<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford not selling Jaguar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:31:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carnut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-221146</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-221146</guid>
		<description>Jaguar desperately needs new products to push right now. And those products better not be a carbon copy of the past models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaguar desperately needs new products to push right now. And those products better not be a carbon copy of the past models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220211</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220211</guid>
		<description>What is amazing, hal, is the rear end on the mid 80&#039;s XJ.  I would LOVE for any car to mimic that setup...albeit updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is amazing, hal, is the rear end on the mid 80&#8217;s XJ.  I would LOVE for any car to mimic that setup&#8230;albeit updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hal</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220207</link>
		<dc:creator>hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220207</guid>
		<description>Hard to see that Ford has a coherent and profitable strategy for any of its car brands other then Volvo.

Coming next: The Crown Vic VanDenPlas.
The perfect marriage of 1970s and 1980s technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to see that Ford has a coherent and profitable strategy for any of its car brands other then Volvo.</p>
<p>Coming next: The Crown Vic VanDenPlas.<br />
The perfect marriage of 1970s and 1980s technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220185</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220185</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t make sense for Ford to hold on to Jaguar since they are not in a position to capitlize on the rationalization processes that they executed at Jaguar by supporting a new series of models. So selling to someone who can support new model launches and holding on to a (minority) stake is the right thing to do for Ford. I would be stunned if that doesn&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t make sense for Ford to hold on to Jaguar since they are not in a position to capitlize on the rationalization processes that they executed at Jaguar by supporting a new series of models. So selling to someone who can support new model launches and holding on to a (minority) stake is the right thing to do for Ford. I would be stunned if that doesn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220180</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re standing around - drinking Gin on the Titanic....

j i m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re standing around &#8211; drinking Gin on the Titanic&#8230;.</p>
<p>j i m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Neves</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220177</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220177</guid>
		<description>^Idiot. Unless it&#039;s Lucky Charms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^Idiot. Unless it&#8217;s Lucky Charms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Neves</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220176</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220176</guid>
		<description>Cereal tastes better with Milk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cereal tastes better with Milk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220135</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220135</guid>
		<description>They should have sold it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have sold it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220126</guid>
		<description>The only reason why Ford bought Jaguar was because it would reduce competition (that&#039;s just my opinion), even though it benefits GM with it&#039;s luxury brands more than Ford with Lincoln which is in the dumps right now.

This is not an article about niche status, but I might as well get into Volvo.
Volvo was one of the smartest moves for FMC. Some think they bought it for too much, I say they bought it for too little. Volvos niche is still safety and is a semi-luxury market brand. Also currently they are the leaders for Ford finding alternatives to our gasoline craze, with over 1 billion invested in it. So you could say Volvos current niche is safety, luxury and clean energy
Land Rover: Aimed at a luxury off road market, SUV segment
Jaguar: Luxury high performance.
Aston Martin: Luxury high performance, like Jaguar but somewhat of a halo brand of the PAG auto group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason why Ford bought Jaguar was because it would reduce competition (that&#8217;s just my opinion), even though it benefits GM with it&#8217;s luxury brands more than Ford with Lincoln which is in the dumps right now.</p>
<p>This is not an article about niche status, but I might as well get into Volvo.<br />
Volvo was one of the smartest moves for FMC. Some think they bought it for too much, I say they bought it for too little. Volvos niche is still safety and is a semi-luxury market brand. Also currently they are the leaders for Ford finding alternatives to our gasoline craze, with over 1 billion invested in it. So you could say Volvos current niche is safety, luxury and clean energy<br />
Land Rover: Aimed at a luxury off road market, SUV segment<br />
Jaguar: Luxury high performance.<br />
Aston Martin: Luxury high performance, like Jaguar but somewhat of a halo brand of the PAG auto group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madonna</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220109</link>
		<dc:creator>Madonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220109</guid>
		<description>I bet Peugeot-Citroen, Hyundai or Tata might want Jaguar, maybe Proton would want it to go alongside Lotus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Peugeot-Citroen, Hyundai or Tata might want Jaguar, maybe Proton would want it to go alongside Lotus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220083</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220083</guid>
		<description>^idiot. Ford is not a niche brand, Jag is.

Ford realizes that Jag has done nothing but cost them $$$ and there is no end in sight.  The aluminum technologies gained are not cost effective to spread to other mainstream models.

They would be stupid not to fish for offers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^idiot. Ford is not a niche brand, Jag is.</p>
<p>Ford realizes that Jag has done nothing but cost them $$$ and there is no end in sight.  The aluminum technologies gained are not cost effective to spread to other mainstream models.</p>
<p>They would be stupid not to fish for offers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220079</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220079</guid>
		<description>^ idiot. regardless of whether ford is a niche brand, that&#039;s not what this story is about. it&#039;s about how ford might not sell the brand. If you you think mark feilds is wrong for sayin it&#039;s gonna be a niche brand, then go complain to him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ idiot. regardless of whether ford is a niche brand, that&#8217;s not what this story is about. it&#8217;s about how ford might not sell the brand. If you you think mark feilds is wrong for sayin it&#8217;s gonna be a niche brand, then go complain to him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220059</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220059</guid>
		<description>rover:
Aston: niche.
LR: niche.
Jag: niche.

Volvo: Previous to Fords buyout, Volvo had a reputation of mainstream, dependable, affordable, safe transportation.  Under the PAG banner, Volvo HAS moved upscale a notch or two.  

Does Volvo elicit the same aura of luxury or speed that is commonly associated with Jaguar or Aston Martin? nope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rover:<br />
Aston: niche.<br />
LR: niche.<br />
Jag: niche.</p>
<p>Volvo: Previous to Fords buyout, Volvo had a reputation of mainstream, dependable, affordable, safe transportation.  Under the PAG banner, Volvo HAS moved upscale a notch or two.  </p>
<p>Does Volvo elicit the same aura of luxury or speed that is commonly associated with Jaguar or Aston Martin? nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British_Rover</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220056</link>
		<dc:creator>British_Rover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220056</guid>
		<description>Volvo pumps out some pretty serious volume. I think they are beyond niche status now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volvo pumps out some pretty serious volume. I think they are beyond niche status now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220050</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220050</guid>
		<description>^idiot: Jaguar is a luxury brand and a part of the Premiere Automotive Group.  If it were not a niche vehicle, it would not be under the PAG banner.

Whether or not they tried to platform engineer a Mondeo to compete with the 3 series is irrelevant, Jag is, and has always been a niche brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^idiot: Jaguar is a luxury brand and a part of the Premiere Automotive Group.  If it were not a niche vehicle, it would not be under the PAG banner.</p>
<p>Whether or not they tried to platform engineer a Mondeo to compete with the 3 series is irrelevant, Jag is, and has always been a niche brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220043</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220043</guid>
		<description>^ idiot. they said ford wanted to make jag high volume with teh x-type.

the point is fields is talking like they will keep jag, not sell it. that is news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ idiot. they said ford wanted to make jag high volume with teh x-type.</p>
<p>the point is fields is talking like they will keep jag, not sell it. that is news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1952 MG TD</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-not-selling-jaguar.html/comment-page-1#comment-220037</link>
		<dc:creator>1952 MG TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/11/ford-not-selling-jaguar/#comment-220037</guid>
		<description>I thought that PAG was all niche vehicles anyways?  How is that news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that PAG was all niche vehicles anyways?  How is that news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
