RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Ford shelves Jaguar’s unified aluminum architecture?

03/13/2006, 8:34 AM

By admin

Jaguar has shelved plans to build cars from a unified aluminum architecture because of financial constraints imposed by Ford, said Lewis Booth, head of Ford’s London-based stable of luxury brands. The Financial Times said Ford has delayed the plan, but it was unclear if further consideration would be given to the issue. Jaguar had aimed to use a single aluminum platform for the new S-Type and XJ. The architecture is already used for the new XK. Ultimately, the plan would actually reduce engineering costs. Pictured right in an Automobile rendering of the proposed 2009 all-new Jaguar XK (see original story). The XJ already uses an aluminum platform, so the next-generation model will likely be unaffected by the decision. Jaguar’s original S-Type was hit badly when it was launched because it shared a basic structure with the Lincoln LS. The X-Type also suffered from its association with the Ford Mondeo.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

03/13, 8:48 AM

posted by:

BAC

Just meke em’ better than BMW and Lexus and it will matter very little what platform you use.

Ford has unlimited ability and limited vision.

03/13, 12:31 PM

posted by:

LKK

wow thats one ugly mother

03/13, 1:03 PM

posted by:

Joel A

Sad news.

03/13, 3:04 PM

posted by:

BCM

My memory is really failing. I don’t remember any serious criticism of the S-Type for sharing a platform with the LS. Unlike the X-Type (which was somewhat unjustly criticized), it was clear that Jaguar had done the development, and the two cars had totally different look and feel. The Camry and ES are still more similar than the S-Type and LS.

03/13, 8:22 PM

posted by:

Garris

Ford never misses a chance to shoot itself in the foot… Keeping models way to long without upgrades, eliminating SVT, and now eliminating the one engineering advantage they may have in the entire company. Amazing…

03/14, 1:31 AM

posted by:

BCM

“They need to dedicate and specilize platforms for different ****.”

Economically nuts. Even Rolls Royce and Bentley need to share platforms with less expensive makes. That’s why they went tits-up and were purchased by firms with the production volume sufficient to subsidize their niches. If the platform is a good one and the vehicles are not obviously similar, why should it be a problem? Honda just slaps an “A” badge on certain of its Japanese models and North Americans pay a big premium to park an “Acura” in their driveway– why then are manufacturers that make an effort to distinguish their brands by styling, performance, and equipment denigrated for platform-sharing?

03/14, 3:34 AM

posted by:

digitalzombie

nissan did it. they’re doing pretty well. GM cross platform and nasty stuff happens. If they made the platform with function in mind then they can build cars that are intended for that platform. Plus they have to actually build a good platform to begin with lol. Mustang chasis was how old before they change to a new platform and retro it? I heard it was 40 years or something which still sound unbelievable to me.

nissan spent a billion dollar on a truck platform and their trucks are pretty good on the new platform. The Z, M, G are on the same specialized platform. I think the new skyline is a new onetoo. gotta invest the money to make money i guess.

If the platform is a good one and the vehicles are not obviously similar, why should it be a problem?

Cuz you can still tell between a fusion and a zephry. hehe. they don’t try much compare to other car companies.

03/14, 9:20 PM

posted by:

Angelo

Nissan built an amazing platform around the VQ engine though. Ford’s platforms did much to be desired. Also, Nissan doesn’t try to compete in a Jaguar league with a low level Ford platform. Having the G35, the FX and the Z car in the same platform is one thing. Having a Ford Mondeo and an X-Type is another. The Mondeo is many things, it’s not sporting.

Also, the X-Type was one expensive lemon.

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel