<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford to cut back V8 Mustang production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 23:43:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stang67</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-346012</link>
		<dc:creator>stang67</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-346012</guid>
		<description>Ford Mustang does get terrible gas mileage. My 2005 Gt has 45000 miles, original brakes and tires and I drive like a grandma and it still averages 16 to 17 mpg city and highway. Sad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford Mustang does get terrible gas mileage. My 2005 Gt has 45000 miles, original brakes and tires and I drive like a grandma and it still averages 16 to 17 mpg city and highway. Sad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345872</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345872</guid>
		<description>C6racer- I just put a gallon of gas in the tank, and see where it takes me.

I did however have a mpg reader on my F-150. It was an after market part that I&#039;ve only recently taken off (read: &quot;Made in China&quot;)

Gary, autonutt- The Saleen S302 Extreme has a Saleen built 4.9 liter. The 5.4 liter (GT500) isn&#039;t a big block.

Noah- I guess your just repeating what other kids have said on this forum. We already know the V-8 is the best selling model so... Do you understand supply and demand? Do the math.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C6racer- I just put a gallon of gas in the tank, and see where it takes me.</p>
<p>I did however have a mpg reader on my F-150. It was an after market part that I&#8217;ve only recently taken off (read: &#8220;Made in China&#8221;)</p>
<p>Gary, autonutt- The Saleen S302 Extreme has a Saleen built 4.9 liter. The 5.4 liter (GT500) isn&#8217;t a big block.</p>
<p>Noah- I guess your just repeating what other kids have said on this forum. We already know the V-8 is the best selling model so&#8230; Do you understand supply and demand? Do the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345826</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345826</guid>
		<description>There are only two reasons for a cutback----one is that the car ain&#039;t selling and two is so the dealers can surcharge more. Has anyone had a more stupid marketing dept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only two reasons for a cutback&#8212;-one is that the car ain&#8217;t selling and two is so the dealers can surcharge more. Has anyone had a more stupid marketing dept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwerveEarly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345705</link>
		<dc:creator>SwerveEarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345705</guid>
		<description>&#039;87-SVO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;87-SVO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345669</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345669</guid>
		<description>jayjc08, I don&#039;t have an mpg gauge in mine either. It wasn&#039;t till &#039;03 that GM started puttin them in the trucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jayjc08, I don&#8217;t have an mpg gauge in mine either. It wasn&#8217;t till &#8216;03 that GM started puttin them in the trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kool_aje</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345655</link>
		<dc:creator>kool_aje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345655</guid>
		<description>How about 30/40 mpg for daily usage Mustang... Equipped by 2.7 litre commonrail turbo intercooler diesel for Europe/Asia/Australia markets (esp. for Australians please). For US,  just give them what they want, we all know how the environment hypocrits are ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about 30/40 mpg for daily usage Mustang&#8230; Equipped by 2.7 litre commonrail turbo intercooler diesel for Europe/Asia/Australia markets (esp. for Australians please). For US,  just give them what they want, we all know how the environment hypocrits are ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOZO</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345629</link>
		<dc:creator>TOZO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345629</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the right engine, casualobserver, the new 3.5L V6 is what the Mustang neeeeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the right engine, casualobserver, the new 3.5L V6 is what the Mustang neeeeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345614</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345614</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you guys understand that it isn&#039;t just fuel prices and enthusiasts that&#039;s cutting production.

Ford is keeping supply low and demand high. Obviously the highest selling and most desirable model is the V-8, which would be great to cut production since it&#039;s been a great enthusiast platform. The pricing has stayed relatively stable, not a bundle of incentives to drive them off the lots.

C6racer- My Ford F-150 on the highway and around town averages about 19 miles to the gallon. I don&#039;t have a miles per gallon reader or anything for my Taurus (3.0 liter V-6), but I&#039;ve had it go about 28 miles on a gallon of gas in Washington D.C, city driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you guys understand that it isn&#8217;t just fuel prices and enthusiasts that&#8217;s cutting production.</p>
<p>Ford is keeping supply low and demand high. Obviously the highest selling and most desirable model is the V-8, which would be great to cut production since it&#8217;s been a great enthusiast platform. The pricing has stayed relatively stable, not a bundle of incentives to drive them off the lots.</p>
<p>C6racer- My Ford F-150 on the highway and around town averages about 19 miles to the gallon. I don&#8217;t have a miles per gallon reader or anything for my Taurus (3.0 liter V-6), but I&#8217;ve had it go about 28 miles on a gallon of gas in Washington D.C, city driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JedS88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345605</link>
		<dc:creator>JedS88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345605</guid>
		<description>How about a 4.9L(302c.i.) Aluminator block in the GT for 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a 4.9L(302c.i.) Aluminator block in the GT for 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arbiter</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345581</link>
		<dc:creator>Arbiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345581</guid>
		<description>Casualobserver,
the V6 used in the Mustang is a SOHC V6, NOT the old 3.8 pushrod unit.

Aluminum heads and SEFI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casualobserver,<br />
the V6 used in the Mustang is a SOHC V6, NOT the old 3.8 pushrod unit.</p>
<p>Aluminum heads and SEFI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JedS88</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345571</link>
		<dc:creator>JedS88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345571</guid>
		<description>Thats better thar my Jeep 4.0L

And Mustang have not had &quot;big blocks&quot; sence 1973</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats better thar my Jeep 4.0L</p>
<p>And Mustang have not had &#8220;big blocks&#8221; sence 1973</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonnycat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345565</link>
		<dc:creator>jonnycat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345565</guid>
		<description>Everything from ford is bad engineering?  Ignorance is bliss, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything from ford is bad engineering?  Ignorance is bliss, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345562</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345562</guid>
		<description>Not to mention 13 mpg city average for my truck too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention 13 mpg city average for my truck too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C6Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345561</link>
		<dc:creator>C6Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345561</guid>
		<description>True that Ford builds crap. My brother&#039;s 1994 325i has an I-6 and gets between 35 and 40 mpg on the highway with the cruise control set at 70mph. No joke. Even my 2000 Sierra, which weighs almost 5000lbs and has a 5.3L V8, can get around 20 mpg with the cruise on 65 mph.
Ford sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that Ford builds crap. My brother&#8217;s 1994 325i has an I-6 and gets between 35 and 40 mpg on the highway with the cruise control set at 70mph. No joke. Even my 2000 Sierra, which weighs almost 5000lbs and has a 5.3L V8, can get around 20 mpg with the cruise on 65 mph.<br />
Ford sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345515</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345515</guid>
		<description>I think enthusiasts will buy big block. What the mileage for V8 15 mpg? Is that much of a difference? Not for this car, but probably for fleet and their fleet #s are pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think enthusiasts will buy big block. What the mileage for V8 15 mpg? Is that much of a difference? Not for this car, but probably for fleet and their fleet #s are pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345509</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345509</guid>
		<description>These have got to be the dumbest series of posts&#039; I have seen in a long time. Look at the competition, what gas milege are they rated at for 08&#039;? They also have gone down quite a bit. Not to take into account this is city mpg everyone is looking at. They do make a big block V8 for the Mustang, it&#039;s called a SHelby GT500. Does anyone realize the V6 must is the cheapest/best gas mileage car for it&#039;s segment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These have got to be the dumbest series of posts&#8217; I have seen in a long time. Look at the competition, what gas milege are they rated at for 08&#8242;? They also have gone down quite a bit. Not to take into account this is city mpg everyone is looking at. They do make a big block V8 for the Mustang, it&#8217;s called a SHelby GT500. Does anyone realize the V6 must is the cheapest/best gas mileage car for it&#8217;s segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ///m</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345498</link>
		<dc:creator>///m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345498</guid>
		<description>16mpg for a V6? Wow... give me an RX-8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16mpg for a V6? Wow&#8230; give me an RX-8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackjimturkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345496</link>
		<dc:creator>jackjimturkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345496</guid>
		<description>global: the Mustang is too ubiquitous to attract ‘vette shoppers. Ford should develop a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>global: the Mustang is too ubiquitous to attract ‘vette shoppers. Ford should develop a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F451</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345474</link>
		<dc:creator>F451</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345474</guid>
		<description>The price of a barrel of oil has spoken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price of a barrel of oil has spoken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moto-racer13</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345470</link>
		<dc:creator>moto-racer13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345470</guid>
		<description>^I agree 100% its ford they don&#039;t know how to build good well engineered cars.  everything from ford is bad engineering. 16mpg in a V6 lol wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^I agree 100% its ford they don&#8217;t know how to build good well engineered cars.  everything from ford is bad engineering. 16mpg in a V6 lol wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP640</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345466</link>
		<dc:creator>LP640</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345466</guid>
		<description>16mpg for a V6 is just terrible, but hey its ford, so no surprise.
Comment by planet_drive, posted on December10 at 11:31 am

The smartest comment on the thread</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16mpg for a V6 is just terrible, but hey its ford, so no surprise.<br />
Comment by planet_drive, posted on December10 at 11:31 am</p>
<p>The smartest comment on the thread</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casualobserver</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345463</link>
		<dc:creator>casualobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345463</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face it.  The Mustang V6 is basically a cast-iron, low-revving, two-valve truck engine.
How about putting Ford&#039;s 3.5L aluminum DOHC V6 in this car?  It will produce more power, rev more freely, and probably get better mileage.  Also, this would take about 150 lbs off the front axle which should make the entry level vehicle noticeably more agile and fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it.  The Mustang V6 is basically a cast-iron, low-revving, two-valve truck engine.<br />
How about putting Ford&#8217;s 3.5L aluminum DOHC V6 in this car?  It will produce more power, rev more freely, and probably get better mileage.  Also, this would take about 150 lbs off the front axle which should make the entry level vehicle noticeably more agile and fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: planet_drive</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345457</link>
		<dc:creator>planet_drive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345457</guid>
		<description>16mpg for a V6 is just terrible, but hey its ford, so no surprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16mpg for a V6 is just terrible, but hey its ford, so no surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RicardoHead</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345451</link>
		<dc:creator>RicardoHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345451</guid>
		<description>Had an older (1996) stang with the 4.6 V8 and got 28 mpg on the highway, and about 19/20 city.  What gives with the V6?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had an older (1996) stang with the 4.6 V8 and got 28 mpg on the highway, and about 19/20 city.  What gives with the V6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345450</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345450</guid>
		<description>What am I missing here?  The V6 gets 16/24 MPG and costs ~$20K.  The V8 gets 15/22 MPG and costs ~$25K.  I don&#039;t think most people buying the Mustang are using it as their primary commuter, and a 1 MPG difference at this rate won&#039;t make much of a difference anyway.

I&#039;d drop the V6 - if you want a Mustang, step up to the real deal.  Offer a big block or a supercharged small block to go up against the Corvette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I missing here?  The V6 gets 16/24 MPG and costs ~$20K.  The V8 gets 15/22 MPG and costs ~$25K.  I don&#8217;t think most people buying the Mustang are using it as their primary commuter, and a 1 MPG difference at this rate won&#8217;t make much of a difference anyway.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d drop the V6 &#8211; if you want a Mustang, step up to the real deal.  Offer a big block or a supercharged small block to go up against the Corvette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345446</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345446</guid>
		<description>Offer the V6, the 4.6 V8, then offer an optional big-block V8.  Few can afford the stupid expensive limited production cars with the big-block engine we want.

Wasn&#039;t it this same Ford company in the 60&#039;s that dropped big engines into small cars and made them affordable  ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Offer the V6, the 4.6 V8, then offer an optional big-block V8.  Few can afford the stupid expensive limited production cars with the big-block engine we want.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t it this same Ford company in the 60&#8217;s that dropped big engines into small cars and made them affordable  ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345441</link>
		<dc:creator>fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345441</guid>
		<description>i perfectly understand that.... gives ford dealers a chance to markup the prices of the V8s they get, while propably boosting the sales of the V6...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i perfectly understand that&#8230;. gives ford dealers a chance to markup the prices of the V8s they get, while propably boosting the sales of the V6&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christianboy10</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345439</link>
		<dc:creator>christianboy10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345439</guid>
		<description>V8 is what makes that car papular,what is ford thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V8 is what makes that car papular,what is ford thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345437</link>
		<dc:creator>cwwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345437</guid>
		<description>Ummm...okay. Not what I would do if it&#039;s selling well. But this is Ford of North America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;okay. Not what I would do if it&#8217;s selling well. But this is Ford of North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: murphy1</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-345436</link>
		<dc:creator>murphy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-to-cut-back-v8-mustang-production.html#comment-345436</guid>
		<description>16 miles per gallon for a v6 in the city....wow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 miles per gallon for a v6 in the city&#8230;.wow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
