In the midst of a thorough product shake-up led by chief executive officer Alan Mulally, Ford looked to Europe for a “right size” hauler to fulfill what it believes is an untapped segment of the North American market. Unlike the automaker formerly known as DaimlerChrysler, which rebadged a big Mercedes-Benz-built commercial van to make the Sprinter, Ford picked the Transit Connect, the smaller of its two European offerings to complement the robust, evergreen E-Series in its domestic commercial lineup.
Let’s be frank: The commercial van industry doesn’t exactly inspire much interest or passion – other than a few extended middle fingers and taps of the horn aimed at lumbering fleet drivers. Yet for millions of Americans, the Chevy Express, GMC Savanna, Dodge Sprinter and Ford E-Series are trusty tools of the trade that put up with a lot and ask for little in return.
A different beast all together, the Transit Connect slots below the Sprinter-like Transit in Europe – thus the rather verbose nomenclature. Famous on tight European streets for its ability to block an entire rue, strasse or corso, the Transit is perhaps best known to Americans for Sabine Schmitz’s 10 minute Nürburgring hustle. The Connect is its front-wheel-drive, car-based little brother used typically for lighter-duty courier and delivery service. This is a segment of the industry that has included everything from Fiat Pandas and Citroen 2CVs with tacked-on boxes in Europe but is almost unheard of in North America.
The only modern equivalent on this side of the pond is the Chevrolet HHR panel van, a rather useless hauler that makes more sense as a rolling billboard than anything else thanks to its miniscule 62.7 cubic foot cargo area. Further illustrating their knack for brilliant product planning, up until the end of the 2009 model year, the bow-tie boys built a 260 horsepower turbocharged and direct-injected HHR SS panel van apparently aimed at sadistic fleet operators.
Sibling rivalry
With no direct competitors here, Ford anticipates losing some E-Series sales to the Transit Connect. Compared to the 1992-vintage E-Series, the Transit Connect that was introduced to Europe in 2001 is state-of-the art.
Sized about like a Volkswagen Jetta with a really tall forehead (a fivehead?), the Transit Connect’s styling is clearly derivative of Ford’s European operations circa 2000. Displaying little of the swoopy pizazz of the Fiesta or Mondeo, the Transit Connect is nonetheless pretty ritzy by commercial vehicle standards. At 180.7 inches long, it’s a whole 56 inches shorter than the gargantuan E-Series.
Inside, you’ll also find a Ford of Europe parts bin affair that even extends as far as the Jaguar-like key (see photo gallery). Comfortable and firm captain’s chairs are easy to slide into but won’t sit you up nearly as high as you’ll find in the E-Series, but at least the passenger has plenty of leg room – a sore point in the big van. The five-passenger variant, called Wagon in Ford-speak, has a 40/60 split-fold rear seat and reasonable leg room, but it’s claustrophobic as there are no windows aft of the C-pillars. Most Transit Connects will be ordered as cargo vans with no rear seats and blocked-out side and rear windows, anyway, but Ford skirts a tax law by importing the people hauler.
Minivan-like Dual sliding side doors and rear panel-wagon doors that, optionally, open 180 degrees combine with a low cargo hold to offer excellent accessibility with no compromises.
Ford’s Work Solutions system, introduced in the F-Series pickups for 2009, makes an appearance. Albeit pricey, the system would supplement a basic cell phone to allow users to share documents with the home base and surf the Web. An optional wireless printer seems a natural choice for printing off receipts and estimates. The system can be further upgraded the Crew Chief status, which allows fleet operators to track vehicles from a home office or from a truck itself. And then there’s a tool tracking system that uses RF ID tags to keep track of tools to alert the driver if he’s left something at a job site.
On the road
Two trim levels and two models are offered, though Ford expects the vast majority of sales to mirror our XLT two-seater cargo van test vehicle. Base XL and five-seater passenger van configurations are also available.
All come with a Focus-sourced 2.0-liter Duratec engine mated to a four-speed automatic transmission. Not exactly the height of technology, the motor puts out a middling 136 horsepower at 6,300 rpm and 128 lb-ft. of torque at 4,750 rpm. The powertrain gives a decent 22 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the highway using regular grade fuel, a vast improvement over the guzzling E-Series.
With front-wheel-drive and unibody construction, the Transit Connect offers a combination that hasn’t traditionally gained favor among commercial users. Its stout MacPherson strut front/solid rear axle suspension does help it deliver impressive 1,600 lbs. payload capacity that should be ample for most users. The cargo area is tall enough to accommodate aftermarket commercial shelving and it’s wide and long enough to fit plywood.
Where the E-Series is ponderous and ungainly – not surprising given its rather vintage underpinnings – the Transit Connect rides firmly and compliantly and offers almost sporty handling. The direct, well-weighted steering comes courtesy of Ford’s European engineering office since this platform is vaguely related to the C170 architecture that underpins the current U.S.-spec Focus.
Its light weight and compact packaging makes it immensely more maneuverable, which should instill confidence in inexperienced fleet drivers. Ford says that fleet operators complain about the intimidating mass and sloppy handling of full-size vans.
A league of its own
With no real competition to speak of other than big body-on-frame cargo vans, the Transit Connect is a wholly unique vehicle. We spent the better part of a hot July day visiting a trio of businesses in Dallas’ design district, each of which operates a fleet of underutilized big vans. All three establishments – an upscale florist, a nationally-recognized cake maker and a large-scale holiday decorator – agreed that the Transit Connect would fulfill a role in their fleets. They raved about the drivability, the fuel economy, Ford Work Solutions and the low initial purchase price.
Leftlane’s bottom line
While those companies we visited were hand-selected by Ford to participate in a media drive, we’re not surprised with their positive reactions – which seemed genuine. But Ford simply cannot loan a Transit Connect to every business owner in North America to show off the new hauler. The automaker’s biggest challenge will be to convince buyers to step out of their trusty big vans and into a much cheaper and more efficient little European delivery shuttle. That won’t be an easy task, but it will certainly pay off for those who make the jump.
2010 Ford Transit Connect XL Cargo base price, $20,780.
2010 Ford Transit Connect XLT Cargo base price, $21,840.
2010 Ford Transit Connect XL Wagon base price, $21,135.
2010 Ford Transit Connect XLT Wagon base price, $22,350.
Words and photos by Andrew Ganz.



07/15, 11:45 AM
posted by:
2WheeledSpeed
Ugly… but it’s not supposed to look perty now is it?
07/15, 11:55 AM
posted by:
JakeK66
It’s not about looks, 2wheel, it’s about capacity and utility. Sense the company I’m currently working for is the primary buyer of many of these for our lease customers, I’ve driven one of these and may I say it rides pretty well. In all reality it’s just a tall roofed last gen Focus wagon, so it drives in very much the same way as my bro’s ‘03 ZTW. It’s interior is lacking of any resembelence of quality plastics, but it’s a utility van so it’s kind of a mute point. It’s a pain on our ordering side that we have like a 6 month lead time to get these sense they are assembled in Turkey, but we’ve alreeady had quite a bit of interest.
07/15, 12:03 PM
posted by:
Rafa LL
I want it in the Nurburgring
07/15, 12:12 PM
posted by:
Lariat Luxury Locomotive Liner No.3
A vehicle for our times, and the times to come. Great job Ford!
07/15, 12:17 PM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
Nice box.
07/15, 12:18 PM
posted by:
johnnycanuck
… I just always wanted to say that without sounding like a pervert.
07/15, 12:25 PM
posted by:
worst 3
needs to come in to the US with the Diesel and a 5 or 6 speed auto, if it had that could replace a lot of the larger cargo vans. a more truck like front would not hurt but it a cargo van
07/15, 12:39 PM
posted by:
JakeK66
Johnny – I always been partial to the pickup lines “nice fart box” or “you’ve got a nice sh!tter”
07/15, 12:56 PM
posted by:
nickkop
worst 3 : Indeed, my friend, you took the words out of my mouth, hit the nail right on the head..
they should offer it here with a small clean turbodiesel inline-4 or inline-5 and maybe a long wheelbase version with a turbodiesel inline-5 or V6
07/15, 12:57 PM
posted by:
FSVT_ROCK
Is not bad, the headlight look a like Fusion and plus is a work Wagon (not truck). Pretty simple, and cool. I’m sure alot small business will use it, or postal office too.
07/15, 1:05 PM
posted by:
A4
I would think vehicles like the Element could be lumped into this category as well. My father narrowly forewent an E-series purchase to go with the Element for a delivery vehicle for a small business. This Transit Connect is going to be great, its a shame we don’t get a diesel version like the Sprinter though.
07/15, 1:13 PM
posted by:
nickkop
this inline-4 is going to be quite wheezy overworked in a cargo van with a full load
07/15, 1:24 PM
posted by:
Borat
Johnny, does not work here: we already know you as a master pervert, but at least you like box!
07/15, 1:27 PM
posted by:
Borat
Speaking of diesel: couple years ago at NYC auto show it was shown in London trim as a diesel with 5 speed. Also, was shown as a taxi: it was as functional as London black cab. I dunno why manufactures are shy of diesel: VW makes hand over fist selling Jettas with diesel (40% Jetta wagons are diesel powered and there are none in stock to test drive in my neck of the woods).
07/15, 1:42 PM
posted by:
beatusmongous
I can hear the ice cream truck coming around the corner now…
07/15, 2:39 PM
posted by:
Payton Byrd
Can we call it the Ford Caravan and reignite the small family van market? It’s essentially a 1984 Dodge Caravan with a modern engine and suspension. And that’s a good thing.
07/15, 4:43 PM
posted by:
Borat
I think original had stronger engine and better mileage.
07/15, 5:06 PM
posted by:
aggie531
i have a feeling that there will be a short version of the Dodge Sprinter van to compete with this.
07/15, 6:02 PM
posted by:
MarkKleis
As a professional mobile detailer, the more I look into this vehicle the more I desperately would like to have it. It really is a neat, functional vehicle. Doesn’t look too shabby in black either!
07/15, 6:37 PM
posted by:
Bubs Solo
Here it is Sabine Schmitz’s 10 minute Nürburgring hustle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1pklvKKnd0
07/15, 7:17 PM
posted by:
A4
Actually Borat, 80% of Jetta Wagons are TDI.
07/15, 7:42 PM
posted by:
Payton Byrd
@Borat
http://www.allpar.com/model/m/history.html
Most significantly
Minivan engines, 1986 Compression
Horsepower Torque lb-ft Manual mpg Auto mpg
2.2 liter, TBI 9.5 97@5,200 122@3,200 21/27 20/23
2.6 liter (Mitsu), 2-barrel 8.7 104@4800 142@2800 (not sold) 19/22
Now, what was that you were saying about more power and better mileage?
07/15, 9:13 PM
posted by:
Borat
What do we learn from those numbers? That Caravan with manual tranny quarter century old original has in fact better mileage (average 24) and with manual will outrun this box as well. That what I call more power: more power to wheels not advertised numbers at 6300 r[pm (like anyone can sit in this truck with engine screaming at those rpm).
07/15, 9:48 PM
posted by:
howsmydriving
The quadriplegic transport van of choice.
07/15, 10:55 PM
posted by:
Payton Byrd
The EPA calculations for fuel economy are WAY more favorable to a 1986 vehicle than 2010 as the testing methodology is much more stringent now. Using the governments converter at http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculator.html the fuel economy of the 1986 Caravan with the 2.2 and manual tranny is 19/25, which is less than the newer, safer, more powerful Ford.
07/16, 2:32 AM
posted by:
armstealer
136 @ 6300RPM
07/16, 10:12 AM
posted by:
beatusmongous
Howsmydriving, my sister rides around in her husband’s Silverado.
07/16, 10:17 AM
posted by:
Borat
One would imagine that there will be some progress achieved in 23 years.