to have that 5.0 on the front fenders again. Give it time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had 5 Mustangs/Capris over the last 25 years so I guess you could say I picked my poison a long time ago. This is easily the best one since the Mustang II debacle and it&#8217;s probably just a matter of time before there&#8217;s one in my garage. If I have one criticism it&#8217;s that it really would be nice to have that 5.0 on the front fenders again. Give it time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DetroitWatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424735</link>
		<dc:creator>DetroitWatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424735</guid>
		<description>Nice car, but I&#039;m very surprised about the price. I heard that the GT would start at  about $27k, which would be reasonable. At $31k, it starts to look less competitive against the Camaro, and 370Z.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice car, but I&#8217;m very surprised about the price. I heard that the GT would start at  about $27k, which would be reasonable. At $31k, it starts to look less competitive against the Camaro, and 370Z.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424730</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424730</guid>
		<description>daddy like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daddy like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blakkarr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424727</link>
		<dc:creator>Blakkarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424727</guid>
		<description>alfa 75,

I have to agree with the v6 option. It&#039;s too bad that FORD may not get that note for a while but Team Shelby  has their Terlingua package which is all the handling upgrades and a boosted V6. Costs less that a V8 and is just as quick and better handling. Costs only a bit more than a factory GT, too. 

I am seriously considering that as my next car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alfa 75,</p>
<p>I have to agree with the v6 option. It&#8217;s too bad that FORD may not get that note for a while but Team Shelby  has their Terlingua package which is all the handling upgrades and a boosted V6. Costs less that a V8 and is just as quick and better handling. Costs only a bit more than a factory GT, too. </p>
<p>I am seriously considering that as my next car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfa 75</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424726</link>
		<dc:creator>alfa 75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424726</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll sell more than two in Europe- high end American cars have a (granted, small) niche following there, especially one with a &quot;smaller&quot; V6 engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll sell more than two in Europe- high end American cars have a (granted, small) niche following there, especially one with a &#8220;smaller&#8221; V6 engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424725</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424725</guid>
		<description>wbent: by parity of reasoning, Spiderman III is a better film than Citizen Kane. &quot;Sales numbers are hard to argue with!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbent: by parity of reasoning, Spiderman III is a better film than Citizen Kane. &#8220;Sales numbers are hard to argue with!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbent</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424723</link>
		<dc:creator>wbent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424723</guid>
		<description>For you haters a couple of things to think about, an IRS would change the Mustang into a neutral feeling platform that does not have the feel of a pony car that people expect. The Mustang is still here and did not have to be revived. The Mustang still out sells all in its class. What model do you think will survive current conditions, GTO, Camero, Challenger.......my money is on Mustang. Knock it all you want but sales numbers are hard to argue with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you haters a couple of things to think about, an IRS would change the Mustang into a neutral feeling platform that does not have the feel of a pony car that people expect. The Mustang is still here and did not have to be revived. The Mustang still out sells all in its class. What model do you think will survive current conditions, GTO, Camero, Challenger&#8230;&#8230;.my money is on Mustang. Knock it all you want but sales numbers are hard to argue with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424717</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424717</guid>
		<description>Mike the loser,

First, thanks for the comment (and we know you&#039;re not a loser). Check out the first photo - you&#039;ll see that Ford had a variety of bright hues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike the loser,</p>
<p>First, thanks for the comment (and we know you&#8217;re not a loser). Check out the first photo &#8211; you&#8217;ll see that Ford had a variety of bright hues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaineMan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424715</link>
		<dc:creator>RaineMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424715</guid>
		<description>A decent review for the only car that is keeping Ford alive. 

You say the V6 model now performs like the outgoing GT... how is this possible? From all I can tell Ford is carrying over the 4.0L engine, which only makes 210hp. Ford is either flat out lying or they&#039;ve changed something under the hood of te V6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decent review for the only car that is keeping Ford alive. </p>
<p>You say the V6 model now performs like the outgoing GT&#8230; how is this possible? From all I can tell Ford is carrying over the 4.0L engine, which only makes 210hp. Ford is either flat out lying or they&#8217;ve changed something under the hood of te V6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike the loser</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424713</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike the loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424713</guid>
		<description>Another car related blog (LLN is by far the best) also reviewed 2010 Mustang yesterday and it was the same color.

So my question is did you guys all had to take turns driving this car? How cheap is Ford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another car related blog (LLN is by far the best) also reviewed 2010 Mustang yesterday and it was the same color.</p>
<p>So my question is did you guys all had to take turns driving this car? How cheap is Ford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dren</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-mustang-gt-review.html#comment-424709</link>
		<dc:creator>dren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=12618#comment-424709</guid>
		<description>Looks good in black.  Like this one better than the previous.  This is what the previous gen should have looked like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good in black.  Like this one better than the previous.  This is what the previous gen should have looked like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.019 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 654/655 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 12:11:01 -->
