




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford unveils fuel-saving plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-403064</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-403064</guid>
		<description>Unless folks overboost with crappy fuel, the blocks should be fine for as long as NA blocks.  A factory turbo is more likey to fail with time, but they can be had for hundreds of dollars in the used market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless folks overboost with crappy fuel, the blocks should be fine for as long as NA blocks.  A factory turbo is more likey to fail with time, but they can be had for hundreds of dollars in the used market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeansterTJ</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-403057</link>
		<dc:creator>DeansterTJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-403057</guid>
		<description>How about a design that doesn&#039;t make people vomit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a design that doesn&#8217;t make people vomit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendino</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-403041</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-403041</guid>
		<description>GM showed us that tweaking some panels and tires gets you the XFE Cobalt. I remember a year or two back Ford did some tweaks to the Focus to do the same thing. Don&#039;t forget about the smaller changes while you&#039;re draining your R&amp;D on the big stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM showed us that tweaking some panels and tires gets you the XFE Cobalt. I remember a year or two back Ford did some tweaks to the Focus to do the same thing. Don&#8217;t forget about the smaller changes while you&#8217;re draining your R&amp;D on the big stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-403029</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-403029</guid>
		<description>Ok, they&#039;re working on the engine and the transmission.  Now how about a lighter chassis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, they&#8217;re working on the engine and the transmission.  Now how about a lighter chassis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFill</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402998</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402998</guid>
		<description>As a former Ford employee, I know how far they have to go, just to be competitive.
The engine sounds good, but it is just one engine, and one tranny
Sounds light years ahead of the 4.0 tractor in Mustang, which they should be ashamed to still sell in a new vehicle.
The Verve/Fiesta should be here when the new Mazda3 arrives.  No later.  Another error.
Introduce a world-class four-banger, when the world really needs one.  Toyota and Honda are tried and true, but vulnerable here.
That should be Job 1 .
Did I say I was a FORMER Ford employee.......
DrFill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former Ford employee, I know how far they have to go, just to be competitive.<br />
The engine sounds good, but it is just one engine, and one tranny<br />
Sounds light years ahead of the 4.0 tractor in Mustang, which they should be ashamed to still sell in a new vehicle.<br />
The Verve/Fiesta should be here when the new Mazda3 arrives.  No later.  Another error.<br />
Introduce a world-class four-banger, when the world really needs one.  Toyota and Honda are tried and true, but vulnerable here.<br />
That should be Job 1 .<br />
Did I say I was a FORMER Ford employee&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
DrFill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktulu</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402993</link>
		<dc:creator>ktulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402993</guid>
		<description>just drive less.
The countor was not bed, ut was just not appropri8 4 america</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just drive less.<br />
The countor was not bed, ut was just not appropri8 4 america</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olds307</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402963</link>
		<dc:creator>olds307</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402963</guid>
		<description>Euro-ford suck. Anyone remember the Ford Contour? Lincoln LS? ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Euro-ford suck. Anyone remember the Ford Contour? Lincoln LS? ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayer_ray_nagin</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402943</link>
		<dc:creator>mayer_ray_nagin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402943</guid>
		<description>I want a 2011 Fiesta with a 1.6 liter that produces 350hp and 340 lbs/ft of torque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a 2011 Fiesta with a 1.6 liter that produces 350hp and 340 lbs/ft of torque.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402942</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402942</guid>
		<description>neptronix: I agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neptronix: I agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayjc08</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402932</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjc08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402932</guid>
		<description>brassmonkey- We don&#039;t know the longevity of these engines, there&#039;s no way to say they won&#039;t have the longevity of a NA motor. Although there&#039;s more major complications added to the engine, some are also taken away. It sounds like their doing very extensive testing on this motor, and so far all the suppliers mentioned have built great parts in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brassmonkey- We don&#8217;t know the longevity of these engines, there&#8217;s no way to say they won&#8217;t have the longevity of a NA motor. Although there&#8217;s more major complications added to the engine, some are also taken away. It sounds like their doing very extensive testing on this motor, and so far all the suppliers mentioned have built great parts in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaineMan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402930</link>
		<dc:creator>RaineMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402930</guid>
		<description>Call me sheltered... but who is David E. Davis and why should I care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me sheltered&#8230; but who is David E. Davis and why should I care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howsmydriving</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402928</link>
		<dc:creator>howsmydriving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402928</guid>
		<description>DO NOT use the word &quot;heck&quot; unless you wish to be mistaken for David E. Davis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO NOT use the word &#8220;heck&#8221; unless you wish to be mistaken for David E. Davis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaineMan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402924</link>
		<dc:creator>RaineMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402924</guid>
		<description>Modern turbo engines will run just fine for years. Heck... the turbo 2.5L in my 89 dodge is still ticking after 20 years and 130,000+ miles. Still boosts fine and pulls well considering its measley 150hp factory rating... gets 20MPG too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern turbo engines will run just fine for years. Heck&#8230; the turbo 2.5L in my 89 dodge is still ticking after 20 years and 130,000+ miles. Still boosts fine and pulls well considering its measley 150hp factory rating&#8230; gets 20MPG too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brassmonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402906</link>
		<dc:creator>brassmonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402906</guid>
		<description>Ford is willing to trade long term buyers for short term gains. The little boosted 4 bangers will not have the longevity of a NA motor. And to plan to go 90% boosted? Not smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is willing to trade long term buyers for short term gains. The little boosted 4 bangers will not have the longevity of a NA motor. And to plan to go 90% boosted? Not smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F3INT))AP3X</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402896</link>
		<dc:creator>F3INT))AP3X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402896</guid>
		<description>How can it not honestly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can it not honestly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402895</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402895</guid>
		<description>yeah.  ford would be stupid not to twin turbo their four cylinders as an option.  oh wait, they&#039;re stupid a lot of the time.  i hope it happens anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah.  ford would be stupid not to twin turbo their four cylinders as an option.  oh wait, they&#8217;re stupid a lot of the time.  i hope it happens anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neptronix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402888</link>
		<dc:creator>neptronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402888</guid>
		<description>oh you know damn well it will hit the 4 bangers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh you know damn well it will hit the 4 bangers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookie4me</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402886</link>
		<dc:creator>cookie4me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402886</guid>
		<description>Neptronix,  that would be ok except I haven&#039;t seen or heard of an &quot;Eco-Boost&quot; 4 cylinder application, I have only seen articles relating to V-6 applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neptronix,  that would be ok except I haven&#8217;t seen or heard of an &#8220;Eco-Boost&#8221; 4 cylinder application, I have only seen articles relating to V-6 applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neptronix</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402884</link>
		<dc:creator>neptronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402884</guid>
		<description>dude, that&#039;s wrong. I am no ford fan but they are making the right moves right now.. their euro models are superior and if we are really getting them, that would be killer. I wonder of this magic &#039;flat torque curve from 1500rpm&#039; applies to their 4 cylinders as well. I hope that the focus recieves this treatment, a turbo 1.4l-1.6l engine would make the focus almost an instant  civic/corolla eater - but who is making the engines? mazda i hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, that&#8217;s wrong. I am no ford fan but they are making the right moves right now.. their euro models are superior and if we are really getting them, that would be killer. I wonder of this magic &#8216;flat torque curve from 1500rpm&#8217; applies to their 4 cylinders as well. I hope that the focus recieves this treatment, a turbo 1.4l-1.6l engine would make the focus almost an instant  civic/corolla eater &#8211; but who is making the engines? mazda i hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 04focus</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/ford-unveils-fuel-saving-plans.html#comment-402883</link>
		<dc:creator>04focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=8376#comment-402883</guid>
		<description>i hope the other 2 percent are six-speed manuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope the other 2 percent are six-speed manuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 375/376 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 14:01:05 -->
