<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford says no to Mustang sedan, wagon; Announces &#8220;Interceptor&#8221; concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:19:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sethgbu</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-460268</link>
		<dc:creator>sethgbu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-460268</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea. The 4 door mustang would extend its marketability. I am a huge mustang fan and always will be but its not the most practical car to own when you have a family. With this option I would still be able to represent mustang while actually fitting more then 1 other person in the car. There are so many different mustang models how could this even be that big of a deal. Its not like its going to replace the 2 door.

the new camaro aint shuttin down anything</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea. The 4 door mustang would extend its marketability. I am a huge mustang fan and always will be but its not the most practical car to own when you have a family. With this option I would still be able to represent mustang while actually fitting more then 1 other person in the car. There are so many different mustang models how could this even be that big of a deal. Its not like its going to replace the 2 door.</p>
<p>the new camaro aint shuttin down anything</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheUkrainian</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-288448</link>
		<dc:creator>TheUkrainian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-288448</guid>
		<description>Ford: USA-- F-Series, Mustang, Taurus, 500, Freestyle, Ranger, Escape, Excursion, Econoline, Explorer, Expedition, Focus, GT,

That Leaves: Fusion (germany/mexico) , Crown Vic (Canada) Edge (Canada) Windstar/Freestar-Discontinued (Canada)


Chevy: USA -- Cobalt, Malibu, Corvette, Uplander, Colorado,  Trailblazer

SOUTH KOREA- AVEO - Rebranded Daewoo...

Canada- Impala, Monte Carlo, New Camaro, Equinox,

Mexico- HHR (the designer of the HHR is also the designer of the PT Cruiser - Chrysler), Avalanche, 

Silverado (most come from canada, minority built in US)
Suburban &amp; Tahoe(US &amp; Mexico)


Before you go spiiting out useless crap, check ur stats. I would do chrysler and dodge but i have better things to do than prove you wrong. 

2nd, The civic and corolla and mazda 3 are all better than the aveo, in most categories except price.... http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-05-20-aveo_x.htm  USA today does a great job explaining the Aveo. 

Now for the good part. You make it seem like you want GM to be the ONLY auto maker in the US. Your views also match Hitler, Communist Russia, China, and a lot of other facist and monopolistic views. If GM was the only car maker, they could make the POS aveo cost 40K and guess what, you wouldnt have a choice to get another one....so yeah, thats a great idea...

You are blinded by your love of GM. Im not saying GM is bad, i like a lot of their cars, as well as Ford, Chrysler, Dodge, Honda, Toyota. 

US Automaker reliability ratings are going up now, almost even with the Asian car market, but people say that asian cars a much better, they are also blinded...


Game, Set, and Match.
I say good-day to you, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford: USA&#8211; F-Series, Mustang, Taurus, 500, Freestyle, Ranger, Escape, Excursion, Econoline, Explorer, Expedition, Focus, GT,</p>
<p>That Leaves: Fusion (germany/mexico) , Crown Vic (Canada) Edge (Canada) Windstar/Freestar-Discontinued (Canada)</p>
<p>Chevy: USA &#8212; Cobalt, Malibu, Corvette, Uplander, Colorado,  Trailblazer</p>
<p>SOUTH KOREA- AVEO &#8211; Rebranded Daewoo&#8230;</p>
<p>Canada- Impala, Monte Carlo, New Camaro, Equinox,</p>
<p>Mexico- HHR (the designer of the HHR is also the designer of the PT Cruiser &#8211; Chrysler), Avalanche, </p>
<p>Silverado (most come from canada, minority built in US)<br />
Suburban &amp; Tahoe(US &amp; Mexico)</p>
<p>Before you go spiiting out useless crap, check ur stats. I would do chrysler and dodge but i have better things to do than prove you wrong. </p>
<p>2nd, The civic and corolla and mazda 3 are all better than the aveo, in most categories except price&#8230;. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-05-20-aveo_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-05-20-aveo_x.htm</a>  USA today does a great job explaining the Aveo. </p>
<p>Now for the good part. You make it seem like you want GM to be the ONLY auto maker in the US. Your views also match Hitler, Communist Russia, China, and a lot of other facist and monopolistic views. If GM was the only car maker, they could make the POS aveo cost 40K and guess what, you wouldnt have a choice to get another one&#8230;.so yeah, thats a great idea&#8230;</p>
<p>You are blinded by your love of GM. Im not saying GM is bad, i like a lot of their cars, as well as Ford, Chrysler, Dodge, Honda, Toyota. </p>
<p>US Automaker reliability ratings are going up now, almost even with the Asian car market, but people say that asian cars a much better, they are also blinded&#8230;</p>
<p>Game, Set, and Match.<br />
I say good-day to you, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheUkrainian</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-288028</link>
		<dc:creator>TheUkrainian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-288028</guid>
		<description>the same camaro that looks like the mustang and takes on some styling cues as the mustang?? ha. GMrules, your biased blindness is starting to get to you..stop being a one sided d*uche bag and grow up. GM isnt the only good car company in the world. Ford has good cars as does GM and so does Dodge, it all depends on different peoples views. i wanna know what you think of the Aveo and HHR...

Anyways, i think ford should build a sporty 4door and wagon that could compete with the charger/magnum, with RWD and power. I hope that it doesnt look like the mustang though, the mustang should remain an icon. I would kill to have an Australian Falcon or the Euro Mondeo. If Ford were to produce a SVT fusion/fusion wagon, i would definatly buy one. The 500 is a decent car, i wouldnt mind having one, although there are others i would get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the same camaro that looks like the mustang and takes on some styling cues as the mustang?? ha. GMrules, your biased blindness is starting to get to you..stop being a one sided d*uche bag and grow up. GM isnt the only good car company in the world. Ford has good cars as does GM and so does Dodge, it all depends on different peoples views. i wanna know what you think of the Aveo and HHR&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyways, i think ford should build a sporty 4door and wagon that could compete with the charger/magnum, with RWD and power. I hope that it doesnt look like the mustang though, the mustang should remain an icon. I would kill to have an Australian Falcon or the Euro Mondeo. If Ford were to produce a SVT fusion/fusion wagon, i would definatly buy one. The 500 is a decent car, i wouldnt mind having one, although there are others i would get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMrules</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287826</link>
		<dc:creator>GMrules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287826</guid>
		<description>Enjoy your final days Mustang. The Camaro is going to eat you alive. Ford might as well build a &quot;Going out of Business&quot; Edition because that is what is going to happen when their precious Mustang rots on their damn lots because everyone would rather have a GM product.

Bye Ford, nice knowing ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy your final days Mustang. The Camaro is going to eat you alive. Ford might as well build a &#8220;Going out of Business&#8221; Edition because that is what is going to happen when their precious Mustang rots on their damn lots because everyone would rather have a GM product.</p>
<p>Bye Ford, nice knowing ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Spadaro</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287343</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Spadaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287343</guid>
		<description>Thank god.  A Mustang sedan just wouldn&#039;t seem right.  If a new sedan and/or wagon are built on the same platform, that&#039;s fine; advertise that they share the same architecture as the Mustang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god.  A Mustang sedan just wouldn&#8217;t seem right.  If a new sedan and/or wagon are built on the same platform, that&#8217;s fine; advertise that they share the same architecture as the Mustang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD from Detroit</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287332</link>
		<dc:creator>JD from Detroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 07:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287332</guid>
		<description>Ford thought of this before.  Here&#039;s an actual factory clay model from 1963:

http://www.muscularmustangs.com/database/fourdoor.jpg

What if...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford thought of this before.  Here&#8217;s an actual factory clay model from 1963:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.muscularmustangs.com/database/fourdoor.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.muscularmustangs.com/database/fourdoor.jpg</a></p>
<p>What if&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phastt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287317</link>
		<dc:creator>phastt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287317</guid>
		<description>&quot;i love picking on little kids that think there all bad!&quot; -chevy490

go outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;i love picking on little kids that think there all bad!&#8221; -chevy490</p>
<p>go outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renton</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287316</link>
		<dc:creator>Renton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287316</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s the last of the V8 Interceptors.  Would have been a shame to blow it up.&quot;

 -Top 5 car film, no doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the last of the V8 Interceptors.  Would have been a shame to blow it up.&#8221;</p>
<p> -Top 5 car film, no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287311</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287311</guid>
		<description>Yesssssssssssssssssssssss LOL good decision ford</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesssssssssssssssssssssss LOL good decision ford</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chevy490</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287310</link>
		<dc:creator>chevy490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287310</guid>
		<description>i love picking on little kids that think there all bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love picking on little kids that think there all bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Head</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287281</guid>
		<description>If Ford wont do it, I will.  I&#039;ll weld the nose of a Mustang onto a Ford Explorer, pop in the seats out of a 1998 Crown Vic, and to make it really iconically horsey-like I&#039;ll mount some longhorns on the hood.
.
Dat be one fine ride!  Si!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ford wont do it, I will.  I&#8217;ll weld the nose of a Mustang onto a Ford Explorer, pop in the seats out of a 1998 Crown Vic, and to make it really iconically horsey-like I&#8217;ll mount some longhorns on the hood.<br />
.<br />
Dat be one fine ride!  Si!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S-60-driver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287243</link>
		<dc:creator>S-60-driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287243</guid>
		<description>Thats cool by me, Chevy!  I dont have a mom. I think its YOUR MOM that ur doing it!!!!!  Hey, its dark in the room, it happens!!   I&#039;ll help and pay for your shrink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats cool by me, Chevy!  I dont have a mom. I think its YOUR MOM that ur doing it!!!!!  Hey, its dark in the room, it happens!!   I&#8217;ll help and pay for your shrink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chevy490</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287237</link>
		<dc:creator>chevy490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287237</guid>
		<description>s-60 ur mom was so good man i told her to stop moning to. im suprised u didnt wake up i was rockin the hole trailer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s-60 ur mom was so good man i told her to stop moning to. im suprised u didnt wake up i was rockin the hole trailer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chevy490</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287236</link>
		<dc:creator>chevy490</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287236</guid>
		<description>s-60-driver the only one i heard moning was ur mom and second of all the mustang platform is gay call it a mustang or not and i mean come on could the mustang look any more plastic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s-60-driver the only one i heard moning was ur mom and second of all the mustang platform is gay call it a mustang or not and i mean come on could the mustang look any more plastic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertical</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287229</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 03:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287229</guid>
		<description>This news is a relief.  A Mustang wagon??!!!  I thought Ford had completely lost its mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news is a relief.  A Mustang wagon??!!!  I thought Ford had completely lost its mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xmnr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287216</link>
		<dc:creator>xmnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287216</guid>
		<description>dew98... s-type...LS v8...thunderbird... hey what are we going to use for the mustang? hey, how about we design a solid-rear and reshape dew98? sounds good...

years pass

hey, what are we gonna do with the thunderbird? meh... can it... no point in trying to make an almost-attractive but slightly &quot;fay&quot; car closer....

hey what are we gonna do with the LS? meh... can it... we&#039;ll use volvo&#039;s P2 for everything! that rwd midsize sedan idea was the problem!

hey what are we gonna do with the s-type? let jaguar figure it out....

So... should we make a sedan version of the mustang? ok, makes sense... should we put an independent rear under it? 

AM I LOSING MY MIND?!! someone go on a rampage and make ford kill every conventional car-based product in their pipeline and go into business selling the (should be) back in production GT, alongside the GR1 which is supposedly from the same platform (why not build both, eh? wouldn&#039;t that help pay for it?).... have ford of europe send over the mondeo and wagon versions, and ford trucks... you get a by... but that diesel that&#039;s coming better be good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dew98&#8230; s-type&#8230;LS v8&#8230;thunderbird&#8230; hey what are we going to use for the mustang? hey, how about we design a solid-rear and reshape dew98? sounds good&#8230;</p>
<p>years pass</p>
<p>hey, what are we gonna do with the thunderbird? meh&#8230; can it&#8230; no point in trying to make an almost-attractive but slightly &#8220;fay&#8221; car closer&#8230;.</p>
<p>hey what are we gonna do with the LS? meh&#8230; can it&#8230; we&#8217;ll use volvo&#8217;s P2 for everything! that rwd midsize sedan idea was the problem!</p>
<p>hey what are we gonna do with the s-type? let jaguar figure it out&#8230;.</p>
<p>So&#8230; should we make a sedan version of the mustang? ok, makes sense&#8230; should we put an independent rear under it? </p>
<p>AM I LOSING MY MIND?!! someone go on a rampage and make ford kill every conventional car-based product in their pipeline and go into business selling the (should be) back in production GT, alongside the GR1 which is supposedly from the same platform (why not build both, eh? wouldn&#8217;t that help pay for it?)&#8230;. have ford of europe send over the mondeo and wagon versions, and ford trucks&#8230; you get a by&#8230; but that diesel that&#8217;s coming better be good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leozug</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287214</link>
		<dc:creator>leozug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287214</guid>
		<description>I think a good step would be for them to go completely belly up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a good step would be for them to go completely belly up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonutt</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287212</link>
		<dc:creator>autonutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287212</guid>
		<description>Why is it that every bit of good news that Ford releases, bad news has to come with it?  No Mustang sedans or wagons?  GREAT!  No new Aussie-developed platform for future RWD Fords?  BOOO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that every bit of good news that Ford releases, bad news has to come with it?  No Mustang sedans or wagons?  GREAT!  No new Aussie-developed platform for future RWD Fords?  BOOO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287207</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287207</guid>
		<description>Interceptor eh... looks like theyre pointed directly to the next crown vic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interceptor eh&#8230; looks like theyre pointed directly to the next crown vic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287205</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287205</guid>
		<description>Thank G-d! I&#039;d hate to see what would happen if those plans did go through...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank G-d! I&#8217;d hate to see what would happen if those plans did go through&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanpants555</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287188</link>
		<dc:creator>meanpants555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287188</guid>
		<description>What sucks about this is that the &#039;attributes&#039; that make a Mustang would have made any subsequent models credible, even if it &#039;corrupted&#039; the Mustang name.

If they produce a Ford Falcon, there will be no frame of reference for the general public and thus make it a more difficult sell.

And don&#039;t give me this sacred cow malarkey; remember they are making a four door 911.

Everything is exploitable in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sucks about this is that the &#8216;attributes&#8217; that make a Mustang would have made any subsequent models credible, even if it &#8216;corrupted&#8217; the Mustang name.</p>
<p>If they produce a Ford Falcon, there will be no frame of reference for the general public and thus make it a more difficult sell.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t give me this sacred cow malarkey; remember they are making a four door 911.</p>
<p>Everything is exploitable in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dre</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287186</link>
		<dc:creator>dre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287186</guid>
		<description>Good thing they did not decide on that........ still need to work on the current one a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing they did not decide on that&#8230;&#8230;.. still need to work on the current one a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287185</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287185</guid>
		<description>The picture of the Mustang sedan in the current (December 18, 2006) issue of &lt;i&gt;AutoWeek&lt;/i&gt; was not placed there by some overenthusiastic teenage fan. This was a Ford design released as a trial balloon. It sank like a lead balloon and Ford wisely changed its mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture of the Mustang sedan in the current (December 18, 2006) issue of <i>AutoWeek</i> was not placed there by some overenthusiastic teenage fan. This was a Ford design released as a trial balloon. It sank like a lead balloon and Ford wisely changed its mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meanpants555</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287183</link>
		<dc:creator>meanpants555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287183</guid>
		<description>I swear to God that this site is run by automotive companies to test enthusiast&#039;s response to their hare brained ideas. I know someone is watching me, I can feel it...

I&#039;m I just being paranoid or is Ricardo Head a spy for Hyundai?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear to God that this site is run by automotive companies to test enthusiast&#8217;s response to their hare brained ideas. I know someone is watching me, I can feel it&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m I just being paranoid or is Ricardo Head a spy for Hyundai?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidg1977</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287182</link>
		<dc:creator>davidg1977</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287182</guid>
		<description>From the views on the AutoWeek website, the design swag looks very interesting from both a sedan and coupe perspective.  However, I completely agree that thinning the brand of the Mustang as a core drivers HP vehicle is not the right direction.  I&#039;d love to see some cues from that AW swag and put it in a RWD Ford (between the Fusion and the Five Hundred) and Lincoln (between the MKZ and the MKS) as a Taurus-sized competitor to the Maxima... it would be great to see a differentiating product but unclear as to how long it would take to deliver and how big the market is for that vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the views on the AutoWeek website, the design swag looks very interesting from both a sedan and coupe perspective.  However, I completely agree that thinning the brand of the Mustang as a core drivers HP vehicle is not the right direction.  I&#8217;d love to see some cues from that AW swag and put it in a RWD Ford (between the Fusion and the Five Hundred) and Lincoln (between the MKZ and the MKS) as a Taurus-sized competitor to the Maxima&#8230; it would be great to see a differentiating product but unclear as to how long it would take to deliver and how big the market is for that vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mujician</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287181</link>
		<dc:creator>mujician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287181</guid>
		<description>Actually one of many, take a llok, most are on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually one of many, take a llok, most are on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287180</link>
		<dc:creator>GL1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287180</guid>
		<description>Finally an intelligent decision from Ford...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally an intelligent decision from Ford&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogleii</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287179</link>
		<dc:creator>moogleii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287179</guid>
		<description>S-60, you&#039;re either a 15.5 year-old, hormone packed teen, or a 20+ year old doofus. I&#039;m going to guess 17 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S-60, you&#8217;re either a 15.5 year-old, hormone packed teen, or a 20+ year old doofus. I&#8217;m going to guess 17 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eam3</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287178</link>
		<dc:creator>eam3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287178</guid>
		<description>It could also be a quick response to the situation.  Something they learned a lot about when the wrong wheel drive Probe was to be the new Mustang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could also be a quick response to the situation.  Something they learned a lot about when the wrong wheel drive Probe was to be the new Mustang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S-60-driver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287175</link>
		<dc:creator>S-60-driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287175</guid>
		<description>SEE!!!!  You guys are bunch of morons and moaned about it for NOTHING!!!!  TOLD YA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEE!!!!  You guys are bunch of morons and moaned about it for NOTHING!!!!  TOLD YA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287172</link>
		<dc:creator>Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287172</guid>
		<description>Autocar and Autoweek seem to be jumping the gun lately and passing out rumours and misinformation. I&#039;m not listening to them anymore, nor should this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autocar and Autoweek seem to be jumping the gun lately and passing out rumours and misinformation. I&#8217;m not listening to them anymore, nor should this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thegoldenmackid</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon.html/comment-page-1#comment-287171</link>
		<dc:creator>thegoldenmackid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/12/15/ford-says-no-to-mustang-sedan-wagon/#comment-287171</guid>
		<description>props to ford for not furthering any destruction of an icon...


i mean did anyone else see those sketches....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>props to ford for not furthering any destruction of an icon&#8230;</p>
<p>i mean did anyone else see those sketches&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
