




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford revises earnings report: doubles loss to $254 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-214148</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-214148</guid>
		<description>Seems to be standard practice: tell people there will be bad news then later tell people how bad the bad news really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be standard practice: tell people there will be bad news then later tell people how bad the bad news really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213700</link>
		<dc:creator>BIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213700</guid>
		<description>David: It makes sense about dealierships and the tooling and so forth, but it seems to me that they could channel the additional $$$ into R&amp;D, technology and design work for engines/platforms, better materials, etc. I&#039;m pretty sure they spend at least in the tens of millions if not more in marketing the Mercury division though. I realize that throwing  $$$ at the problem won&#039;t solve anything, it still just kinda seems wasteful to try and catch the Ford one-offs...
Overall I suppose it&#039;s a combination of bad managment and lack of solid product portfolio. I hate to see Ford in so much trouble though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: It makes sense about dealierships and the tooling and so forth, but it seems to me that they could channel the additional $$$ into R&amp;D, technology and design work for engines/platforms, better materials, etc. I&#8217;m pretty sure they spend at least in the tens of millions if not more in marketing the Mercury division though. I realize that throwing  $$$ at the problem won&#8217;t solve anything, it still just kinda seems wasteful to try and catch the Ford one-offs&#8230;<br />
Overall I suppose it&#8217;s a combination of bad managment and lack of solid product portfolio. I hate to see Ford in so much trouble though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213592</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213592</guid>
		<description>#1: hey loser, post in your own name and quit using mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: hey loser, post in your own name and quit using mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213575</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213575</guid>
		<description>Ford, please let go of Mazda before you go under.  Let them have the C1 platform so they can continue to make the 3.  Hell, they gave you the platform from the 6 and you&#039;re running w/ it, only seems fair to me.  Sell the PAG to a german company (BMW?) and just get out of the American car market.  Ford would actually be a profitable company if they didn&#039;t sell cars here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford, please let go of Mazda before you go under.  Let them have the C1 platform so they can continue to make the 3.  Hell, they gave you the platform from the 6 and you&#8217;re running w/ it, only seems fair to me.  Sell the PAG to a german company (BMW?) and just get out of the American car market.  Ford would actually be a profitable company if they didn&#8217;t sell cars here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213574</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213574</guid>
		<description>BIX:  If you look at the spreading there costs over increased capacity (even with the incremental tooling required), it&#039;s definitely worth having Mercury around.  The avg Mercury driver buys that car b/c it&#039;s a one off of a Ford.  If Mercury didn&#039;t exist, they are most likely, per the consultants, to go buy non-Ford vehicles and in turn take away from volume that helps fund Ford and Lincoln vehicles.  

There is no cost for the dealerships as that is a franchisee who bears that expense and the Marketing is likely a pittance in the overall expenditures of Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIX:  If you look at the spreading there costs over increased capacity (even with the incremental tooling required), it&#8217;s definitely worth having Mercury around.  The avg Mercury driver buys that car b/c it&#8217;s a one off of a Ford.  If Mercury didn&#8217;t exist, they are most likely, per the consultants, to go buy non-Ford vehicles and in turn take away from volume that helps fund Ford and Lincoln vehicles.  </p>
<p>There is no cost for the dealerships as that is a franchisee who bears that expense and the Marketing is likely a pittance in the overall expenditures of Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atomicbri</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213570</link>
		<dc:creator>Atomicbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213570</guid>
		<description>OK Ford, sounds like you&#039;re on a road to ruin if you don&#039;t shape up....shape up in the shape of the C1 Ford Focus please! Don&#039;t make the mistake a third time and just facelift ONCE AGAIN the old and 8 year old Focus we have here currently for sale. Bring over the Fiesta (but rename it) and at least you will have some smaller cars in the lineup, unlike now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Ford, sounds like you&#8217;re on a road to ruin if you don&#8217;t shape up&#8230;.shape up in the shape of the C1 Ford Focus please! Don&#8217;t make the mistake a third time and just facelift ONCE AGAIN the old and 8 year old Focus we have here currently for sale. Bring over the Fiesta (but rename it) and at least you will have some smaller cars in the lineup, unlike now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213532</link>
		<dc:creator>BIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 12:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213532</guid>
		<description>Not that it would help too much, but why don&#039;t they ditch Mercury for one thing. The extra tooling, labor, marketing, dealerships, etc. It might not help all of their problems, but to me it seems like such a wasteof $$$ for mediocre cloned cars, with a questionable demographic market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it would help too much, but why don&#8217;t they ditch Mercury for one thing. The extra tooling, labor, marketing, dealerships, etc. It might not help all of their problems, but to me it seems like such a wasteof $$$ for mediocre cloned cars, with a questionable demographic market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnut4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213489</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnut4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213489</guid>
		<description>When it rains, it pours LOL. More bad news for Ford. Am I surprised? Nope, it is because the recent product launches are not up to expectations. The Fusion and Five Hundred are decent but not big hits that Ford needs so badly. Calling Mazda and Ford European styling studios, the parent company needs your help. The North American studios have no idea what a nice car looks like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it rains, it pours LOL. More bad news for Ford. Am I surprised? Nope, it is because the recent product launches are not up to expectations. The Fusion and Five Hundred are decent but not big hits that Ford needs so badly. Calling Mazda and Ford European styling studios, the parent company needs your help. The North American studios have no idea what a nice car looks like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213446</link>
		<dc:creator>peter g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213446</guid>
		<description>254 mill...Ouch! Abandon ship!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>254 mill&#8230;Ouch! Abandon ship!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durandal</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213444</link>
		<dc:creator>Durandal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213444</guid>
		<description>port ford of europe&#039;s model line over here.  can&#039;t be any worse than what we&#039;ve got now, and their focus would kick our focus&#039;s ass.  i&#039;m pretty sure the mondeo would own up on the fusion.

i don&#039;t want to see any of these american car companies go down, it would mean the death of the US economy and allow china to easily surpass us in the global marketplace.

ford, gm, chrysler, get your butts in gear.  look at toyota!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>port ford of europe&#8217;s model line over here.  can&#8217;t be any worse than what we&#8217;ve got now, and their focus would kick our focus&#8217;s ass.  i&#8217;m pretty sure the mondeo would own up on the fusion.</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t want to see any of these american car companies go down, it would mean the death of the US economy and allow china to easily surpass us in the global marketplace.</p>
<p>ford, gm, chrysler, get your butts in gear.  look at toyota!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213382</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213382</guid>
		<description>they should do everything apart from the last part but it could help...... no one knows until u give it a try right??? buit then againlast time i tried something crazy i got suspended</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they should do everything apart from the last part but it could help&#8230;&#8230; no one knows until u give it a try right??? buit then againlast time i tried something crazy i got suspended</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213381</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213381</guid>
		<description>man ford needs to get its game on man like really change all the styling on all cars and make all new models also make the lineup a lot smaller and make it radical and futuristic looking and there we go good again also they need to change their logo and make its slogan THE NEW FORD COMPNAY GERMAN ENGENEERING!!! (no they shouldnt)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man ford needs to get its game on man like really change all the styling on all cars and make all new models also make the lineup a lot smaller and make it radical and futuristic looking and there we go good again also they need to change their logo and make its slogan THE NEW FORD COMPNAY GERMAN ENGENEERING!!! (no they shouldnt)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million.html#comment-213367</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/08/03/ford-revises-earnings-report-doubles-loss-to-254-million/#comment-213367</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time to start making some nice cars.  Taurus?  Give me a break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time to start making some nice cars.  Taurus?  Give me a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 298/299 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 18:43:39 -->
